I'm not sure if it's djokavic or just the pressure to win one more, but it's odd to see such a dip in level in these finals from what we see in the prior matches.Federer hasn't brought his A game in the finals at Wimbledon and now the USO. But even if he did, I don't know that he could beat Djokovic.
The larger racket gave him more backhand and more serve, but took something off the golden forehand.. Well that and age.Fed's forehand has become too wristy, whippy, and loopy. Hard to see him miss so many forehands.
Nice tourney. Djoker is all class too. Nice win![]()
Think he did bring his A game but it's not enough to beat Djokovic's A game. There's a reason Nole has 12785 points in 2015 and Murray in 2nd is at 7370.Federer hasn't brought his A game in the finals at Wimbledon and now the USO. But even if he did, I don't know that he could beat Djokovic.
It's probably pointless to argue because even if he did bring his A game he may lose but I don't see how that's his A game with 50+ unforced errors. Novak deserved the win but I can't help feeling the Fed threw away another great chance.Master of Past and Present said:Think he did bring his A game but it's not enough to beat Djokovic's A game. There's a reason Nole has 12785 points in 2015 and Murray in 2nd is at 7370.Popinski said:Federer hasn't brought his A game in the finals at Wimbledon and now the USO. But even if he did, I don't know that he could beat Djokovic.
The difference is that Agassi played absolutely perfect tennis for three sets, but was still down 2-1 after Fed took it up a notch in the 3rd set tie-break. Agassi knew it was over after that.Popinski said:Somewhat of a role reversal for Federer from 10 years ago at the US Open. An old Agassi took a set from prime Federer, but Federer eventually took over.
Yeah the gap between Agassi and Federer was clearly larger at that point than that in last night's final. I was just referring to the general circumstances.The difference is that Agassi played absolutely perfect tennis for three sets, but was still down 2-1 after Fed took it up a notch in the 3rd set tie-break. Agassi knew it was over after that.Popinski said:Somewhat of a role reversal for Federer from 10 years ago at the US Open. An old Agassi took a set from prime Federer, but Federer eventually took over.
If Federer had played that well last night he'd have won.
I don't think you can just look at error count and say that means someone played less than their best., I think it has to be taken into consideration that he knows hitting in the middle of the court isn't going to do anything for him but extend the match in time which is just going to help Djokovic. To beat Djokovic in best of 5 (and really probably win in 4 at most), he's going to need to hit lines which means more risk and more errors. He needs to hit big shots to create opportunities to come in and end points. And really it worked except he only converted 17% of break points and Djokovic gets a ton of credit for that.It's probably pointless to argue because even if he did bring his A game he may lose but I don't see how that's his A game with 50+ unforced errors. Novak deserved the win but I can't help feeling the Fed threw away another great chance.Master of Past and Present said:Think he did bring his A game but it's not enough to beat Djokovic's A game. There's a reason Nole has 12785 points in 2015 and Murray in 2nd is at 7370.Federer hasn't brought his A game in the finals at Wimbledon and now the USO. But even if he did, I don't know that he could beat Djokovic.
Pretty sick.Djokovic first to win 6 Master 1000s in a single season, also first to make 8 finals. Previously 6 finals was tops.
What's wrong with Andy Murray in the overall scheme of things. Has he just never recovered fully from the surgery? Did he lose the drive after winning 2013 Wimbledon?Team competition but really wouldn't be a stretch to say Andy Murray won Davis Cup. I'm amazed he was able to carry them to a title.
Probably the greatest individual run in Davis Cup history. No hype.Doesn't mean two ####s to the average fan, but winning the first one in 79 years is a massive achievement for Great Britain, and elevates an already revered player to epic hero status in his homeland.Team competition but really wouldn't be a stretch to say Andy Murray won Davis Cup. I'm amazed he was able to carry them to a title.
Yeah, an amazing season but is was actually less dominant than Federer's 2006 season. Roger was 92-5, 3 major titles (finalist in the other), 12 total titles. The Masters tournaments were a different format back then so you can't compare apples to apples but Roger won 5 of them. Out of those 5 losses, 3 were to the world's number #2 player and the world's best clay court player ever on clay. Roger made the finals is 16 of the 17 tournaments he entered. Roger was 11-0 on grass and 59-2 on hard courts. He was 16-3 on clay with all three losses to the greatest clay court player of all-time.BobbyLayne said:Def one of the best seasons of all-time, more dominant than Federer's best season. 82-6, 3 major titles, 3rd man to reach all 4 major finals (after Rod Laver and Roger Federer), a record 6 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching the final of 8 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching 15 consecutive finals, and a record 31 top 10 match victories. Losses were 3 to Fed (5-3 overall), one each to Andy, Ivo and Stan.
Almost reaching "count the number of angels on a pinhead" status here.Yeah, an amazing season but is was actually less dominant than Federer's 2006 season. Roger was 92-5, 3 major titles (finalist in the other), 12 total titles. The Masters tournaments were a different format back then so you can't compare apples to apples but Roger won 5 of them. Out of those 5 losses, 3 were to the world's number #2 player and the world's best clay court player ever on clay. Roger made the finals is 16 of the 17 tournaments he entered. Roger was 11-0 on grass and 59-2 on hard courts. He was 16-3 on clay with all three losses to the greatest clay court player of all-time.BobbyLayne said:Def one of the best seasons of all-time, more dominant than Federer's best season. 82-6, 3 major titles, 3rd man to reach all 4 major finals (after Rod Laver and Roger Federer), a record 6 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching the final of 8 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching 15 consecutive finals, and a record 31 top 10 match victories. Losses were 3 to Fed (5-3 overall), one each to Andy, Ivo and Stan.
It is definitely close but they had equal records in grand slams, Roger won a higher percentage of matches and had 1 more title and only loss 2 non-clay matches.
Same things that have always plagued Murray. He's not the fittest guy around, and he can't settle his nerves. Super talented, though.Dentist said:What's wrong with Andy Murray in the overall scheme of things. Has he just never recovered fully from the surgery? Did he lose the drive after winning 2013 Wimbledon?Team competition but really wouldn't be a stretch to say Andy Murray won Davis Cup. I'm amazed he was able to carry them to a title.
I've read several articles about 2006 Federer vs. 2015 Djoker.Yeah, an amazing season but is was actually less dominant than Federer's 2006 season. Roger was 92-5, 3 major titles (finalist in the other), 12 total titles. The Masters tournaments were a different format back then so you can't compare apples to apples but Roger won 5 of them. Out of those 5 losses, 3 were to the world's number #2 player and the world's best clay court player ever on clay. Roger made the finals is 16 of the 17 tournaments he entered. Roger was 11-0 on grass and 59-2 on hard courts. He was 16-3 on clay with all three losses to the greatest clay court player of all-time.BobbyLayne said:Def one of the best seasons of all-time, more dominant than Federer's best season. 82-6, 3 major titles, 3rd man to reach all 4 major finals (after Rod Laver and Roger Federer), a record 6 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching the final of 8 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching 15 consecutive finals, and a record 31 top 10 match victories. Losses were 3 to Fed (5-3 overall), one each to Andy, Ivo and Stan.
It is definitely close but they had equal records in grand slams, Roger won a higher percentage of matches and had 1 more title and only loss 2 non-clay matches.
(Player year end ranking during that season)I've read several articles about 2006 Federer vs. 2015 Djoker.Yeah, an amazing season but is was actually less dominant than Federer's 2006 season. Roger was 92-5, 3 major titles (finalist in the other), 12 total titles. The Masters tournaments were a different format back then so you can't compare apples to apples but Roger won 5 of them. Out of those 5 losses, 3 were to the world's number #2 player and the world's best clay court player ever on clay. Roger made the finals is 16 of the 17 tournaments he entered. Roger was 11-0 on grass and 59-2 on hard courts. He was 16-3 on clay with all three losses to the greatest clay court player of all-time.BobbyLayne said:Def one of the best seasons of all-time, more dominant than Federer's best season. 82-6, 3 major titles, 3rd man to reach all 4 major finals (after Rod Laver and Roger Federer), a record 6 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching the final of 8 Masters 1000 tournaments, reaching 15 consecutive finals, and a record 31 top 10 match victories. Losses were 3 to Fed (5-3 overall), one each to Andy, Ivo and Stan.
It is definitely close but they had equal records in grand slams, Roger won a higher percentage of matches and had 1 more title and only loss 2 non-clay matches.
I think it's pretty dang close. I'm going to give a slight edge to Federer because the guy he lost his GS final to was the greatest clay courter ever, and the same guy he lost the clay masters to... well and also I'm FedDentist
Djoker lost to Wawrinka.. that's inexcusable and kept him from the greatest season ever.
The fact that Federer can still beat the guy now (albeit not in a 5 set tournament) is ####### amazing.I will say this - I have watched Roger live a lot more than Novak. And I have never seen anyone hit as many perfectly placed winners as Roger. I'm arguing the stats favor the most recent season, but with my own eyes - Federer at the US Open was better than anyone I had ever seen, and to date better than anyone else I have seen in person. I'm a 2.5 player and no expert analyst, but from my layman view, at his peak he was ####### amazing.