I suspect if we looked closely, we would find Tebow's stats compare favorably to a lot of QB's first five (or six) starts. For example, his yards per attempt, TD and Int percentages, and overall QB rating are all better than Sam Bradford's first six starts. Heck, statistically, Tebows first six starts compare favorably to Joe Flacco's most recent six starts.I think he will be the starter the rest of this season - and thought this was an interesting read comparing Tebow to Eli through 5 first starts - not including this past week (hint: Tebow's PASSING numbers are much better):
5 Starts
http://www.denverpost.com/paige/ci_19274728By Woody PaigeI suspect if we looked closely, we would find Tebow's stats compare favorably to a lot of QB's first five (or six) starts. For example, his yards per attempt, TD and Int percentages, and overall QB rating are all better than Sam Bradford's first six starts. Heck, statistically, Tebows first six starts compare favorably to Joe Flacco's most recent six starts.I think he will be the starter the rest of this season - and thought this was an interesting read comparing Tebow to Eli through 5 first starts - not including this past week (hint: Tebow's PASSING numbers are much better):
5 Starts
Closely? Realistically, Tebow's stats are damn good compared most QBs in their first 6 starts. It's just that because of the controversy surrounding him, he's treated like a guy who's in the middle of his 4th season. When Tebow makes a typical young QB mistake like throwing the ball into coverage instead of just tossing it out of bounds it's because he's the worst quarterback in the history of the NFL, whereas with every other young QB it's "something he'll learn in time". It's the biggest hypocrisy going around these boards right now. The Tebow haters loathe the guy because his name brings him credit and attention that his NFL play doesn't yet deserve, yet those same people do the exact same thing and nitpick him as if he's some perfect 5th year starter rather than a young QB who's only just beginning to learn how to play in the NFL.FWIW, here are Tebow's numbers in his first 6 starts compared to some other guys that I heard ended up becoming fairly decent fantasy options.I suspect if we looked closely, we would find Tebow's stats compare favorably to a lot of QB's first five (or six) starts. For example, his yards per attempt, TD and Int percentages, and overall QB rating are all better than Sam Bradford's first six starts. Heck, statistically, Tebows first six starts compare favorably to Joe Flacco's most recent six starts.I think he will be the starter the rest of this season - and thought this was an interesting read comparing Tebow to Eli through 5 first starts - not including this past week (hint: Tebow's PASSING numbers are much better):
5 Starts
http://www.denverpost.com/paige/ci_19274728By Woody PaigeI suspect if we looked closely, we would find Tebow's stats compare favorably to a lot of QB's first five (or six) starts. For example, his yards per attempt, TD and Int percentages, and overall QB rating are all better than Sam Bradford's first six starts. Heck, statistically, Tebows first six starts compare favorably to Joe Flacco's most recent six starts.I think he will be the starter the rest of this season - and thought this was an interesting read comparing Tebow to Eli through 5 first starts - not including this past week (hint: Tebow's PASSING numbers are much better):
5 Starts
The Denver Post
POSTED: 11/06/2011 01:00:00 AM MST
UPDATED: 11/06/2011 01:13:58 PM MST
The Broncos' young quarterback, 2-2 as an erratic starter, looked Quasimodo ugly in his fifth game.
In the first half of a blowout defeat, he completed only four passes, was sacked and harassed repeatedly by eight men in the box and played terrible as the Broncos failed to score a touchdown, and the NFC opponent got 24 points. The outcome was no longer in doubt when his pass was intercepted and returned for a touchdown.
While witnessing the debacle at the stadium, I wondered if I was absolutely wrong for supporting the acclaimed quarterback I had first seen play so skillfully in college.
Afterward, he was criticized in Denver and condemned nationally. The quarterback's performance was described as comical, amateurish and hopeless, and some in the media believed he was a monumental faux pas, or faux passer, as a first-round pick.
The Broncos coach even doubted the quarterback — saying privately that he was raw, couldn't read defenses, didn't throw accurately enough and scrambled too often.
However, the quarterback would go on to play in five Super Bowls, winning two, and was selected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
John Elway.
More quarterbacks through their first five starts:
ESPN analyst Trent Dilfer, 1-4 record, two touchdowns, nine interceptions, would be the QB on Ravens' Super Bowl-winning team.
Southern football icon and No. 2 pick overall, Archie Manning, 2-2-1, 40-of-86 passing, five touchdowns, five interceptions, 10.9 rating in one game as Saints rookie, father of two NFL quarterbacks.
The Colts' (injured) Peyton Manning, No. 1 pick, 1-4, four touchdowns, 12 interceptions, would win one Super Bowl.
The Giants' Eli Manning, No. 1 pick (traded from Chargers following draft), 0-5, three touchdowns, seven interceptions, would win one Super Bowl.
The Packers' Aaron Rodgers, 2-3 as starter, finally, in fourth season, nine touchdowns, four interceptions, would win one Super Bowl.
Fox analyst Terry Bradshaw, 2-3, one touchdown, eight interceptions, 41-of-100 passing, would win four Super Bowls, Hall of Famer.
ESPN commentator Steve Young, 1-4 with Tampa Bay, three touchdowns, eight interceptions, would be 49ers' starting quarterback on one Super Bowl-winning team, Hall of Famer.
Fox analyst Troy Aikman, 0-5, three touchdowns, eight interceptions, won three Super Bowls with Cowboys, Hall of Famer.
Joe Montana, 1-4, six touchdowns, four interceptions, won four Super Bowls with 49ers, Hall of Famer.
Brett Favre, 2-3, six touchdowns, two interceptions, won one Super Bowl with Packers.
Sam Bradford, No. 1 pick overall in 2010 by Rams, 2-3, six touchdowns, eight interceptions, lost his fifth start 44-6.
Colt McCoy, tied with Boise State's Kellen Moore heading into Saturday night for most victories as a quarterback in FBS, drafted in third round last year, current Browns starter, 2-3, three touchdowns, three interceptions.
Ryan Fitzpatrick, current Bills starter who just signed a six-year, $59 million contract extension, 0-5, two touchdowns, 10 interceptions with Rams, then Bengals.
Michael Vick, current Eagles starter, 2-3, five touchdowns, one interception with Falcons.
Johnny Unitas, 3-2 as a starter in 1956 after taking over as Baltimore starter, threw interception for touchdown on first series, fumbled ball away on first play of second series, nine touchdowns, 10 interceptions with 3-4 record for season, won two NFL championships, Hall of Famer.
Cam Newton, No. 1 overall pick, 2011, current Panthers starter, 1-4 in first five games, seven touchdowns, six interceptions.
Then, there is: Tim Tebow, 2-3 as Broncos starter, seven touchdowns, four interceptions.
In five starts, Tebow has passed for 984 yards, rushed for 321 yards and completed 48.3 percent of his passes. In comparison, Elway (knocked out of his first game, replaced in the second half of his fifth game) passed for 420 yards, rushed for 41 yards, completed 45.8 percent and was 2-3 with one touchdown, five interceptions.
In his book for youngsters, the "Comeback Kid" would write that "TV commentators asked: 'Is Elway the $5 million mistake?' "
Elway was the Broncos' starter for the next 15 years — and had won more regular-season games than any other quarterback when he retired.
Elway also played poorly in his sixth start. He was 11-of-31 with no touchdowns and an interception in a loss . . . to the Raiders in Los Angeles.
The Broncos did not give up on Elway then? The Broncos must not give up on Tebow now.
No matter what happens in Oakland against the Raiders today, Tebow has to start the rest of the season so he can be judged properly.
John Elway, sacked nine times in the first half by the Bears in his fifth start, and those other quarterbacks who started rather badly certainly should agree.
The same reason you're asking the questions is the reason you wont get good value for him. If he's starting, he's almost a lock as FF QB1. Period. There is little argument there (and those that are opposed are guys who either hate him, are looking at "real" football instead of purely FF, or who simply have reality issues).The problem is, he could be benched as soon as he has 1 really bad game (again). That fear (i.e. the reason you want to move him) is the same reason people (at least realistic ones) aren't going to pay too much for him.
Call me crazier, I'm starting Tebow over Rodgers for the rest of the season.I'm holding. Call me crazy, but I'm starting Tebow @ KC this week over Brady @ Jets.
these 2 guysCall me crazier, I'm starting Tebow over Rodgers for the rest of the season.I'm holding. Call me crazy, but I'm starting Tebow @ KC this week over Brady @ Jets.![]()
His floor is 13 and his ceiling is 30. I think there's a better chance his value increases than decreases, especially with how Matt Moore did last week against the Chiefs. There's no way they can bench him regardless of performance after next week. He will need to lose 3 straight games before it's considered. I don't care what Elway said. Orton was 1-4 and until Tebow's record approaches that he'll remain the starter.If you have another good QB, yes, trade now if you can get good value. The problem is that other owners may want to see one more good fantasy game and be reassured that he won't be benched either. Of course, if that happens, his value will sky rocket and if it doesn't, it will plummet.
I'm fairly convinced the leash isn't nearly as short as he's making it out to be. They have no other options and he's 2-1.The irony will be if Elway has a shorter lease with Tebow than the Broncos did with him. Maybe all this talk of benching him, is just a ploy to motivate Tebow - the last coach in Denver used to do stuff like that.![]()
]Considering that the only negative on Tebow's fantasy trade value is the chance that he'll get benched, you don't think that's relevant?Might want to work on those dot connecting skills.Love the comparisons to other rookie qbs... Guess the point is that it's supposed to make a case not to bench him... Not sure it makes for a quality fantasy QB analogy.
According to Robert Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style, the details of typesetting ellipsis depend on the character and size of the font being set and the typographer's preference. Bringhurst writes that a full space between each dot is "another Victorian eccentricity. In most contexts, the Chicago ellipsis is much too wide"—he recommends using flush dots, or thin-spaced dots (up to one-fifth of an em), or the prefabricated ellipsis character (Unicode U+2026, Latin entity …). Bringhurst suggests that normally, an ellipsis should be spaced fore-and-aft to separate it from the text, but when it combines with other punctuation, the leading space disappears and the other punctuation follows. This is the usual practice in typesetting. He provides the following examples:i … j k…. l…, l l, … l m…? n…!]Considering that the only negative on Tebow's fantasy trade value is the chance that he'll get benched, you don't think that's relevant?Love the comparisons to other rookie qbs... Guess the point is that it's supposed to make a case not to bench him... Not sure it makes for a quality fantasy QB analogy.
Might want to work on those dot connecting skills.