What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Daryl Richardson Thread (3 Viewers)

Does anyone have a refined opinion on Daryl Richardson's role for 2013 and beyond?
He reminded me of a slower version of Chris Johnson(2009) last year when he got touches. Tough runner, nice burst, good vision, not afraid of contact. His production took a hit when Fisher decided to keep pounding with Jackson in the 2nd half of the year.Having been mentored for a year by a class act like Sjax and now that Sjax is gone, I see no reason why Richardson won't get first crack at the starting gig. It's his to lose in my opinion. However, nowadays the term "starter" means almost nothing for RBs other than who is in on the first play of the game. I think we can expect a split of the carries between Richardson/Pead/Stacy to look something like 13/8/6 per game. Then catches to be about 2.5/2/1 per game. My prediction for Richardson is RUSH: 200/1,000/6TD REC: 40/300/3TD
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DRich, Pead, and Stacy will be RBBC
It seems everyone agrees but I feel that one of the backs will separate to assume the lead back role.

Jeff Fisher has taken chances with troubled players in the draft but he cracks down on them, see last year's suspensions of two of his troubled rookies, so I would imagine Pead is squarely in Fisher's doghouse and will remain their even after his suspension is over.

I don't know what to expect of this year's late round rookie but Richardson isn't a rookie, he flashed big play potential last year, and he knows the system. I think you would have to assume he will begin as the lead back and opportunity is worthy plenty for any fantasy RB.

Anything can happen in camp and in the preseason but it seems right now that Daryl Richardson is in the driver's seat and if he starts the year as the primary back I think he can keep the lead back role.

I think now RB Daryl Richardson is the guy to have for the Rams.

 
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Clark Judge considers second-year RB Daryl Richardson the "favorite" to be the Rams' starting running back.
Judge doesn't appear to have any inside info here, reasoning Richardson is the front-runner only "because he's the only guy with a resume." In June, coach Jeff Fisher indicated the club envisions Richardson as a "space" player, which typically means a change-of-pace back -- how Richardson was used as a rookie. We believe Isaiah Pead and Zac Stacy both have better chances to start.


Source: CBS Sports
 
DRich, Pead, and Stacy will be RBBC
It seems everyone agrees but I feel that one of the backs will separate to assume the lead back role.Jeff Fisher has taken chances with troubled players in the draft but he cracks down on them, see last year's suspensions of two of his troubled rookies, so I would imagine Pead is squarely in Fisher's doghouse and will remain their even after his suspension is over.

I don't know what to expect of this year's late round rookie but Richardson isn't a rookie, he flashed big play potential last year, and he knows the system. I think you would have to assume he will begin as the lead back and opportunity is worthy plenty for any fantasy RB.

Anything can happen in camp and in the preseason but it seems right now that Daryl Richardson is in the driver's seat and if he starts the year as the primary back I think he can keep the lead back role.

I think now RB Daryl Richardson is the guy to have for the Rams.
i think you are referring to janoris jenkins and chris givens as the "troubled" rookies he cracked down on. they received one game suspensions. jenkins was arguably the top rookie DB, and broke or tied several league rookie records. givens led the team in receiving as a rookie, and also broke a league rookie record. both are incumbent starters. they weren't squarely in the doghouse and didn't remain so after the suspension was over. given this, it seems you could draw the opposite conclusion from the one you have.

there may be other reasons to not like pead (he didn't deal well with adversity, wasn't resilient, etc.), but i can't see how the examples used above fall into that category?

* imo there isn't a lot that can be assumed. richardson did have the advantage over pead of a full set of OTAs last year... this year will be a more level playing field.

BTW, we don't really need to speculate about this, fisher has already commented on it...

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/7491/isaiah-pead

"Coach Jeff Fisher says Isaiah Pead's one-game suspension will have no bearing on the Rams' running back competition."Not whatsoever," Fisher said Thursday. "He’s not going to be penalized as far as reps and carries during the preseason. We’re getting ready for a long haul, and we’ll be without him for one week, which we understand, but it doesn’t complicate things.""

i don't agree with the leap and inference rotoworld makes after this excerpt (in the link), that is again speculative... but going by fisher's on the record statements, it doesn't follow that pead has caused irreperable damage to his chances, and he has permanently been placed on the scrap heap.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Richardson is better then pead, just is. It was very obvious last season.

This is why he'll get most of the carries.

Pead failed miserably last year and other then his 2nd round selection I see no reason for hope he becomes anything more then hardesty. Now throw in he's already getting suspended, yuck.

Guys tend to hold value when a guy is drafted in the 1st two rounds and I can't say I blame anyone.

 
Richardson is better then pead, just is. It was very obvious last season.

This is why he'll get most of the carries.

Pead failed miserably last year and other then his 2nd round selection I see no reason for hope he becomes anything more then hardesty. Now throw in he's already getting suspended, yuck.

Guys tend to hold value when a guy is drafted in the 1st two rounds and I can't say I blame anyone.
but pead had only ten carries.

isn't that a pretty statistically small sample group to make a definitive conclusion that richardson "just is" better?

i can see the sense in which you meant pead failed miserably, but another interpretation is that he got behind, couldn't catch up, and never really received a chance... it isn't like he had a few hundred carries with a 3.0 YPC, and demonstrated that he doesn't have the ability to play at this level.

it is reasonable to think that because the coaching staff seemed to favor richardson over pead last year that they might this year, too - but the caveat is that richardson had the advantage of full set of OTAs over pead, which he doesn't this year.

i also wouldn't assume richardson will definitely get the bulk of the carries, as this completely ignores stacy... for all we know, he could emerge (and ganaway broke baylor rushing records, and is the one thumper on the roster of the presumed top four TBs, not counting the UFAs)...

 
Something that needs to be pointed out, again, because it doesn't seem to be sticking: Pead is getting suspended this season for a drug arrest from last offseason. Fisher has claimed that he wasn't happy with Pead last year but is more impressed with his offseason this year. The suspension means very little to Fisher.

 
Richardson is better then pead, just is. It was very obvious last season.

This is why he'll get most of the carries.

Pead failed miserably last year and other then his 2nd round selection I see no reason for hope he becomes anything more then hardesty. Now throw in he's already getting suspended, yuck.

Guys tend to hold value when a guy is drafted in the 1st two rounds and I can't say I blame anyone.
but pead had only ten carries.

isn't that a pretty statistically small sample group to make a definitive conclusion that richardson "just is" better?

i can see the sense in which you meant pead failed miserably, but another interpretation is that he got behind, couldn't catch up, and never really received a chance... it isn't like he had a few hundred carries with a 3.0 YPC, and demonstrated that he doesn't have the ability to play at this level.

it is reasonable to think that because the coaching staff seemed to favor richardson over pead last year that they might this year, too - but the caveat is that richardson had the advantage of full set of OTAs over pead, which he doesn't this year.

i also wouldn't assume richardson will definitely get the bulk of the carries, as this completely ignores stacy... for all we know, he could emerge (and ganaway broke baylor rushing records, and is the one thumper on the roster of the presumed top four TBs, not counting the UFAs)...
Richardson was actually hurt when training camp started last year and didn't enter the equation until relatively late.

http://www.thescore.com/nfl/articles/315923-daryl-richardson-news-richardson-hamstring-finally-got-on-the-practice-field-after-missing-the-first-week-and-a-half-of-camp-the-st-louis-post-dispatch-reports

You are right that Pead didn't have any opportunity last season, but the reason is because Richardson outshined him.

It's possible that things will change next year. Pead did get into a couple games late in the season. On the other hand, I can't think of too many cases where a rookie came in and clearly outplayed his fellow rookie competitor, only to be passed later on. With all of the examples that immediately come to mind, the player who looked good right away ended up being the better player long term (i.e. Mike Williams vs. Rejus Benn, Johnny Knox vs. Juaquin Iglesias, Stevan Ridley vs. Shane Vereen).

 
Richardson was actually hurt when training camp started last year and didn't enter the equation until relatively late.

http://www.thescore.com/nfl/articles/315923-daryl-richardson-news-richardson-hamstring-finally-got-on-the-practice-field-after-missing-the-first-week-and-a-half-of-camp-the-st-louis-post-dispatch-reports

You are right that Pead didn't have any opportunity last season, but the reason is because Richardson outshined him.

It's possible that things will change next year. Pead did get into a couple games late in the season. On the other hand, I can't think of too many cases where a rookie came in and clearly outplayed his fellow rookie competitor, only to be passed later on. With all of the examples that immediately come to mind, the player who looked good right away ended up being the better player long term (i.e. Mike Williams vs. Rejus Benn, Johnny Knox vs. Juaquin Iglesias, Stevan Ridley vs. Shane Vereen).
i wasn't aware richardson was hurt in OTAs, but i can still see how it might have conferred an advantage being at the OTAs that pead missed (mental reps, having the opportunity to pick the brains of coaches and vets in person and around the clock)... aside from that, the ability to transition from college to pro does seem variable... we can also think of examples of players that come immediately to mind that didn't set the world on fire as rookies, but turned out pretty well( C.J. spiller, for instance)...

i get that richardson presumably outplayed pead in practice (why else the disparity in reps and opportunity), but some seem to to be implying that this was the case in games, and 10 carries is an absurdly small sample to base a definitive conclusion on...

even if it is true that richardson did better than pead though both had little or no preparation through on field participation in OTAs, that doesn't necessarily mean that pead can't shine more brightly when both have full ability to participate in 2013 (maybe some players do better with less participation, others do better with more... probably some do better in both cases, but we don't know yet which categories pead falls into yet, that is the point)...

as to some of your examples, mike williams was known to be extremely talented, but fell due to character and off field red flags, so maybe it shouldn't have come as such a surprise that he has had a better career than benn... but i don't think that is exactly analogous with the richardson situation (was he generally thought of by scouts as potential 1st-2nd round talent before draft?)... sometimes a player gets off to a faster start, gets locked in, gets entrenched, and it becomes difficult for the other prospect to ever get a chance to even GET THE OPPORTUNITY to shine, even if they hypothetically had the ability... but again, i don't think richardson's rookie year was as spectacular at his position as williams was at his (if that were the case, richardson would be the entrenched starter, which he clearly isn't, based on information flowing from team). benn also had a torn ACL which didn't help his career, who knows if williams had one and benn didn't, their respective careers may not have unfolded in exactly the same way? that said, i did like williams better after rookie season, and i still do.

in case of ridley and vereen, they are different enough in terms of physical tools (ridley bigger body, belichick may prefer him to pound defenses, vereen has better hands, which may have led him to being cast in kevin faulk complementary/situational role) to render them not the most apt analogy, either... pead and richardson are pretty similar physically and as far as skill set (i know richardson was more explosive, and has better VJ, but they seem to have more in common that ridley and vereen).

not trying to come off as pead apologist, just think getting off to a slow start and being outplayed in practice doesn't mean he can't emerge this year...

if you were to assign odds to rams RB candidates starting, how would you break down richardson, pead, stacy and ganaway, that might be more constructive for others reading the thread.

and what will "starter" mean, or will it be a full blown RBBC?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barring injury, Richardson should get 1st crack and week 1 is Arizona 4.3ypc. Week 2 is ATL 4.8ypc and week 3 is Dallas at 4.5ypc. He needs to put up good numbers.

 
not trying to come off as pead apologist, just think getting off to a slow start and being outplayed in practice doesn't mean he can't emerge this year...if you were to assign odds to rams RB candidates starting, how would you break down richardson, pead, stacy and ganaway, that might be more constructive for others reading the thread.

and what will "starter" mean, or will it be a full blown RBBC?
There are lots of excuses for Pead. I'm more inclined to the Occam's razor way of doing things. The Rams staff clearly favored Richardson last year. That means Richardson was probably a lot more impressive in practice. If he was a lot more impressive in practice then he's probably the better talent. That's the simplest, most direct explanation.

I'm not quite ready to bury Pead, but he should be viewed as a longshot to become a viable starter or even the lead back here.

In terms of the odds, I don't think any one of these guys has obvious workhorse ability. I think we're looking at an ugly RBBC where there might not be a single back with over 200 carries. I'd peg Richardson as the favorite for the speed/quickness role and Stacy as the favorite for more of the thunder/power role.

Having said that, Fisher tends to pick a guy and give him most of the work. I'd actually peg Stacy as the most likely to get 250+ carries since he's the only guy here with conventional featured back size. I see Richardson as more of a COOP back indefinitely since he's only 192 pounds.

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back in the day Change of pace backs were just that(size didnt matter). This could repeat ala L.T. and Mike Turner and Cj2k and Lendale. No, the rams dont have players of their talent (probably) and none of them are likely to sniff any of those guys careers minus Lendale's. Todays ff conventional wisdom always reads "smaller equals less" and this is not always true. Not comparing weight either; i understand the slight weight gap between LT vs drich vs Cj2k..... Just saying what will happen. Daryl will get the lions share of the carries. 200-225 for Daryl, 85 for Stacy, maybe 75 for Pead and the rest is nonsense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
doombringer said:
Back in the day Change of pace backs were just that(size didnt matter). This could repeat ala L.T. and Mike Turner and Cj2k and Lendale. No, the rams dont have players of their talent (probably) and none of them are likely to sniff any of those guys careers minus Lendale's. Todays ff conventional wisdom always reads "smaller equals less" and this is not always true. Not comparing weight either; i understand the slight weight gap between LT vs drich vs Cj2k..... Just saying what will happen. Daryl will get the lions share of the carries. 200-225 for Daryl, 85 for Stacy, maybe 75 for Pead and the rest is nonsense.
LT was 220 as a rookie.

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.
It's not a matter of size to me - from what I've seen Pead has superior vision and change of direction. Richardson is more explosive and can turn the corner quicker so I expect him to be used a lot on the outside. I view Richardson as a complementary back but honestly I don't see any of these RB's getting 200 carries. All 3 have their strengths/weaknesses so I expect a true RBBC with none being a great fantasy option. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Stacy becoming the starter but he seems like he'll be stuck as a 15 carry guy in this offense.

 
doombringer said:
Daryl will get the lions share of the carries. 200-225 for Daryl, 85 for Stacy, maybe 75 for Pead and the rest is nonsense.
This is one of the possible outcomes for 2013. How many rushing attempts do you have Austin down for? Did you have this eat part of the outside runs or inside runs?

The way I see the Rams 2RB system working with Austin who I expect to have 30-60 rushing attempts.

For your low I see 380ra from the RB. Bradford had 37ra last season. Not a runner but I would still expect him to get 30-50ra. That would be at least 410ra which is how many they had in 2012. So are you expecting the Rams to run more than last season with the additional runs from Austin?

That is what I am expecting because they did not have a player in this role last season. Amendola had 2 runs Givens had 3. Most seem to think the Rams will pass the ball more than they were last season with Steven Jackson. I can see reasons for expecting that. However Jackson was an excellent pass protector and receiving option. Bradford talked about being uncomfortable with the pass protection with Jackson. I see reasons the Rams may not be throwing a lot more than last season though and why they might run more. I see the Rams adding a new role/weapon to their offense they did not have last season in Austin and I do expect him to get a significant amount of carries (more than 20 EOY)

What if Richardson, Pead and Austin are all competing for a similar outside running role in the offense though? Then that 200-225ra pie would get split in half or in 3rds of what you expect Richardson to get. The carries could look like 85-120 Richardson 75-100 Pead 40-65 Austin with the rest going to the inside RB.

Last season Steven Jackson got 263 carries to Richardson+Pead 108 This is an example of how they want to run a 2RB offense. I do think they have some misdirection plays in mind where they will intentionally be giving the defense an outside or inside look and then be able to run counters off of that. Mix personnel to help those counters and keep the defense guessing.

With the Titans and Fisher we have seen slightly more favor given to an outside change of pace RB in terms of draft picks invested. However until 1st round pick Chris Johnson broke out in his 2nd season there was always an inside RB to compliment him(and the worse versions of him preceding that) with White, Travis Henry, Antwain Smith. I will say this Fisher has not invested a high pick into a inside RB since White (2nd round) all of the other 2nd round and 1st round picks have been used on outside type runners.

I think there are 2 distinct roles/types of RB they want to have in those roles most of the time. I see those roles splitting the 350-400 RB carries (not counting Austin here) being split a number of ways.

275-300 outside RB 75-100 inside RB.

275-300 inside RB 75-100 outside RB.

175-200 inside RB 175-200 outside RB.

Because none of the RB are really established I expect something closer to the even split scenario between the 2 roles than I expect one RB to emerge as the feature RB.

Looking at the history of the OC with the Jets and Fisher with the Titans the inside RB role is much more likely to eclipse 250 carries than the outside role is. With the exception being Chris Johnson. I do not think Richardson is quite that good to get that type of workload, but he did outplay Pead in that role last season.

I am interested in the player who wins the inside running role, because I think that role is more likely to get starter carries in the offense than the outside RB role will.

I think Pead will compete for both the inside and outside running role but I do not think this is an area as well suited to his talent as outside runs such as the off tackle and outside zone runs are. I think it would be easier for him to earn a role as an outside RB as that seems to be his strength.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2nd-year RBs: Daryl Richardson

Evan Silva

This is Part 7 in my 10-Part Second-Year Running Back Series, using NFL Game Rewind to analyze each sophomore back's rookie-season tape. For the Lamar Miller, David Wilson, Bryce Brown, Vick Ballard, Bernard Pierce, and Ronnie Hillman writeups, click here:

Miller Link.
Wilson Link.
Brown Link.
Ballard Link.
Pierce Link.
Hillman Link.

Daryl Richardson

A little-known seventh-round pick out of Abilene Christian, Richardson outplayed more highly touted Rams second-rounder Isaiah Pead in training camp and entered his rookie year as the primary change-of-pace back for Steven Jackson. After a handful of early-season long runs, there were whispers Richardson might steal Jackson's job. (That may sound silly now, but it really did happen.) Richardson's usage faded down the stretch, earning 16 combined carries over the last five games. He averaged a paltry 1.53 YPC on his final 17 runs.

Earlier this offseason, I asked a high-ranking Rams official why Richardson's usage dwindled. He explained that the team simply wanted to get Jackson the football more in what they internally anticipated would be the all-time franchise rushing leader's final season with the organization.

The Rams' tailback job is now wide open to competition, with Richardson, Pead, and fifth-round pick Zac Stacy as the top three options. Richardson stands in at just 5-foot-10 and 192 pounds, and I want to know whether he has a realistic shot to be an NFL feature back. My opinion wavered on that topic while watching him play week to week as a rookie. So I took all day Tuesday to re-watch Richardson's 122 rookie-season touches. I emerged with the following thoughts:

One thing I've learned over the past several years is that watching a football player week to week in small doses -- like how change-up back Richardson was used -- provides a different perspective than watching him repetitively all at once. I think you get a much stronger feel for a player watching him over and over at a voluminous clip in one extended sitting. My opinion of Richardson as last season closed was less favorable than it is now. It's also possible I sort of subconsciously held Richardson's late-season usage reduction against him.

Following this one-fell-swoop review of his 122 touches, I think Richardson stands a legitimate chance to be the foundation of St. Louis' rushing attack, if given that opportunity. I think he can be a go-to, lead NFL runner in a spread-type offense the Rams are expected to implement this season.

So why was Richardson's late-season yards-per-carry average so low? It was 4.85 on the year, and 5.54 before those final 17 runs. On game tape, Richardson didn't look gassed or like he'd hit a rookie wall. He looked like the same player. I think a number of factors were at work. For one, the Rams played a murderer's row of stretch-run rush defenses, facing San Francisco, Tampa Bay, Minnesota, and Seattle at their place. The 17-run sample size was small. Injuries piled up on St. Louis' offensive line, which allowed a ton of backfield penetration. Richardson still flashed big-play ability on receptions and toss sweeps. He just didn't get any room to run on those final few carries.

Save arguably David Wilson, Daryl Richardson is the single most explosive second-year back I've reexamined for this series, superior in this area to Lamar Miller, Bryce Brown, Ronnie Hillman, and Bernard Pierce. He runs with urgency, high energy and suddenness, and displays outstanding first-step burst. Again, again, and again, Richardson's acceleration jumped off the screen. He has big-play speed both on inside runs and plays to the edge. Richardson consistently demonstrated natural explosion whenever his shoulder pads were pointed north-south or at a 45-degree angle. He routinely won footraces to the corner. Richardson runs with an incredible amount of juice.

What I found even more encouraging than Richardson's straight-ahead burst and speed was his toughness between the tackles. His sheer velocity on inside running plays was outstanding and extremely impressive for a back his size. Richardson never shied from contact and finished runs with authority. He kept his feet moving through traffic and consistently fell forward to max out plays.

While this all made Richardson an exciting watch, there were concerns. Fumbling is one of the most fixable running back flaws, but Richardson had rookie-year ball-security issues. He fumbled three times, losing two. The most critical lost ball came in clock-killing mode with St. Louis leading Washington 31-28 late in Week 2. The fumble almost cost the Rams the game. Richardson was inconsistent in pass protection, and it stood out more than once. I did think he showed plus receiving skills, securing the football with his hands rather than body and converting 24-of-26 (92.3 percent) catchable targets.

As a runner, Richardson lacks great balance, on several occasions slipping in the hole or behind the line of scrimmage before attempts at upfield cuts. This resulted in yards left on the field. Richardson's vision was shaky and somewhat unpredictable from snap to snap. I counted several plays on which a cutback lane was opened by his offensive line, but Richardson failed to identify. Again, he left too much yardage on the field.

If Richardson didn't diagnose an alley early in his rushing attempt, he sometimes got into trouble. I'd describe him as sudden and explosive, but not elusive. Richardson is not a shake-and-bake runner, and rarely made defenders outright miss. He ran into too many piles. And because of his size, Richardson did not break tackles with leg drive. He can run through arm tackles when sprung into space -- I saw him do this often, in fact -- but I wouldn't say he's a particularly effective after-contact-yardage back. He ran with toughs and physicality, but did not run with power.

Here were some comments on Richardson made by NFL Network's Mike Mayock during the Rams' Week 5 game against the Cardinals:

"I kinda like this kid. Seventh-round pick, not a lot of publicity generated about him. Richardson has consistently outplayed Isaiah Pead to the point where he's getting almost equal snaps in the backfield now with Steven Jackson. ... And he's a lot quicker than Steven Jackson is at this point in his career. He's got burst to him."

Whether it was Mayock, Gus Johnson, or Ian Eagle, I noticed announcing crews covering Rams games continuously mistake Richardson for Steven Jackson. I took this as a good sign for Richardson, and more evidence of his combination of burst, inside toughness, and rushing velocity.

An observation I recall making during the season -- when Richardson was operating as a pace-change back behind Jackson -- was that the Rams preferred using him on the perimeter as opposed to inside. While this reexamination did reconfirm Richardson’s frequent handling of screens, swings, off-tackle sprints, and stretch runs, the coaching staff certainly wasn't averse to letting Richardson attack opponents on interior handoffs. In my snap-by-snap chart of Richardson's 98 carries, I marked 55 (56.1 percent) as designed to travel inside. And whereas Bryce Brown and David Wilson were prone to run-bouncing outside, Richardson did a commendable job of staying inside on between-the-tackles runs, playing within the design of the offense.

My pre-draft analysis of Zac Stacy can be found at this link. And in this second-year running back series, I still have Isaiah Pead left to go. But while I fully acknowledge some (mostly correctable) flaws in his game, my preliminary conclusion after re-watching Richardson is that he will likely be the Rams' best backfield option in 2013. I'm changing my opinion of him and bumping him up my fantasy rankings.
 
2nd-year RBs: Daryl Richardson

Evan Silva

This is Part 7 in my 10-Part Second-Year Running Back Series, using NFL Game Rewind to analyze each sophomore back's rookie-season tape. For the Lamar Miller, David Wilson, Bryce Brown, Vick Ballard, Bernard Pierce, and Ronnie Hillman writeups, click here:

Miller Link.

Wilson Link.

Brown Link.

Ballard Link.

Pierce Link.

Hillman Link.

Daryl Richardson

Following this one-fell-swoop review of his 122 touches, I think Richardson stands a legitimate chance to be the foundation of St. Louis' rushing attack, if given that opportunity. I think he can be a go-to, lead NFL runner in a spread-type offense the Rams are expected to implement this season.

...

...

...

Save arguably David Wilson, Daryl Richardson is the single most explosive second-year back I've reexamined for this series, superior in this area to Lamar Miller, Bryce Brown, Ronnie Hillman, and Bernard Pierce. He runs with urgency, high energy and suddenness, and displays outstanding first-step burst. Again, again, and again, Richardson's acceleration jumped off the screen. He has big-play speed both on inside runs and plays to the edge. Richardson consistently demonstrated natural explosion whenever his shoulder pads were pointed north-south or at a 45-degree angle. He routinely won footraces to the corner. Richardson runs with an incredible amount of juice.

What I found even more encouraging than Richardson's straight-ahead burst and speed was his toughness between the tackles. His sheer velocity on inside running plays was outstanding and extremely impressive for a back his size. Richardson never shied from contact and finished runs with authority. He kept his feet moving through traffic and consistently fell forward to max out plays.

...

...

Here were some comments on Richardson made by NFL Network's Mike Mayock during the Rams' Week 5 game against the Cardinals:

"I kinda like this kid. Seventh-round pick, not a lot of publicity generated about him. Richardson has consistently outplayed Isaiah Pead to the point where he's getting almost equal snaps in the backfield now with Steven Jackson. ... And he's a lot quicker than Steven Jackson is at this point in his career. He's got burst to him."

Whether it was Mayock, Gus Johnson, or Ian Eagle, I noticed announcing crews covering Rams games continuously mistake Richardson for Steven Jackson. I took this as a good sign for Richardson, and more evidence of his combination of burst, inside toughness, and rushing velocity.

An observation I recall making during the season -- when Richardson was operating as a pace-change back behind Jackson -- was that the Rams preferred using him on the perimeter as opposed to inside. While this reexamination did reconfirm Richardson’s frequent handling of screens, swings, off-tackle sprints, and stretch runs, the coaching staff certainly wasn't averse to letting Richardson attack opponents on interior handoffs. In my snap-by-snap chart of Richardson's 98 carries, I marked 55 (56.1 percent) as designed to travel inside. And whereas Bryce Brown and David Wilson were prone to run-bouncing outside, Richardson did a commendable job of staying inside on between-the-tackles runs, playing within the design of the offense.

...
Yet Footballguys gurus continue to bash Richardson and still consider Pead the better choice.....go figure :rolleyes:

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.
It's not a matter of size to me - from what I've seen Pead has superior vision and change of direction. Richardson is more explosive and can turn the corner quicker so I expect him to be used a lot on the outside. I view Richardson as a complementary back but honestly I don't see any of these RB's getting 200 carries. All 3 have their strengths/weaknesses so I expect a true RBBC with none being a great fantasy option. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Stacy becoming the starter but he seems like he'll be stuck as a 15 carry guy in this offense.
I guess when Pead runs up his OL behind that really shows off that vision.

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.
It's not a matter of size to me - from what I've seen Pead has superior vision and change of direction. Richardson is more explosive and can turn the corner quicker so I expect him to be used a lot on the outside. I view Richardson as a complementary back but honestly I don't see any of these RB's getting 200 carries. All 3 have their strengths/weaknesses so I expect a true RBBC with none being a great fantasy option. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Stacy becoming the starter but he seems like he'll be stuck as a 15 carry guy in this offense.
I guess when Pead runs up his OL behind that really shows off that vision.
Watch more than a handful of carries

 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.
It's not a matter of size to me - from what I've seen Pead has superior vision and change of direction. Richardson is more explosive and can turn the corner quicker so I expect him to be used a lot on the outside. I view Richardson as a complementary back but honestly I don't see any of these RB's getting 200 carries. All 3 have their strengths/weaknesses so I expect a true RBBC with none being a great fantasy option. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Stacy becoming the starter but he seems like he'll be stuck as a 15 carry guy in this offense.
I guess when Pead runs up his OL behind that really shows off that vision.
Watch more than a handful of carries
He wasn't impressive at all.

 
The way I see the Rams 2RB system working with Austin who I expect to have 30-60 rushing attempts.
You think they want to expose a 170+ pound WR that they want to be a major part of their passing game to that kind of punishment?

I can see him lining up in the backfield, going out for passes - with perhaps a handful of carries sprinkled throughout the season.

 
The way I see the Rams 2RB system working with Austin who I expect to have 30-60 rushing attempts.
You think they want to expose a 170+ pound WR that they want to be a major part of their passing game to that kind of punishment?

I can see him lining up in the backfield, going out for passes - with perhaps a handful of carries sprinkled throughout the season.
End arounds, inside hand offs, stuff where he runs in space, but yeah, 60 seems really high. 30 does not. Two carries a game doesn't seem all that crazy. Is there that much difference between running the ball and catching short stuff over the middle with LB's lurking to take your head off? Welker is 5'9 and 185 lbs. Austin is 5'8 and 174 and way more elusive. I think his elusiveness and agility offset the 11 pounds.

 
2nd-year RBs: Daryl Richardson

Evan Silva

This is Part 7 in my 10-Part Second-Year Running Back Series, using NFL Game Rewind to analyze each sophomore back's rookie-season tape. For the Lamar Miller, David Wilson, Bryce Brown, Vick Ballard, Bernard Pierce, and Ronnie Hillman writeups, click here:

Miller Link.

Wilson Link.

Brown Link.

Ballard Link.

Pierce Link.

Hillman Link.

Daryl Richardson

Following this one-fell-swoop review of his 122 touches, I think Richardson stands a legitimate chance to be the foundation of St. Louis' rushing attack, if given that opportunity. I think he can be a go-to, lead NFL runner in a spread-type offense the Rams are expected to implement this season.

...

...

...

Save arguably David Wilson, Daryl Richardson is the single most explosive second-year back I've reexamined for this series, superior in this area to Lamar Miller, Bryce Brown, Ronnie Hillman, and Bernard Pierce. He runs with urgency, high energy and suddenness, and displays outstanding first-step burst. Again, again, and again, Richardson's acceleration jumped off the screen. He has big-play speed both on inside runs and plays to the edge. Richardson consistently demonstrated natural explosion whenever his shoulder pads were pointed north-south or at a 45-degree angle. He routinely won footraces to the corner. Richardson runs with an incredible amount of juice.

What I found even more encouraging than Richardson's straight-ahead burst and speed was his toughness between the tackles. His sheer velocity on inside running plays was outstanding and extremely impressive for a back his size. Richardson never shied from contact and finished runs with authority. He kept his feet moving through traffic and consistently fell forward to max out plays.

...

...

Here were some comments on Richardson made by NFL Network's Mike Mayock during the Rams' Week 5 game against the Cardinals:

"I kinda like this kid. Seventh-round pick, not a lot of publicity generated about him. Richardson has consistently outplayed Isaiah Pead to the point where he's getting almost equal snaps in the backfield now with Steven Jackson. ... And he's a lot quicker than Steven Jackson is at this point in his career. He's got burst to him."

Whether it was Mayock, Gus Johnson, or Ian Eagle, I noticed announcing crews covering Rams games continuously mistake Richardson for Steven Jackson. I took this as a good sign for Richardson, and more evidence of his combination of burst, inside toughness, and rushing velocity.

An observation I recall making during the season -- when Richardson was operating as a pace-change back behind Jackson -- was that the Rams preferred using him on the perimeter as opposed to inside. While this reexamination did reconfirm Richardson’s frequent handling of screens, swings, off-tackle sprints, and stretch runs, the coaching staff certainly wasn't averse to letting Richardson attack opponents on interior handoffs. In my snap-by-snap chart of Richardson's 98 carries, I marked 55 (56.1 percent) as designed to travel inside. And whereas Bryce Brown and David Wilson were prone to run-bouncing outside, Richardson did a commendable job of staying inside on between-the-tackles runs, playing within the design of the offense.

...
Yet Footballguys gurus continue to bash Richardson and still consider Pead the better choice.....go figure :rolleyes:
I think the article by Silva is a very good one. Keep in mind however that Silva is also the only source touting Pead as a possible starter. Sounds like he changed his mind?

I have not seen anyone here bashing Richardson. Pead yes, but not really Richardson.

eta- The claim by the coaches that they were giving Jackson more carries at the end of the season because they wanted to pad his career stats with the Rams is ridiculous. They were making a playoff push until they lost to the Vikings. They were playing Jackson more because he gave them the best chance to win, not because they cared about his career stats with the Rams.

Fisher has said he would have liked to have another year to work with Jackson.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JohnnyU said:
Vision6 said:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22610256/training-camp-preview-st-louis-rams

... Position battles

The departure of Steven Jackson means running back is wide open, with three inexperienced vets and one rookie competing for jobs. Daryl Richardson is the favorite, mostly because he's the only guy with a resume. As Jackson's understudy last season, he ran for 475 yards, averaged 4.8 yards per carry and demonstrated big-play capability. Isaiah Pead could push him, and the Rams would like that. But he was a huge disappointment as a rookie, with only 10 carries. That's not what the Rams were expecting from their second-round pick, nor is this: Pead must serve a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Nevertheless, look for him to compete with rookie Zac Stacy and journeyman Terrance Ganaway for carries in what could be a crowded, running-back-by-committee approach.
Footballguys view: Pead is going to miss the first game of the season due to a one-game suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Richardson is the most explosive back on the roster but may not be built to be a featured back. We'll see how much the team complements him with bigger backs like Pead or Stacy. Some feel Stacy is the best fit at the top of the depth chart because of his size, leg drive, and determination.
It seems the biggest knock against Richardson is his build and the biggest thing people are pointing to with Pead and Stacey is size. Richardson isn't a rookie like Stacey, he isn't facing a suspension nor does he have an abuse problem like Pead, he knows the system and he has produced which holds real value.

I'm not sure arguing size holds more value than proven veteran production.

Possibly if Stacey flashes or proves himself he wil earn more opportunities or if Pead overcomes his issues he will earn more confidence from the coaching staff but right now it seems Richardson is the guy in the drivers seat and he's been productive when he got opportunities last year so I think he could be an interesting guy this year.
Pead 5'10" 197, Richardson 5' 10" 195.....hmmmm...... I guess those 2 lbs gives him the edge, LOL.
It's not a matter of size to me - from what I've seen Pead has superior vision and change of direction. Richardson is more explosive and can turn the corner quicker so I expect him to be used a lot on the outside. I view Richardson as a complementary back but honestly I don't see any of these RB's getting 200 carries. All 3 have their strengths/weaknesses so I expect a true RBBC with none being a great fantasy option. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with Stacy becoming the starter but he seems like he'll be stuck as a 15 carry guy in this offense.
I guess when Pead runs up his OL behind that really shows off that vision.
Watch more than a handful of carries
He wasn't impressive at all.
No, he wasn't but he still averaged 5.4 YPC. However, Richardson was not impressive running inside either - I believe he was around 3.4 YPC on runs between the tackles. I don't think he can be 'the guy' but I'm avoiding the Rams running game since I'm doubtful anyone else will be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

The Rams list Daryl Richardson as their "projected starter" at running back heading into training camp.
It's only notable in that the Rams had to list someone on their training camp press release, and chose Richardson over Isaiah Pead and Zac Stacy. Momentum has been building for Richardson after Pead appeared to be the early favorite to replace Steven Jackson on early downs, but we're headed for a genuine camp battle. Pead is still the slight favorite despite his Week 1 suspension.

Related: Isaiah Pead, Zac Stacy

Source: stlouisrams.com
 
Any update from homers on how his camp and preseason is going?
Richardson is cleary the best RB in camp and preseason. Pead has looked like hell, Stacy hasn't done anything but sit on the trainers table and even less in games. Cunningham is a longshot, but someone to keep an eye on.

 
It might be good to talk about Richardson without getting into Pead and Stacy.

25 touches was a surprising lot of work last week - but the reality is his real value comes when he gets a breakaway TD, that will happen.

 
It might be good to talk about Richardson without getting into Pead and Stacy.

25 touches was a surprising lot of work last week - but the reality is his real value comes when he gets a breakaway TD, that will happen.
Assuming his foot is okay. The splits last week pre and post injury were startling and tell me something material did happen to his foot.

 
LawFitz said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
It might be good to talk about Richardson without getting into Pead and Stacy.

25 touches was a surprising lot of work last week - but the reality is his real value comes when he gets a breakaway TD, that will happen.
Assuming his foot is okay. The splits last week pre and post injury were startling and tell me something material did happen to his foot.
Solid run defense from the Cards last week, but they gave him a lot of touches. That's a good thing. But whether he can withstand that sort of beating is unknown. My bet is that he can't. Grabbing Stacy or Cunningham is a shark move in deep leagues.

 
Before he got his ankle taped, he looked fantastic. Big gains off screens and dump-offs, solid runs both up the middle and outside. After he came back in, he looked pretty poor running. Hope he's good for Sunday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Daryl Richardson has foot in a boot
by Michael Hurcomb | CBSSports.com
(4:14 pm ET) Rams running back Daryl Richardson, who was limited last week, had his injured foot in a boot Wednesday, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Richardson, who played Week 2, did not practice Wednesday as the team prepares for Week 3 at Dallas.
 
Rotoworld:

Daryl Richardson battled turf toe the entire 2013 season and points to that as one of the main reasons he struggled as a second-year pro.
Richardson suffered the injury in the season opener. It affected his push-off and made planting and cutting difficult. Richardson averaged just 3.1 YPC as a sophomore and didn't even dress for the final eight games. GM Les Snead remains confident Richardson can return to a prominent offensive role, but for now the Rams want Richardson to stay off his feet and let the toe heal.

Source: St Louis Post-Dispatch
 
Rotoworld:

Daryl Richardson battled turf toe the entire 2013 season and points to that as one of the main reasons he struggled as a second-year pro.

Richardson suffered the injury in the season opener. It affected his push-off and made planting and cutting difficult. Richardson averaged just 3.1 YPC as a sophomore and didn't even dress for the final eight games. GM Les Snead remains confident Richardson can return to a prominent offensive role, but for now the Rams want Richardson to stay off his feet and let the toe heal.

Source: St Louis Post-Dispatch
I must say, I was surprised by his flop this season. I definitely liked what I saw last year and was expecting big things from until Stacy was drafted. I really liked Stacy, and thought Stacy would eventually take the lead in a rbbc.
 
Not just Stacy but UFA Cunningham looked better. If they add a RB on day two or three, somebody isn't going to make the roster (could be Pead, but he played some special teams).

Part of his problem is he isn't that good in pass protection, which the team values a lot in their RBs.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top