Sand
Footballguy
That, ladies and gentlemen, is what a media suplex looks like.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is what a media suplex looks like.
The responses from the left in the article are great. Sounds like NPR lost their way.That, ladies and gentlemen, is what a media suplex looks like.
The wording of the original article was poor. From re-reading it sounds like atleast 60% of hospital cases are unvaccinated people and 40% have had 1 or 2 shots. If we estimate 78% of the UK population being vaccinated with 1 or 2 shots then I think your numbers are off a little.Those vax numbers are readily available. Link
I'm not jumping out of the vaccine window, but at first blush 40% vs 68.8% fully vaxed is not what I would have expected with 95% vax effectiveness.
You are correct on the "up to". I don't know what the hell that means, it could also be said as less than 41%....and there are a lot of numbers way less than 41% lol.
This was mostly how I saw it as well.
This was kind of my original point, although I was too lazy to finish the job. The "40% of hospitalizations are vaxxed" headline is just wildly misleading, even ignoring the fact that all 40% weren't "fully vaxxed".The wording of the original article was poor. From re-reading it sounds like atleast 60% of hospital cases are unvaccinated people and 40% have had 1 or 2 shots. If we estimate 78% of the UK population being vaccinated with 1 or 2 shots then I think your numbers are off a little.
745 is the average daily admittance to the hospital. A population of 53M above the age of 12.
Unvaccinated daily hospitalizations is 447 out of 11.66M. = .0000383%
Vaccinated daily hospitalizations is 298 out of 41.3M. = .0000072%
Unvaccinated people are being hospitalized daily at 5.3 times the rate of unvaccinated people. This would be around 84% vax effective.
The reason I don't like him is he comes off as the podcast version of the talking heads that dominate the news channels. I flock to the medium of podcasts to avoid people like him.Ben Shiprio is hated because he is successful at doing exactly what the mainstream media does. Ben doesn't twist the news by relying on dubious information or misinformation. Ben stays with accurate and reliable facts. He just presents facts which support his side, which is exactly what the mainstream media has been doing for decades. Ben is beating them at their own game which really makes them mad.
Hmmm...Im gonna say the article was pretty harsh but I do agree with the general concept. It's comical to come out and say that Shapiro doesn't tell falsehoods, rejects most right wing conspiracy ideas( vaxxing, Trump winning etc) yet is STILL a bad thing because, God forbid, he looks at things from a conservative perspective.This was mostly how I saw it as well.
I can't tell if this is the ultimate self own / backtracking on "mainstream media" post or your way of expressing your utter hatred and disgust for Ben Shiprio. FWIW....I agree with this particular assessment of MSM.Ben Shiprio is hated because he is successful at doing exactly what the mainstream media does. Ben doesn't twist the news by relying on dubious information or misinformation. Ben stays with accurate and reliable facts. He just presents facts which support his side, which is exactly what the mainstream media has been doing for decades. Ben is beating them at their own game which really makes them mad.
Maybe I'm missing something that the daily data is illustrating (not sure where you got it from original article linked but assume its good).The wording of the original article was poor. From re-reading it sounds like atleast 60% of hospital cases are unvaccinated people and 40% have had 1 or 2 shots. If we estimate 78% of the UK population being vaccinated with 1 or 2 shots then I think your numbers are off a little.
745 is the average daily admittance to the hospital. A population of 53M above the age of 12.
Unvaccinated daily hospitalizations is 447 out of 11.66M. = .0000383%
Vaccinated daily hospitalizations is 298 out of 41.3M. = .0000072%
Unvaccinated people are being hospitalized daily at 5.3 times the rate of unvaccinated people. This would be around 84% vax effective.
The bolded is incorrect. The actual stat was 60% are completely unvaxxed, meaning 40% were one shot, two shots, or two shots + 2-3 week period to be fully vaxxed. They did not have stats on the percentage that were "fully vaxxed".Maybe I'm missing something that the daily data is illustrating (not sure where you got it from original article linked but assume its good).
I have two simple data points. 68% of UK is double vaccinated (which is what is recommended). At least 40% of hospitalizations are from double vaccinated. So imo, unless you think "at least" means a lot less than 40% (maybe thats what your daily data shows?) I don't see how that looks anywhere close to the published numbers effectiveness?
Again, maybe that 40% from the UK Science Chief is way off?
I have mixed feelings about Shapiro.The reason I don't like him is he comes off as the podcast version of the talking heads that dominate the news channels. I flock to the medium of podcasts to avoid people like him.
Censorship sounds reasonable when it is framed as falsehoods about Healthcare. But it takes about a day before it gets expanded to things we disagree with.Hmmm...Im gonna say the article was pretty harsh but I do agree with the general concept. It's comical to come out and say that Shapiro doesn't tell falsehoods, rejects most right wing conspiracy ideas( vaxxing, Trump winning etc) yet is STILL a bad thing because, God forbid, he looks at things from a conservative perspective.
It reeks of censorship based on political ideology and nothing more, and that's not a good thing
That was my exposure to him initially, thought he came off well, and therefore started listening to the podcast. Then IMO on his show he turns more into the stuff I hate as he puts on what I assume is a bit of a show. There are nuggets of goodness in there, but just tired of feeling like I was getting yelled at and how he resorts to the lame "Sleepy Joe" type of shots. Unsubscribed and would much rather listen to other pods that we listed, especially ones where there are 2 people on to counter each other.I have mixed feelings about Shapiro.
Interestingly I think we have a lot of folks on this board that self-identify as former "conservatives" but turned away by the republican party of recent times that fundamentally Shapiro would seemingly appeal to. I mean a conservative who is loudly anti Trump. He's pro vaccine. He will explain his positions.
My exposure to Shapiro is mostly from a few video clips I saw a few years ago and his sit down with Joe Rogan (which I would recommend if you want to understand Shapiro better).
Not sure how to describe him, but he's combative at essentially the same level as most talking heads (as you point out KP), which is generally a turn-off. But he is actually smart and consistent. I'm not saying Hannity or Tucker or Maddow aren't smart...but Shapiro will actually explain to why he feels the way he does with something other than "them people bad". And when he doesn't agree with something, sides do not sway him. Anti Trump should be a huge feather in his camp...what other "talking head" on either side has done something comparable.
Unfortunately I think Daily Wire is pretty crummy, haven't gone on recently but lots of Adware and not a lot of meat. Maybe its improved, I expect that it will.
I think you're right about how Shapiro appeals. From the little I've seen of him, he makes a case and doesn't revert to "them people bad" as you said. His whole thing of "facts over feelings" can be abrasive but also there can be truth there too that's needed. It's a balance.I have mixed feelings about Shapiro.
Interestingly I think we have a lot of folks on this board that self-identify as former "conservatives" but turned away by the republican party of recent times that fundamentally Shapiro would seemingly appeal to. I mean a conservative who is loudly anti Trump. He's pro vaccine. He will explain his positions.
My exposure to Shapiro is mostly from a few video clips I saw a few years ago and his sit down with Joe Rogan (which I would recommend if you want to understand Shapiro better).
Not sure how to describe him, but he's combative at essentially the same level as most talking heads (as you point out KP), which is generally a turn-off. But he is actually smart and consistent. I'm not saying Hannity or Tucker or Maddow aren't smart...but Shapiro will actually explain to why he feels the way he does with something other than "them people bad". And when he doesn't agree with something, sides do not sway him. Anti Trump should be a huge feather in his camp...what other "talking head" on either side has done something comparable.
Unfortunately I think Daily Wire is pretty crummy, haven't gone on recently but lots of Adware and not a lot of meat. Maybe its improved, I expect that it will.
Censorship never sounds reasonableCensorship sounds reasonable when it is framed as falsehoods about Healthcare. But it takes about a day before it gets expanded to things we disagree with.
Now do why the right are dismissive of the left-leaning media. Thanks in advanceWhy Im dismissive of the fringe media sources
Bannon…a person who called for the beheading of Wray and Fauci. Who stated he throws crap out there to flood the zone. Who was arrested for fraud and needed presidential pardon. Yet he is a big part of right wing news and information.
Charlie Kirk…already had a poor opinion of him…his ranting on Simone Biles today was awful.
People like a podcaster Julie Kelly spouting off calling the officers who testified today “crisis actors”.
Just deplorable commentary by some lately. I just cant under that.
Because it makes you feel better about supporting a political party that's doing their damnedest to destroy democracy in the name of a wretched old demagogue?Ramblin Wreck said:Now do why the right are dismissive of the left-leaning media. Thanks in advance
Try again. First attempt was an abject failure.Because it makes you feel better about supporting a political party that's doing their damnedest to destroy democracy in the name of a wretched old demagogue?
Thank you for the honest explanation of your support for Biden.Because it makes you feel better about supporting a political party that's doing their damnedest to destroy democracy in the name of a wretched old demagogue?
Funny. Welcome back. Please don't ruin the non-shtick 1/6 threads with your outbursts. TIA.Thank you for the honest explanation of your support for Biden.
Funny. Welcome back. Please don't ruin the non-shtick 1/6 threads with your outbursts. TIA.
Funny. Welcome back. Please don't ruin the non-shtick 1/6 threads with your outbursts. TIA.
You're opinion is noted and received. I have definitely been in a pattern of calling out other posters lately, which is not what Joe wants. I understand.You might want to follow your own advice. This kick you're on blaming people you disagree with for derailing threads is not a good look. In fact, it actually perpetuates what you accuse others of doing. You're doing the same thing in other threads with me and other posters as well.
Things you don't like to hear doesn't always mean someone is trying to derail a thread. Sometimes the truth is hard to bear, but it needs to be said in order to advance the conversation. We're trying to break the bubble here, not add to it. Let's do it together, deal?![]()
A Google spokesperson says the company has already demonetized Gateway Pundit’s homepage and some of its stories, including a half dozen or so examples of Gateway Pundit pieces that the Center for Countering Digital Hate cited and were shared with Google. The spokesperson continued: “We have strict publisher policies that prohibit content promoting anti-vaccine theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and false claims about the 2020 U.S. Presidential election – and our enforcement can be as targeted as demonetizing a specific page. We already actioned the majority of pages shared from this report back in 2020 or early 2021 and similarly stopped serving ads on the site’s homepage last year. We will continue to take appropriate action if new content is uploaded that violates our policies.”
Can you explain this in a little more detail?While I've been pleasantly surprised by Biden's tenure so far,