What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TED talks - Ideas worth spreading (1 Viewer)

Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
:goodposting: BTW, Sebastian Thrun is my new hero.

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Marge: "Now Homer, it's easy to criticize...."

Homer: "It's fun, too!"

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
 
'roadkill1292 said:
'bentley said:
'Hooper31 said:
'bentley said:
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.
That weed one is so true. I've been doing some research into growing and people are just insanely methodical with this from the lighting, fertilizer, soil, testing php etc.
 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.
As I said above, I agree that many of them are interesting. And I've worn New Balance shoes and a performance fleece top while training for a half marathon and topped it off with a nice microbrew. I've just never marveled at or been amazed by an executive summary of a very deep subject.
 
Alain de Botton: Atheism 2.0

LINK to Ted Talk

I've been an agnostic for most of my life. I understand the atheist perspective, but I've sort of viewed it as a form of religion unto itself. To me atheism is a belief in no God which I think takes some amount of faith. I view it as a statement of knowledge. Knowing what is or isn't (gnostic) would be the exact opposite of agnosticism IMO. Probably just an argument of semantics and really not worth our time to debate.

Anyway, regardless of how you feel about atheism I think this guy nails exactly what atheists are missing out on. There are some good aspects of religion that atheists can draw on.

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.
As I said above, I agree that many of them are interesting. And I've worn New Balance shoes and a performance fleece top while training for a half marathon and topped it off with a nice microbrew. I've just never marveled at or been amazed by an executive summary of a very deep subject.
I am curious how do find new subjects to become deeply engrossed in? I presume you don't have complete a priori knowledge requiring no further research on all subjects, so when you find a new subject where/how do you start researching it?
 
I watched three last night;1) Why work doesn't get done at work2) 3 things I learned as my plane crashed3) 10 things you didn't know about orgasms4) Jamie Oliver- Teach kids about foodI think #1 was my favorite. When people are asked where they go to get stuff done, they typically say "home office", "in the car" or "early in the morning", but they hardly say "the office". And it all boils down to uninterrupted personal time. The speaker explained that most creative work takes time; a person needs to be alone with his thoughts for a significant amount of time in order to complete a difficult task. And at the office, you rarely have as much as a single hour uninterrupted. He had some interesting solutions: have an afternoon every week during which no one talks to another, and get rid of meetings.
 
That's interesting. He says he no longer wants to postpone anything in life because of his plane experience. But the truth is, the overwhelming majority of people make the mistake of not having much patience. They constantly need stimulus, or they get bored or frustrated and move on to the next thing. Most people can't sit still and watch a TV show or read a book in one sitting (or read a book at all) The fact that he took that lesson from it speaks more of him as a person. It says that he is different from most people. He is more laid-back and has more patience, and the plane experience jolted that world view. I also doubt he changed. People don't change. His body language and speech patterns suggest he is still very laid-back. So he's saying these things but doesn't believe it. He also shakes his head no when he says he eliminated negative energy from his life. He just lied right there. Shook his head no when he says he's not had a fight with his life in two years. Another lie. Shook his head no when he said above all, the only goal in life he had was to be a great dad, so that's another lie.

In that video, I see a salesman, lying about his personal experience to sell ideas he doesn't believe. Plus, his plane experience didn't even change him. I did learn this person is laid back.

 
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.

 
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.
A lot of them probably aren't for you, that's for sure. Many of the speakers have interesting new perspectives that don't fit your world view.
 
Just got an interesting personal message telling me to stay out of this thread. That peaked my interest.

 
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.
A lot of them probably aren't for you, that's for sure. Many of the speakers have interesting new perspectives that don't fit your world view.
Well I see several of the speakers are liberals. You got Clinton, Gore, former Labour PM Gordon Brown, Richard Dawkins. I shudder to think what "interesting new perspective" Clinton has for us. From under the White House desk?
 
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.
A lot of them probably aren't for you, that's for sure. Many of the speakers have interesting new perspectives that don't fit your world view.
Well I see several of the speakers are liberals. You got Clinton, Gore, former Labour PM Gordon Brown, Richard Dawkins. I shudder to think what "interesting new perspective" Clinton has for us. From under the White House desk?
Usually when I think of Ted Talks, I think of science and technology. Many of the speakers introduce us to some new advancement in those areas. You're the first person who's mentioned political leanings.
 
I'd like to hear a TED talk on "Thread Subjects Fensalk Couldn't Ruin." When it comes to bringing the suck, the guy's got impressive range.

 
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.
A lot of them probably aren't for you, that's for sure. Many of the speakers have interesting new perspectives that don't fit your world view.
Well I see several of the speakers are liberals. You got Clinton, Gore, former Labour PM Gordon Brown, Richard Dawkins. I shudder to think what "interesting new perspective" Clinton has for us. From under the White House desk?
I don't think you've spent much time on this site. It's a science web site - not a Liberal stomping ground.
 
Beej, I know I can't erase years of abuse overnight, but speaking to you rationally and without insults just doesn't get through to you, buddy. You've been kicked around so badly by this board for so long that you're simply ruined for decent conversation here. You can't talk to anybody any more than we can talk to you. Isn't it time to declare "Victory!" and walk away?

 
That's interesting. He says he no longer wants to postpone anything in life because of his plane experience. But the truth is, the overwhelming majority of people make the mistake of not having much patience. They constantly need stimulus, or they get bored or frustrated and move on to the next thing. Most people can't sit still and watch a TV show or read a book in one sitting (or read a book at all) The fact that he took that lesson from it speaks more of him as a person. It says that he is different from most people. He is more laid-back and has more patience, and the plane experience jolted that world view. I also doubt he changed. People don't change. His body language and speech patterns suggest he is still very laid-back. So he's saying these things but doesn't believe it. He also shakes his head no when he says he eliminated negative energy from his life. He just lied right there. Shook his head no when he says he's not had a fight with his life in two years. Another lie. Shook his head no when he said above all, the only goal in life he had was to be a great dad, so that's another lie.

In that video, I see a salesman, lying about his personal experience to sell ideas he doesn't believe. Plus, his plane experience didn't even change him. I did learn this person is laid back.
He also picked the Giants yesterday.
 
That's interesting. He says he no longer wants to postpone anything in life because of his plane experience. But the truth is, the overwhelming majority of people make the mistake of not having much patience. They constantly need stimulus, or they get bored or frustrated and move on to the next thing. Most people can't sit still and watch a TV show or read a book in one sitting (or read a book at all) The fact that he took that lesson from it speaks more of him as a person. It says that he is different from most people. He is more laid-back and has more patience, and the plane experience jolted that world view. I also doubt he changed. People don't change. His body language and speech patterns suggest he is still very laid-back. So he's saying these things but doesn't believe it. He also shakes his head no when he says he eliminated negative energy from his life. He just lied right there. Shook his head no when he says he's not had a fight with his life in two years. Another lie. Shook his head no when he said above all, the only goal in life he had was to be a great dad, so that's another lie.

In that video, I see a salesman, lying about his personal experience to sell ideas he doesn't believe. Plus, his plane experience didn't even change him. I did learn this person is laid back.
Take a look at this (12 second video):The Head Shake

That is an interview of a man under suspicion of murdering his ex-wife; in fact, he is the number one suspect police are looking at. See what he does there? If you only watched his body language and tried to discern if he was honest or not here, you would likely conclude Bruce was being deceptive. He shakes his head no when he says yes, and he shrugs his shoulders when he says "Yeah, and I knew that". Not only that, he hesitates slightly and looks up and to the right before as he answers, like he is searching for the answer.

All classic tells that someone is lying, right?

Yet he is NOT lying here. If you thought he was, you'd be clearly mistaken. He had a rock solid alibi; he was out of town when she was stabbed. Two other people were convicted of her murder.

if you must know more

Next time you spot a clue to deception, don't be quick to call someone a liar by one or two clues alone. The process is a lot more complex than what it appears on the surface. Try focusing on the facts and looking for inconsistencies, first. That will be much more reliable and trustworthy for the average person. Had that been done in this case as well, Bruce Mullenix would have been cleared quickly, and focus would have fallen where it should, on his daughter Rachael and her boyfriend Ian Allen (the actual murderers).

No comment on our TED speaker; I'll let the reader decide if you have clue one about whether he believes what he is saying.

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.
As I said above, I agree that many of them are interesting. And I've worn New Balance shoes and a performance fleece top while training for a half marathon and topped it off with a nice microbrew. I've just never marveled at or been amazed by an executive summary of a very deep subject.
I am curious how do find new subjects to become deeply engrossed in? I presume you don't have complete a priori knowledge requiring no further research on all subjects, so when you find a new subject where/how do you start researching it?
For the third or fourth time, I never said I didn't find them interesting. Just that I didn't find them something that I would "marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed" and that some people substitute watching a TED talk for actual knowledge.The only real negative I can see is that I've watched 2-3 recently where it seemed like someone was just setting the viewer up to buy their book.

So, in conclusion, my opinion of TED talks <> beej's

 
Stuff White People Like sums it up pretty well. Excerpt from the opening of the article:
We don't all wander our way through life continuously looking to impress everyone we meet. It is possible to sit back, take the world in, and just sort of marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed. If you you look hard enough at anything its not hard for you to find something negative (or just dream up something negative) about everything.
Meh. I try to spend more than 18 minutes soaking the world in. I think some of them are pretty interesting, but they do seem to appeal to the Wikipedia-level experts in every field.
The Ted talks are very helpful in leading one to more detailed research on a given subject. If someone likes Sebastian Thrun's 19-minute talk on driverless cars, he's more likely to search for more news articles about the concept.
They also can be very helpful if you just feel like being entertained for 18 minutes. Also, just because something is on Stuff White People Like doesn't mean it's not really great. A couple examples: 1 2.
As I said above, I agree that many of them are interesting. And I've worn New Balance shoes and a performance fleece top while training for a half marathon and topped it off with a nice microbrew. I've just never marveled at or been amazed by an executive summary of a very deep subject.
I am curious how do find new subjects to become deeply engrossed in? I presume you don't have complete a priori knowledge requiring no further research on all subjects, so when you find a new subject where/how do you start researching it?
For the third or fourth time, I never said I didn't find them interesting. Just that I didn't find them something that I would "marvel at it with no other intention but to be amazed" and that some people substitute watching a TED talk for actual knowledge.The only real negative I can see is that I've watched 2-3 recently where it seemed like someone was just setting the viewer up to buy their book.

So, in conclusion, my opinion of TED talks <> beej's
Thanks but that really wasn't my question. Just curious where you find things that are worth researching. The FFA, the news, life in general. That kind of stuff.I don't listen to a lot of TED, NPR is probably my primary source for exposure to new ideas, but I have appreciated most of the ones I have heard.

 
Ben Goldacre - Battling bad science

Every day there are news reports of new health advice, but how can you know if they're right? Doctor and epidemiologist Ben Goldacre shows us, at high speed, the ways evidence can be distorted, from the blindingly obvious nutrition claims to the very subtle tricks of the pharmaceutical industry.

I really enjoyed this one.

 
Ben Goldacre - Battling bad science

Every day there are news reports of new health advice, but how can you know if they're right? Doctor and epidemiologist Ben Goldacre shows us, at high speed, the ways evidence can be distorted, from the blindingly obvious nutrition claims to the very subtle tricks of the pharmaceutical industry.

I really enjoyed this one.
Love this kind of stuff. Dr. Dean Edell debunks this kind of quackery on his radio show all the time.
 
Ben Goldacre - Battling bad science

Every day there are news reports of new health advice, but how can you know if they're right? Doctor and epidemiologist Ben Goldacre shows us, at high speed, the ways evidence can be distorted, from the blindingly obvious nutrition claims to the very subtle tricks of the pharmaceutical industry.

I really enjoyed this one.
Thanks for sharing this. I'm going to be teaching an AP Statistics class next year and this talk will fit in perfectly for use in the class. :thumbup:
 
I think a lot of you know that I am kind of a food/health/sustainability guy (wacko?) so I have been watching a lot of the TEDTalks Food Matters channel.

Here are a couple that I really enjoyed:

Roger Doiron: My subversive (garden) plot 18:48- A vegetable garden can do more than save you money -- it can save the world. At TEDxDirigo Roger Doiron shows how gardens can re-localize our food and feed our growing population.

Britte Riley: A garden in my apartment 7:52 - Britta Riley :wub: wanted to grow her own food (in her tiny apartment). So she and her friends developed a system for growing plants in discarded plastic bottles -- researching, testing and tweaking the system using social media, trying many variations at once and quickly arriving at the optimal system. Call it distributed DIY. And the results? Delicious.

I have long been a fan of Vertical Earth Gardens but Riley takes it to an entirely new level. Very clever.

Dan Barber: How I fell in love with a fish 19:02- Chef Dan Barber squares off with a dilemma facing many chefs today: how to keep fish on the menu. With impeccable research and deadpan humor, he chronicles his pursuit of a sustainable fish he could love, and the foodie's honeymoon he's enjoyed since discovering an outrageously delicious fish raised using a revolutionary farming method in Spain.

Barber also gives a fascinating talk about humane fois gras that was profiled on This American Life (Poultry Slam 2011 - Act 3 Latin Liver)

 
'Mr. Pickles said:
My initial impression is this TED thing is a bunch of shysters and crooks. I got a little creeped out watching that video. Don't think I'll watch any more.
:lmao:
I don't want to intentionally encourage Fensalk but quite a few TEDTalkers have books, stores or products that they are inadvertently plugging. But of course they do, they're 'experts' on these subjects. Being knowledgeable enough to give lectures on a topic kind of goes arm-in-arm with somehow trying to make money off your knowledge. I have seen a couple that do it shamelessly but otherwise it's really not a big deal.
 
TED is awesome, saw many of them at the "U", quality thought provoking ideas that inspire people, allow them to dream, and push people to reach for something better.

Honestly, we should post up one a day for a thread and discuss/debate, use the clip as the track to run on, might be interesting.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top