Paper Tiger
Footballguy
In a .5 ppr, 12 team league, who realistically would be the elite choice as a RB2? For me it's Marshawn Lynch, followed closely by Fred Jackson. Thoughts...
Lynch is going late 1st/early 2nd in a lot of leagues. I would say he is not an RB2. I like Michael Turner as an RB2 this year. He has the upside to make RB1 numbers many weeks. The .5 PPR won't make a huge difference but i would get an RB1 who will reel in some catches to offset Turner just a bit.In a .5 ppr, 12 team league, who realistically would be the elite choice as a RB2? For me it's Marshawn Lynch, followed closely by Fred Jackson. Thoughts...
I think he was talking about guys who most people veiw as 2nd tier not guys who can be had in the 2nd atleast thats the way I took it. I do think McFadden could fall into that area because he has high upside but because of injuries nobody wants him as their 1. My guy would be Matthews I see him having a huge year with no Tolbert to take away Td's.Depends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a fewQB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
Those are more like rb3/flex guys. I think Helu is the only one with a realistic chance of being more and I don't trust Shanahan.Starks, Helu, Ridley/Vereen are who I would target after I addressed other spots early
Actually the Bengals have already said that him and Scott will be a RBBC, and Leonard will get most of the 3rd downs. Not to mention Herron might get some action.If am lucky enough to draft a top RB early in the 1st in a PPR (and for the most part that is what I play), I would feel comfortable going very deep into the RB2s to grab my RB2...I think both Green-Ellis and Shonn Greene will outperform their draft spot, and while you may not get RB1 numbers from them, the final points between RB12 and RB16-18 are usually pretty close. I just like those two because they have zero competition (as of today) and have teams that are (or will be) committing to the run.
Anybody who has to share a backslash with another guy in the backfield is not somebody you want as a starter.Starks, Helu, Ridley/Vereen are who I would target after I addressed other spots early
Agreed. Beanie, Isaac Redman and Ridley are mine.For me the ideal RB2 has consistent if unsexy production with the upside of a RB1. That rules out more guys than youd think.
So you're going RB-RB?I'll be the first one to say Matt Forte
I agree with this it is the other way around for a RB2, he is usually inconsistent and has those 130 yards and 3 touchdown games, then next week it is 54 yards and nothing else. Beanie Wells, Shonn Greene, Deangelo Williams, Ahmad Bradshaw. All come to mind from last year when I think of a RB2.For me the ideal RB2 has consistent if unsexy production with the upside of a RB1. That rules out more guys than youd think.
Be fair, if they went Megatron first, then Charles second, they might get between 3.01 and 3.04So you're going RB-RB?I'll be the first one to say Matt Forte
got burned by him last year.. not too confident in him this yeartook him in the 3rd or 4th round alst year and feltDepends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a few
QB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?
Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
This is the answer.May not get crazy carries, and you have to worry about the feet, but he'll get TDs and he'll get catches. Could wind up scoring like a low-end RB1 if he remains relatively healthy.Ahmad Bradshaw
what makes you say that?For me it's demarco Murray. I haven't been this excited about a cowboy running back since emmitt was in his prime. The offensive line is better this year, the receivers are top tier, the defense will be better & Garrett likes him. Felix jones is no more than a back up. This kid is set to take off. He'll catch a lot of balls as well. It's all up to health. If healthy, he's a rb1 that can be had in the late 2nd round.
I like this approach Joey...I'd love to take McGahee in the 6-7th as my RB3/flex, then snag Hillman in the 9-10th...it may be early to grab a handcuff that early, but Hillman can turn into fantasy gold later in the season...for those that really dare to wait on an RB2 later in the draft while shoring up the other positions, you could go McGahee in the 6th and then Hillman in the 10th as insurance.Similar ADPs for a Wells/Williams combo in AZ.As I typed the above, I realized I couldn't see myself being happy with either suggestion but just throwing it out there looking at the latest ADP #s![]()
Hillman? No way with John Fox as the coach. He errors on the side of the veterans and he's not going to let him passpro Manning.'49er fan said:I like this approach Joey...I'd love to take McGahee in the 6-7th as my RB3/flex, then snag Hillman in the 9-10th...it may be early to grab a handcuff that early, but Hillman can turn into fantasy gold later in the season...'joey said:for those that really dare to wait on an RB2 later in the draft while shoring up the other positions, you could go McGahee in the 6th and then Hillman in the 10th as insurance.Similar ADPs for a Wells/Williams combo in AZ.As I typed the above, I realized I couldn't see myself being happy with either suggestion but just throwing it out there looking at the latest ADP #s![]()
What coachesvsay before training camp is nearly meaningless.Actually the Bengals have already said that him and Scott will be a RBBC, and Leonard will get most of the 3rd downs. Not to mention Herron might get some action.If am lucky enough to draft a top RB early in the 1st in a PPR (and for the most part that is what I play), I would feel comfortable going very deep into the RB2s to grab my RB2...I think both Green-Ellis and Shonn Greene will outperform their draft spot, and while you may not get RB1 numbers from them, the final points between RB12 and RB16-18 are usually pretty close. I just like those two because they have zero competition (as of today) and have teams that are (or will be) committing to the run.
If you take away the game where the Jets played 7 or 8 DBs all game, BJGE is around a 3.0 YPC. That's with the Pats' explosive passing game. Now he goes to the Bengals, where he will face legit defenses( both in terms of defenders in the box and Steelers/Ravens), and receive less chances around GL, I don't see why anyone would draft BJGE. Better options will be available on WWWhat coachesvsay before training camp is nearly meaningless.Actually the Bengals have already said that him and Scott will be a RBBC, and Leonard will get most of the 3rd downs. Not to mention Herron might get some action.If am lucky enough to draft a top RB early in the 1st in a PPR (and for the most part that is what I play), I would feel comfortable going very deep into the RB2s to grab my RB2...I think both Green-Ellis and Shonn Greene will outperform their draft spot, and while you may not get RB1 numbers from them, the final points between RB12 and RB16-18 are usually pretty close. I just like those two because they have zero competition (as of today) and have teams that are (or will be) committing to the run.
Haha who sees Mathews as 2nd tier? Top 5 RB in most rankings.I think he was talking about guys who most people veiw as 2nd tier not guys who can be had in the 2nd atleast thats the way I took it. I do think McFadden could fall into that area because he has high upside but because of injuries nobody wants him as their 1. My guy would be Matthews I see him having a huge year with no Tolbert to take away Td's.Depends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a fewQB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
You don't understand tiers...most people consider Foster/McCoy/Rice the first tier and the second tier would include Mathews. 2nd Tier still means RB1. It just means there's more questions about those players than the ones in the first tier.Haha who sees Mathews as 2nd tier? Top 5 RB in most rankings.I think he was talking about guys who most people veiw as 2nd tier not guys who can be had in the 2nd atleast thats the way I took it. I do think McFadden could fall into that area because he has high upside but because of injuries nobody wants him as their 1. My guy would be Matthews I see him having a huge year with no Tolbert to take away Td's.Depends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a fewQB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
And you don't understand the original post (asking who is the best RB2) and his reply (saying mathews would be his pick for that)You don't understand tiers...most people consider Foster/McCoy/Rice the first tier and the second tier would include Mathews. 2nd Tier still means RB1. It just means there's more questions about those players than the ones in the first tier.Haha who sees Mathews as 2nd tier? Top 5 RB in most rankings.I think he was talking about guys who most people veiw as 2nd tier not guys who can be had in the 2nd atleast thats the way I took it. I do think McFadden could fall into that area because he has high upside but because of injuries nobody wants him as their 1. My guy would be Matthews I see him having a huge year with no Tolbert to take away Td's.Depends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a fewQB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
What part did I not understand the original post? I was just explaining Nagle's post. I was explaining that Nagle considers RB2 to mean Tier 2, which could still mean a round 1 RB. Did I say I agree with that? No. Your reply asked "who sees Mathews as 2nd tier?" so I explained that many people see him as a 2nd tier RB, which could still mean a top 5 RB.And you don't understand the original post (asking who is the best RB2) and his reply (saying mathews would be his pick for that)You don't understand tiers...most people consider Foster/McCoy/Rice the first tier and the second tier would include Mathews. 2nd Tier still means RB1. It just means there's more questions about those players than the ones in the first tier.Haha who sees Mathews as 2nd tier? Top 5 RB in most rankings.I think he was talking about guys who most people veiw as 2nd tier not guys who can be had in the 2nd atleast thats the way I took it. I do think McFadden could fall into that area because he has high upside but because of injuries nobody wants him as their 1. My guy would be Matthews I see him having a huge year with no Tolbert to take away Td's.Depends on where your 2nd rd. pick falls. If its around the turnaround, and a fewQB's and a TE come off the board, maybe you luck into Chris Johnson?Doubtful but someone slips every year. I got Ray Rice and McFadden 10th and 14 last season
Agree. The Bengals have been talking RBBC for years now and it hasn't even come close to happening. Personally, I'll be less surprised with Scott getting cut than him seeing a big chunk of the carries. Dan Herron? Yeesh. BJGE would have to play completely awful to not be a workhorse this year IMO and even then I'm not sure what they'd do.What coachesvsay before training camp is nearly meaningless.Actually the Bengals have already said that him and Scott will be a RBBC, and Leonard will get most of the 3rd downs. Not to mention Herron might get some action.If am lucky enough to draft a top RB early in the 1st in a PPR (and for the most part that is what I play), I would feel comfortable going very deep into the RB2s to grab my RB2...I think both Green-Ellis and Shonn Greene will outperform their draft spot, and while you may not get RB1 numbers from them, the final points between RB12 and RB16-18 are usually pretty close. I just like those two because they have zero competition (as of today) and have teams that are (or will be) committing to the run.
Id just hand cuff Toby Gerhart to Peterson, the early season schedule is cup cake easy and he did great as a fill in last year, caught alot of passes tooFred Jackson or Adrian Peterson.Jackson is likely to fall into the late second or early third.IF Peterson falls then pick up Blount/Hightower/McGahee in the later rounds to cover for Peterson until he is back.
I like Gerhart regardless if I get ADP. His upside is tied to ADP's health obviously, but he still has a higher ceiling than anyone else you're getting RB4/5.Id just hand cuff Toby Gerhart to Peterson, the early season schedule is cup cake easy and he did great as a fill in last year, caught alot of passes tooFred Jackson or Adrian Peterson.Jackson is likely to fall into the late second or early third.IF Peterson falls then pick up Blount/Hightower/McGahee in the later rounds to cover for Peterson until he is back.
I don't disagree with a RB/RB strategy, especially with WR being so deep, but it just seems like you could throw a dart at the RBs with ADPs after round six and find solid production. There is a plethora of players there that could match or exceed what SJAX, Lynch, or Sproles might give you in round 2 where you could be drafting Fitzgerald or Jennings instead of a RB.I don't see McFadden making it to the second round.Sjax and sproles were the first to come to mind for me. Also if you are drafting at the end of the first round and DMC or lynch falls to your second pick, it would be really hard to pass up. Who said going rb rb is a thing of the past?
He is completely awful. He'll be exposed outside of the Pats' O this yearAgree. The Bengals have been talking RBBC for years now and it hasn't even come close to happening. Personally, I'll be less surprised with Scott getting cut than him seeing a big chunk of the carries. Dan Herron? Yeesh. BJGE would have to play completely awful to not be a workhorse this year IMO and even then I'm not sure what they'd do.What coachesvsay before training camp is nearly meaningless.Actually the Bengals have already said that him and Scott will be a RBBC, and Leonard will get most of the 3rd downs. Not to mention Herron might get some action.If am lucky enough to draft a top RB early in the 1st in a PPR (and for the most part that is what I play), I would feel comfortable going very deep into the RB2s to grab my RB2...I think both Green-Ellis and Shonn Greene will outperform their draft spot, and while you may not get RB1 numbers from them, the final points between RB12 and RB16-18 are usually pretty close. I just like those two because they have zero competition (as of today) and have teams that are (or will be) committing to the run.
The only reason I didn't bring up Gerhart is because if AP is playing he has no value. The other guys I brought up can fill in on bye weeks and if your top RB goes down for a short time.I like Gerhart regardless if I get ADP. His upside is tied to ADP's health obviously, but he still has a higher ceiling than anyone else you're getting RB4/5.Id just hand cuff Toby Gerhart to Peterson, the early season schedule is cup cake easy and he did great as a fill in last year, caught alot of passes tooFred Jackson or Adrian Peterson.Jackson is likely to fall into the late second or early third.IF Peterson falls then pick up Blount/Hightower/McGahee in the later rounds to cover for Peterson until he is back.
'Coeur de Lion said:Don't think you're crazy at all. That's exactly my take on it. 500 team RB carries is reasonable assuming the backfield doesn't fall apart. 250 Hillis (including goal-line), 200 Charles (10 / game early, his pre-injury 15 / game late), 50 McCluster / other.IMO Hillis is at least even money to outscore Charles straight up over the year as whole; when you factor in the huge difference in ADP Hillis is a slam dunk value-wise.'Stinkin Ref said:saw on rotoworld or something that KC has talked about 500 rushing attempts this year....if they approach that number Hillis should be very involved...I am a huge KC fan....and I know this may seem crazy...but I think Hillis could end up with more touches (piece of the rushing attempts pie + receptions) than Charles...factor in the possibility that he may get some goal line love and while
Charles still may have good numbers, I wouldn't be surprised if Hillis is the more productive back week in and week out and ends up being the one you want to own of the two....especially at their ADP....
I worry more about players' effectiveness in the year immediately after a big injury than most. Charles and Peterson are still going in the borderline RB1 / RB2 range, which seems risky to me.