What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Jake Locker Hype Train (1 Viewer)

Locker looked pedestrian, but to be honest, Washington isn't very good except for a couple of players. Take Locker out, and they're a 2-3 win team. They're a 7-8 win team with him.

NU looked really good as well, and there are some NFL players on that defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Problem is, he seems to be the same exact guy that he has always been: a great athlete with ho-hum QB skills. There has been no apparent development in his pocket presence, poise, accuracy, or decision making. This is his fourth season playing college football. At what point do you stop making excuses and start to accept the possibility that his passing ability might never grow to an NFL starter level? It's a long season and this will probably prove to be his low point, but right now he's looking more like the next Tarvaris Jackson than the next Steve Young.
Today was his 15th game in a pro-style offense. Don't forget it.
 
Accuracy and footwork were a big mess today, wasn't helped by the early drops though. I stopped watching when it got out of hand because obviously at that point all you're going to do is throw, makes evaluating difficult. I haven't watched as much of him as I'd like but will from here out. Curious to see how much he develops as the year goes on because it's obvious the potential's still there.

 
I'm not sure if that's a good excuse. A lot of the great ones seem to "get it" instantly. Guys like Bradford, Rodgers, and Roethlisberger pretty much dominated as soon as they stepped on the field in college. If you're a 4th year senior and you're a first round caliber QB, you should dominate against NCAA competition. Locker still looks like a guy who's trying to find his way.

 
If Tebow is a first-round pick, Locker is. I don't think he's more of a project than Tebow.

"Pedestrian" is a good term to describe him. Worse than not evolving, he doesn't have the natural explosiveness this season. Maybe he's over-thinking it. Too much pressure to "evolve" because that's why he stayed. Maybe he'll look better if he starts playing to win the game. Enjoying the game. He seems to be carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders.

I think the pendulum on Locker is going to swing too far after this game (Jevan Snead????).

And don't be shocked if Nebraska is playing for the national championship. This is a really good team.

 
Does the result of this one game have to be one of two options?a) Future #1 pick in NFL draft.b) Completely sucks.Isn't there some form of middle ground here? And isn't it possible this singular game will not totally determine his future one way or the other?
In Fairness it could say how good Nebraska's D is...
 
Has any top-5 college quarterback EVER done as poorly as Locker did today? Ever?

The guy is supposed to be the #1 pick in the draft and he just went 4-for20.

 
Locker is nowhere close to NFL ready...he's going to be a "project" much like Tebow. He wont start in the NFL for at least 3 years IMHO.

 
Maybe Sarkasian should stop taking cheap shots at his former players and focus on coaching up his current ones.

 
Except for the few on this board, I really hate Seahawk fans. You guys are fair weather fans, and nothing is ever good enough for you guys.

Jake Locker is overrated and this talk about drafting him or that he will be the first QB drafted is complete bull####....

That is all. :rolleyes:

 
:thumbup: for 2012

(Seriously, though, I'm with ya 100%. The Locker hype train has been a massive joke. Locker will be another run-first/spread-option quarterback failure in the NFL. I just hope that a team doesn't spend a 1st round pick on him.)

 
Locker will be another run-first/spread-option quarterback failure in the NFL.
Are you sure? Wouldn't he have to have played in a spread offense for this to be true? I hate to break it to you, but he's never played in a spread offense. WTF are you talking about?That said, I wouldn't be surprised to see him slip out of the first round. It happens to lots of prospects. He's played one full year in a pro-style offense. He's had several big games, and one embarrassingly bad game. You have to know that the QB that he might be in five years is not the quarterback that he is now. Further, is all this "he's awesome" vs "he sucks" talk necessary? How about, "he's a prospect". Time will tell.To the original poster, there aren't many Seatte fans that post on this board. I'm one of the few. I object to you painting me with your broad brush. I'm as objective as they get. I criticize there failures just as often as I praise their success. Feel free to click on my profile, search my posts, and point out the first inkling of homerism that you see from me.
 
Crazy talk. A miserable game against a superior opponent and he's not even a first rounder any more?
He may not be a first rounder. I've never seen him step into a throw knowing he was going to get thumped, but I have seen him lean back and sail passes over and over in the same situations. On a positive note, he's doing a better job of throwing balls away and dialing up a new one instead of taking horrendous sacks trying to extend a play.
 
Except for the few on this board, I really hate Seahawk fans. You guys are fair weather fans, and nothing is ever good enough for you guys.

Jake Locker is overrated and this talk about drafting him or that he will be the first QB drafted is complete bull####....

That is all. :rant:
:confused: :rolleyes: Haven't the Seahawks only won 1 game in the last 200,324? And yet they sell-out the stadium every single game for the last...well, for as long as they have had Seahawks stadium. Also, the Seahawks home is known as one of the hardest places to play and the loudest outdoor stadium in the country. I'm not sure how this all equals "fairwheather fans?"

I'm just confused all the way around...

As for Jake Locker, to the original poster, you're as bad as the Jake Locker fan boys. What's the difference to them saying he is going to be the best player in NFL history to your hyperbole ridden rant? They are the same emotional over-reaction except in opposite directions. One is brought on my nuthugging love while the other (yours) is brought about by HATE, pure HATE. No difference. The reality is that Jake Locker has every single physical component necessary to become a great quarterback. Does he have the mental aspects necessary? I'm not sure, no one actually knows, since he is still like 21 years old. QB's take more time to mature than any other position, so in fact, he can become the best in history, just like he can become a massive bust. He did make a huge advancement coming into last year, the change of being under Sark for 1 year was obvious to anyone willing to look. Coming into this year however i see no advancement at all. All is not lost, he still has plenty of time and all the tools. We will see.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Crazy talk. A miserable game against a superior opponent and he's not even a first rounder any more?
He may not be a first rounder. I've never seen him step into a throw knowing he was going to get thumped, but I have seen him lean back and sail passes over and over in the same situations. On a positive note, he's doing a better job of throwing balls away and dialing up a new one instead of taking horrendous sacks trying to extend a play.
I'm more of a casual college football fan these days, so I'll defer to you guys, but I'd be blown away if the guy who has been #1 on Kiper's and the majority of draft boards suddenly falls off the 1st round map altogether. Even after the Nebraska debacle, Kiper has him at #4 overall.We'll see. :confused:
 
Except for the few on this board, I really hate Seahawk fans. You guys are fair weather fans, and nothing is ever good enough for you guys.Jake Locker is overrated and this talk about drafting him or that he will be the first QB drafted is complete bull####....That is all. :confused:
Newsflash: It's not just coffee swilling fans who think Shaun Alexander is still on the team who have Locker as a 1st rounder. Objective thoughts: I think he's got a long way to go before he's a NFL QB, and his question marks/issues are, in my opinion, the most important parts of being a QB - decision making and accuracy. I'd love to see him step into more throws and stop floating the ball high, too. But, the kid was basically a RB in HS and had Ty Willingham as his QB for his first few years. Someone mentioned "Go Jake Go" in one of these other threads. He's basically in year 2 of being a real QB. He's got great intangibles, and works his ### off. Writing him off at this point in time is as silly as crowning his ###. The fact is that he isn't a finished product, we just don't know what he's going to be, and anybody who claims they know one way or the other is just pulling crap out of their backside.Subjective thoughts: I'd love it if the 'hawks got him with their first pick, but I full well realize that's the irrational UW alum/lifetime hawk fan in me. If we pass over a QB with more prototypical skills like Luck or Mallet, I'll be mildly annoyed. If they're all off the board, I'd love to see it. I like rooting for him, and I like that he came back for his senior year, and I hope it doesn't cost him too much scratch. If he did end up getting it and turning into what his potential is, him doing it in Seattle would be a treat for a city that's been bent over a barrel and whipped with a chainsaw for the last few years.
 
Except for the few on this board, I really hate Seahawk fans. You guys are fair weather fans, and nothing is ever good enough for you guys.

Jake Locker is overrated and this talk about drafting him or that he will be the first QB drafted is complete bull####....

That is all. :rant:
:confused: :rolleyes: Haven't the Seahawks only won 1 game in the last 200,324? And yet they sell-out the stadium every single game for the last...well, for as long as they have had Seahawks stadium. Also, the Seahawks home is known as one of the hardest places to play and the loudest outdoor stadium in the country. I'm not sure how this all equals "fairwheather fans?"

I'm just confused all the way around...
Yes, they've sold out every game played in Qwest Field. Yes, they are the loudest and quite proud of it. Since moving in Qwest they take great pride in leading the NFL in visiting teams false start penalties. The 12th man is alive an well. However, northwest sports fans are the definition of fair-weather fans. When a team is rolling, local support flourishes. This is true in both baseball and football. It was true in basketball as well. That was so true that after a few losing seasons most fans really didn't care when the team moved to Oklahoma city. Yes, fans around here are as fair-weather as it gets.To be fair, people in the Puget Sound area generally frown on people that define their local identity through professional sports. We have a lot going for us around here beyond sports. This area is really defined by the "outdoorsy" types. Hiking, biking, camping, fishing, skiing (both snow and water) are what sells in this area. I'm not sure how to define it properly without using too broad a brush, but coffee and microbrews are way more important around here than Seahawk victories. IMO there is a lot of truth in what he is saying.

 
Locker was 4/20 for 71 yards (45 yard completion, two 10-yarders and a 6-yarder) with 1 TD and 2 INTs against Nebraska.

Jevan Snead was supposed to be a first round pick, too.

 
Objective thoughts: I think he's got a long way to go before he's a NFL QB, and his question marks/issues are, in my opinion, the most important parts of being a QB - decision making and accuracy. I'd love to see him step into more throws and stop floating the ball high, too. But, the kid was basically a RB in HS and had Ty Willingham as his QB for his first few years. Someone mentioned "Go Jake Go" in one of these other threads. He's basically in year 2 of being a real QB. He's got great intangibles, and works his ### off. Writing him off at this point in time is as silly as crowning his ###.
I really question the amount of slack that people are willing to cut young QBs who appear to have "tremendous upside" on the basis of their physical talent. You say Locker has only been a real QB for two years. He has been a QB since high school. This is his fourth year on campus at Washington. While I realize that their coaching hasn't always been tremendous, I find it hard to believe that Willingham's staff didn't introduced him to concepts like throwing mechanics and progressions. That's basic stuff that any self-respecting high school QB coach will preach to his kids. And yet here we are 5-6 years after Locker first emerged as a blue chip high school QB prospect, still wondering when he'll put the puzzle together.

How many years does someone need to play QB before we can expect him to start doing the things that a QB is supposed to do? How long is it reasonable to wait for potential to become production? 2-3 years from now if he's still struggling, will we still hear the same excuses? When can we finally pull the plug and finally say, "You know, maybe he's just a great quarterback."

I don't know the exact answer, but I think Denny Green was onto something when he said, "They are who we thought they were." Kyle Boller, Charlie Whitehurst, and Josh McCown are great physical specimens at the QB position. They look like a QB is supposed to look. They're big guys wiith above average mobility who can chuck the ball a mile. But you know what? They're not good quarterbacks. For the most part, they never have been. Their production has never matched their alleged upside.

In college Derek Anderson was a big, statuesque pocket passer who would have been a brilliant prospect if only he could have improved his accuracy and cut down on the interceptions. Fast forward a few years. After a fluke season with the Browns in which he pieced together a handful of good games, everyone suddenly thought Derek Anderson was a franchise QB. Well...not so fast. A few years later he's the same exact guy he was at Oregon State: a big INT-machine with terrible accuracy.

My philosophy with QBs is that what you see is what you get. Look at what these guys did in their first seasons as NCAA starters:

Aaron Rodgers - 61.6% completions, 8.3 yards/attempt, 19 TD, 5 INT, 147 QB rating

Mark Sanchez - 65.8% completions, 8.8 yards/attempt, 34 TD, 10 INT, 165 QB rating

Sam Bradford - 69.5% completions, 9.2 yards/attempt, 36 TD, 8 INT, 177 QB rating

These guys basically fell out of the crib and dominated. Call it coaching. Call it scheme. Call it situation.

I call it ability. If you're an NFL QB in college, you're supposed to dominate. So what if your coaching isn't great and your teammates are mediocre? You're playing against amateurs, 95% of whom will never start an NFL game. If you can't find a way to get it done, I don't like your chances in the NFL where everyone on the field is as good as the best players you faced in college.

Locker did okay in 2009. 58.2% completions, 7.0 yards/attempt, 21 TD, 11 INT, 130 QB rating. That's not awful, but it's not up to snuff with what you expect to see from an elite passer. I think he's closer to a Charlie Whitehurst/Stephen McGee/Kevin O'Connell than a Aaron Rodgers/Mark Sanchez/Sam Bradford. He's not a guy you draft in the first round. He's a guy you take in the middle rounds as a developmental backup with the hope that you can correct his bad habits.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought we already had a Locker thread? :confused:

In any event, putting aside the uninformed and almost repugnant start to this thread, I certainly don't think Locker is heading toward 1st round consideration. He's looked terrible. But, to be fair, a lot of us aren't surprised by that. :rolleyes:

 
Except for the few on this board, I really hate Seahawk fans. You guys are fair weather fans, and nothing is ever good enough for you guys.Jake Locker is overrated and this talk about drafting him or that he will be the first QB drafted is complete bull####....That is all. :confused:
GTFO, you are a fair weather fan. I didn't see anyone but myself defending Pete Carroll.
 
Objective thoughts: I think he's got a long way to go before he's a NFL QB, and his question marks/issues are, in my opinion, the most important parts of being a QB - decision making and accuracy. I'd love to see him step into more throws and stop floating the ball high, too. But, the kid was basically a RB in HS and had Ty Willingham as his QB for his first few years. Someone mentioned "Go Jake Go" in one of these other threads. He's basically in year 2 of being a real QB. He's got great intangibles, and works his ### off. Writing him off at this point in time is as silly as crowning his ###.
I really question the amount of slack that people are willing to cut young QBs who appear to have "tremendous upside" on the basis of their physical talent.
I really question people who write long diatribes on the internet. I said I don't think Locker isn't an NFL QB yet. I don't know if he'll get there. You, apparently, don't think he will, and that's fine. :shrug:
 
Objective thoughts: I think he's got a long way to go before he's a NFL QB, and his question marks/issues are, in my opinion, the most important parts of being a QB - decision making and accuracy. I'd love to see him step into more throws and stop floating the ball high, too. But, the kid was basically a RB in HS and had Ty Willingham as his QB for his first few years. Someone mentioned "Go Jake Go" in one of these other threads. He's basically in year 2 of being a real QB. He's got great intangibles, and works his ### off. Writing him off at this point in time is as silly as crowning his ###.
I really question the amount of slack that people are willing to cut young QBs who appear to have "tremendous upside" on the basis of their physical talent.
I really question people who write long diatribes on the internet. I said I don't think Locker isn't an NFL QB yet. I don't know if he'll get there. You, apparently, don't think he will, and that's fine. :wub:
:lmao: Watching people jockey for position so that they can have verifiable evidence of their wicked smart football knowledge is sort of silly. I'm not directing this at you, EBF. I appreciate you sharing your opinion. I just see it a lot and wonder what the point is.

 
Crazy talk. A miserable game against a superior opponent and he's not even a first rounder any more?
The problem is that he has miserable games every other week. And yes you can make excuses because Washington sucks so bad that every opponent can legally be described as "superior", but a true NFL prospect would find a way to elevate his own game even against the best competition. Jay Cutler played for a team that was as bad as the Huskies and yet he put up superior stats.Are we going to give Locker a pass for the entire season because every one of his opponents is superior?? He damn well better put up 5 TD and 500 yards against Washington State, then.

 
Objective thoughts: I think he's got a long way to go before he's a NFL QB, and his question marks/issues are, in my opinion, the most important parts of being a QB - decision making and accuracy. I'd love to see him step into more throws and stop floating the ball high, too. But, the kid was basically a RB in HS and had Ty Willingham as his QB for his first few years. Someone mentioned "Go Jake Go" in one of these other threads. He's basically in year 2 of being a real QB. He's got great intangibles, and works his ### off. Writing him off at this point in time is as silly as crowning his ###.
I really question the amount of slack that people are willing to cut young QBs who appear to have "tremendous upside" on the basis of their physical talent.
I really question people who write long diatribes on the internet. I said I don't think Locker isn't an NFL QB yet. I don't know if he'll get there. You, apparently, don't think he will, and that's fine. :wall:
Diatribe?? :lmao: That looks like a well thought out and statistically supported argument. He may be right, he may be wrong, but amid the sea of crap that gets posted around here, that is the kind of stuff I come here for. :shrug:
 
Locker will be another run-first/spread-option quarterback failure in the NFL.
Are you sure? Wouldn't he have to have played in a spread offense for this to be true? I hate to break it to you, but he's never played in a spread offense. WTF are you talking about?That said, I wouldn't be surprised to see him slip out of the first round. It happens to lots of prospects. He's played one full year in a pro-style offense. He's had several big games, and one embarrassingly bad game. You have to know that the QB that he might be in five years is not the quarterback that he is now. Further, is all this "he's awesome" vs "he sucks" talk necessary? How about, "he's a prospect". Time will tell.

To the original poster, there aren't many Seatte fans that post on this board. I'm one of the few. I object to you painting me with your broad brush. I'm as objective as they get. I criticize there failures just as often as I praise their success. Feel free to click on my profile, search my posts, and point out the first inkling of homerism that you see from me.
Please re-read the first few words of my post.

Thanks

 
Ryan Leaf starter kit
From a character standpoint Leaf and Locker are polar opposites. Further, they had a very different skill set. Leaf was a much taller stationary pocket passer. Locker is more of an average height and vastly more athletic. This was a nice try at a one-liner, but sadly it fails miserably from just about every angle.
 
Ryan Leaf starter kit
From a character standpoint Leaf and Locker are polar opposites. Further, they had a very different skill set. Leaf was a much taller stationary pocket passer. Locker is more of an average height and vastly more athletic. This was a nice try at a one-liner, but sadly it fails miserably from just about every angle.
yeah more of a vince young starter kit
 
Ryan Leaf starter kit
From a character standpoint Leaf and Locker are polar opposites. Further, they had a very different skill set. Leaf was a much taller stationary pocket passer. Locker is more of an average height and vastly more athletic. This was a nice try at a one-liner, but sadly it fails miserably from just about every angle.
yeah more of a vince young J.P. Losman starter kit
 
Pedestrian performance vs. Arizona State.
Agreed. He had a few opportunities to step into a throw and take a hit, but I saw him backing away from it preventing him from being able to put more on the throw. I understand this isn't a "natural" thing to do, but IMO its one the things I look for in assessing an potential NFL QB.ASU game planned well to take away his ability to run. Huskies attempted several running plays just for Locker, but they went nowhere.On a positive note I think he delivered one of his best deep balls I've ever seen down the right sideline to WR J Kearse, but it was dropped. Ball was dropped perfectly into a small window. Kearse may have had one of his worst games ever with multiple drops.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ryan Leaf starter kit
From a character standpoint Leaf and Locker are polar opposites. Further, they had a very different skill set. Leaf was a much taller stationary pocket passer. Locker is more of an average height and vastly more athletic. This was a nice try at a one-liner, but sadly it fails miserably from just about every angle.
yeah more of a vince young J.P. Losman starter kit
I'll vote twice for this one. Locker is looking more and more like a Losman clone.
 
Are we just supposed to delete the USC game from our memories?
Did he really do that much in one game to erase all the memories of the other games he's played this season? I think any and all Husky fans should adjust expectations and enjoy the rest of this season accordingly; perhaps Jake will give us a few more memories to hold onto. I've mentioned it before and it was half tongue in cheek, but I'm thinking more and more that Jake takes a stab at a career in baseball at some point. It may not be right away and it may come only after giving the NFL a real go, but I just don't see him making the adjustments necessary; I could see him adjusting to playing on a baseball diamond though.As far as PAC 10 QB's go, Locker is realistically middle of the pack in terms of production and NFL translatable skills. He is most definitely behind Luck and Foles (both JR's), but when all is said and done a few other current starters in the league may sneak past him. He should have left after last year.
 
Are we just supposed to delete the USC game from our memories?
Did he really do that much in one game to erase all the memories of the other games he's played this season? I think any and all Husky fans should adjust expectations and enjoy the rest of this season accordingly; perhaps Jake will give us a few more memories to hold onto. I've mentioned it before and it was half tongue in cheek, but I'm thinking more and more that Jake takes a stab at a career in baseball at some point. It may not be right away and it may come only after giving the NFL a real go, but I just don't see him making the adjustments necessary; I could see him adjusting to playing on a baseball diamond though.As far as PAC 10 QB's go, Locker is realistically middle of the pack in terms of production and NFL translatable skills. He is most definitely behind Luck and Foles (both JR's), but when all is said and done a few other current starters in the league may sneak past him. He should have left after last year.
just curious - why should I believe your assessment of Locker more than say... just about every NFL scout and talent evaluator? No seriously, what is is that you see that they don't or rather that you don't see that they do?ETA: full discosure: I'm a WSU grad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are we just supposed to delete the USC game from our memories?
Did he really do that much in one game to erase all the memories of the other games he's played this season? I think any and all Husky fans should adjust expectations and enjoy the rest of this season accordingly; perhaps Jake will give us a few more memories to hold onto. I've mentioned it before and it was half tongue in cheek, but I'm thinking more and more that Jake takes a stab at a career in baseball at some point. It may not be right away and it may come only after giving the NFL a real go, but I just don't see him making the adjustments necessary; I could see him adjusting to playing on a baseball diamond though.As far as PAC 10 QB's go, Locker is realistically middle of the pack in terms of production and NFL translatable skills. He is most definitely behind Luck and Foles (both JR's), but when all is said and done a few other current starters in the league may sneak past him. He should have left after last year.
just curious - why should I believe your assessment of Locker more than say... just about every NFL scout and talent evaluator? No seriously, what is is that you see that they don't or rather that you don't see that they do?ETA: full discosure: I'm a WSU grad.
I think you're basing your statement on what NFL scouts and talent evaluators said BEFORE this season. I would be dumbfounded if many of them are still riding that bandwagon.
 
I think you're basing your statement on what NFL scouts and talent evaluators said BEFORE this season. I would be dumbfounded if many of them are still riding that bandwagon.
He was #4 overall on Kiper's big board last week. He's currently #5 overall on Scout's Inc's Top 32.Locker's demise is waaaaaaaaaaay overblown on this board.
 
I think you're basing your statement on what NFL scouts and talent evaluators said BEFORE this season. I would be dumbfounded if many of them are still riding that bandwagon.
He was #4 overall on Kiper's big board last week. He's currently #5 overall on Scout's Inc's Top 32.Locker's demise is waaaaaaaaaaay overblown on this board.
:confused: Not much of a drop at all for the guys who get paid to evaluate pro value.
 
I think you're basing your statement on what NFL scouts and talent evaluators said BEFORE this season. I would be dumbfounded if many of them are still riding that bandwagon.
He was #4 overall on Kiper's big board last week. He's currently #5 overall on Scout's Inc's Top 32.Locker's demise is waaaaaaaaaaay overblown on this board.
TGunz, you know as well as I do that Kiper and Scouts are glacial with that sort of thing, and when the season winds down they do wholesale adjustments after speaking to the "real" NFL scouts and evaluators.Either way, I don't think it's going out on a limb to say that Locker is no longer in the hunt for the top pick or the top QB slot. Considering Denver took Tebow in the 1st round, I wouldn't rule out someone falling in love with Locker's "potential."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top