TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
I would guess that as long as comic book movies keep pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars, there's no immediate plan to change that strategy.Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
I would guess that as long as comic book movies keep pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars, there's no immediate plan to change that strategy.Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
Movies habits change as the price of seeing a movie keep going up. If I'm shelling out $50 and up not including concessions to take the family to a movie, then we're only going to a big budget spectacle that makes sense to see on the big screen, which falls right in the superhero movie wheelhouse. If there is a good character-driven drama or comedy I want to see, I'm waiting for it to become available on dvd/streaming. Doesn't make much sense to me to see those in a theater when I can feel the same impact in my home. But the theater is worth it for good special effects/cgi and action sequences, IMHO.Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
I guess...if you like that sort of stuff.Movies habits change as the price of seeing a movie keep going up. If I'm shelling out $50 and up not including concessions to take the family to a movie, then we're only going to a big budget spectacle that makes sense to see on the big screen, which falls right in the superhero movie wheelhouse. If there is a good character-driven drama or comedy I want to see, I'm waiting for it to become available on dvd/streaming. Doesn't make much sense to me to see those in a theater when I can feel the same impact in my home. But the theater is worth it for good special effects/cgi and action sequences, IMHO.
You're being ridiculed.Jeez, can't even walk into a specific comic book movie thread in the FFA without being judged for watching...*gasp*...comic book movies. What in the actual hell?
Do comic book movies have to be block busters?Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
Is that even real? I seriously do not think that this is the official trailer.
It's notIs that even real? I seriously do not think that this is the official trailer.
I like him.How To Try Too Hard:
Step 1 - Hire Joachin Phoenix
Ledger hasn't even worked since he was the Joker."Ledger was okay."![]()
Basically yes.Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
Sarcasm doesn't fly around here?KarmaPolice said:Not enough :X emojis for this post.
It certainly looks unique. I'm in.https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-new-clown-prince-rises-in-the-first-teaser-for-joker-1833749728/amp
Jesus this looks incredible
https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-new-clown-prince-rises-in-the-first-teaser-for-joker-1833749728/amp
Jesus this looks incredibly bad
You have no idea if they are going to do that, if they are throwing you off or if they’ll give you 5 of them with him narrating them and not knowing what is what. Come on.I hate giving him an origin story.
This looks like one of those movies that if it was just a standalone movie it would be a good thriller but since its "The Joker" and in the DC universe it won't be good. Looks like too much Norman Bates meets IT in a noir kinda setting....https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-new-clown-prince-rises-in-the-first-teaser-for-joker-1833749728/amp
Jesus this looks incredible
I’m not here to defend dc but Wonder Woman was great, aquaman was fine and people seem to think Shazam will be good. Seems like they’ve turned it around once Zach Snyder got shown the door.This looks like one of those movies that if it was just a standalone movie it would be a good thriller but since its "The Joker" and in the DC universe it won't be good. Looks like too much Norman Bates meets IT in a noir kinda setting....
Yes Snyder was a big problem for DC and hopefully they improve with him gone. Batman, Joker, etc are all such icons they deserve better. Reports on Shazam are that its the best DC movie yet.I’m not here to defend dc but Wonder Woman was great, aquaman was fine and people seem to think Shazam will be good. Seems like they’ve turned it around once Zach Snyder got shown the door.
"Spiderman bugs me..."I know what you're saying but WTF?
2002-2007: 3 with Toby Maguire
2012-2014: 2 with Andrew Garfunkel
2016-2019: 4 with some Dutch kid
Throw in that Spiderverse thing for kicks.
10 GD Spiderman movies in 17 years. Really?
What's the pitch for this like?
Producer: I've got it. We remake Spiderman!
Exec: Uh, didn't we just do that?
Producer: Yeah, but get this: Peter Parker is a goofy high school kid that gets bit by a radioactive spider and he gets all these cool powers!
Exec: Yeeeahhhh, OK. So what's going to be different from the previous ones?
Producer: It's going to be a different actor. Duh.
Maybe they translate to the big screen better and with more familiarity than your preferred stories filled with no-picture book learnin'.Good point. But do the blockbusters have to be comic book movies?
He already has one. This looks a lot better than falling into a vat of acid and then going crazy.shadyridr said:I hate giving him an origin story.
That...sounds...awesome.B Maverick said:This looks like one of those movies that if it was just a standalone movie it would be a good thriller but since its "The Joker" and in the DC universe it won't be good. Looks like too much Norman Bates meets IT in a noir kinda setting....
Batman has all the best villains.the joker is a great character. it's really too bad, that batman sucks ###. worst "superhero" ever.
Yep his best work is when he is reigned in a but like in Her.How To Try Too Hard:
Step 1 - Hire Joachin Phoenix
The problem is with the audience not the studio. To get a blockbuster, it must be an animated movie, a live action remake of an animated film or a movie connected to an existing action-adventure movie/comic world (Marvel, Star Wars Fast&Furious, Jurassic World, etc.)That's not true. No blockbuster film is keeping any other film from being made. Movie studios need tent pole films to fund the smaller films. Without big films, little films don't get made.
My only concern is that they don't turn this into some kind of a puff piece where their going for sympathy angles.Chaka said:Really?
I love the idea of a Joker origin story. Beyond that it's anyone's guess if it's going to be well done but the original concept is compelling IMO.
Not sure there is another "bad guy" I would say that about.
I agree to a certain extent. Ledger as the Joker is amazing. That movie is one of my all time favs.[icon] said:The Joker has been perfected... Ledger took the character to an impossible apex. I’m not sure anyone can or even should try to step into those shoes again. Leto sure as hell shouldn’t have.
All that said, if I was to see ANYONE out there give it a try, it would be Phoenix. File me under “very curious” about this film....
Everybody starts innocent.My only concern is that they don't turn this into some kind of a puff piece where their going for sympathy angles.
Not as bad as MOP math, but still made me chuckle.So while I'm 97.2% sure this won't top Ledger, I'm always willing to watch to see if the other 3.6% comes to fruition.
I think it was because before him, the guy who played the Joker was a slapstick kind of guy on the TV show. Jack brought his attitude to it and, at the time, it was a completely different take on what the Joker could be. Looking back now, it seems kind of stupid. But at the time, it was magnificent.Am I the only one who doesn't get why Nicholson's Joker is so highly thought of? He had some good lines but I don't see why people think it was so great.
This makes sense. I was 15 when I saw Batman and enjoyed it. Jack was good, some great lines. Didn't have the same affect as when I saw Ledger. Jack was a little more campy, Ledger was more serious I guess.I think it was because before him, the guy who played the Joker was a slapstick kind of guy on the TV show. Jack brought his attitude to it and, at the time, it was a completely different take on what the Joker could be. Looking back now, it seems kind of stupid. But at the time, it was magnificent.
Exactly. From 1966 to 1989 The Joker was defined by Cesar Romero, who I personally feel played the character as delightfully insane. Nicholson's take was really obligated to use that as a starting point. Had he went "full Jack" I don't think audiences would have appreciated it. We certainly weren't ready for a Ledger type of Joker and had Burton delivered that I guarantee it would have been critically panned.I think it was because before him, the guy who played the Joker was a slapstick kind of guy on the TV show. Jack brought his attitude to it and, at the time, it was a completely different take on what the Joker could be. Looking back now, it seems kind of stupid. But at the time, it was magnificent.
This town needs an enema!This makes sense. I was 15 when I saw Batman and enjoyed it. Jack was good, some great lines. Didn't have the same affect as when I saw Ledger. Jack was a little more campy, Ledger was more serious I guess.
The Joker: Tell me something, my friend. You ever dance with the devil in the pale moonlight?
Bruce Wayne: What?
The Joker: I always ask that of all my prey. I just... like the sound of it.