Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
That is a valid point, the rookies got creamed last week.No first time playoff QB won yet (0-4).
I'm thinking that Peppers is gonna get manhandled again, and will have little or no impact at all.Sorry Rexy. Peppers is gunna bust you up.
What makes you think that?? Moose has been dropping them all year long, as a matter of fact, he has the most dropped passes on the team................. and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.
Well, maybe that part is a bit of wishful thinking, but the odds are still long for the fanless team that is on the road for the 4th time in 5 weeks.What makes you think that?? Moose has been dropping them all year long, as a matter of fact, he has the most dropped passes on the team................. and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.
No first time playoff QB won yet (0-4).
Sorry Rexy. Peppers is gunna bust you up.
Yeah, those road woes really killed them on the way to Superbowl two years ago...Well, maybe that part is a bit of wishful thinking, but the odds are still long for the fanless team that is on the road for the 4th time in 5 weeks.What makes you think that?? Moose has been dropping them all year long, as a matter of fact, he has the most dropped passes on the team................. and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.
Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
It sure didn't help them on their first trip through Chicago this year, either.Yeah, those road woes really killed them on the way to Superbowl two years ago...Well, maybe that part is a bit of wishful thinking, but the odds are still long for the fanless team that is on the road for the 4th time in 5 weeks.What makes you think that?? Moose has been dropping them all year long, as a matter of fact, he has the most dropped passes on the team................. and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.
He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda. Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
The giants are a better offense than the Bears, and look what Carolina just did to them.
I watched the first meeting, and Carolina laid an egg. Anybody that thinks that first meeting is representative of the Carolina you're seeing in the playoffs, is short-sighted. That's like judging the Broncos based on their opening loss to Miami. Teams don't play well EVERY week. However, Carolina has shown a propensity to perform well in the playoffs, and on the road, at that. The Bears still have to prove that (not that they won't, but experience here lies firmly in Carolina's corner), so save the "Grossman is twice the QB" crap until he proves it.Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda. Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
The giants are a better offense than the Bears, and look what Carolina just did to them.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
And the Bears played a big part in Carolina laying that egg. The 8 sack figure alone doesn't even adequately represent the amount of punishment that Delhomme received on that day. So save the "Carolina will crush the Bears" crap until they prove on the field they are capable of sustaining a drive against this team, let alone beating them.I watched the first meeting, and Carolina laid an egg. Anybody that thinks that first meeting is representative of the Carolina you're seeing in the playoffs, is short-sighted. That's like judging the Broncos based on their opening loss to Miami. Teams don't play well EVERY week. However, Carolina has shown a propensity to perform well in the playoffs, and on the road, at that. The Bears still have to prove that (not that they won't, but experience here lies firmly in Carolina's corner), so save the "Grossman is twice the QB" crap until he proves it.Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda. Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
The giants are a better offense than the Bears, and look what Carolina just did to them.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
Where did I say "Carolina will crush the Bears", ########?And the Bears played a big part in Carolina laying that egg. The 8 sack figure alone doesn't even adequately represent the amount of punishment that Delhomme received on that day. So save the "Carolina will crush the Bears" crap until they prove on the field they are capable of sustaining a drive against this team, let alone beating them.I watched the first meeting, and Carolina laid an egg. Anybody that thinks that first meeting is representative of the Carolina you're seeing in the playoffs, is short-sighted. That's like judging the Broncos based on their opening loss to Miami. Teams don't play well EVERY week. However, Carolina has shown a propensity to perform well in the playoffs, and on the road, at that. The Bears still have to prove that (not that they won't, but experience here lies firmly in Carolina's corner), so save the "Grossman is twice the QB" crap until he proves it.Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda. Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
The giants are a better offense than the Bears, and look what Carolina just did to them.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
I guess the to the initial post, which was titled "The Panthers Will Crush The Bears", meant something else.Where did I say "Carolina will crush the Bears", ########?And the Bears played a big part in Carolina laying that egg. The 8 sack figure alone doesn't even adequately represent the amount of punishment that Delhomme received on that day. So save the "Carolina will crush the Bears" crap until they prove on the field they are capable of sustaining a drive against this team, let alone beating them.I watched the first meeting, and Carolina laid an egg. Anybody that thinks that first meeting is representative of the Carolina you're seeing in the playoffs, is short-sighted. That's like judging the Broncos based on their opening loss to Miami. Teams don't play well EVERY week. However, Carolina has shown a propensity to perform well in the playoffs, and on the road, at that. The Bears still have to prove that (not that they won't, but experience here lies firmly in Carolina's corner), so save the "Grossman is twice the QB" crap until he proves it.Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda. Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.Your problem is you think Carolina will only put up 3 this week.Funny how you want to talk offense...Carolina is a better offense than the Bears.He could be half the QB and still take out a pathetic offense that scores 3.Um, do you have a link to when Grossman suddenly became twice the quarterback? He must have won some playoff games or something, right?Of course it won't - the Panthers aren't getting off that easy. Grossman is twice the QB that they faced the first time, and Moose isn't going to drop 4 passes.27-3, Bears.Cause it is going to go just like last time...I think Urlacher and Company will have something to say about that when Delhomme gets sacked another 8 times and picked a few times...
The giants are a better offense than the Bears, and look what Carolina just did to them.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
Yes, I want to ignore that you owned this offense in the regular season...because of the body of work the Carolina Panthers put forth...the same you want to ignore that the Browns put up how man points against that defense?Again, the game will not go exactly the same... or do you also think that Denver will easily handle the Patriots?Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda.
Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
You want to ignore that the Bears owned this offense. The Bears have allowed over 9 points scored at home only ONCE this season. 1 out of 8. Ignore that. What does the Pats/Denver game have anything to do with the Bears owning the Panthers? What the heck kind of logic is that?Yes, I want to ignore that you owned this offense in the regular season...because of the body of work the Carolina Panthers put forth...the same you want to ignore that the Browns put up how man points against that defense?Again, the game will not go exactly the same... or do you also think that Denver will easily handle the Patriots?Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda.
Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
That was then...this is now. Statistically the Bears and Panthers defenses are so close it is silly.
Disrespected? No joke to it...no need to push a line higher than that for a team with a limited offense going against a team that just shut out a much better offense.
What does the Pats Denver game mean? Simple...you all seem to think because you sacked Delhomme 8 times and forced the turnovers in the first game during the "regular season" that it means the same will happen in the "playoffs". Just as Denver easily handled NE in the regular season, but the playoffs are a different beast.Though I do not expect Bears fans to be too keen on what happens in the playoffs given how infrequently they have been there over the past 20 years.You want to ignore that the Bears owned this offense. The Bears have allowed over 9 points scored at home only ONCE this season. 1 out of 8. Ignore that. What does the Pats/Denver game have anything to do with the Bears owning the Panthers? What the heck kind of logic is that?Yes, I want to ignore that you owned this offense in the regular season...because of the body of work the Carolina Panthers put forth...the same you want to ignore that the Browns put up how man points against that defense?Again, the game will not go exactly the same... or do you also think that Denver will easily handle the Patriots?Funny how you want to ignore that we owned this offense. People, including yourself, said the same thing the first time around. The Panthers offense is better than the Bears, and their D is good too. They are a more balanced team, yadda yadda.
Joke Delhomme was hurt and confused the entire game. And when the game was over, it was very apparant that the Bears D was so dominant that they can completely control that offense and the entire football game against them. And that hasn't changed.
The line of -3 is a complete joke for this game, and once again this disrespected Bears team is going to show everyone that they're missing the boat here.
That was then...this is now. Statistically the Bears and Panthers defenses are so close it is silly.
Disrespected? No joke to it...no need to push a line higher than that for a team with a limited offense going against a team that just shut out a much better offense.
You smell like a bitter Packers fan.
WINNAH!!!!!You smell like a bitter Packers fan.
WINNAH? Of what? The I cannot face the reality that the Bears are not as good as you homers think award?Keep thinking it will be just like last time and be that confident...it only makes it more sweet when they lose.WINNAH!!!!!You smell like a bitter Packers fan.
And keep thinking they aren't as good as they've consistently performed this season. Just going to make you even more bitter when they win.WINNAH? Of what? The I cannot face the reality that the Bears are not as good as you homers think award?Keep thinking it will be just like last time and be that confident...it only makes it more sweet when they lose.WINNAH!!!!!You smell like a bitter Packers fan.
Not bitter at all.The defense is good...so is Carolinas.And keep thinking they aren't as good as they've consistently performed this season. Just going to make you even more bitter when they win.
No - Carolina's defense is good, the Bears' defense is great.Not bitter at all.The defense is good...so is Carolinas.And keep thinking they aren't as good as they've consistently performed this season. Just going to make you even more bitter when they win.
Their offense has been consistently bad...Carolina's has not.
HTH
Doesn't get any more basic than that.carolina is playing great right now. They are going to be tough to beat. IF the bears play D like they have been playing most of the year and the offense doesn't turn it over multiple times, the bears will win the game. That simple.
Chicago 12.6 ppg allowedCarolina 16.2 ppg allowedNo - Carolina's defense is good, the Bears' defense is great.Not bitter at all.The defense is good...so is Carolinas.And keep thinking they aren't as good as they've consistently performed this season. Just going to make you even more bitter when they win.
Their offense has been consistently bad...Carolina's has not.
HTH
Seems like the same story you were telling the first time. But there's only one thing that will matter, just like last time - to beat this Bears D, you need to be able to run right at them like Pittsburgh did. They won't be able to run to the sides like Foster enjoys, the D is too fast and Urlacher will run him down all day long. Carolina isn't capable of running right at them and will be one dimensional as a result. And whenever you drop your QB against this D, you are asking for pain and trouble. Carolina does not match up against this team worth a damn, and the outcome will be the same this time.Chicago 12.6 ppg allowedCarolina 16.2 ppg allowedNo - Carolina's defense is good, the Bears' defense is great.Not bitter at all.The defense is good...so is Carolinas.And keep thinking they aren't as good as they've consistently performed this season. Just going to make you even more bitter when they win.
Their offense has been consistently bad...Carolina's has not.
HTH
Chicago 281.8 ypg allowed
Carolina 282.6 ypg allowed
Chicago 179.5 passing ypg allowed
Carolina 191.1 pasing ypg allowed
Chicago 102.3 rushing ypg allowed
Carolina 91.6 rushing ypg allowed
Chicago 41 sacks
Carolina 45 sacks
Chicago 34 takeaways
Carolina 38 takeaways
Both are great defenses....time to end your denial.
Facts make you sleepy huh?Yup...but as I said, if you think it will happen just as it did the first time, you are seriously one naive homer.
Seems like the same story you were telling the first time. But there's only one thing that will matter, just like last time - to beat this Bears D, you need to be able to run right at them like Pittsburgh did. Carolina can't do that and will be one dimensional as a result. Whenever you drop your QB against this D, you are asking for pain and trouble. Carolina does not match up against this team worth a damn, and the outcome will be the same this time.
The Bears are a tad better than a banged up Giants D, nice try.Going to be a long and bitter offseason for ya.Carolina can't do that? Thats pretty funny...as that is exactly what they just did to the Giants.
That they are...does not mean the Panthers "can't do it" though.No...should be a very exciting off-season. New coaching staff, about $20 million in cap space for the team to play around with...Walker rehab going well...good high draft pick coming up.The Bears are a tad better than a banged up Giants D, nice try.Going to be a long and bitter offseason for ya.Carolina can't do that? Thats pretty funny...as that is exactly what they just did to the Giants.
The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
In that time period...GB has only finished at the bottom of the division 6 times...twice they were tied with the Bears.The Bears on the other hand finished last 12 times in that same span.The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
Might want to look up chief...The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
Not very good at math, are ya skippy? Packers finished in last 7 times over that span. 70, 71, 75, 76, 80, 88, 90In that time period...GB has only finished at the bottom of the division 6 times...twice they were tied with the Bears.The Bears on the other hand finished last 12 times in that same span.The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
Green Bay won the division 9 times finished 2nd another 8 times.
Again...no need for me to be bitter.
This game, as most do, will come down to turnovers. In the first meeting, the 2 Delhomme int's resulted in a whopping 8 yard drive (TD) and a 3 yard drive (FG). Eliminate those and it was a 3-3 game. These two teams are very evenly matched. Whoever turns the ball over more this game loses.
I actually did not stop at life before Favre...I went on to the current time.Packers were last in 71, 75, 76, 80, and 88Not very good at math, are ya skippy? Packers finished in last 7 times over that span. 70, 71, 75, 76, 80, 88, 90In that time period...GB has only finished at the bottom of the division 6 times...twice they were tied with the Bears.The Bears on the other hand finished last 12 times in that same span.The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
Green Bay won the division 9 times finished 2nd another 8 times.
Again...no need for me to be bitter.
The Bears finished last 7 times, the same span. 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 81, 82
The Bears won the division 6 times - 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90
The Packers won 3 times - 72, 78, 82
Then you have a problem with reading too, don't ya? The point in dropping Favre out is to show that your organization sucked before him, and will more likely than not suck after him. It's not way out there, because without him they didn't do a thing for 22 years. It's essentially the same logic you are using to suggest a very young Bears team will have trouble winning again next season.I actually did not stop at life before Favre...I went on to the current time.Packers were last in 71, 75, 76, 80, and 88Not very good at math, are ya skippy? Packers finished in last 7 times over that span. 70, 71, 75, 76, 80, 88, 90In that time period...GB has only finished at the bottom of the division 6 times...twice they were tied with the Bears.The Bears on the other hand finished last 12 times in that same span.The Pack has had a great run with Favre, and, untill this year, have dominated the Bears as long as Farve has been playing for them.Now that Farve is in his decline, and possibly may not return, welcom back to the bottom of the division, where the Packers were comfortable at , for 22 years before Farve saved them.And no reason to be bitter. Though I guess you think the Bears doing better once in a blue moon makes a Packer fan bitter...thats pretty funny....I guess 20 years of bitterness has gotten to you.
This was posted by someone else in another thread.:
Packers season records
1970: 6-8-0
1971: 4-8-2
1972: 10-4-0 (ONE AND DONE IN PLAYOFFS!)
1973: 5-7-2
1974: 6-8-0
1975: 4-10-0
1976: 5-9-0
1977: 4-10-0
1978: 8-7-1
1979: 5-11-0
1980: 5-10-1
1981: 8-8-0
1982: 5-3-1 (Only made the playoffs because of short year!)
1983: 8-8-0
1984: 8-8-0
1985: 8-8-0
1986: 4-12-0
1987: 5-9-1
1988: 4-12-0
1989: 10-6-0
1990: 6-10-0
1991: 4-12-0
Green Bay won the division 9 times finished 2nd another 8 times.
Again...no need for me to be bitter.
The Bears finished last 7 times, the same span. 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 81, 82
The Bears won the division 6 times - 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90
The Packers won 3 times - 72, 78, 82
90...last yes...but also tied for 2nd as 4 teams finished at 6-10 that year.
Point being...just saying life without Favre will make the team suck is a bit out there.
And why stop at when Favre got there? Because it drops the Bears down a notch and pushes the Packers way up there. That would be like stopping at 83 when speaking of the Bears.