What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

** Tarantino's Hateful Eight - Official thread ** (1 Viewer)

If I had to give this a rating, I'd say 8/10...

my only gripe with it:

I thought the scene where QT shows us how the gang took over the haberdashery really brought everything to a halt. I'm not sure why he had to show us exactly HOW they killed Minny and exactly HOW all the other dudes died. It could've been left unsaid, or explained in a really quick scene after the jig is up.
 
I agree with you RJ, it was the weakest of the scenes in the film but it still had its moments and it sets up a wonderful "explosion" involving Tatum which I have been quiet on but I am glad QT cast him. He needed a Hollywood pretty boy/sacrificial lamb for some of us to cheer on. I cheered the violence in the last hour, not one of these turds is innocent, maybe the new Sheriff but it's debatable.

For those that have seen it, there are 8 marks on the movie poster, 7 of them red, save one for black to insinuate something, I am pretty sure I get it and don't want to ruin spoilers here but...some folks weren't so sure who makes it out alive in the film.

 
I agree with you RJ, it was the weakest of the scenes in the film but it still had its moments and it sets up a wonderful "explosion" involving Tatum which I have been quiet on but I am glad QT cast him. He needed a Hollywood pretty boy/sacrificial lamb for some of us to cheer on. I cheered the violence in the last hour, not one of these turds is innocent, maybe the new Sheriff but it's debatable.

For those that have seen it, there are 8 marks on the movie poster, 7 of them red, save one for black to insinuate something, I am pretty sure I get it and don't want to ruin spoilers here but...some folks weren't so sure who makes it out alive in the film.
I've seen several posters with 1 and 2 black marks.Eta: depends on who's on the poster.

http://i.imgur.com/YwSGBMc.jpg

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am sure I missed it, but how does this count at QT's 8th flick?
According to IMDB, as the sole director:Res Dogs

Pulp Fiction

Jackie Brown

Kill Bill (1 movie in 2 parts)

Death Proof

Basterds

Django

Hateful 8

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So a movie that takes place all in one room MUST be viewed in on the big screen? Is there some big chase scene around a kitchen table or something?
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
Meh

 
So a movie that takes place all in one room MUST be viewed in on the big screen? Is there some big chase scene around a kitchen table or something?
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
Meh
You keep quiet unless you've seen it as the Director intended.

 
So a movie that takes place all in one room MUST be viewed in on the big screen? Is there some big chase scene around a kitchen table or something?
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
Meh
You keep quiet unless you've seen it as the Director intended.
:lmao:

Cinematography can fix QT's crapfests.

 
"This is why we don't do film"

-Theater Manager, King of Prussia

You can't write this stuff. I'm laughing but here we have a revolt by movie theaters to show an actual movie. Think Boogie Nights when they are trying to get everyone to go from film to video...lot of movies now are not really shot on actual film, sad.

 
"This is why we don't do film"

-Theater Manager, King of Prussia

You can't write this stuff. I'm laughing but here we have a revolt by movie theaters to show an actual movie. Think Boogie Nights when they are trying to get everyone to go from film to video...lot of movies now are not really shot on actual film, sad.
:shrug: There's a reason film is dying.

 
There's more good reviews than bad around the net. Also, it's at about 75% on RT, which given how polarizing QT is, is a pretty good percentage. A lot of people pan his movies because they just don't like him.
I meant the whole 70mm roadshow thing. I'm sure the film itself is getting good reviews.

 
There's more good reviews than bad around the net. Also, it's at about 75% on RT, which given how polarizing QT is, is a pretty good percentage. A lot of people pan his movies because they just don't like him.
That story wasn't about the movie being bad, just that the high school kid at the theater doesn't now how to use a projector.

 
I saw the 70mm roadshow in Atlanta. Thought it was a neat experience. With a long movie like this, the intermission was great for the bladder. Though I do really like seeing previews on the bigscreen and missed them here.

 
There's more good reviews than bad around the net. Also, it's at about 75% on RT, which given how polarizing QT is, is a pretty good percentage. A lot of people pan his movies because they just don't like him.
That story wasn't about the movie being bad, just that the high school kid at the theater doesn't now how to use a projector.
Yeah I see that now. The headline said something about the most brutal reviews, so I stopped right there...didn't realize they were taking about the roadshow and not the movie itself.
 
There's more good reviews than bad around the net. Also, it's at about 75% on RT, which given how polarizing QT is, is a pretty good percentage. A lot of people pan his movies because they just don't like him.
There have been posts about QT and I think if I were to be chained to his wrist for a day or two like JJL was to Russell, I might not like him for very long, he's a strange bird. But so were a lot of genius artist types. Some famous artists in paintings tend to copy other folks they loved and adored along the way. Dali was insane to a lot of folks.

And it's a COMEDY, hate to break it to folks but it's a Western/Comedy, not one where the jokes are coming a mile a minute but there were a lot of laughs in this movie.

 
Rick James said:
I saw the 70mm roadshow in Atlanta. Thought it was a neat experience. With a long movie like this, the intermission was great for the bladder. Though I do really like seeing previews on the bigscreen and missed them here.
We loved no previews but again that's us. I think there will be previews on the Jan 1st wide release.

Doesn't the fact they didn't cram previews into the first 20 minutes tell you something about the makers of this film?

The 25th-31st 70MM launch is for the self proclaimed film buffs like me to feel like QT is our best buddy and understands our frustration with the World at large. The Jan 1st wider release is for the masses.

 
Rick James said:
I saw the 70mm roadshow in Atlanta. Thought it was a neat experience. With a long movie like this, the intermission was great for the bladder. Though I do really like seeing previews on the bigscreen and missed them here.
Doesn't the fact they didn't cram previews into the first 20 minutes tell you something about the makers of this film?
You think there's 20 minutes of previews on 70mm available?

 
Ministry of Pain said:
Wingnut said:
Officer Pete Malloy said:
There's more good reviews than bad around the net. Also, it's at about 75% on RT, which given how polarizing QT is, is a pretty good percentage. A lot of people pan his movies because they just don't like him.
There have been posts about QT and I think if I were to be chained to his wrist for a day or two like JJL was to Russell, I might not like him for very long, he's a strange bird. But so were a lot of genius artist types. Some famous artists in paintings tend to copy other folks they loved and adored along the way. Dali was insane to a lot of folks.

And it's a COMEDY, hate to break it to folks but it's a Western/Comedy, not one where the jokes are coming a mile a minute but there were a lot of laughs in this movie.
It's really like QT remade Duck Soup but in the Old West. You can really tell he's a fan of the classics.

 
So we've gone from:

your opinion of the film should not be counted heavily as you didn't see the film the way the director or anyone associated with the art side of that film wanted you to see it.
To:

Ministry of Pain said:
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
:lmao:

 
Wingnut said:
Ministry of Pain said:
I agree with you RJ, it was the weakest of the scenes in the film but it still had its moments and it sets up a wonderful "explosion" involving Tatum which I have been quiet on but I am glad QT cast him. He needed a Hollywood pretty boy/sacrificial lamb for some of us to cheer on. I cheered the violence in the last hour, not one of these turds is innocent, maybe the new Sheriff but it's debatable.

For those that have seen it, there are 8 marks on the movie poster, 7 of them red, save one for black to insinuate something, I am pretty sure I get it and don't want to ruin spoilers here but...some folks weren't so sure who makes it out alive in the film.
I've seen several posters with 1 and 2 black marks.Eta: depends on who's on the poster.

http://i.imgur.com/YwSGBMc.jpg
:lmao:

 
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.

 
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.
They all done with these? I'm going to see it may as well do this.
 
Officer Pete Malloy said:
Ministry of Pain said:
Officer Pete Malloy said:
So a movie that takes place all in one room MUST be viewed in on the big screen? Is there some big chase scene around a kitchen table or something?
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
Meh
I'm no expert on movie film, but, I wasn't expecting this film to be shot inside at all. I thought the whole point of using Ultra 70MM was for the wide aspect ratio without loss of quality. What good does that do you inside with roughly a few meters on either side of you?

 
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.
They all done with these? I'm going to see it may as well do this.
I think its showing until NYE. Its also longer due to the pre movie overture (4-5 minutes) and a 12-15 minute intermission halfway through. Also, you're supposed to get a program but I've heard it's hit or miss whether or not theaters have enough to go around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.
They all done with these? I'm going to see it may as well do this.
I think its showing until NYE. Its also longer due to the pre movie overture (4-5 minutes) and a 12-15 minute intermission halfway through. Also, you're supposed to get a program but I've heard it's hit or miss whether or not theaters have enough to go around.
Cool. Thanks.
 
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.
They all done with these? I'm going to see it may as well do this.
The screen I saw it on was the Peruvian West Palm Beach, capacity 466. Huge screen, it was done right, exceptional experience.

 
Officer Pete Malloy said:
Ministry of Pain said:
Officer Pete Malloy said:
So a movie that takes place all in one room MUST be viewed in on the big screen? Is there some big chase scene around a kitchen table or something?
The first 30-45 minutes is a stagecoach ride and some majestic scenery. Snow looked real and probably is, stagecoach authenticity, the costumes and the fur coats these guys are all sporting in the snow. The color contrast and vividness of the shots in low lighting. You can see SLJ in very black/dark surroundings. There is plenty to see if you like the art of film.
Meh
I'm no expert on movie film, but, I wasn't expecting this film to be shot inside at all. I thought the whole point of using Ultra 70MM was for the wide aspect ratio without loss of quality. What good does that do you inside with roughly a few meters on either side of you?
Why do you continue to spit out opinions on a film you have not seen at all or if you have it wasn't in the manner we are trying to discuss?(Requires no response) Again with all due respect you're being a DB about it and I think until you see the film you might want to dial it down a notch or two. Would love to discuss films, how they are made, any classics that get thrown in but it seems like you're ammo in this thread is to try and make fun of folks who felt they went and experienced something that was unique. I find that whole line of thought a waste of time.

 
good movie. Too many gawdamnits. Only poorly written high school football coaches, police detectives and military personnel are allowed to say it.

 
Cliff notes on this Road Show thing?
100+ showings in 44 locations using Ultra Panavision 70mm film. You know reel to reel stuff. Biggest release with this type of film in 20 years. A lot of the showings are in small theaters with small screens and apparently the little kids running the projectors don't remember how.

If you aren't fortunate enough to see one of these showings you obviously didn't see it as the Director intended and have no business commenting on the quality of the movie.
They all done with these? I'm going to see it may as well do this.
The screen I saw it on was the Peruvian West Palm Beach, capacity 466. Huge screen, it was done right, exceptional experience.
Sounds pretty cool.
 
I'm no expert on movie film, but, I wasn't expecting this film to be shot inside at all. I thought the whole point of using Ultra 70MM was for the wide aspect ratio without loss of quality. What good does that do you inside with roughly a few meters on either side of you?
Why do you continue to spit out opinions on a film you have not seen at all or if you have it wasn't in the manner we are trying to discuss?(Requires no response) Again with all due respect you're being a DB about it and I think until you see the film you might want to dial it down a notch or two. Would love to discuss films, how they are made, any classics that get thrown in but it seems like you're ammo in this thread is to try and make fun of folks who felt they went and experienced something that was unique. I find that whole line of thought a waste of time.
I have seen the movie. And who is we? I applaud everyone that gets the chance to go see the 70mm roadshow, it's great. I only made fun of the one person that mandated that as a requirement to have an opinion or make comment.

 
Avid moviegoer that's GLAD they don't do film anymore.

I used to go to a lot of openers for the sole reason the

print was not messed up. You can go see Star Wars in

a couple of weeks from now knowing the movie won't

have lines through it. Some things deserve to die.

QT is fighting a losing battle as screens and the theater

rooms get smaller -14 screen movieplex- instead of the

one giant theater with the 80+ foot wide screen.

I'll take that trade off any day as some movies I will wait

to watch at home on a 8' by 6' screen.

 
Ask me if my ### is fat!

Why?

Just do it!

Is your ### fat?

Oui!
Was that supposed to be funny?
If you saw the film, youd know.
I shouldn't have to see the movie to know if a funny line is funny, Mr. Ebert.
"Hey this is great iced tea."
:lmao: I'll teach you to dive. I used to be a champion, you know.
Yeesh, I'm really kind of busy, Rat.

 
I'm no expert on movie film, but, I wasn't expecting this film to be shot inside at all. I thought the whole point of using Ultra 70MM was for the wide aspect ratio without loss of quality. What good does that do you inside with roughly a few meters on either side of you?
Why do you continue to spit out opinions on a film you have not seen at all or if you have it wasn't in the manner we are trying to discuss?(Requires no response) Again with all due respect you're being a DB about it and I think until you see the film you might want to dial it down a notch or two. Would love to discuss films, how they are made, any classics that get thrown in but it seems like you're ammo in this thread is to try and make fun of folks who felt they went and experienced something that was unique. I find that whole line of thought a waste of time.
I have seen the movie. And who is we? I applaud everyone that gets the chance to go see the 70mm roadshow, it's great. I only made fun of the one person that mandated that as a requirement to have an opinion or make comment.
To be fair, i think he said those opinions are skewed, not that they are null and void.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top