Including what the FA is managing?how much will that 40% represent in your total porfolio?
I am sure there are FA's out there worth their weight in gold but my general opinion is that they are a bunch of duche bags....In my line of work we regularly deal with the one of the largest brokerage firms (all big banks are required to help cross sell products). They are a dime a dozen with no other goal than making money for themselves. I have consistently out gained them with much less complex strategies and MUCH lower risk. It is my opinion that you can pick a simple index fund (i personally own a small cap, s&p and long term growth) that will, over time, equal or exceed whatever they recommend. Like you i hold roughly 30% in the aforementioned funds, 50% in stocks (FB, AMZN, F, AAPL, BAC, NTI, SLY and two dividend stocks EEP, NTI) with the rest sitting in cash. IMO trust yourself over some dude that is pushing the funds that get him the largest commission.Including what the FA is managing?how much will that 40% represent in your total porfolio?
About 20%
He has about 50% of our savings under his watch... He is doing a decent job, but not all that impressed.
FWIW, leveraged ETFs are designed for very short term trading vs. something sitting for a few months.10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
I really want to test my own strategies out - I'm going on 31, but if what I laid out above works for the next few years, I'll move all of my funds into the above... I want to own a few stocks of companies I believe in, an S&P fund, & then a diverse group of no load funds like above... Not looking to set the world on fire, but hopefully pickup 7-8% annually over the course of time.I am sure there are FA's out there worth their weight in gold but my general opinion is that they are a bunch of duche bags....In my line of work we regularly deal with the one of the largest brokerage firms (all big banks are required to help cross sell products). They are a dime a dozen with no other goal than making money for themselves. I have consistently out gained them with much less complex strategies and MUCH lower risk. It is my opinion that you can pick a simple index fund (i personally own a small cap, s&p and long term growth) that will, over time, equal or exceed whatever they recommend. Like you i hold roughly 30% in the aforementioned funds, 50% in stocks (FB, AMZN, F, AAPL, BAC, NTI, SLY and two dividend stocks EEP, NTI) with the rest sitting in cash. IMO trust yourself over some dude that is pushing the funds that get him the largest commission.Including what the FA is managing?how much will that 40% represent in your total porfolio?
About 20%
He has about 50% of our savings under his watch... He is doing a decent job, but not all that impressed.
Yeah, you want to avoid 3x ETFs unless your window is shorter than a day. Long-term they will only lose you money.FWIW, leveraged ETFs are designed for very short term trading vs. something sitting for a few months.10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
(Also, fixed your GRPN entry in the contest; switched you with the person who is long when I entered - sorry)
Why is that? In 10 years the S&P will prob be 2500 or even higher - Say it picks up 40% over the next decade, if I am 3x wouldn't that return 120% over the life of the investment?FWIW, leveraged ETFs are designed for very short term trading vs. something sitting for a few months.10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
(Also, fixed your GRPN entry in the contest; switched you with the person who is long when I entered - sorry)
Unfortunately, the math doesn't work out:Why is that? In 10 years the S&P will prob be 2500 or even higher - Say it picks up 40% over the next decade, if I am 3x wouldn't that return 120% over the life of the investment?FWIW, leveraged ETFs are designed for very short term trading vs. something sitting for a few months.10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
(Also, fixed your GRPN entry in the contest; switched you with the person who is long when I entered - sorry)
Thanks, makes sense... Ill replace the leveraged fund with spyUnfortunately, the math doesn't work out:http://thecollegeinvestor.com/4414/leveraged-etfs-dont-match-market-performance/Why is that? In 10 years the S&P will prob be 2500 or even higher - Say it picks up 40% over the next decade, if I am 3x wouldn't that return 120% over the life of the investment?FWIW, leveraged ETFs are designed for very short term trading vs. something sitting for a few months.(Also, fixed your GRPN entry in the contest; switched you with the person who is long when I entered - sorry)10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
Just did something similar to this. I needed to simplify my life and was sick of following lots of individual stocks every day. So we're now in Vanguard index funds and just 10 of our favorite stocks. Good luck.As much as you guys have cracked HUCKS jokes in the past, I think it has become more obvious I am not, nor do I try to represent a financial guru... Anyways, I have a FA who handles a lot of our savings, but I also play around with a decent portion of the balance. I have been trying to come up with an investing strategy for a little while that I just want to set and forget for at least 4-5 years while adding to it on a quarterly basis... This is what I'm thinking about doing, any opinions or criticism is welcome:
Just waiting for an entry point over the next couple of months:
50% into no-load Vanguard funds:
VFINX
NAESX
VISVX
VGSIX
VDMIX
VFSVX
VEIEX
VTRIX
10 percent S&P 3x Pro Shares
UPRO
Remaining 40 percent in stocks I think just are destined to continue to grow
GOOG
MA
T (Dividend purposes)
AMZN
Very few investors should be largely in individual stocks long term. Unless you're an expert in a market segment or one particular company. There's just too much going on and too much risk to the little guy. They're fun to play with, and do have a place as a small part of a well-rounded portfolio, but, the lion's share of most people's investments should be in index funds.Just did something similar to this. I needed to simplify my life and was sick of following lots of individual stocks every day. So we're now in Vanguard index funds and just 10 of our favorite stocks. Good luck.
Jim Cramer just felt a sharp pain in his back.Very few investors should be largely in individual stocks long term. Unless you're an expert in a market segment or one particular company. There's just too much going on and too much risk to the little guy. They're fun to play with, and do have a place as a small part of a well-rounded portfolio, but, the lion's share of most people's investments should be in index funds.Just did something similar to this. I needed to simplify my life and was sick of following lots of individual stocks every day. So we're now in Vanguard index funds and just 10 of our favorite stocks. Good luck.
This is true.Very few investors should be largely in individual stocks long term. Unless you're an expert in a market segment or one particular company. There's just too much going on and too much risk to the little guy. They're fun to play with, and do have a place as a small part of a well-rounded portfolio, but, the lion's share of most people's investments should be in index funds.Just did something similar to this. I needed to simplify my life and was sick of following lots of individual stocks every day. So we're now in Vanguard index funds and just 10 of our favorite stocks. Good luck.
Down big in pre-market.I'm just looking at it as a short term play and anticipate going in and out throughout the year. I'd be happy to hold it for 2014 though. Some good news in the pipeline, it seems. Of course, you never know with trials.Whats your thought on the possible increase or just speculation?Picked up some GALE at 5.55
Hoping to see it get back over 7 short term.
Personally, I'm not seriously worried until this continues on for a bit. To put a number behind that, I'd say a 10% drop from here on, but I'm unofficially starting to watch closely. I'm a very long term investor, and I'm not into anything that I'd need short-term liquidity on, so I can ride out a down-turn personally. With what's going on outside of the US with the beginnings of a taper, combined with some initially weaker 2014 economic data domestically, I'm not surprised to see some sell off taking place. Putting things into perspective, last year was absurd, and I feel like now is the beginning of a pull back for all of the folks sitting on relatively substantial 2013 gains. I will say I'd be nervous if I was into anything of substance outside of retirement index-type funds that I'm currently into.What's the FBG opinion?
Is this just healthy activity or is something bigger underway?
That's appearing on a doomsday prepper-type site, so...Was this posted here somewhere? Some dude charted the last few years against the 1920s and called the top near Jan 14th...![]()
Can't remember what thread I saw this in.
Seen it everywhere... We aren't having a real crash like that until QE is over for at least 6-12 months...That's appearing on a doomsday prepper-type site, so...Was this posted here somewhere? Some dude charted the last few years against the 1920s and called the top near Jan 14th...![]()
Can't remember what thread I saw this in.
Swore I've seen the chart on another site, but that's the first one that popped up in google. Seemed like a weird connection, that's all, and the most recent top was right about there. Looks like further down in the google results is the same chart in the WSJ. Wasn't sure if I had first run across it in this thread.That's appearing on a doomsday prepper-type site, so...Was this posted here somewhere? Some dude charted the last few years against the 1920s and called the top near Jan 14th...![]()
Can't remember what thread I saw this in.
Meanwhile it was at $55 around 9:50 and an hour later at $60...
Yep, it's coming back but probably a lot of short covering. It's still down 18% or so today.Meanwhile it was at $55 around 9:50 and an hour later at $60...
Rest of sector in line. I'm getting pounded on XONE.Yep, it's coming back but probably a lot of short covering. It's still down 18% or so today.Meanwhile it was at $55 around 9:50 and an hour later at $60...
Thats where I sold a long time agoi love my amazon play at 380.....thankfully i only own 50 shares....I hope DDD hits 50 so i can rebuy....
They have a FB like valuation... Makes no sense.whew...I was really tempted to buy Linkedin
i at least sold at 56 ish...Thats where I sold a long time agoi love my amazon play at 380.....thankfully i only own 50 shares....I hope DDD hits 50 so i can rebuy....![]()
Thanks for the update.[SIZE=10pt]Clearwater Seafoods Inc. (CLR - TSX)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]Reinstating Coverage; All Cashed Up - Thursday, February 06, 2014[/SIZE]
On February 4, 2014, Clearwater announced the closing of a bought deal equity offering of 4.0 MM shares at $8.50 per share for gross proceeds of $34.0 MM. Cormark participated as a syndicate member; this morning we are reinstating coverage following research restriction. Post the financing we are reiterating a $10.00 target (8.5x 2015E EBITDA). We believe strong Q4/13 results in March, led by ongoing strength in shrimp and scallop pricing as well as currency tailwinds, will act as a catalyst for the stock, and see no reason why similar results cannot be posted through H1/14. With the company now cashed up for M&A, discussions likely ongoing with a handful of vendors, and the rationale for adding incremental supply highly sound, we believe this represents another near-term catalyst and one that could increase EBITDA by as much as 20% and drive similar levels of EPS accretion. With strong management guiding a ship with both substantial operating momentum and a handful of internal and external growth opportunities, we reiterate a Top Pick recommendation.
I don't think the correction is close to over short-term. Probably going to head farther south over the next couple of months.Correction is over... We can now continue our march to the moon.
I'm personally sitting on the sidelines. I think it is likely there will be some new highs, but I think within 1-2 years we are setting up for a gigantic crash.