Cheesedawg
Footballguy
I did the same. Dropped Rams for Texans.I went with the Texans instead.Anyone rolling with the Rams D this week?
Thought about Cleveland, but just couldn't bring myself to do it.
I did the same. Dropped Rams for Texans.I went with the Texans instead.Anyone rolling with the Rams D this week?
Thought about Cleveland, but just couldn't bring myself to do it.
They have two leaders on the defense who have been playing at an elite level, and they've been the critical elements in their outstanding team defense over the last four games.I thought they looked good for stretches of the game. A lesser QB may have crumbled, maybe. I thought they looked more aggressive in the first half. Not sure if they got a little conservative or GB fixed up their protections a little bit. In the end, the TE made a good catch on the hail mary play, but DET really didn't defend it very well.Mixed bag, but i think DET has the talent, coaching, and potential to outplay and potentially dominate some weaker teams, and their schedule serves it up. The problem, of course, is they tend to fail when it counts the most. I love their upside but would never be comfortable trusting them with anything of value on the line.Any notes from the guys that got to see the game tonight?
(specifically how did the Lion's D look?)
Its really hard to tell from the highlights I saw, but it seems like aside from a few fluke plays the Lion's D looked decent.
Seriously considering them for the playoffs............and any help is appreciated.
TZM
Its not a matter of "vitriol", but you can call it what you like.Thanks for actually answering the simple question, sans vitriol. Weird how that offended so many. Also weird is the reasoning to keep signing.He's mentioned it before. Used to post on another board and the user name was not prevelant (or even able to be seen), so most users on there signed their initials. Habit.Is there a reason why you sign each post?Any notes from the guys that got to see the game tonight?
(specifically how did the Lion's D look?)
Its really hard to tell from the highlights I saw, but it seems like aside from a few fluke plays the Lion's D looked decent.
Seriously considering them for the playoffs............and any help is appreciated.
TZM
Its this part that bothers me the most.Would agree with VandyMan they might be hard to trust despite the easy schedule. It's a dysfunctional team that has a history of ups and downs, and they've got 10 days to recover from a soul crushing loss that effectively killed their slim playoff hopes. You have to wonder how a hungry a 4-8 team with nothing to play for will perform.I thought they looked good for stretches of the game. A lesser QB may have crumbled, maybe. I thought they looked more aggressive in the first half. Not sure if they got a little conservative or GB fixed up their protections a little bit. In the end, the TE made a good catch on the hail mary play, but DET really didn't defend it very well.Mixed bag, but i think DET has the talent, coaching, and potential to outplay and potentially dominate some weaker teams, and their schedule serves it up. The problem, of course, is they tend to fail when it counts the most. I love their upside but would never be comfortable trusting them with anything of value on the line.
You are welcome to show where I went wrong, if you are so inclined.Yeah kook comes across as a real jerk
It's about the least obtrusive sig on the boards, and easier to skim past than all the two-man-league roster breakdowns that litter shark pool sigs.Thanks for actually answering the simple question, sans vitriol. Weird how that offended so many. Also weird is the reasoning to keep signing.
FixedThey have two leaders on the defense who have been playing at an elite level, and they've been the critical elements in their outstanding team defense over the last four games.I thought they looked good for stretches of the game. A lesser QB may have crumbled, maybe. I thought they looked more aggressive in the first half. Not sure if they got a little conservative or GB fixed up their protections a little bit. In the end, the TE made a good catch on the hail mary play, but DET really didn't defend it very well.Mixed bag, but i think DET has the talent, coaching, and potential to outplay and potentially dominate some weaker teams, and their schedule serves it up. The problem, of course, is they tend to fail when it counts the most. I love their upside but would never be comfortable trusting them with anything of value on the line.Any notes from the guys that got to see the game tonight?
(specifically how did the Lion's D look?)
Its really hard to tell from the highlights I saw, but it seems like aside from a few fluke plays the Lion's D looked decent.
Seriously considering them for the playoffs............and any help is appreciated.
TZM
DE Ziggy Ansah is second to Watt in second to Watt in sacks, but he's a complete player, very active in stopping the run. But he's inexperienced; the Ghana native only started playing American football six years ago. He's already showing signs of greatness but it'll be interesting to see if he continues to develope into a dominating All Pro.
CB Darius Slay is also in his third year, but had a rough start to his year. He was burned repeatedly v. San Diego and Denver. He turned his season around, and over the last two months PFF has consistently rated him as the top 2/top 3 CB. Not a true shutdown corner in that doesn't shadow, only plays the left side. In two games against the Packers, he gave up one completion. Teams now rarely challenge.
There are other competent pieces to the Lions D. DEJason TaylorDevin Taylor has been improving greatly over the season, Haloti Ngata clogs the middle, DBs Diggs & Abdul-Quddus have stepped up. They miss DeAndre Levy, one of the best cover LBs around, and the LB corps is just average.
Would agree with VandyMan they might be hard to trust despite the easy schedule. It's a dysfunctional team that has a history of ups and downs, and they've got 10 days to recover from a soul crushing loss that effectively killed their slim playoff hopes. You have to wonder how a hungry a 4-8 team with nothing to play for will perform. Lions fans are probably hoping not well, to ensure Caldwell doesn't return. Not sure that players GAF what sports talk radio has to say.
From a FF D perspective, they get excellent pressure, force few turnovers (13 YTD, only 5 INT which is next to last), but they've been solid of late in terms of YA and PA. Historically they play much better at home, so if they show some heart in StL & NO, they'd be an excellent play in Championship week at home v. SF.
.
The only reason I caught it is because he was a Gamecock.hehe yeah that's a not a very good Freudian slip as he's not really in JT territory yet
![]()
Thatguythere: I am rolling with Washington with confidence. I am hoping that Washington has the momentum to keep playing well as they have something to play for while Dallas is in regress mode. At least I hope!Anyone rolling with the redskins?
Home game, division game and tied for division lead, Matt caassel, Monday night. All sounds pretty good and they have been putting up double digits the last three games. Due for a regression? Or are they going to win the nfc east?
That's it. One guy? Might have convinced me to take Chicago. I like that Monday night matchup though.Thatguythere: I am rolling with Washington with confidence. I am hoping that Washington has the momentum to keep playing well as they have something to play for while Dallas is in regress mode. At least I hope!Anyone rolling with the redskins?
Home game, division game and tied for division lead, Matt caassel, Monday night. All sounds pretty good and they have been putting up double digits the last three games. Due for a regression? Or are they going to win the nfc east?
I'm rolling with the Redskins. I like the matchup but I also like the advantage of the Monday Night game. A couple times this year streaming has burnt/almost burnt me by scoring negative points. If I have a >1 point lead going into Monday night, I'm benching them.That's it. One guy? Might have convinced me to take Chicago. I like that Monday night matchup though.Thatguythere: I am rolling with Washington with confidence. I am hoping that Washington has the momentum to keep playing well as they have something to play for while Dallas is in regress mode. At least I hope!Anyone rolling with the redskins?
Home game, division game and tied for division lead, Matt caassel, Monday night. All sounds pretty good and they have been putting up double digits the last three games. Due for a regression? Or are they going to win the nfc east?
I picked them up too....what the heck. Monday night, division game....If the Giants lose they can be on top alone in the division right?I'm rolling with the Redskins. I like the matchup but I also like the advantage of the Monday Night game. A couple times this year streaming has burnt/almost burnt me by scoring negative points. If I have a >1 point lead going into Monday night, I'm benching them.That's it. One guy? Might have convinced me to take Chicago. I like that Monday night matchup though.Thatguythere: I am rolling with Washington with confidence. I am hoping that Washington has the momentum to keep playing well as they have something to play for while Dallas is in regress mode. At least I hope!Anyone rolling with the redskins?
Home game, division game and tied for division lead, Matt caassel, Monday night. All sounds pretty good and they have been putting up double digits the last three games. Due for a regression? Or are they going to win the nfc east?
Yup and they're still pitching a shutout thanks to the blocked kick. SweeeetBears off to good start. Sack and blocked kick
Is that how that works? The returned td doesn't count against them but extra point does?Yup and they're still pitching a shutout thanks to the blocked kick. SweeeetBears off to good start. Sack and blocked kick
In my league, a scoring TD only counts against the defense if the defense actually gave up the points. Thus, I actually got + 2 on that TD for the niners.Is that how that works? The returned td doesn't count against them but extra point does?Yup and they're still pitching a shutout thanks to the blocked kick. SweeeetBears off to good start. Sack and blocked kick
I am rolling with Cincy again.Solid choice most weeks ROS. When I picked them up to start last weekI might roll with Cincy for a second week, especially if the Browns will be starting Austin Davis at QB.and compared them to DEN (my starter all season) I was surprised to find I liked them better in 4 of the then remaining 5 weeks.
Last week we got a bit lucky, though. VG IRL but not elite FF wise. Their first TD of the year was timely.
I can't wait to drop the stink of the Bears off my squad. WTMF happened?Come on. Bears D have only allowed 7 points. They're fine.
Hope you didn't do that...Chiefs are rolling, rolling, rolling. Many thanks to the folks in this thread for pimping them hard a few weeks ago. Paying off big time!!!oddsbodkins said:Debating on dropping the Chiefs since it sounds like Houston may be out for awhile. Texans already on my roster but Alfred Morris is available and I could use the RB depth.
They're the Bears. A bunch of failures. Always have been. Always will beDark Matter said:I can't wait to drop the stink of the Bears off my squad. WTMF happened?Come on. Bears D have only allowed 7 points. They're fine.
Oh, I did. Evidently I severely overestimated Justin Houston's injury. Thankfully, I didn't need them until week 15 thanks to already clinching a bye. May stick with the Texans or get the Chiefs back. Both have great schedules weeks 15 & 16.Hope you didn't do that...Chiefs are rolling, rolling, rolling. Many thanks to the folks in this thread for pimping them hard a few weeks ago. Paying off big time!!!oddsbodkins said:Debating on dropping the Chiefs since it sounds like Houston may be out for awhile. Texans already on my roster but Alfred Morris is available and I could use the RB depth.
San Diego, Baltimore, and Cleveland for the playoff march...doesn't get any better than that!!!
I did too. I started them the last two. Who could blame us?Made the brilliant move of dropping Philly this week.![]()
Eh, why beat yourself up? Trust the process, not the results. There's no way in the world it would have been smart to start a collapsing D on the road against one of the best offenses in the league. Just one of those games.Made the brilliant move of dropping Philly this week.![]()
Got snaked on the Lions, so I'm rolling with the Jets. Might try to pick up Buffalo, too. But don't feel great about either of them.Looking ahead to Week 14 (and the rest of the playoffs) here's who I'm considering:
* Jets vs Tenn. Despite Mariotta's huge day today, he doesn't particularly scare me. Jets also have a great Week 15 match-up @ Dallas, but finish vs NE. Revis may still be out, and they just haven't been that good for most of the season.
* Detroit @ STL. Hail Marys notwithstanding, Detroit's D has been playing well lately, and STL is stuck in neutral. They have a tough Week 15 match-up @NO, and then play SF at home, which looks good by the numbers, but Gabbert has at least turned the Niners into a non-pushover.
* Buffalo @ Philadelphia. This one's not looking as good right now, is it? Honestly, what worries me more is that the Bills have been coasting on their rep for most of the season. They follow this with an OK match-up at Washington, then a dream one vs Dallas.
If I knew all three would be available each week, I'd probably want to go Detroit-Jets-Buffalo. But for now I'll probably just target Detroit, then maybe grab Jets if I have the roster spot. I'll worry about Week 16 if I get there. Bills don't seem worth holding onto for three weeks just for that Week 16 match-up.