zamboni
Footballguy
-- Tailbacks Will Be In Demand Despite Flukish Stats -- from FFMastermind.com ESPN's Len Pasquarelli reports only four of the top 10 teams in the league in rushing offense are currently either in or tied for first place in their divisions, a dramatic reduction from the past few seasons. And just three of the NFL's top 10 individual rushers play for clubs currently holding first-place perches. But based on discussions over the past week with several NFL general managers, talks that revolved around looking forward to offseason personnel priorities, this disconnect between the running game and overall success is largely regarded as an aberration. The prevailing wisdom is that you still win by running the football -- the record for teams that have rushed 30 or more times in games through the first 12 weeks of the 2003 campaign is 119-30 -- and that's why several teams will be ardently seeking to really upgrade their backfields after this season. No team figures to be more aggressive in rectifying its tailback situation than the Dallas Cowboys, where HC Bill Parcells almost certainly won't go into a second season with RB Troy Hambrick as the starter, and will do just about whatever it takes to land a quality runner. The Detroit Lions have go get some running game help for QB Joey Harrington, or their young quarterback could continue to regress, as he has in some areas this year. Oakland needs some new blood at the position and, with QB Tom Brady emerging now as one of the NFL's top quarterbacks, imagine how much better the New England offense could be if the Patriots land a top-shelf runner. The Washington Redskins, Pittsburgh Steelers and Tampa Bay Bucs must galvanize the tailback position. Tennessee could be in that group as well, depending on the future of RB Eddie George, whose contract now greatly outdistances his production. Of course, the problem for any team seeking to upgrade at tailback is that there are not many standout veterans who will be in the free agent pool, and the strength of the position in the draft probably won't be discernable until the underclass prospects commit. This is not, as it currently stacks up, a particularly strong senior assemblage of tailbacks. As for the veterans, RB Duce Staley of Philadelphia could be the best of a dubious crop, and some team might have to overpay to land the former Eagles starter. --------------------With perhaps a few exceptions, I think he nailed most teams that will likely be looking for new starting RBs next year.That said, he is the only observer I've heard so far that has said it could be a weak RB draft (although to be fair, he said it depends on who declares for the draft)Also, I disagree with his comment about some team perhaps "overpaying" to land Staley. I don't see any team making such a move. I'd be surprised if Staley even gets signed away to be the de facto starter - to compete to be a starter, sure, but not to be the man.

Rudi and Bennett have done exceptional work at the tailback position, and I'd expect CINN to free up the money w/Dillon to bolster the 'D' even morethis HC is a Defensive guy, after all, and would love to grab a McAllister-type as a shut down corner...maybe the Champ?, from Danny-boy
illon goes nowhere unless Cincy want to dump him (cut or traded for low draft pick like a 4th rounder). No team is going to give a lot up for a 28 year old rb with a known attitude.Barlow stays in SF. Barlow is a restricted free agent. SF makes a tender at 3rd round or 1st round $, and no one wants him for that amount.Henry stays in Buffalo. Why trade him when Magahee is totally unproven and coming off a major injury? Has he already shown enough in practice that they know he has the same talent and had durability? That is impossible. By the way, Henry has a cap friendly contract, which makes trading more desirable, but also keeping him more desirable.Sorry, I just don't see many rbs switching teams.