I do mostly tax planning, some work on deals and controversy. Most time spent writing tax opinions; otherwise, doing research.Any tax lawyers here? I'd love to get a day-to-day rundown of what you actually do.
Most of them spend their days actually working.How many users here have law degrees anyway?
Do we have and medical doctors other than jene bramel?
Most would call that am added bonus.But Tim is here, so there would be collateral damage. :softball:Good idea. Only way we'll ever kill all the lawyers is if we get them in the same place.
Most of them spend their days actually working.How many users here have law degrees anyway?
Do we have and medical doctors other than jene bramel?
I'll allow it. And then probably explain why you're wrong, but allow it.Hooper31 said:Is it acceptable to post stories and reasons in this thread that lead us to believe the profession causes good people to make horrible decisions?How dare you suggest that my fees are reasonable?
You don't just get to back out of this thread. You're committed now.Bah, I got sucked into the lawyer thread (which I think comprises 100% litigation types other than me). I don't want to be here. Backing away slowly...or quickly.
If she didn't want to post in here, she shouldn't have appeared. I'm not letting her out until she finds substitute counsel.You don't just get to back out of this thread. You're committed now.Bah, I got sucked into the lawyer thread (which I think comprises 100% litigation types other than me). I don't want to be here. Backing away slowly...or quickly.
If you want out you need to file a motion with the icourt, supported by declarations.
Wait a second, what about those of us that are lawyers in training/baby sharks?Also, non-lawyers posting in here: you should identify yourselves. We can use an acronym so it's easy - something like Am Not A Lawyer.
no difference until you pass the bar.Wait a second, what about those of us that are lawyers in training/baby sharks?Also, non-lawyers posting in here: you should identify yourselves. We can use an acronym so it's easy - something like Am Not A Lawyer.
You're the ones we want in here the least.Wait a second, what about those of us that are lawyers in training/baby sharks?Also, non-lawyers posting in here: you should identify yourselves. We can use an acronym so it's easy - something like Am Not A Lawyer.
I'm a CPA (ANAL). We deal with attorneys fairly regularly from all across the spectrum....big law, large local, international, all the way down to the small guys. I kinda just wonder what they do every day. In my younger days I'd thought about going back to law school for tax law, but I don't have any desire to do that anymore.Tax lawyers? Seriously? I've never known a tax lawyer to be wed to a time of year, or are you just talking about people who deal in individual income taxes? Aren't those generally...accountants?Right. Which is why I want to know what the #### they're doing this time of year....It's March. You won't hear from tax guys for about 60 more days.Any tax lawyers here? I'd love to get a day-to-day rundown of what you actually do.
I oversaw tax at my last job but was no tax lawyer. In that I'm generally dealing with M&A, our tax lawyers are generally structuring deals. Also I worked a lot with people who helped us with our international tax restructuring, researching and helping us set up structures that eventually comprised Singapore and Luxembourg as our primary vehicles. What kind of day-to-day are you talking about?
If she didn't want to post in here, she shouldn't have appeared. I'm not letting her out until she finds substitute counsel.You don't just get to back out of this thread. You're committed now.Bah, I got sucked into the lawyer thread (which I think comprises 100% litigation types other than me). I don't want to be here. Backing away slowly...or quickly.
If you want out you need to file a motion with the icourt, supported by declarations.
Don't make me hold you in contempt of FordIf she didn't want to post in here, she shouldn't have appeared. I'm not letting her out until she finds substitute counsel.You don't just get to back out of this thread. You're committed now.Bah, I got sucked into the lawyer thread (which I think comprises 100% litigation types other than me). I don't want to be here. Backing away slowly...or quickly.
If you want out you need to file a motion with the icourt, supported by declarations.
Actually I have nothing but respect for most lawyers. Going to law school and passing the bar are real accomplishments. I considered it but was too lazy (and probably not smart enough.)I'm going to use this post as exhibit a when anyone asks me why I'm ruining another thread with lawyer talk.I tried to start a thread just for lawyers to talk about that stuff, but people just came in and insulted lawyers. So you can thank Tim.Two lawyers are walking down the beach, see a beautiful woman lying there in the sand.
"Boy," says the first lawyer, "I'd sure like to screw that one!"
The second lawyer says, "Outta what?"
Mr. Roboto, please remove this person.Actually I have nothing but respect for most lawyers. Going to law school and passing the bar are real accomplishments. I considered it but was too lazy (and probably not smart enough.)I'm going to use this post as exhibit a when anyone asks me why I'm ruining another thread with lawyer talk.I tried to start a thread just for lawyers to talk about that stuff, but people just came in and insulted lawyers. So you can thank Tim.Two lawyers are walking down the beach, see a beautiful woman lying there in the sand.
"Boy," says the first lawyer, "I'd sure like to screw that one!"
The second lawyer says, "Outta what?"
The CPA exam kicked the snot out of the bar exam.Actually I have nothing but respect for most lawyers. Going to law school and passing the bar are real accomplishments. I considered it but was too lazy (and probably not smart enough.)I'm going to use this post as exhibit a when anyone asks me why I'm ruining another thread with lawyer talk.I tried to start a thread just for lawyers to talk about that stuff, but people just came in and insulted lawyers. So you can thank Tim.Two lawyers are walking down the beach, see a beautiful woman lying there in the sand.
"Boy," says the first lawyer, "I'd sure like to screw that one!"
The second lawyer says, "Outta what?"
Don't want to ask the ones you know as you think it might seem offensive? You're going to get very different answers from the groups you mention (as you know since I'm sure you interact with them in different types of situations). I've tended only to interact with BigLaw or in only one case, in- house (don't see many tax lawyers in-house). My impression was tons of research, plus they write and rewrite the parts of securities documents like prospectuses and M&A documents that none of the rest of us read. In M&A they can end up doing a lot of work getting letter rulings and the like, too. I did a Reverse Morris Trust deal (everyone scurries out of the thread), for instance, that was heavily dependent upon this element.I'm a CPA (ANAL). We deal with attorneys fairly regularly from all across the spectrum....big law, large local, international, all the way down to the small guys. I kinda just wonder what they do every day. In my younger days I'd thought about going back to law school for tax law, but I don't have any desire to do that anymore.Tax lawyers? Seriously? I've never known a tax lawyer to be wed to a time of year, or are you just talking about people who deal in individual income taxes? Aren't those generally...accountants?Right. Which is why I want to know what the #### they're doing this time of year....It's March. You won't hear from tax guys for about 60 more days.Any tax lawyers here? I'd love to get a day-to-day rundown of what you actually do.
I oversaw tax at my last job but was no tax lawyer. In that I'm generally dealing with M&A, our tax lawyers are generally structuring deals. Also I worked a lot with people who helped us with our international tax restructuring, researching and helping us set up structures that eventually comprised Singapore and Luxembourg as our primary vehicles. What kind of day-to-day are you talking about?
I'm game. Especially if I get to use cuffs. ANALI think I'm appointing Mr. Roboto as our bailiff. It just sounds right.
No, but there will be some bull#### waste of time CLE.There aren't going to be any additional bar dues in here are there? I'm not sure I can handle any further bartabsdues.
that's because lawyers despise real estate agents of all kinds, and unlike most of the public, we have the ability to #### with them.There arent any real estate lawyers here though are there? RE lawyers bug the #### out of me. I can't count the number of times I had a deal about to be signed, eagerly waiting for a big fat commission, and some dumb #### RE lawyer jumps in and screws everything up.
And you exercise that ability every chance you get.that's because lawyers despise real estate agents of all kinds, and unlike most of the public, we have the ability to #### with them.There arent any real estate lawyers here though are there? RE lawyers bug the #### out of me. I can't count the number of times I had a deal about to be signed, eagerly waiting for a big fat commission, and some dumb #### RE lawyer jumps in and screws everything up.
Commercial.I don't despise real estate agents, but I don't do real estate law. tim, are you an agent? Commercial, residential, both?
Gotcha. I guess I can understand why commercial agents and lawyers hate each other.Commercial.I don't despise real estate agents, but I don't do real estate law. tim, are you an agent? Commercial, residential, both?
I don't wish to generalize all math teachers, but ####. You're out of your depth again.Hooper31 said:Your assumption is that I'm wrong? Okay. Sounds like you're pre-programmed to be on the defensive. Noted.I'll allow it. And then probably explain why you're wrong, but allow it.Hooper31 said:Is it acceptable to post stories and reasons in this thread that lead us to believe the profession causes good people to make horrible decisions?How dare you suggest that my fees are reasonable?
I don't wish to generalize to all lawyers. I know there are many types that do many different jobs. I have two experiences with lawyers that have shaped my perceptions. I understand those are anecdotal, but its what I have to go on. In both instances I witnessed lawyers drag out disputes for as long as possible. Neither lawyer wanted to find an amicable solution in either dispute. Neither wished to help either party find a resolution. The lawyers involved had a financial incentive to drag these disputes out as long as possible. All the lawyers involved stoked the fires of mistrust at every turn. When parties on either side expressed interest in negotiation, even peaceful negotiations, the lawyers in all cases encouraged what I can only describe as "hostile" replies. The long term intent was always to extend the dispute seeking a court room, and judge, and more importantly continuances and delays.
The bolded above is my claim. Lawyers have a financial incentive to make sure disputes aren't resolved quickly. Like I said, my perception is possible skewed due to two different experiences, but I doubt this is up for debate.
Are all lawyers evil money hungry villains? Of course not, but this scenario of dragging out cases resulting in a financial gain can lead to good people making horrible decisions. No?
Sounds like the horrible decision may have been the choice in lawyers.Hooper31 said:Your assumption is that I'm wrong? Okay. Sounds like you're pre-programmed to be on the defensive. Noted.I'll allow it. And then probably explain why you're wrong, but allow it.Hooper31 said:Is it acceptable to post stories and reasons in this thread that lead us to believe the profession causes good people to make horrible decisions?How dare you suggest that my fees are reasonable?
I don't wish to generalize to all lawyers. I know there are many types that do many different jobs. I have two experiences with lawyers that have shaped my perceptions. I understand those are anecdotal, but its what I have to go on. In both instances I witnessed lawyers drag out disputes for as long as possible. Neither lawyer wanted to find an amicable solution in either dispute. Neither wished to help either party find a resolution. The lawyers involved had a financial incentive to drag these disputes out as long as possible. All the lawyers involved stoked the fires of mistrust at every turn. When parties on either side expressed interest in negotiation, even peaceful negotiations, the lawyers in all cases encouraged what I can only describe as "hostile" replies. The long term intent was always to extend the dispute seeking a court room, and judge, and more importantly continuances and delays.
The bolded above is my claim. Lawyers have a financial incentive to make sure disputes aren't resolved quickly. Like I said, my perception is possible skewed due to two different experiences, but I doubt this is up for debate.
Are all lawyers evil money hungry villains? Of course not, but this scenario of dragging out cases resulting in a financial gain can lead to good people making horrible decisions. No?
And you often deserve it.And you exercise that ability every chance you get.that's because lawyers despise real estate agents of all kinds, and unlike most of the public, we have the ability to #### with them.There arent any real estate lawyers here though are there? RE lawyers bug the #### out of me. I can't count the number of times I had a deal about to be signed, eagerly waiting for a big fat commission, and some dumb #### RE lawyer jumps in and screws everything up.
what you're describing is unethical behavior. An attorney engaging in unethical behavior does not do so because the profession made him.instead, it is far more likely that the attorney was unethical before joining the profession.Hooper31 said:Your assumption is that I'm wrong? Okay. Sounds like you're pre-programmed to be on the defensive. Noted.I'll allow it. And then probably explain why you're wrong, but allow it.Hooper31 said:Is it acceptable to post stories and reasons in this thread that lead us to believe the profession causes good people to make horrible decisions?How dare you suggest that my fees are reasonable?
I don't wish to generalize to all lawyers. I know there are many types that do many different jobs. I have two experiences with lawyers that have shaped my perceptions. I understand those are anecdotal, but its what I have to go on. In both instances I witnessed lawyers drag out disputes for as long as possible. Neither lawyer wanted to find an amicable solution in either dispute. Neither wished to help either party find a resolution. The lawyers involved had a financial incentive to drag these disputes out as long as possible. All the lawyers involved stoked the fires of mistrust at every turn. When parties on either side expressed interest in negotiation, even peaceful negotiations, the lawyers in all cases encouraged what I can only describe as "hostile" replies. The long term intent was always to extend the dispute seeking a court room, and judge, and more importantly continuances and delays.
The bolded above is my claim. Lawyers have a financial incentive to make sure disputes aren't resolved quickly. Like I said, my perception is possible skewed due to two different experiences, but I doubt this is up for debate.
Are all lawyers evil money hungry villains? Of course not, but this scenario of dragging out cases resulting in a financial gain can lead to good people making horrible decisions. No?
There's a spectrum of talents and temperaments and ethics among lawyers just as there is in any other profession and in humanity in general.Hooper31 said:I subscribe to Philip Zambardo's philosophy with regard to why good people sometimes do bad things. Situations and circumstances can result in slimey behavior. I think those circumstances occur more or less often in various professions. Do you disagree?what you're describing is unethical behavior. An attorney engaging in unethical behavior does not do so because the profession made him.instead, it is far more likely that the attorney was unethical before joining the profession.
I disagree with the idiotic and insulting suggestion that lawyers violate an oath they took when joining the profession as a result of working on an hourly basis. Also with your spelling of the word slimy.Hooper31 said:I subscribe to Philip Zambardo's philosophy with regard to why good people sometimes do bad things. Situations and circumstances can result in slimey behavior. I think those circumstances occur more or less often in various professions. Do you disagree?what you're describing is unethical behavior. An attorney engaging in unethical behavior does not do so because the profession made him.instead, it is far more likely that the attorney was unethical before joining the profession.
Most "litigators" rarely go to trial...mostly because it's hard, and it cuts into profits.Hooper, I am not a lawyer but I work closely with them and I can tell you straight out that most lawyers absolutely prefer to settle rather than go to court. That doesn't mean that either side will capitulate just to avoid trial but if there's a settlement to be had they'll take it with pleasure. Doesn't mean there aren't evil, money hungry, jackholes out there but most are out to help their client more than to aggrandize themselves
And because juries aren't all that reliable.Most "litigators" rarely go to trial...mostly because it's hard, and it cuts into profits.Hooper, I am not a lawyer but I work closely with them and I can tell you straight out that most lawyers absolutely prefer to settle rather than go to court. That doesn't mean that either side will capitulate just to avoid trial but if there's a settlement to be had they'll take it with pleasure. Doesn't mean there aren't evil, money hungry, jackholes out there but most are out to help their client more than to aggrandize themselves
Sorry to hear your insulting notions about lawyers aren't popular in a thread full of lawyers. Don't let the door hit you too hard.Hooper31 said:Thanks for quickly ending the conversation. Have a nice day.Lawyers are, for the most part, the most ethical group of people you will run across.
Jury unpredictability is something lawyers use to talk clients into settling.And because juries aren't all that reliable.Most "litigators" rarely go to trial...mostly because it's hard, and it cuts into profits.Hooper, I am not a lawyer but I work closely with them and I can tell you straight out that most lawyers absolutely prefer to settle rather than go to court. That doesn't mean that either side will capitulate just to avoid trial but if there's a settlement to be had they'll take it with pleasure. Doesn't mean there aren't evil, money hungry, jackholes out there but most are out to help their client more than to aggrandize themselves
And because juries aren't all that reliable.Most "litigators" rarely go to trial...mostly because it's hard, and it cuts into profits.Hooper, I am not a lawyer but I work closely with them and I can tell you straight out that most lawyers absolutely prefer to settle rather than go to court. That doesn't mean that either side will capitulate just to avoid trial but if there's a settlement to be had they'll take it with pleasure. Doesn't mean there aren't evil, money hungry, jackholes out there but most are out to help their client more than to aggrandize themselves
BAR NONE!!!Hooper31 said:Thanks for quickly ending the conversation. Have a nice day.Lawyers are, for the most part, the most ethical group of people you will run across.
Name me another profession you'd allow to have a check for several million dollars written to on your behalf and assume you'll be getting it, other than your actual bank.BAR NONE!!!Hooper31 said:Thanks for quickly ending the conversation. Have a nice day.Lawyers are, for the most part, the most ethical group of people you will run across.