What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Gay Mafia (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness.

Hope you see my point, if not, politely ask me to explain it to you, and I shall.
I hope you see my point when I put your first two sentences in context:

Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness. That classification began to be subjected to critical scrutiny in the research, which consistently failed to produce any empirical or scientific basis for regarding homosexuality as a disorder or abnormality. As a result of such accumulated research, professionals in medicine, mental health, and the behavioral and social sciences, opposing the classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, claimed the conclusion that it was inaccurate, and that the DSM classification reflected untested assumptions that were based on once-prevalent social norms and clinical impressions from unrepresentative samples which consisted of patients seeking therapy and individuals whose conduct brought them into the criminal justice system.[1]

Since the 1970s, the consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental health professions globally is that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexual orientation, while there remain those who maintain that it is a disorder.[2] In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975.[3] Thereafter other major mental health organizations followed and it was finally declassified by the World Health Organization in 1990. Consequently, while some still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder, the current research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, reflecting the official positions of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.
link
You missed my point.

You are trying to use a biased psychological opinion to argue your point ("The important point to remember is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals because they are not capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals, most often fixated, are attracted to children, not to men or women.")

Psychology once claimed homosexuality as a mental disease, and now it isn't. What changed, other than public anger towards the classification, which proves psychology is affected by whats popular in public opinion and can't be considered a reliable source to either prove or disprove your opinion, as public opinion isn't always factually correct.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness.

Hope you see my point, if not, politely ask me to explain it to you, and I shall.
I hope you see my point when I put your first two sentences in context:

Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness. That classification began to be subjected to critical scrutiny in the research, which consistently failed to produce any empirical or scientific basis for regarding homosexuality as a disorder or abnormality. As a result of such accumulated research, professionals in medicine, mental health, and the behavioral and social sciences, opposing the classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, claimed the conclusion that it was inaccurate, and that the DSM classification reflected untested assumptions that were based on once-prevalent social norms and clinical impressions from unrepresentative samples which consisted of patients seeking therapy and individuals whose conduct brought them into the criminal justice system.[1]

Since the 1970s, the consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental health professions globally is that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexual orientation, while there remain those who maintain that it is a disorder.[2] In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975.[3] Thereafter other major mental health organizations followed and it was finally declassified by the World Health Organization in 1990. Consequently, while some still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder, the current research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, reflecting the official positions of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.
link
You missed my point.You are trying to use a biased psychological opinion to argue your point ("The important point to remember is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals because they are not capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals, most often fixated, are attracted to children, not to men or women.")

Psychology once claimed homosexuality as a mental disease, and now it isn't. What changed, other than public anger towards the classification, which proves psychology is affected by whats popular in public opinion and can't be considered a reliable source to either prove or disprove your opinion, as public opinion isn't always factually correct.
I think you skipped the section on science and research.

 
Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness.

Hope you see my point, if not, politely ask me to explain it to you, and I shall.
I hope you see my point when I put your first two sentences in context:

Psychology was one of the first disciplines to study homosexuality as a discrete phenomenon. Prior to and throughout most of the 20th century, common standard psychology viewed homosexuality in terms of pathological models as a mental illness. That classification began to be subjected to critical scrutiny in the research, which consistently failed to produce any empirical or scientific basis for regarding homosexuality as a disorder or abnormality. As a result of such accumulated research, professionals in medicine, mental health, and the behavioral and social sciences, opposing the classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, claimed the conclusion that it was inaccurate, and that the DSM classification reflected untested assumptions that were based on once-prevalent social norms and clinical impressions from unrepresentative samples which consisted of patients seeking therapy and individuals whose conduct brought them into the criminal justice system.[1]

Since the 1970s, the consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental health professions globally is that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexual orientation, while there remain those who maintain that it is a disorder.[2] In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975.[3] Thereafter other major mental health organizations followed and it was finally declassified by the World Health Organization in 1990. Consequently, while some still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder, the current research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, reflecting the official positions of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.
link
You missed my point.You are trying to use a biased psychological opinion to argue your point ("The important point to remember is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals because they are not capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals, most often fixated, are attracted to children, not to men or women.")

Psychology once claimed homosexuality as a mental disease, and now it isn't. What changed, other than public anger towards the classification, which proves psychology is affected by whats popular in public opinion and can't be considered a reliable source to either prove or disprove your opinion, as public opinion isn't always factually correct.
I think you skipped the section on science and research.
research like this ? http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/

http://wizbangblog.com/2013/09/17/global-warming-experts-admit-we-lied/

 
Forget "science" and "research" please.

The whole of human sexuality can be described by Merriam Webster. Masters and Johnson could've saved themselves a whole lot of work if they'd have just picked up a dictionary.

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.

Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.
peer review can be biased too. Anything that has a human element can be biased and it is always wise to question research findings on that fact alone. Do you really not understand that concept?

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.
peer review can be biased too. Anything that has a human element can be biased and it is always wise to question research findings on that fact alone. Do you really not understand that concept?
You're right, we should stop doing research and just go with whatever we thought might be the right answer at first.
 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.
peer review can be biased too. Anything that has a human element can be biased and it is always wise to question research findings on that fact alone. Do you really not understand that concept?
You're right, we should stop doing research and just go with whatever we thought might be the right answer at first.
Nope, but we should be skeptical for sure

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.
peer review can be biased too. Anything that has a human element can be biased and it is always wise to question research findings on that fact alone. Do you really not understand that concept?
You're right, we should stop doing research and just go with whatever we thought might be the right answer at first.
Nope, but we should be skeptical for sure
No, I got your back. Earth is flat, homosexuality is a mental illness, disease should be treated with leeches. I'm on board.

 
I don't think the IPCC does much research on human sexuality, so... no.
Lol, you think IPCC is the only one to lie or mislead in their research for some kind of agenda ? Are you that naive my little pot smoking friend.Also, the trouble with psychology research is it can mislead you from the truth, just because you researched a subject doesn't mean you weren't collecting the research with a biased mindset that lead you into presenting the data in a way that is false.
I don't smoke pot, and I believe that's the point of peer review.
peer review can be biased too. Anything that has a human element can be biased and it is always wise to question research findings on that fact alone. Do you really not understand that concept?
You're right, we should stop doing research and just go with whatever we thought might be the right answer at first.
Nope, but we should be skeptical for sure
No, I got your back. Earth is flat, homosexuality is a mental illness, disease should be treated with leeches. I'm on board.
I never said the earth is flat, or homosexuality is a mental illness or any of those things. You just can't argue with logic, you argue with emotion, like a female

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting read from Nate Silver: How Rare Are Anti-Gay-Marriage Donations in Silicon Valley?

...

My purpose here is not to weigh in on the ethics of Eich’s resignation or the protests of his appointment (see Andrew Sullivan and Will Oremus for different views on those topics). But I can provide some context about just how unusual Eich’s financial support of Proposition 8 was in Silicon Valley.

Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote in 2008, although it was opposed by 56 percent of voters in Santa Clara County and 62 percent of voters in San Mateo County, which are the two most associated with Silicon Valley. However, technology companies have a reputation for being liberal or libertarian on social issues, even by California standards.
...
 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.

In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Sorry, the moron quota for this thread has already been filled. Please take your theories elsewhere.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Sorry, the moron quota for this thread has already been filled. Please take your theories elsewhere.
Sickest part of the gay agenda, you have to agree 100% with them or you get labeled a bigot.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Sorry, the moron quota for this thread has already been filled. Please take your theories elsewhere.
Sickest part of the gay agenda, you have to agree 100% with them or you get labeled a bigot.
Pretty sure I labeled you a moron there.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Sorry, the moron quota for this thread has already been filled. Please take your theories elsewhere.
Sickest part of the gay agenda, you have to agree 100% with them or you get labeled a bigot.
Pretty sure I labeled you a moron there.
The irony being I'm actually trying to contribute to discussion, you're just hurling insults.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Your videos make more sense now. At what age do you believe you were emasculated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Sorry, the moron quota for this thread has already been filled. Please take your theories elsewhere.
Sickest part of the gay agenda, you have to agree 100% with them or you get labeled a bigot.
Pretty sure I labeled you a moron there.
The irony being I'm actually trying to contribute to discussion, you're just hurling insults.
:shrug:

Dance with who brung ya.

 
I would like to officially register my shock in finding out that johnjohn rejects science.
But what it science doesn't confirm what you already believe? What then, smart guy?
Guys, stop. It's obviously stupid to even try. Now go get me a torch, I think my neighbor is a witch.
Is her name Samantha or Sabrina? :excited:
Angelique.
Burn her anyway!

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.

Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
If only there were homosexuality in previous generations, we might be able to disprove this theory.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
If only there were homosexuality in previous generations, we might be able to disprove this theory.
I'm not saying it's the direct cause, rather that humans are programmable; open to suggestion. Our social norms are developed based on environment.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.

Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
Um, you are aware that most gay men were not raised that way. And how do you explain gay men who are not effeminate?

 
It's not 'wrong' to be gay, there's really no inmoral lifestyle choice so long as no one else is harmed.

But the modern homosexual lifestyle is completely manmade. If this were a million years ago, all men would be clawing to bang women.

You're not going to convince me that after millions of years of your family line, that you're special and aren't attracted to women.

You might make the conscious choice to take a #### because in 2014 your primal needs of survival are taken care of, but biologically you are programmed to pursue women.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
Um, you are aware that most gay men were not raised that way. And how do you explain gay men who are not effeminate?
It was an example to set up the extreme. Not all dogs are Chihuahuas; not all gays are effeminate.Feminization is a gateway to homosexuality is what I'm suggesting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
If only there were homosexuality in previous generations, we might be able to disprove this theory.
I'm not saying it's the direct cause, rather that humans are programmable; open to suggestion. Our social norms are developed based on environment.
Sexual (gender) preference is not a "social norm", dip-####.

And think of the millions of homosexuals that were raised to be straight. Did that work?

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
If only there were homosexuality in previous generations, we might be able to disprove this theory.
I'm not saying it's the direct cause, rather that humans are programmable; open to suggestion. Our social norms are developed based on environment.
Sexual (gender) preference is not a "social norm", dip-####.

And think of the millions of homosexuals that were raised to be straight. Did that work?
It's not? Why is it that homosexuality was considered normal by Spartans than?

Men have a g-spot in their ### they can derive pleasure from. If some rules thousands of years ago didn't place a taboo on honosexuality, it could have potentially grown into a social norm.

 
Gay sheep exist in roughly the same percentage as gay humans. Is that because sheep culture isn't tough enough these days and all the rams have been emasculated?

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
Your videos make more sense now. At what age do you believe you were emasculated?
Key word: Believe.

 
So john, do you believe homosexuality is a mental illness?
Behavioral disorder.In my opinion, everyone is bisexual we are attracted to people. However, modern homosexuality is a result of the emasculation of men.

We're not taught to be rugged and hardworking. Instead we're being taught to be fabulous!
I like to think you're smarter than this.
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
If only there were homosexuality in previous generations, we might be able to disprove this theory.
I'm not saying it's the direct cause, rather that humans are programmable; open to suggestion. Our social norms are developed based on environment.
Sexual (gender) preference is not a "social norm", dip-####.

And think of the millions of homosexuals that were raised to be straight. Did that work?
It's not? Why is it that homosexuality was considered normal by Spartans than?

Men have a g-spot in their ### they can derive pleasure from. If some rules thousands of years ago didn't place a taboo on honosexuality, it could have potentially grown into a social norm.
:lmao: Never mind. I forgot who I was replying to.

 
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
Um, you are aware that most gay men were not raised that way. And how do you explain gay men who are not effeminate?
It was an example to set up the extreme. Not all dogs are Chihuahuas; not all gays are effeminate.Feminization is a gateway to homosexuality is what I'm suggesting.
The Chihuahaus/dogs analogy makes no sense. And feminization as a gateway to homosexuality does still not explain gay men who are not effeminate.

And speaking of dogs, homosexual behavior among animals including dogs, dolphins, penguins, ducks (also fish and reptiles) has been well documented. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior and I doubt you suggest that animals that exhibit gay behavior have been feminized in their culture.

 
Gay sheep exist in roughly the same percentage as gay humans. Is that because sheep culture isn't tough enough these days and all the rams have been emasculated?
Sheep are irrelevant, the better question is to determine whether or not the % of the homosexual population is growing.

 
It's not? Why is it that homosexuality was considered normal by Spartans than?

Men have a g-spot in their ### they can derive pleasure from. If some rules thousands of years ago didn't place a taboo on honosexuality, it could have potentially grown into a social norm.
Ironic that the next post in the thread was from Spartans Rule

 
I'm suggesting if you raised a boy as a girl and reinforced the idea that he was supposed to be attracted to other men, that this boy would grow up an effeminate homosexual.Take this idea, soften it up and apply it to a generation of kids who grow up watching the idiot box.
Um, you are aware that most gay men were not raised that way. And how do you explain gay men who are not effeminate?
It was an example to set up the extreme. Not all dogs are Chihuahuas; not all gays are effeminate.Feminization is a gateway to homosexuality is what I'm suggesting.
The Chihuahaus/dogs analogy makes no sense. And feminization as a gateway to homosexuality does still not explain gay men who are not effeminate.

And speaking of dogs, homosexual behavior among animals including dogs, dolphins, penguins, ducks (also fish and reptiles) has been well documented. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior and I doubt you suggest that animals that exhibit gay behavior have been feminized in their culture.
It makes perfect sense. I never said that all homosexuals are men that were feminized. That would be like saying all dogs were Chihuahuas.

As stated before, I think all humans are bisexual. Therefore it comes to no surprise that some animals get freaky with members of the same sex.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top