Okay, since you insist on remaining blissfully ignorant, here you go. I challenge you to refute any of this with documented facts that show otherwise:
Obama was born in Hawaii, but it wasn’t under the circumstances he invents in his book. Evidence demonstrates that Stanley Anne Dunham and Barack Obama, Sr were not married. That would explain why he can’t produce a birth certificate – he probably wasn’t born in a hospital (much less being born in 2 different hospitals, which is what he has claimed on different occasions). Therefore there was no filing for an official birth certificate. Children born out of wedlock were a disgrace for the parents, especially the mother, back then. That wouldn’t prevent a grandparent from calling the papers and making an announcement back then, however. And that certificate of live birth? Hawaii issues it to any resident upon request. And the designation of race: African on it is positively laughable. As is his statement that his father and grandfather hugged as his father left when he was 2 years old. Documentation shows conclusively that Stanley Anne Dunham left for college in Washington State with Obama a couple of weeks after he was born. His father was long gone by the time he was two. This would also explain why Obama has spent roughly 2 million dollars in legal fees in preventing people from uncovering his long form birth certificate rather than simply producing it when requested.
The above would also explain why two different independent investigators have found an identical SS number for Obama - a number issued by Connecticut, a state Obama or his family had never been in at the time of issuance. That SS number was actually issued sometime between 1977 and 1979 for someone who was born in 1890 and probably needed it for benefits. It isn’t unusual in the case of identity theft that a SS number like this is chosen – there is no one to challenge it, they have already passed on. This is also likely the reason why when one looks at Obama’s Federal Income tax return that the SS number is left blank rather than redacted.
Then we have the Western Kentucky professor who stated that he tried to look up Obama's birth certificate when he was an election official in Hawaii, and has stated that he found that such a birth certificate did not exist - a professor who has nothing to gain from the revelation and has used it to defend Obama from his attackers in his own peculiar way. Or the nine workers for the US Department of Education in Iowa who are indicted for accessing Obama's student loan records - each on separate occassions. I suppose the first found nothing at all revealing about Obama and the other 8 just had to break the law to take a look themselves...
We know Obama went to public school in Indonesia under the guidance of his adopted father, and attended as Barry Sotero. We also know without question that to attend Indonesian public schools that one had to be Muslim, and that religious education in the Muslim faith was part of Indonesian curriculum.
We know Obama went to Occidental college starting in 1979 and that he left for Columbia in 1981. Obama himself admits that he struggled in school, partied, and did not get good grades while at Occidental. Despite repeated requests, Obama will not release his admission forms or transcripts from Occidental, or his admission forms or transcripts from Columbia.
We know for a fact that Obama took a trip to Pakistan in 1981 – when Pakistan would not admit Americans into their country or accept American passports.
We know that Obama – despite getting an education with self-admitted mediocre credentials from a small liberal arts school like Occidental – was admitted to Ivy League school Columbia in 1981.
We know all about Obama’s seeking company with people like Bill Ayers – a fellow Alinskyite and former domestic terrorist, and his relationship for 2 decades with Jeremiah Wright, whom he chose for spiritual guidance for he and his family.
We know about Obama’s disdain for the middle class – his intentionally made public statements about the “bitter clingers” in the Midwest, those he named derisively as pathetically relying on their belief in Christianity as well as the Second Amendment when he spoke in San Francisco.
We know about Obama’s repeated public references to “shared prosperity”, and how income should be capped at a level he determines for any and all Americans.
We know about Michelle Obama reinforcing Obama’s disdain for America with her, “for the first time in her adult life she is proud of her country”. Obama shares her shame of America, as he showed so aptly in his whirlwind tour of Europe.
We know about Obama’s vision of this country – how he believes in the strong control by a Federal government (run by him, of course), how financial success should be capped and penalized in order to provide more for the less “fortunate”. We know he believes in governmental control of private businesses. He has demonstrated all this amply through numerous statements and examples.
We have seen his vision of health care created, and despite his alleged Constitutional scholarship he has placed this program directly in the face of Constitutional challenges – challenges that have every appearance of having sound basis and strong foundation. He enthusiastically supports a Federal government that mandates through strong-arm tactics that each and every citizen has to purchase a specific product or service under penalty of fine and/or jail for failure to do so – something that has never happened in the history of this country.
We know that Obama made the slip of “57 states” – a Muslim reference – when he was talking about campaigning in the US. He also publicly called America the world’s largest Muslim country while speaking in Europe. He has bowed before the Saudi royalty but he actively has publicly disrespected Netanyahu. He has done virtually nothing to impede the progress of Iran’s nuclear weapon program, which Iran has specifically stated they will use to destroy Israel.
We know that Obama refuses without exception to use the terms “radical” “Islamic” and “terrorist” strung together. Neither will any of his staff use that string of words in any form despite being cornered and questioned specifically at length about it. He has had any reference to those words strung together stricken from public records.
He has had his administration allow confessed Islamic terrorist leaders and active members – responsible for the direct death of thousands of Americans or attempting direct action that would result in the mass murder of numerous Americans - the same rights under United States law as US citizens, and wants to have showcase trials for them under criminal jurisdiction rather than using military tribunals – knowing full well what the course of the defense for these actions will be in a very public setting.
Now we see that he does not believe in State's Rights as specifically designated in the 14th Amendment, and has instead unleashed the Justice Department on Arizona despite Arizona's illegal immigration law being a virtual mirror of Federal immigration laws that he refuses to allow to be enforced.
*********************************************
Any one of these items by themselves would seem to be the workings of a crackpot, or a conspiracy theorist, and rightfully so I might add if they did indeed stand alone. But when you create an amalgam, the parameters change a bit – or they should to an impassionate rational viewpoint.
So there are your dots. Tell you what – you connect them and tell me what you come up with - unless of course you can prove them to have no foundation.
I’ll look forward to your conclusions either way.