What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Suggestion for Clayton Gray (SOS info) (1 Viewer)

mac daddy

Footballguy
Would it possible to, in addition to what you have now (the strength of schedule for the season per position), to have a chart that shows the strength of schedule for a particular week arranged by team (row) and position (column).

For example, in the Week 6 Subscriber Content section, we would have a link just for Week 6, and in that one chart I can see the strength of schedule for each team's QB, RB, WR, TE, etc.

That way we don't have to bounce back and forth between all the different charts.

I like the way you have it now that has all the weeks (especially for trades and pickups and such), but another having the same information compiling all the specific week data in one place would be helpful.

 
Would it possible to, in addition to what you have now (the strength of schedule for the season per position), to have a chart that shows the strength of schedule for a particular week arranged by team (row) and position (column).For example, in the Week 6 Subscriber Content section, we would have a link just for Week 6, and in that one chart I can see the strength of schedule for each team's QB, RB, WR, TE, etc.That way we don't have to bounce back and forth between all the different charts.I like the way you have it now that has all the weeks (especially for trades and pickups and such), but another having the same information compiling all the specific week data in one place would be helpful.
Isn't that already provided? It's the 'match up' data that comes out every Wednesday....isn't it?
 
There are a few unexpected results in Clayton Grays (SOS article) for week 3 2013:

The following are some of the results that the SOS article stated that seem very counter intuitive.

1. Oaklands defense (score 10.8) is considered to have an easy matchup against Denver's offense. (Denver has one of the best offenses this year) so I think this number should be lower.

2. Seattle's defense (score: 6.3) is considered to have a neutral matchup against Jacksonville's offense. (Jacksonville has one of the worst offenses this year) so I think this number should be lower.

3. KC defense (score 6.5) is considered to have an neutral matchup against Philadelphia's offense. (Phily has one of the best offenses this year) so I think this number should be higher.

If Clayton can address these examples and let me know if I am interpreting this correctly, and if I am, how do you explain these examples I provided.

Thanks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top