einstein2u
Footballguy
thanks....some more reading to do.
Yeah, this sort of thing is pointless if you go ppg, because drafting injured players is not the way to have the "perfect draft" (hindsight and all now) ...but, hobbit, do you add or subtract for injuries? do you rank boldin higher because he was injured in 2005, or lower? i see it as a double-edged sword
As good as Gates is / was this season, I couldn't risk my entire draft on him which is close to what you'd be doing if you draft Gates in Round 1 of a 12 team draft. Even if you get Mike Anderson at the turn (or a similar RB near the bottom of the Top 10), you're risking that RB2 slot a great deal. Also, given that Gates is the top TE, the position is becoming much more prominent in the NFL. Gonzo, Shockey, Crumpler have all done well and don't pose as big a dropoff from Gates as dones not taking 2 RBs in the Top 14-15 picks.There's one question I want to pose to you guys...in both these drafts that require TEs, Gates was in the top 11 overall.
How early would you guys draft him next year? Is he worth a late first round pick? Early second? Late second?
Why?
Once you download and install the Draft Dominator... click Help - VBD Revisited to see the Value Based Drafting Article.For this thread, all you need to know is that I'm making the "perfect" draft...meaning, each pick has all knowledge available to them, and knows all knowledge is available to others. So, this is how the draft would've shaped out.As for DD, check out the main page (http://www.footballguys.com), download it, and play around with it. It's a fantastic drafting tool that uses something called Value Based Drafting to get you an edge on your competition.ff rook....been following this thread with interest. what is draft dominator? can someone explain please.
I can't find the link right now that explains what Value Based Drafting (VBD) is, so hopefully someone can help with that.
Thanks, Bruce.And for Einstein, it's well worth the money just for that application. Absolutely fantastic.Once you download and install the Draft Dominator... click Help - VBD Revisited to see the Value Based Drafting Article.For this thread, all you need to know is that I'm making the "perfect" draft...meaning, each pick has all knowledge available to them, and knows all knowledge is available to others. So, this is how the draft would've shaped out.As for DD, check out the main page (http://www.footballguys.com), download it, and play around with it. It's a fantastic drafting tool that uses something called Value Based Drafting to get you an edge on your competition.ff rook....been following this thread with interest. what is draft dominator? can someone explain please.
I can't find the link right now that explains what Value Based Drafting (VBD) is, so hopefully someone can help with that.
Bruce said he'd post it on site when you got through. That'll save you from a mass e-mailing. to all of your hard work, Keys. I do this most every year, too - but probably wouldn't be able to get to it for at least a month. Thanks again.By the way, with Joe's approval, I will e-mail the actual projections file to anyone who wants it when I'm actually done with all this.
That would take care of everyone's individual leagues, etc.
Ah, the forum I rarely check. Thank you sir.Bruce said he'd post it on site when you got through. That'll save you from a mass e-mailing. to all of your hard work, Keys. I do this most every year, too - but probably wouldn't be able to get to it for at least a month. Thanks again.By the way, with Joe's approval, I will e-mail the actual projections file to anyone who wants it when I'm actually done with all this.
That would take care of everyone's individual leagues, etc.
Well, it's not lack of predictibility, IMO...it's just that 2004 was an amazing year for QBs in general. Therefore, we overpredicted how QBs would do this year, and it just didn't happen.I think 2004 was the abberation, and 2005 was just regression to the mean.What I find most interesting is the near complete turnover of QB value from 2004 to 2005 in terms of VBD:
2004:
Manning (1.05)
Culpepper (2.02)
McNabb (3.03)
Bulger (4.03)
Green (4.09)
2005:
Palmer (2.12)
Brady (3.02)
Manning (3.06)
That speaks VOLUMES to me about redraft QB value and utter lack of predictability at that position from year to year.
Good insight...I noticed that too. However I feel that looking at this list it is still easier to get a good WR later in the draft than RB's.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
I think this a valid argument, but we didn't know who the top wide receivers were before the season started. The projected top wide receivers were Moss and Owens. No one could predict that S Smith, S Smoss, Fitz would be the top 3 wide receivers. This is the main reason why people wait until later to grab wide receivers. Wide Receivers are unpredictable every year (except for two to three studs per year) which is why I can't imagine 9 wide receivers going in the first two rounds.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
That's fine...But of the top 4 RBs chosen by ADP, 3 performed, and 1 busted. Of the top 4 WRs chosen by ADP, 2 performed, 1 halfway busted (TO was great until he got suspended), and 1 busted.I think this a valid argument, but we didn't know who the top wide receivers were before the season started. The projected top wide receivers were Moss and Owens. No one could predict that S Smith, S Smoss, Fitz would be the top 3 wide receivers. This is the main reason why people wait until later to grab wide receivers. Wide Receivers are unpredictable every year (except for two to three studs per year) which is why I can't imagine 9 wide receivers going in the first two rounds.
However, supply and demand still makes RB's more valuable IMHO. I don't think that anyone picking Steve Smith or Chad Johnson would be wrong in doing so, I just still think the supply of runningbacks is low compared to recievers.That's fine...But of the top 4 RBs chosen by ADP, 3 performed, and 1 busted. Of the top 4 WRs chosen by ADP, 2 performed, 1 halfway busted (TO was great until he got suspended), and 1 busted.I think this a valid argument, but we didn't know who the top wide receivers were before the season started. The projected top wide receivers were Moss and Owens. No one could predict that S Smith, S Smoss, Fitz would be the top 3 wide receivers. This is the main reason why people wait until later to grab wide receivers. Wide Receivers are unpredictable every year (except for two to three studs per year) which is why I can't imagine 9 wide receivers going in the first two rounds.
Of the top 15 RBs chosen by ADP, 9 busted, and 6 performed.
Of the top 15 WRs chosen by ADP, 8 busted, 5 performed, and 2 halfway performed (DJax and TO).
Doesn't seem to be THAT much difference to me.
And by perfect draft position, both Randy Moss and Domanick Davis busted as much as the other. I counted them both as busts.
Where will it be posted on the site?Bruce said he'd post it on site when you got through. That'll save you from a mass e-mailing. to all of your hard work, Keys. I do this most every year, too - but probably wouldn't be able to get to it for at least a month. Thanks again.By the way, with Joe's approval, I will e-mail the actual projections file to anyone who wants it when I'm actually done with all this.
That would take care of everyone's individual leagues, etc.
Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
All good points.You know me, just like to stir up crap...I never said I was fully behind this, but might as well explore it.Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
Numbers can lie to you, and I think they are here.
Allow me to throw out the pertinent facts:
Using the pre-season ADP:
3 RBs in the Top 20 slots were injured for more than 8 games.
4 more RBs in the Top 21 slots were injured for at least 4 games.
That's 7 out of 21 that are hurt.
Injury comparison: 2 WRs in the Top 30 missed more than 8 games (TO, Walker), and only one of those was due to injury. 3 WRs in the Top 40 missed at least 8, with 1 more missing at least 4 games.
QB - One in the Top 20 missed more than 8 (Culpepper), and one more in the Top 40 (Bulger). McNabb at 27 also missed 7 games.
Of course you can argue that the injuries are part of the game - but that is EXACTLY the point. RBs get hurt at an alarming rate since they handle the ball 3 times as much as WRs. You have to take RBs more than WRs since you not only need stud RBs, but you also need depth because on average you're going to lose one of those studs for at least 1/4 of a season if not longer. With 7 of the top 17 RBs falling downward due to injuries, WRs can go up in value with 20/20 hindsight.
Injuries must be "the grain of salt" that you take with these results.
All that in mind - I think this is great work keys. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but I think the conclusion you drew from your results is flawed.
then post it on the biggest ff board... way to keepit asecretAll good points.You know me, just like to stir up crap...I never said I was fully behind this, but might as well explore it.Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
Numbers can lie to you, and I think they are here.
Allow me to throw out the pertinent facts:
Using the pre-season ADP:
3 RBs in the Top 20 slots were injured for more than 8 games.
4 more RBs in the Top 21 slots were injured for at least 4 games.
That's 7 out of 21 that are hurt.
Injury comparison: 2 WRs in the Top 30 missed more than 8 games (TO, Walker), and only one of those was due to injury. 3 WRs in the Top 40 missed at least 8, with 1 more missing at least 4 games.
QB - One in the Top 20 missed more than 8 (Culpepper), and one more in the Top 40 (Bulger). McNabb at 27 also missed 7 games.
Of course you can argue that the injuries are part of the game - but that is EXACTLY the point. RBs get hurt at an alarming rate since they handle the ball 3 times as much as WRs. You have to take RBs more than WRs since you not only need stud RBs, but you also need depth because on average you're going to lose one of those studs for at least 1/4 of a season if not longer. With 7 of the top 17 RBs falling downward due to injuries, WRs can go up in value with 20/20 hindsight.
Injuries must be "the grain of salt" that you take with these results.
All that in mind - I think this is great work keys. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but I think the conclusion you drew from your results is flawed.
Honestly? I'm looking for the "Moneyball" concept of FF. There's gotta be something. VBD is a huge part of it...but now that's become too common.
We have to find something that's undervalued, and exploit it. That's part of the reason I did this.
Yes, but let's say we find it in this thread...then, only the 500 or so people that read this thread will know it for quite a while, and I'm sure only a tenth or so will actually believe it.Plus, 500 minds are a lot better than one.then post it on the biggest ff board... way to keepit asecretAll good points.You know me, just like to stir up crap...I never said I was fully behind this, but might as well explore it.Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
Numbers can lie to you, and I think they are here.
Allow me to throw out the pertinent facts:
Using the pre-season ADP:
3 RBs in the Top 20 slots were injured for more than 8 games.
4 more RBs in the Top 21 slots were injured for at least 4 games.
That's 7 out of 21 that are hurt.
Injury comparison: 2 WRs in the Top 30 missed more than 8 games (TO, Walker), and only one of those was due to injury. 3 WRs in the Top 40 missed at least 8, with 1 more missing at least 4 games.
QB - One in the Top 20 missed more than 8 (Culpepper), and one more in the Top 40 (Bulger). McNabb at 27 also missed 7 games.
Of course you can argue that the injuries are part of the game - but that is EXACTLY the point. RBs get hurt at an alarming rate since they handle the ball 3 times as much as WRs. You have to take RBs more than WRs since you not only need stud RBs, but you also need depth because on average you're going to lose one of those studs for at least 1/4 of a season if not longer. With 7 of the top 17 RBs falling downward due to injuries, WRs can go up in value with 20/20 hindsight.
Injuries must be "the grain of salt" that you take with these results.
All that in mind - I think this is great work keys. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but I think the conclusion you drew from your results is flawed.
Honestly? I'm looking for the "Moneyball" concept of FF. There's gotta be something. VBD is a huge part of it...but now that's become too common.
We have to find something that's undervalued, and exploit it. That's part of the reason I did this.
Yes, and you know I'm here for ample rebuttal. Good discussions back and forth.Funny you should mention "Moneyball" - I was just using that analogy for FF today.All good points.You know me, just like to stir up crap...I never said I was fully behind this, but might as well explore it.Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
Numbers can lie to you, and I think they are here.
Allow me to throw out the pertinent facts:
Using the pre-season ADP:
3 RBs in the Top 20 slots were injured for more than 8 games.
4 more RBs in the Top 21 slots were injured for at least 4 games.
That's 7 out of 21 that are hurt.
Injury comparison: 2 WRs in the Top 30 missed more than 8 games (TO, Walker), and only one of those was due to injury. 3 WRs in the Top 40 missed at least 8, with 1 more missing at least 4 games.
QB - One in the Top 20 missed more than 8 (Culpepper), and one more in the Top 40 (Bulger). McNabb at 27 also missed 7 games.
Of course you can argue that the injuries are part of the game - but that is EXACTLY the point. RBs get hurt at an alarming rate since they handle the ball 3 times as much as WRs. You have to take RBs more than WRs since you not only need stud RBs, but you also need depth because on average you're going to lose one of those studs for at least 1/4 of a season if not longer. With 7 of the top 17 RBs falling downward due to injuries, WRs can go up in value with 20/20 hindsight.
Injuries must be "the grain of salt" that you take with these results.
All that in mind - I think this is great work keys. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but I think the conclusion you drew from your results is flawed.
Honestly? I'm looking for the "Moneyball" concept of FF. There's gotta be something. VBD is a huge part of it...but now that's become too common.
We have to find something that's undervalued, and exploit it. That's part of the reason I did this.
Exactly. That's the main reason I won't include kickers/defenses in this.It was a glaring reminder to me that no matter how highly defenses "VBD" in our league, given the massive scoring defenses produce under our rules, the inability to predict that the Bills will suck and the Bears will nearly set records is reason enough to wait on them.
Well, VBD was it...until half the FF world started using it.I think it might be at least fun to spend the offseason trying to figure out what the next one is.Yes, and you know I'm here for ample rebuttal. Good discussions back and forth.
Funny you should mention "Moneyball" - I was just using that analogy for FF today.
There should be an equivalent book for FF....
I think that the right type of analysis is too "adjust" for guys like Boldin, Cadillac. I would only adjust for guys that are not chronic injury types. Simply add to the point totals the "average PPG" for a "average replacement player". So if the base format is a 12 team league that starts 3 WRs. Take the average PPG for WRs #37-48 and multiply it by the full number of games missed (not partial games) and add it to adjusted players point total. For Boldin, that would be 2 games of production at an assumed "replacement rate" of production. In actuality, in the 2 leagues that I had Boldin I put in players like Mason, Coles, Muhammed when he was out.Yeah, this sort of thing is pointless if you go ppg, because drafting injured players is not the way to have the "perfect draft" (hindsight and all now) ...but, hobbit, do you add or subtract for injuries? do you rank boldin higher because he was injured in 2005, or lower? i see it as a double-edged sword
Yeah but the DD is programmed with VBD which should fully account for these drop-offs. It is a fair point to say that one does not think the "dropoffs" of 2005 are likely to be replicated in 2006/2007 (the "Peyton Manning" argument coming out of the 2004 season), although I'm not sure that is what I expect out of Gates given his PPG over the 2nd half of 2004 and all of 2005.I do not think I could draft him before mid/late second. The opportunity cost is too steep. It is the same argument as for first round qb. RBs and WRs are too far behind others.
In addition, the dropoff from Gates to Cooley.Witten/Alge is not near as far as RBs: RB1/RB2 of Rudi/Jordan in rounds 1 and 2 with Dunn in round 4 as RB3 to Jordan/Dunn as RB1/RB2 with someone like FWP as RB3.
To me, the first set of RB/RB is "safer". Also, it gives you a very solid base for your team. I would also think that Rudi/Holt would give an advantage over Gates/Jordan.
I probably did not articulate this well, but I hope the point was made.
Check your PM in a second...Yes, and you know I'm here for ample rebuttal. Good discussions back and forth.Funny you should mention "Moneyball" - I was just using that analogy for FF today.All good points.You know me, just like to stir up crap...I never said I was fully behind this, but might as well explore it.Whoa whoa whoa.....Hold on a second here.
Breaking this down by round, into number of each position actually taken vs. positions that *should've* been taken each round:
1st Round: ADP had 11 RBs, 1 QB. Perfect draft had 8 RBs, 3 WRs, 1 TE.
2nd Round: ADP: 7 RBs, 4 WRs, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 6 WRs, 1 QB.
3rd Round: ADP: 2 RBs, 7 WRs, 1 TE, 1 QB. Perfect Draft: 2 QB, 8 RB, 2 WR
4th Round: ADP: 6 RBs, 4 WRs, 2 QBs. Perfect Draft: 9 WRs, 3 RBs.
5th Round: ADP: 3 RBs, 5 WRs, 1 TE, 3 QBs. Perfect Draft: 5 RBs, 2 WRs, 3 TEs, 2 QBs,
What's interesting?
According to this, too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
Possibly.
I know this is going to get a few harsh responses...but this thread was designed to explore things we haven't explored before...so let's do that.
I'm going to bold it:
Too many running backs are possibly being taken early in drafts.
In the first two rounds, ADP has 18 RBs off the board, where the perfect draft has 13. On the flip side, ADP has 4 WRs off the board, while the perfect draft had 9.
Does this mean anything? Maybe, maybe not. But, for those of you in start 3 WR leagues, you might want to take a step back on this one.
Numbers can lie to you, and I think they are here.
Allow me to throw out the pertinent facts:
Using the pre-season ADP:
3 RBs in the Top 20 slots were injured for more than 8 games.
4 more RBs in the Top 21 slots were injured for at least 4 games.
That's 7 out of 21 that are hurt.
Injury comparison: 2 WRs in the Top 30 missed more than 8 games (TO, Walker), and only one of those was due to injury. 3 WRs in the Top 40 missed at least 8, with 1 more missing at least 4 games.
QB - One in the Top 20 missed more than 8 (Culpepper), and one more in the Top 40 (Bulger). McNabb at 27 also missed 7 games.
Of course you can argue that the injuries are part of the game - but that is EXACTLY the point. RBs get hurt at an alarming rate since they handle the ball 3 times as much as WRs. You have to take RBs more than WRs since you not only need stud RBs, but you also need depth because on average you're going to lose one of those studs for at least 1/4 of a season if not longer. With 7 of the top 17 RBs falling downward due to injuries, WRs can go up in value with 20/20 hindsight.
Injuries must be "the grain of salt" that you take with these results.
All that in mind - I think this is great work keys. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but I think the conclusion you drew from your results is flawed.
Honestly? I'm looking for the "Moneyball" concept of FF. There's gotta be something. VBD is a huge part of it...but now that's become too common.
We have to find something that's undervalued, and exploit it. That's part of the reason I did this.
There should be an equivalent book for FF....
Sure.When I finish, I'll go through and do that.Hey Keys, good job. I have a question: Could you list out what the perfect drafts would be for each draft spot?
Keys, nice work as always.More fodder for this weekThe final file has been sent to Bruce to post in the Apps forum.
I'll do the final touches on this thread later today.
I've never done them before.There's a post somewhere in here where another poster had run through the top 100 of last year...so that's close. That was obviously very QB heavy.Have these "perfect" drafts been completed for prior years? I ask because if there is at least 3 years of data than valid arguments for trends, absolutes, and so forth.
I think the guy you quoted got it right about the playoffs being more about luck. No amount of depth is going to change that unless you make a habit of benching guys like Holt, Gates, LT2 in the playoffs because you think they may underperform due to bad matchups. I don't know of any owners that would bench those guys if they are playing.Which goes on to prove that the first two or three rounds don't make a championship team. They can help you win a lot of games and hopefully get you into the playoffs, but don't assure you of a championship. Exactly why we all must work doubly hard to have solid drafts throughout, not just the first few rounds...VALUE VALUE VALUE!And this is why people say it takes skill to get the playoffs, but once you're in the playoffs, it takes luck. Imagine a "dream team" with Tomlinson, Portis, Steven Jackson, SMoss, Holt, Galloway and Gates. Here's how they would have done in week 15:
1.03: LaDainian Tomlinson, RB 85 yds, 0 TD
1.06: Clinton Portis, RB 116 yds, 0 TD
2.03: Steven Jackson, RB 82 yds, 0 TD
1.12: Santana Moss, WR 73 yds, 0 TD
2.05: Torry Holt, WR[ 16 yds, 1 TD
2.06: Joey Galloway, WR 38 yds, 0 TD
1.11: Antonio Gates, TE 29 yds, 0 TD
In fact, here are all of the mediocre or worse games in red:
Week 15
1.01: Shaun Alexander, RB 172 yds, 1 TD
1.02: Larry Johnson, RB 184 yds, 2 TD
1.03: LaDainian Tomlinson, RB 85 yds, 0 TD
1.04: Tiki Barber, RB 249 yds, 2 TD
1.05: Edgerrin James, RB 45 yds, 1 TD
1.06: Clinton Portis, RB 116 yds, 0 TD
1.07: Rudi Johnson, RB 131 yds, 2 TD
1.08: Lamont Jordan, RB 172 yds, 0 TD
1.09: Steve Smith, WR 85 yds, 2 TD
1.10: Larry Fitzgerald, WR 85 yds, 1 TD
1.11: Antonio Gates, TE 29 yds, 0 TD
1.12: Santana Moss, WR 73 yds, 0 TD
2.01: Thomas Jones, RB 94 yds, 1 TD
2.02: Mike Anderson, RB 101 yds, 2 TD
2.03: Steven Jackson, RB 82 yds, 0 TD
2.04: Chad Johnson, WR 99 yds, 1 TD
2.05: Torry Holt, WR 16 yds, 1 TD
2.06: Joey Galloway, WR 38 yds, 0 TD2.07: Chris Chambers, WR 34 yds, 1 TD
2.08: Marvin Harrison, WR 8 rec 135
2.09: Warrick Dunn, RB 90 yds, 0 TD
2.10: Carson Palmer, QB 274/3/2
2.11: Willis McGahee, RB 55 yds, 1 TD
2.12: Reuben Droughns, RB 84 yds, 0 TD
Week 16
1.01: Shaun Alexander, RB 145 yds, 3 TD
1.02: Larry Johnson, RB 179 yds, 2 TD
1.03: LaDainian Tomlinson, RB 67 yds, 0 TD
1.04: Tiki Barber, RB 129 yds, 0 TD
1.05: Edgerrin James, RB 55 yds, 0 TD
1.06: Clinton Portis, RB 118 yd, 1 TD
[b]1.07: Rudi Johnson, RB 96 yds, 0 TD
1.08: Lamont Jordan, RB 0 yds, 0 TD
1.09: Steve Smith, WR 18 yds, 0 TD
1.10: Larry Fitzgerald, WR 93 yds, 1 TD
1.11: Antonio Gates, TE 52 yds, 1 TD
1.12: Santana Moss, WR 160 yds, 3 TD
2.01: Thomas Jones, RB 106 yds, 1 TD
2.02: Mike Anderson, RB 66 yds, 1 TD
2.03: Steven Jackson, RB 49 yds, 1 TD
2.04: Chad Johnson, WR 117 yds, 1 TD
2.05: Torry Holt, WR 163 yds, 1 TD
2.06: Joey Galloway, WR 97 yds, 0 TD
2.07: Chris Chambers, WR 51 yds, 2 TD
2.08: Marvin Harrison, WR 0 rec 0 yds
2.09: Warrick Dunn, RB 64 yds, 0 TD
2.10: Carson Palmer, QB 266/2/2
[b]2.11: Willis McGahee, RB 66 yds, 0 TD
2.12: Reuben Droughns, RB 65 yds, 0 TD