Halfway there!lsutigers said:I don't disagree with that. Still say he will finish as starter.My opinion:
There is no way he supplants Foster or Brown unless there is injury. Even Grimes seemed to be the clear 3 to me.
Halfway there!lsutigers said:I don't disagree with that. Still say he will finish as starter.My opinion:
There is no way he supplants Foster or Brown unless there is injury. Even Grimes seemed to be the clear 3 to me.
Lol, crazy. They said on NFL radio that the Texans are hitting the panic button at running back.Halfway there!lsutigers said:I don't disagree with that. Still say he will finish as starter.My opinion:
There is no way he supplants Foster or Brown unless there is injury. Even Grimes seemed to be the clear 3 to me.
so, you think they're getting a free pass in the next day's film session, or you'd just prefer to hear them thrown under the bus in a press conference?dhockster said:My comment was more directed at Gary Kubiak and how he never took the players to task, any team problems "were on him". While I don't think a coach should totally denigrate a player in the media, I do thinkI didn't see what he actually said, but the first thing belichick will say after a loss is they need to coach betterdhockster said:The worst part of that fiasco was after the game when O'Brien basically said "that was on me".
I agree the coaching was bad based on all the missed assignments and penalties, but the players were terrible, too. Don't be all player friendly, Bill, like Kubiak was. Hold them accountable.
I think he has some idea how to coach, and that kind of attitude is one reason I'm a belichick fan.
the world needs more of that, and not just in football
he can honestly talk about players not living up to expectations of the team. If you always give underperformers a free pass, then you lose the players on your team who are actually performing. One game is
definitely not a big enough sample to criticize O'Brien but if you are a Texans fan, it was definitely disappointing to hear a reaction similar to the previous coach. It doesn't mean he will perform like the previous coach,
it just made it appear that nothing has really changed for this team from last year.
Excellent post. Gotta give Grimes credit where it's due even though Ive stated I like Blue better. Guy is playing his heart out. Ronnie Brown got hit in the backfield quite a bit.Duane Brown might be the most important player on offense. Let's hope we never have to see Newton at Left Tackls during the regular season. Having him start on the right side is bad enough.
Seems like CB Brandon Harris is on the bubble. If we carry 5 corners, I see Joseph, Jackson, Bouye, Hal being ahead of him for sure.
Grimes and Blue might prove to be a good 1-2 punch for WHEN, not if, Foster goes down.
Liked what I see from Clowney so far. I hope it continues.
Fitzpatrick will definitely earn the praise and hatred of the fanbase as he takes em through extreme highs and pitiful lows. Keenum probably got back his 2nd string job over Savage.
Refreshing to see some good plays on special teams for once.
I agree with most things you are saying. He saw game action AFTER savage. He had moments where he did seem like he wanted to run first. If a Matt McGloin saw waivers, I would bet the farm that Keenum is sent packing in a heartbeat to make room. However, you mention the different offense. I don't view that as a pure negative. I view it as a positive in Bill O'Brien's coaching philosophy. How many people whined and complained about Kubiak trying to "square-peg" Keenum into his "round-hole" offense? For Keenum to have any chance to succeed, he needs to run something similar to his U of H spread offense. I liked the wide looks and screens that he threw to Martin last night. O'Brien didn't try to make Keenum play like Fitzpatrick, unlike Kubiak who tried to make him play like Matt Schaub. I hope the guy succeeds, despite some of his VY-like fan boys trashing any other QB for the Texans that takes air and space away from Case. I think Savage is way too raw and green, that Keenum will retain the #2 job, unless a hidden veteran talent that BOB likes becomes unexpectedly available.I don't like Keenum's prospects of making the team. It just seems that O'Brien isn't keen on Case. Similar to a girl saying "He's a really nice guy". Odd that when hes out there they run a completely different offense. I think Case is competing with FA QBs and those soon to be placed on waivers.
I hope you're right bc I'd like to see Case as the 2. However, listening to O'Brien in interviews I get the feeling hes keeping Case on to appease McNair and the Houston Cougar fanboys.I agree with most things you are saying. He saw game action AFTER savage. He had moments where he did seem like he wanted to run first. If a Matt McGloin saw waivers, I would bet the farm that Keenum is sent packing in a heartbeat to make room. However, you mention the different offense. I don't view that as a pure negative. I view it as a positive in Bill O'Brien's coaching philosophy. How many people whined and complained about Kubiak trying to "square-peg" Keenum into his "round-hole" offense? For Keenum to have any chance to succeed, he needs to run something similar to his U of H spread offense. I liked the wide looks and screens that he threw to Martin last night. O'Brien didn't try to make Keenum play like Fitzpatrick, unlike Kubiak who tried to make him play like Matt Schaub. I hope the guy succeeds, despite some of his VY-like fan boys trashing any other QB for the Texans that takes air and space away from Case. I think Savage is way too raw and green, that Keenum will retain the #2 job, unless a hidden veteran talent that BOB likes becomes unexpectedly available.I don't like Keenum's prospects of making the team. It just seems that O'Brien isn't keen on Case. Similar to a girl saying "He's a really nice guy". Odd that when hes out there they run a completely different offense. I think Case is competing with FA QBs and those soon to be placed on waivers.
is there really an alternative to newton, or will they just have to plant cj over there until next year's draft?Excellent post. Gotta give Grimes credit where it's due even though Ive stated I like Blue better. Guy is playing his heart out. Ronnie Brown got hit in the backfield quite a bit.Duane Brown might be the most important player on offense. Let's hope we never have to see Newton at Left Tackls during the regular season. Having him start on the right side is bad enough.
Seems like CB Brandon Harris is on the bubble. If we carry 5 corners, I see Joseph, Jackson, Bouye, Hal being ahead of him for sure.
Grimes and Blue might prove to be a good 1-2 punch for WHEN, not if, Foster goes down.
Liked what I see from Clowney so far. I hope it continues.
Fitzpatrick will definitely earn the praise and hatred of the fanbase as he takes em through extreme highs and pitiful lows. Keenum probably got back his 2nd string job over Savage.
Refreshing to see some good plays on special teams for once.
The whole team played with great passion and it was a lot more fun to watch obviously. Seemed Clowney may have helped set the tone with back to back plays.
Ive seen more than enough of Derek Newton and Brandon Harris. Time to try someone else.
Are you referring to CJ Fiedorowitz? Yeah...there's not much behind Newton, unless Tyson Clabo and Will Yeatmon find the magical fountain of youth AND skills. Sadly, Newton is decent at run blocking, and I think BOB wants to pound the rock as much as possible. A good chunk of our picks this year seemed to indicate improving the run game. So it makes sense to glue CJ next to Newton as much as possible. He's already the biggest and best blocker of the 3 tight ends. Graham is mediocre at blocking, and Griffin is allegedly not picking up the playbook as well as others. I like CJ a lot, but his transformation into the uber poor-man's Gronk might have to wait a few seasons.is there really an alternative to newton, or will they just have to plant cj over there until next year's draft?Excellent post. Gotta give Grimes credit where it's due even though Ive stated I like Blue better. Guy is playing his heart out. Ronnie Brown got hit in the backfield quite a bit.The whole team played with great passion and it was a lot more fun to watch obviously. Seemed Clowney may have helped set the tone with back to back plays.Duane Brown might be the most important player on offense. Let's hope we never have to see Newton at Left Tackls during the regular season. Having him start on the right side is bad enough.
Seems like CB Brandon Harris is on the bubble. If we carry 5 corners, I see Joseph, Jackson, Bouye, Hal being ahead of him for sure.
Grimes and Blue might prove to be a good 1-2 punch for WHEN, not if, Foster goes down.
Liked what I see from Clowney so far. I hope it continues.
Fitzpatrick will definitely earn the praise and hatred of the fanbase as he takes em through extreme highs and pitiful lows. Keenum probably got back his 2nd string job over Savage.
Refreshing to see some good plays on special teams for once.
Ive seen more than enough of Derek Newton and Brandon Harris. Time to try someone else.
While I agree that taking care of their own would be good for their image as an organization, there appears to be a disconnect. There are basically two ways these contract negotiations work:If the Texans are the organization that "does things the right way" I really think they need to get JJ Watt signed to a new deal. He is one of, if not THE premier defensive players right now and he has outplayed his contract tremendously over the first three years of the contract. Consider that with his signing bonus and salary he has been paid just over $9 million in his first 3 years ($3 million per year on average). He will be paid $1.9 million this year, and will be paid $6.9 million next year since the Texans exercised the 5th year option. He could be franchised in his sixth year for probably around $10 million (if they do it based on 3-4 defense DE's) or $13 million (if it is based on all defensive ends). So on the high end the Texans could have Watt for 3 more years for $22 million without signing him to a long term deal ($7.3 million per year). If he has a career ending injury, he doesn't have the benefit of having received a big signing bonus up front. Besides the fact that he is extremely talented, he is also a workout warrior and is the right guy to have as the face of your team.
The Texans have hamstrung themselves with their cap management, first continually deferring money on Andre's salary, causing him to have a cap figure of $15 million this year, and second signing Cushing and Foster to big contracts at positions that are getting less and less of the big money contracts. I understand their cap issues, but not tying up Watt long term is just a black eye for an organization that considers itself the gold standard in how to run an organization.
I say figure out a way to get his contract done before this season to fit under this years cap. Treat a top player in the league like a top player in the league.
One last point: In the next CBA, the players need to change the rules regarding the fifth year option. I say if a team exercises the fifth year option then they lose the right to franchise that player in year 6 or they have to pay the player some amount to retain the right to franchise him in year 6.
Generally, I agree with what you are saying. And I think the biggest problem is what the players got in the CBA. Cutting the rookie pay grade was necessary because undeserving rookies who became busts were getting monies that should have gone to more deserving veterans. The 5th year team option is ridiculus for the players because the only way the team takes the option is if the player is far outplaying his contract. With the Franchise Tag, if you draft a stud first rounder who outplays his contract you can get that player for 6 years (like Watts case) without having to sign them to a huge second contract. That seems like too much of a players career, especially for players who are showing they deserve the money. I am sure there are lesser defensive ends who were drafted with Watt who will make more money than Watt over the first 6 years because they were able to sign a second contract before he did.While I agree that taking care of their own would be good for their image as an organization, there appears to be a disconnect. There are basically two ways these contract negotiations work:If the Texans are the organization that "does things the right way" I really think they need to get JJ Watt signed to a new deal. He is one of, if not THE premier defensive players right now and he has outplayed his contract tremendously over the first three years of the contract. Consider that with his signing bonus and salary he has been paid just over $9 million in his first 3 years ($3 million per year on average). He will be paid $1.9 million this year, and will be paid $6.9 million next year since the Texans exercised the 5th year option. He could be franchised in his sixth year for probably around $10 million (if they do it based on 3-4 defense DE's) or $13 million (if it is based on all defensive ends). So on the high end the Texans could have Watt for 3 more years for $22 million without signing him to a long term deal ($7.3 million per year). If he has a career ending injury, he doesn't have the benefit of having received a big signing bonus up front. Besides the fact that he is extremely talented, he is also a workout warrior and is the right guy to have as the face of your team.
The Texans have hamstrung themselves with their cap management, first continually deferring money on Andre's salary, causing him to have a cap figure of $15 million this year, and second signing Cushing and Foster to big contracts at positions that are getting less and less of the big money contracts. I understand their cap issues, but not tying up Watt long term is just a black eye for an organization that considers itself the gold standard in how to run an organization.
I say figure out a way to get his contract done before this season to fit under this years cap. Treat a top player in the league like a top player in the league.
One last point: In the next CBA, the players need to change the rules regarding the fifth year option. I say if a team exercises the fifth year option then they lose the right to franchise that player in year 6 or they have to pay the player some amount to retain the right to franchise him in year 6.
1) Play out the contract, get paid top dollar as a free agent
2) Tear up rookie contract early, take discounted contract
But it appears Watt wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He wants to immediately become the highest paid defensive player after 3 years on a 5 year deal.
The contracts signed by Patrick Peterson and Tyron Smith actually hurt Watt's case and squarely fit in category #2 above despite seeming like large contracts. These guys would certainly get paid more (and/or have more guaranteed money) if they waited a year or two. It would be fundamentally unwise to make Watt the highest paid defensive player two years before his rookie contract is up. It might seem like the right thing to do, but it would cripple the team.
Oh and Watt didn't choose to sign a 5 year deal. The CBA mandates a 4 year deal for 1st rounders with a 5th year team option. And I don't think he necessarily wants to become the top paid player. He wants to be paid like one of the top players which he has shown he is. He is a victim of the poor CBA the players negotiated.While I agree that taking care of their own would be good for their image as an organization, there appears to be a disconnect. There are basically two ways these contract negotiations work:If the Texans are the organization that "does things the right way" I really think they need to get JJ Watt signed to a new deal. He is one of, if not THE premier defensive players right now and he has outplayed his contract tremendously over the first three years of the contract. Consider that with his signing bonus and salary he has been paid just over $9 million in his first 3 years ($3 million per year on average). He will be paid $1.9 million this year, and will be paid $6.9 million next year since the Texans exercised the 5th year option. He could be franchised in his sixth year for probably around $10 million (if they do it based on 3-4 defense DE's) or $13 million (if it is based on all defensive ends). So on the high end the Texans could have Watt for 3 more years for $22 million without signing him to a long term deal ($7.3 million per year). If he has a career ending injury, he doesn't have the benefit of having received a big signing bonus up front. Besides the fact that he is extremely talented, he is also a workout warrior and is the right guy to have as the face of your team.
The Texans have hamstrung themselves with their cap management, first continually deferring money on Andre's salary, causing him to have a cap figure of $15 million this year, and second signing Cushing and Foster to big contracts at positions that are getting less and less of the big money contracts. I understand their cap issues, but not tying up Watt long term is just a black eye for an organization that considers itself the gold standard in how to run an organization.
I say figure out a way to get his contract done before this season to fit under this years cap. Treat a top player in the league like a top player in the league.
One last point: In the next CBA, the players need to change the rules regarding the fifth year option. I say if a team exercises the fifth year option then they lose the right to franchise that player in year 6 or they have to pay the player some amount to retain the right to franchise him in year 6.
1) Play out the contract, get paid top dollar as a free agent
2) Tear up rookie contract early, take discounted contract
But it appears Watt wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He wants to immediately become the highest paid defensive player after 3 years on a 5 year deal.
The contracts signed by Patrick Peterson and Tyron Smith actually hurt Watt's case and squarely fit in category #2 above despite seeming like large contracts. These guys would certainly get paid more (and/or have more guaranteed money) if they waited a year or two. It would be fundamentally unwise to make Watt the highest paid defensive player two years before his rookie contract is up. It might seem like the right thing to do, but it would cripple the team.
So what's your point? Those are the parameters for EVERYONE. Whether they are good or not is irrelevant. Saying "it's not fair" is not a good negotiation tactic. Those parameters are what they all have to work with. And negotiations work one of the two ways that I outlined. He's either going to have to take a nice, long deal like Tyron Smith or he's going to have to wait until his contract is up to get a sick deal. Teams can't afford to tear up rookie contracts and make guys the highest paid at their position. That's the whole allure of draft picks - they give you the opportunity to acquire good talent on the cheap. If you suddenly start paying them before their contracts expire, who is going to be on your team? There are 53 players and only $133 million in cap space. I think Joseph, Andre, and Schaub's contracts alone take up more than $33 million of this year's number, so you have to average less than $2 million per player for the rest of them. Levi Brown, Foster, and Cushing aren't cheap.Oh and Watt didn't choose to sign a 5 year deal. The CBA mandates a 4 year deal for 1st rounders with a 5th year team option. And I don't think he necessarily wants to become the top paid player. He wants to be paid like one of the top players which he has shown he is. He is a victim of the poor CBA the players negotiated.
You are right that the system is what the system is and right now that is what Watt has to work with. To be clear, I do not think he is saying it's not fair, I think he is only pointing out to the Media that he thinks he has earned better pay based on his play. His popularity is really the only negiotiating chip he has so he is trying to use this to move negotiations. He can't do anything about the current CBA but he can still do everything he can to try to get the Texans to redo his deal. You would do the same thing if you were at the top of your profession and other less qualified people were making more than you because of a contract that was in place before you entered the profession.So what's your point? Those are the parameters for EVERYONE. Whether they are good or not is irrelevant. Saying "it's not fair" is not a good negotiation tactic. Those parameters are what they all have to work with. And negotiations work one of the two ways that I outlined. He's either going to have to take a nice, long deal like Tyron Smith or he's going to have to wait until his contract is up to get a sick deal. Teams can't afford to tear up rookie contracts and make guys the highest paid at their position. That's the whole allure of draft picks - they give you the opportunity to acquire good talent on the cheap. If you suddenly start paying them before their contracts expire, who is going to be on your team? There are 53 players and only $133 million in cap space. I think Joseph, Andre, and Schaub's contracts alone take up more than $33 million of this year's number, so you have to average less than $2 million per player for the rest of them. Levi Brown, Foster, and Cushing aren't cheap.Oh and Watt didn't choose to sign a 5 year deal. The CBA mandates a 4 year deal for 1st rounders with a 5th year team option. And I don't think he necessarily wants to become the top paid player. He wants to be paid like one of the top players which he has shown he is. He is a victim of the poor CBA the players negotiated.
If the Texans are the organization that "does things the right way" I really think they need to get JJ Watt signed to a new deal.
The Texans have hamstrung themselves with their cap management, first continually deferring money on Andre's salary, causing him to have a cap figure of $15 million this year, and second signing Cushing and Foster to big contracts at positions that are getting less and less of the big money contracts.
Care to expand on your thoughts?Kool-Aid Larry said:dhockster said:If the Texans are the organization that "does things the right way" I really think they need to get JJ Watt signed to a new deal.
The Texans have hamstrung themselves with their cap management, first continually deferring money on Andre's salary, causing him to have a cap figure of $15 million this year, and second signing Cushing and Foster to big contracts at positions that are getting less and less of the big money contracts.![]()
I am a fan. I want the team to sign the right deal everytime. I want the team to sign my favorite player to a huge contract until he stinks and then I want them to cut him. I reserve the right to second guess everything. Geez... don't you know how to be a fan?my thoughts are that people love to complain.
when the texans repeatedly appease johnson with all these new deals you complain.
when they sign these other guys to new deals you complain.
now, you're complaining that they haven't done the exact same thing with watt.
I think the ghost of al davis should come visit you this xmas so you can learn the error of your ways.
My main point was I thought the Texans should reward their best player for playing great. My secondary point was that the Texans may have difficulty doing this because they have made some questionable cap decisions in the past.I thought being a fan meant rooting for your team -- not nitpicking the #### out of them
#excitementCJ Fiedorowicz with a TD. That guy can do everything. Zero problems catching the ball. #Texans
Via Arnie Stapleton of the Associated Press, Texans defensive end J.J. Watt and Broncos right tackle Chris Clark exchanged words during one-on-one drills, after Watt dominated Clark and Clark took a swipe at Watt, knocking his helmet off.
“Don’t get mad when you get beat,” Watt said to Clark.
Meanwhile, Texans safety D.J. Swearinger celebrated a little too loudly and proudly after intercepting Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning during 11-on-11 drills.
“I picked off Peyton today and I guess that got them a little chippy,” Swearinger said. “The offense did great, ran the ball down their throat, so, hey, I would get mad, too. That’s all it is: Players making plays and people getting mad.”
Coach Bill O’Brien downplayed the notion that lines were crossed.
“It was competition,” O’Brien told reporters. “I don’t really even know what you’re talking about. I really don’t. It was just a lot of good competition and I felt like it helped our team a lot, and I’m not speaking for the Broncos, but I know that competition helps everybody, so it was good.”
"I would say it’s pretty close," Texans' coach Bill O'Brien said today about the backup quarterback competition. "I think it’s pretty close. We’re discussing that right now. Both guys had good moments last night, but I think that Tom Savage definitely closed the gap, and it’s pretty close."
Savage and Case Keenum have spent the past several months competing to be the team's backup quarterback. Keenum has eight games of starting experience from last season, while Savage barely even has college experience upon which to call.
The natural conclusion was that Savage would have a lot of work to do before being ready to play in the NFL.
The natural conclusion was that Savage would have a lot of work to do before being ready to play in the NFL.
And while O'Brien cautioned against getting too carried away with what Savage did in the 74-yard touchdown drive he led Saturday night, he was clearly impressed.
"We broke the huddle, and as a young quarterback when the referee leans into the huddle and he winds the clock you’ve got to get going, so he probably could have called the play before the referee wound the clock," O'Brien said. "So he ended up calling the play and then having to break the huddle, and it involved some motion and shifting and things like that.
"... It wasn’t confusion as much as it was he had to get going, and I thought that he kept his poise there really well. He was able to motion, I believe it was [Travis] Labhart, and then make the correct protection point, and then make the right read, and then make the throw, which is a good thing to see for us for a rookie quarterback to be able to do that, so I thought he handled that situation well."
O'Brien was very happy with how he looked in the practices he participated in with the Broncos. He said he did not feel the need to start all his starters since they got in work against another team during the week.What's up with Foster, homers? I haven't seen much about why he was held out Saturday night, but I presume it was just that they didn't want to put him out there when he's coming off the hammy.
HOUSTON -- The Houston Texans' roster will have to be down to 75 by 4 p.m. ET/3 p.m. CT Tuesday. That will mean 13 actual cuts, because the Texans started with 89 on the roster and will place David Quessenberry on the non-football injury list.
And those cuts began Monday. According to the Houston Chronicle, the Texans have cut receiver Joe Adams, receiver Alec Lemon, guard Sam Longo, running back William Powell, nose tackle David Hunter, nose tackle Austin Brown, cornerback Junior Mertile, outside linebacker Terrance Lloyd and outside linebacker Lawrence Sidbury.
Those cuts happened before the Texans practiced late Monday morning, so the coaches got another look at the bottom of the roster before finishing that first round of cuts. They need to make four more to get down to 75.
If Keenum plays poorly, I don't think he will be one of the three. I think the Texans would likely sign a veteran QB cut from another team.Case Keenum will start the 4th preseason game. O'Brien has said the team will take 3 QBs into the regular season.
The Houston Texans waived LB Paul Hazel, OG Conor Boffeli and WR Anthony McClung Tuesday, Aug. 26.
Keenum has given the Texans no reason to keep him. If a decent back-up QB is cut, I think they will cut Keenum.If Keenum plays poorly, I don't think he will be one of the three. I think the Texans would likely sign a veteran QB cut from another team.Case Keenum will start the 4th preseason game. O'Brien has said the team will take 3 QBs into the regular season.
That's even more of an indictment against Keenum. he supposedly "knows" the system, and he is still this bad. I don't think any decent FA QB they sign could do worse than Case even with the fact that they don't know the system yet.Unfortunately the local fan support creates enough distraction for the team it is even extra reason to cut him. That's one thing I think the supporters of Tebow never understood, just how much their behavior hurt the very player they were supporting. Granted this is orders of magnitude less than Tebow. But when no other city in the NFL would have this level desire to see him as the QB, it's a pretty good sign the support is based in other than what he's showing on the NFL field so far.
Though with all the talk about O'brien wanting people who know the system and all, that might give Keenum an edge if other options are equal. Just that he's had a few months in the system now, while anyone else is coming in a blank slate. Should McGloin or Mallett become available though I would think he might jump at getting them at the expense of Case.
If it were based purely on his pre-season performances I would say it was extremely likely. But since Keenum and Savage have been so bad, it is not likely early in the season. If the Texans are out of it by week 11 or 12, I could definitelyWhat do you guys think the chances are that Fitzpatrick gets replaced at any point this season?
I think you summed the situation up well. I don't expect Fitzpatrick to play well enough that replacing him isn't looked at during the season. I'm just not sure there's much reason to think it's going to improve anything at this point. A poorly playing Fitzpatrick is probably still the best option unless you're looking at getting experience for a Savage, or Keenum, to see more of what you might or might not have in them.If it were based purely on his pre-season performances I would say it was extremely likely. But since Keenum and Savage have been so bad, it is not likely early in the season. If the Texans are out of it by week 11 or 12, I could definitelyWhat do you guys think the chances are that Fitzpatrick gets replaced at any point this season?
see Savage getting some late season starts to get some experience and for the Texans to see whether they need to go back into the draft for a future QB.
If the Texans cut Keenum, definitely keep an eye on whatever veteran they bring in to be back-up to assess whether they have any starting potential.
Labhart was released. I'd expect they will try to get him onto the practice squad.Martin will return Texans' punts and kicksHOUSTON -- Texans coach Bill O'Brien didn't announce a backup quarterback Friday, but he did resolve one competition.
Keshawn Martin will be the Texans' kick and punt returner this season.
"He’s done a good job," O'Brien said. "... He’s a guy that’s one of the most improved players on our team. He’s got to continue to go that way. He came back in training camp, whether it was his return ability or his play on offense, he’s done a really good job of taking what we coached him in the spring ... and come here and improved a lot."
O'Brien met with Martin after organized team activities (OTAs) to go over the ways in which he wanted to see him improve. Martin had plenty of struggles in both the return game and as a receiver last season, and had to fight his way onto the roster. By midway through training camp, Martin had clearly moved himself off the bubble.
He competed with Mike Thomas, Travis Labhart, EZ Nwachukwu, running back Dennis Johnson (released earlier this month) and DeVier Posey for those return roles. If you want to get really technical, starting cornerback Kareem Jackson took some returns during OTAs and training camp, but there was no reason to ever take those seriously.
Labhart was released today, but could be back for the practice squad if he clears waivers. Thomas will likely make the team as the slot receiver. No word on Nwachukwu just yet.