What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***The rookie hype has begun*** (1 Viewer)

benson_will_lead_the_way said:
purplehaze67 said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
Is Darrell Jackson for 1.03 enough?The guy has LT,Willie Parker, Thomas Jones and needs WR's. Plus he has 1.02 as well.
If it were me holding the 1.03, probably not. Unless I was in a "win now" mode, I'd rather take my chances with CJ over DJ.
But he could/will probably have both if he wants with 1.02 as well. But you don't think its enough...humm
Well, ok if you look at it that way I'd prefer Lynch+CJ over either one+DJ right now. I could probably turn around and trade Lynch for a better WR then Jax if I was inclined to bolster WR at the expense of RB.
 
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
purplehaze67 said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
Is Darrell Jackson for 1.03 enough?The guy has LT,Willie Parker, Thomas Jones and needs WR's. Plus he has 1.02 as well.
If it were me holding the 1.03, probably not. Unless I was in a "win now" mode, I'd rather take my chances with CJ over DJ.
But he could/will probably have both if he wants with 1.02 as well. But you don't think its enough...humm
Well, ok if you look at it that way I'd prefer Lynch+CJ over either one+DJ right now. I could probably turn around and trade Lynch for a better WR then Jax if I was inclined to bolster WR at the expense of RB.
True so how much more to get it done?
 
waiver wire said:
Not sure if this is useful to anyone but here goes.

I earned the 1.01 in a ZF league :banned:

Decided I'd see if the AD hype is enough to coax some good value out of the guys at 1.02 or 1.03 in a move-down scenario. Shot off a general email asking if either had any willingness to start trade talks.

Both pretty quickly said they'd be happy with whoever was there for them at their current pick and had no interest in paying to move up.
Just received and quickly declined this offer for the 1.01:1.04/2.10/4.04
i would have rejected this out right as wellthis deal does nothing to help your team

i would have at least taken a second to look at his roster to see if i could counter if i could have gotten a top player back

if there wasn't a player i wanted then there is no chance that a deal could get done
No, he does have some usable players but I'm not really looking to move below 1.03 in this draft, at least at this point in the process. Maybe after combines/pro days or after the NFL draft, I might see the gap between 1.01 and 1.04 narrow enough to be workable.To make me change my mind, the trade would really have to knock my socks off. Not sure I want to be in the business of making those kinds of offers and since I am pretty happy to stay put, I don't see myself taking the role of putting something on the table.

Tweaking an existing offer to make it a better fit, maybe. But it'd already need to be in the ballpark for me to do that. This wasn't even close enough to feel we had enough common ground to negotiate from.

 
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
purplehaze67 said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
Is Darrell Jackson for 1.03 enough?The guy has LT,Willie Parker, Thomas Jones and needs WR's. Plus he has 1.02 as well.
If it were me holding the 1.03, probably not. Unless I was in a "win now" mode, I'd rather take my chances with CJ over DJ.
But he could/will probably have both if he wants with 1.02 as well. But you don't think its enough...humm
Well, ok if you look at it that way I'd prefer Lynch+CJ over either one+DJ right now. I could probably turn around and trade Lynch for a better WR then Jax if I was inclined to bolster WR at the expense of RB.
True so how much more to get it done?
Well I can give an answer for me, but that does no good when dealing with this owner. I personally love (probably too much) my draft picks and very young, high-upside players (guys in NFL year 1, 2, 3). So, if I were your trading partner in this scenario, I would not be up for a DJax deal. The actual owner may well think differently. Most people do. Depending on where your 2007 #1 is, that plus your 2008 #1 might well get you the 1.03 and maybe a #2 in 07 or 08 from me, just as a rough guide without knowing anything about the makeup or philosophy of either squad.I'd say that, even though I don't like DJax for 1.03, it's not a laughable offer and it's decent starting point for negotiations. Have you had any prelim talks with the guy to see if he'd be up for making a trade, and what he'd be looking for in return? That is probably the way I'd begin. Let him tell you vs you putting something together that you think might work.
 
Not sure if this is useful to anyone but here goes.I earned the 1.01 in a ZF league :yes:Decided I'd see if the AD hype is enough to coax some good value out of the guys at 1.02 or 1.03 in a move-down scenario. Shot off a general email asking if either had any willingness to start trade talks. Both pretty quickly said they'd be happy with whoever was there for them at their current pick and had no interest in paying to move up.
Just received and quickly declined this offer for the 1.01:1.04/2.10/4.04
I thought it was at least worth a counter. :IBTL:
Thought about it briefly, but with the dropoff between 1.01 and 1.04 coupled with the seemingly weak overall depth in this draft, it's going to be tough to make something work. I don't see much value at all in late 2nd rounders and later this year. I'd probably need something very substantial in 2008 to feel good about dropping down past 1.03 as things sit right now. I will keep you in mind as an interested party and maybe closer to/after the NFL draft, we can revisit and see if a mutually-agreeable deal can be reached.
I figured it was worth a shot. I have eight picks, but my team is pretty deep, so I don't need all those picks and am willing to unload some picks to move up. If 2.04 instead of 2.10 makes a difference, I have that out there too.I really want to move out of 1.04, but it is such a horrible pick to have this year. Nobody wants to trade up to it, nobody wants to trade down to it. There are the three obvious top picks, then about 5-6 players that are of about equal value.
 
Not sure if this is useful to anyone but here goes.I earned the 1.01 in a ZF league :moneybag:Decided I'd see if the AD hype is enough to coax some good value out of the guys at 1.02 or 1.03 in a move-down scenario. Shot off a general email asking if either had any willingness to start trade talks. Both pretty quickly said they'd be happy with whoever was there for them at their current pick and had no interest in paying to move up.
Just received and quickly declined this offer for the 1.01:1.04/2.10/4.04
I thought it was at least worth a counter. :goodposting:
Thought about it briefly, but with the dropoff between 1.01 and 1.04 coupled with the seemingly weak overall depth in this draft, it's going to be tough to make something work. I don't see much value at all in late 2nd rounders and later this year. I'd probably need something very substantial in 2008 to feel good about dropping down past 1.03 as things sit right now. I will keep you in mind as an interested party and maybe closer to/after the NFL draft, we can revisit and see if a mutually-agreeable deal can be reached.
I figured it was worth a shot. I have eight picks, but my team is pretty deep, so I don't need all those picks and am willing to unload some picks to move up. If 2.04 instead of 2.10 makes a difference, I have that out there too.I really want to move out of 1.04, but it is such a horrible pick to have this year. Nobody wants to trade up to it, nobody wants to trade down to it. There are the three obvious top picks, then about 5-6 players that are of about equal value.
Value of the 1.04 will go up after the draft. One of the other runningbacks will land in a favorable situation. Still going to need a lot more to move up to the 1.01 though.
 
I was actually offered westy/C-buck for 1.01. I declined mistake or no?
I'm a huge AD fan, but I think I would have taken that.
I'm shocked at the number of people who willingly set their team back 2 years, at least.In non-ppr, Bush/Maroney/DeW/Addai/White were iffy starters most of the year (some early, some late, some middle). You just don't see many rookie RBs come in, and start in year one. And if they do start, produce.So AD probably won't be a solid RB1/RB2 until 2008. At best.And he probably won't start tearing up the league until year 3-4. For that, you're giving up a top 5 PPR RB. AD might never have a good as year as Westy had last year. He might never have a good as year as Westy has this year. You only have to win your league once every 10-12 years (depending on league size obviously) to break even. Unless you enjoy paying your friends to play FF with you. So there's nothing wrong with going for the championship. Lots of people around here would trade their entire roster for 2006/2007 rookies. Build a real dynasty they say! Lets pay my friends for 4 years while 50% of my "future studs" bust. Without question, I'd cash in on the rookie pick hype. Wait until the draft gets close. Let ESPN/NFLN hype AD/Lynch/CJ to no end. Then when a guy will toss you Westy+Vjack+Delhomme, you can laugh all the way to the playoffs. Earlier in this thread someone offered Boldin for 1.03. *lol* Proven 90+ catch guy, elite WR, young, solid, reliable, for a rookie thats no better then 50/50. You would not believe the hype Charles Rogers got. I saw him taken at 1.02 in one league, 1.03 in various others. Ron Dayne. Oh man people ate themselves up some Dayne. William Green was 1.01 in a number of leagues. Lelie? Duckett? Remember when Michael Clayton was a lock for 80/1000/8 for the next 8 years? BMW? Uh yah that meant BIG Mike Williams. Oh how that nickname went awry. Oh Chris Perry. The talent! He oozes it! If only... If only... No one is a lock. People bust alllll the time.If you can get elite talent (top 5-10 RB top 5-10WR) for a roll of the dice, you take that allll day. Don’t play for 2009 unless you have to. Don’t throw away a stud for a college highlight reel on youtube.
 
I was actually offered westy/C-buck for 1.01. I declined mistake or no?
I'm a huge AD fan, but I think I would have taken that.
I'm shocked at the number of people who willingly set their team back 2 years, at least.In non-ppr, Bush/Maroney/DeW/Addai/White were iffy starters most of the year (some early, some late, some middle). You just don't see many rookie RBs come in, and start in year one. And if they do start, produce.So AD probably won't be a solid RB1/RB2 until 2008. At best.And he probably won't start tearing up the league until year 3-4. For that, you're giving up a top 5 PPR RB. AD might never have a good as year as Westy had last year. He might never have a good as year as Westy has this year. You only have to win your league once every 10-12 years (depending on league size obviously) to break even. Unless you enjoy paying your friends to play FF with you. So there's nothing wrong with going for the championship. Lots of people around here would trade their entire roster for 2006/2007 rookies. Build a real dynasty they say! Lets pay my friends for 4 years while 50% of my "future studs" bust. Without question, I'd cash in on the rookie pick hype. Wait until the draft gets close. Let ESPN/NFLN hype AD/Lynch/CJ to no end. Then when a guy will toss you Westy+Vjack+Delhomme, you can laugh all the way to the playoffs. Earlier in this thread someone offered Boldin for 1.03. *lol* Proven 90+ catch guy, elite WR, young, solid, reliable, for a rookie thats no better then 50/50. You would not believe the hype Charles Rogers got. I saw him taken at 1.02 in one league, 1.03 in various others. Ron Dayne. Oh man people ate themselves up some Dayne. William Green was 1.01 in a number of leagues. Lelie? Duckett? Remember when Michael Clayton was a lock for 80/1000/8 for the next 8 years? BMW? Uh yah that meant BIG Mike Williams. Oh how that nickname went awry. Oh Chris Perry. The talent! He oozes it! If only... If only... No one is a lock. People bust alllll the time.If you can get elite talent (top 5-10 RB top 5-10WR) for a roll of the dice, you take that allll day. Don’t play for 2009 unless you have to. Don’t throw away a stud for a college highlight reel on youtube.
Rant... but I like it! :confused:
 
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
purplehaze67 said:
benson_will_lead_the_way said:
Is Darrell Jackson for 1.03 enough?The guy has LT,Willie Parker, Thomas Jones and needs WR's. Plus he has 1.02 as well.
If it were me holding the 1.03, probably not. Unless I was in a "win now" mode, I'd rather take my chances with CJ over DJ.
But he could/will probably have both if he wants with 1.02 as well. But you don't think its enough...humm
Well, ok if you look at it that way I'd prefer Lynch+CJ over either one+DJ right now. I could probably turn around and trade Lynch for a better WR then Jax if I was inclined to bolster WR at the expense of RB.
True so how much more to get it done?
Well I can give an answer for me, but that does no good when dealing with this owner. I personally love (probably too much) my draft picks and very young, high-upside players (guys in NFL year 1, 2, 3). So, if I were your trading partner in this scenario, I would not be up for a DJax deal. The actual owner may well think differently. Most people do. Depending on where your 2007 #1 is, that plus your 2008 #1 might well get you the 1.03 and maybe a #2 in 07 or 08 from me, just as a rough guide without knowing anything about the makeup or philosophy of either squad.I'd say that, even though I don't like DJax for 1.03, it's not a laughable offer and it's decent starting point for negotiations. Have you had any prelim talks with the guy to see if he'd be up for making a trade, and what he'd be looking for in return? That is probably the way I'd begin. Let him tell you vs you putting something together that you think might work.
CJ is likely going to end up with the Bucs or Browns - not exactly ideal situations. TB would be ok, but what about the QB situation? I'd rather have DJax if I wanted to win this year.
 
that was a good post by billyjoe...

last line - "Don’t throw away a stud for a college highlight reel on youtube." is borderline sig material... :goodposting:

too often, others overvalue youth in dynasty leagues (i'm guilty of this at times)...

that said, it isn't always as cut & dry as having a team populated entirely with geezers that is win in 07 or bust, or having all rookies that may not be competitive for half a decade or more...

ideally you can construct a team that is balanced in terms of age, experience, production, potential... especially when you can use draft, waiver wire & trades to do so... in practive, though, it is probably hard to not emphasize one over the other...

i can tolerate being a little worse at certain positions in short term if by doing so i think i can gain a decided advantage in long term... how best to do that, is still an open question...

an interesting corollary to issue billy joe raised... the same critical eye that is levelled at bust rate of rookies, in the interest of a thorough study of the matter... could also be turned to & directed at vets... how often do vets bust...

boldin does seem like a pretty sure thing, so there are matters of degree here... chris chambers was coming off very good year in 05, & many had him as top 10-15 WR... he's not that old... did he bust in 06? maybe he comes back & he wasn't a bust...

so if you can get a truly "sure thing" vet, whatever that means, for a high pick, that could a great thing to do (qualifying it with depending on age... many would disagree on whether SA is worth 1.1... i don't think so, but 30 year old RBs coming off injury riddled season ((especially leg/knee/foot injury)) frighten me)... but making sure you have identified a sure thing can be difficult...

* edit/add - the divides in thinking on youth/experience, potential/production & on their relative merits is always provocative in dynasty discussions...

dynasty can be very challenging... the layer of complexity added by age concerns is what appeals to a lot of dynasty players... imagine chess if the pieces could not only get injured or suspended or have off year... but get old...

but these questions can also be reduced to something simpler... the teams that have the most above average players usually wins... good players can be young or old...

i've definitely seen different strategies win... some teams favor trading away first rounders to get underrated older players... though most of the teams i've seen do well at this, were also adept at trading back into draft in future when they had use of vets but before they became spent...

one advantage to rookies (& not necessarily talking about bush & AD here, but boldin may be good example)... their value is not known yet... many undervalued rookie QBs last year... same with MJD... colston... once players are vets & have 3-4 seasons or more playing at high level, its hard to acquire those players cheaply, & there is not as great a variance & disparity in value any more...

getting an LT, or steven jackson, or boldin, or getting a few of those players, BEFORE THEY BREAK OUT, is the kind of move that can win leagues... & in position to keep winning for many years...

in general, the successful teams i have seen, are not only adept at making shrewd trades & WW moves, but at manipulating the draft process... trading out of bad spots, & into good ones...

maximizing value can at times take the form of parlaying picks into players, & vice verce...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I currently own the 1.01 & 1.02 in a 16-team IDP dynasty rookie draft ("Papa Bear" in my sig)

I offered:

Chester Taylor RB MIN

Mewelde Moore RB MIN

Ciatrick Fason RB MIN

for:

Musa Smith RB BAL

2007 1.03

It was declined. :hifive:

Shortly afterwards another team aquired the pick.

Trade details:

Mark Anderson DE CHI

2007 1.03

for:

Julius Peppers DE CAR

2007 1.14

2008 1st

So I approach the new owner of the 1.03 with a verbal offer of:

Chester Taylor RB MIN

Mewelde Moore RB MIN

Ciatrick Fason RB MIN

Torry Holt WR STL

for:

2007 1.03

He declined! :wub: :lmao:

P.S. I must admit I'm not so sure I would've actually gone through with this trade, waaaay too much IMO!

 
I currently own the 1.01 & 1.02 in a 16-team IDP dynasty rookie draft ("Papa Bear" in my sig)I offered:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINfor:Musa Smith RB BAL2007 1.03It was declined. :lmao: Shortly afterwards another team aquired the pick.Trade details:Mark Anderson DE CHI2007 1.03for:Julius Peppers DE CAR2007 1.142008 1stSo I approach the new owner of the 1.03 with a verbal offer of:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINTorry Holt WR STLfor:2007 1.03He declined! :o :yes: P.S. I must admit I'm not so sure I would've actually gone through with this trade, waaaay too much IMO!
He's nuts for declining that offer. Holt alone is worth more than the 1.03.
 
fruity pebbles said:
Athletic Supporter said:
I currently own the 1.01 & 1.02 in a 16-team IDP dynasty rookie draft ("Papa Bear" in my sig)I offered:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINfor:Musa Smith RB BAL2007 1.03It was declined. :yes: Shortly afterwards another team aquired the pick.Trade details:Mark Anderson DE CHI2007 1.03for:Julius Peppers DE CAR2007 1.142008 1stSo I approach the new owner of the 1.03 with a verbal offer of:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINTorry Holt WR STLfor:2007 1.03He declined! :lmao: :lmao: P.S. I must admit I'm not so sure I would've actually gone through with this trade, waaaay too much IMO!
He's nuts for declining that offer. Holt alone is worth more than the 1.03.
Whatever! Holt's knees are getting worn and Taylor wont have a long shelf life in Minny. I turned it down and am still happy with the decision
 
fruity pebbles said:
Athletic Supporter said:
I currently own the 1.01 & 1.02 in a 16-team IDP dynasty rookie draft ("Papa Bear" in my sig)I offered:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINfor:Musa Smith RB BAL2007 1.03It was declined. :yes: Shortly afterwards another team aquired the pick.Trade details:Mark Anderson DE CHI2007 1.03for:Julius Peppers DE CAR2007 1.142008 1stSo I approach the new owner of the 1.03 with a verbal offer of:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINTorry Holt WR STLfor:2007 1.03He declined! :lmao: :lmao: P.S. I must admit I'm not so sure I would've actually gone through with this trade, waaaay too much IMO!
He's nuts for declining that offer. Holt alone is worth more than the 1.03.
Whatever! Holt's knees are getting worn and Taylor wont have a long shelf life in Minny. I turned it down and am still happy with the decision
Holt's a top 5 WR who had a minor cleanup of one of his knees. Happens all the time. Glad you're happy with it though.
 
cstu said:
CJ is likely going to end up with the Bucs or Browns - not exactly ideal situations. TB would be ok, but what about the QB situation? I'd rather have DJax if I wanted to win this year.
I agree for a team in "win now" mode, the trade looks a lot better. But otherwise, if you are 2+ years out for competitiveness, I'm not sure how much stock should be put in NFL team situations as they are right now. Who is to say that CJ won't help lead his new team to an Arizona-like status? Lots of things can change between now and opening kickoff 2009.
 
fruity pebbles said:
Athletic Supporter said:
I currently own the 1.01 & 1.02 in a 16-team IDP dynasty rookie draft ("Papa Bear" in my sig)I offered:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINfor:Musa Smith RB BAL2007 1.03It was declined. :unsure: Shortly afterwards another team aquired the pick.Trade details:Mark Anderson DE CHI2007 1.03for:Julius Peppers DE CAR2007 1.142008 1stSo I approach the new owner of the 1.03 with a verbal offer of:Chester Taylor RB MINMewelde Moore RB MINCiatrick Fason RB MINTorry Holt WR STLfor:2007 1.03He declined! :shock: :own3d: P.S. I must admit I'm not so sure I would've actually gone through with this trade, waaaay too much IMO!
He's nuts for declining that offer. Holt alone is worth more than the 1.03.
Whatever! Holt's knees are getting worn and Taylor wont have a long shelf life in Minny. I turned it down and am still happy with the decision
:mellow:
 
I do think the Rookie Hype gets to more owners than trading of future picks for Vets. But both do have thier bonus' and it takes a proper balance.

however, I have seen more teams destroyed by trading for the future then for the present.

 
This trade just went down in one of my 12 team dynasty leagues

Team A gets: 1.01, Rod Smith, and Roscoe Parrish

Team B gets: Plaxico Burress, Chris Chambers, and Jerious Norwood.

What do you guys think?

 
here is a trade I made that involved the 1.03 rookie pick

I gave

Clemmoms, Sinorice Moss, 1.03, 2.17

I got

Bulger, Deuce, Bruce

 
here is a trade I made that involved the 1.03 rookie pickI gave Clemmoms, Sinorice Moss, 1.03, 2.17 I got Bulger, Deuce, Bruce
Thats not too bad either. Can I assume you are in a win now mode?
 
was offered 1.01 for caddy and 1.03

I have Marion Barber/Gore/Bush /Caddy i was going to grab Cal Johnson hopefully as Wrs are weak but wouldn't mind AD on my team.

 
The following trade is for pick 1.03 in a contract/salary cap league.

Devil Doggs gave up:

Barber, Marion DAL RB

Benson, Cedric CHI RB

Jackson, Darrell SEA WR

Sacrificial Lambs gave up:

Berrian, Bernard CHI WR

Hackett, D.J. SEA WR

Jones, Brandon TEN WR

Year 2007 Round 1 Draft Pick from Sacrificial Lambs

 
Just paid through the nose for the 1.1. I gave up Laurence Maroney, Lee Evans, and 1.7 pick. However, I think I could afford to overpay. I have a strong WR corps and I didn't care about 1.7. For me this basically boiled down to Maroney vs AP/Calvin Johnson. I like the latter 2 guys better.

 
Just paid through the nose for the 1.1. I gave up Laurence Maroney, Lee Evans, and 1.7 pick. However, I think I could afford to overpay. I have a strong WR corps and I didn't care about 1.7. For me this basically boiled down to Maroney vs AP/Calvin Johnson. I like the latter 2 guys better.
Ouch
 
I offered Thomas JOnes and the 1.05 for the 1.01. I have not heard back. His team has more holes then mine, but I wouldn't mind keeping TJ. He is younger then people remember (28) and he doesn't have near the touches of some RBs of comparable age. THere is likely 3-4 years worth of tread left on the tires.

 
I gave

Matt Leinart, 1.01, Schweigert

received

Clinton Portis, Keith Brooking, Vince Young, picks #18 and 34

I figure VY = ML, Brooking = Schweigert, so Portis and 2 picks for 1.01

 
I offered 1.4, 2.4, and 4.4 for 1.2. That was rejected.
I offered 1.4, 2.4, and 4.4 for 1.3. Rejected.I was offered 1.3 for Roy Williams. Rejected.I offered Terrell Owens for 1.3. Rejected (on grounds that he is an Eagles fan).I offered 1.4 plus Hank Baskett for 1.3. Rejected.
 
I was actually offered westy/C-buck for 1.01. I declined mistake or no?
I'm a huge AD fan, but I think I would have taken that.
I'm shocked at the number of people who willingly set their team back 2 years, at least.In non-ppr, Bush/Maroney/DeW/Addai/White were iffy starters most of the year (some early, some late, some middle). You just don't see many rookie RBs come in, and start in year one. And if they do start, produce.

So AD probably won't be a solid RB1/RB2 until 2008. At best.

And he probably won't start tearing up the league until year 3-4.

For that, you're giving up a top 5 PPR RB. AD might never have a good as year as Westy had last year. He might never have a good as year as Westy has this year.

You only have to win your league once every 10-12 years (depending on league size obviously) to break even. Unless you enjoy paying your friends to play FF with you. So there's nothing wrong with going for the championship. Lots of people around here would trade their entire roster for 2006/2007 rookies. Build a real dynasty they say! Lets pay my friends for 4 years while 50% of my "future studs" bust.

Without question, I'd cash in on the rookie pick hype. Wait until the draft gets close. Let ESPN/NFLN hype AD/Lynch/CJ to no end. Then when a guy will toss you Westy+Vjack+Delhomme, you can laugh all the way to the playoffs.

Earlier in this thread someone offered Boldin for 1.03. *lol* Proven 90+ catch guy, elite WR, young, solid, reliable, for a rookie thats no better then 50/50. You would not believe the hype Charles Rogers got. I saw him taken at 1.02 in one league, 1.03 in various others. Ron Dayne. Oh man people ate themselves up some Dayne. William Green was 1.01 in a number of leagues. Lelie? Duckett? Remember when Michael Clayton was a lock for 80/1000/8 for the next 8 years? BMW? Uh yah that meant BIG Mike Williams. Oh how that nickname went awry. Oh Chris Perry. The talent! He oozes it! If only... If only...

No one is a lock. People bust alllll the time.

If you can get elite talent (top 5-10 RB top 5-10WR) for a roll of the dice, you take that allll day. Don’t play for 2009 unless you have to. Don’t throw away a stud for a college highlight reel on youtube.
Just to add validity to your point: The guy in my dynasty league that year sent the 1.01 pick for Marvin Harrison. The guy who traded for the 1.01 draft Chuck Rogers. We are from MI, so there was some homerism. Nevertheless, that one will be remembered.
 
I have the 1.01 in my dynasty league and I am holding tight right now. I need a lot of help at RB and plan on taking AP with the 1.01.

I have received a few trade offers but they haven't peaked my interest enough where I would pull the trigger.

I plan on waiting until after the draft to see where players end up before I consider trading.

 
I offered Deuce McAllister and Joe Horn for the 1.2 and he declined because he has Cooper and Colston also. I re-offered today with Horn being a Falcon. Fair deal?

I had the 1.1 the year Rogers cam out. The best offer I got was an old Eddie George. I declined.

Rookie hype is crazy but my 2 time defending champ team has Steven Jackson, Larry Fitzgerald, and Ronnie Brown as main stays. I traded Ricky W for the 1.2 and 1.4 before the suspension.

 
I gave Matt Leinart, 1.01, SchweigertreceivedClinton Portis, Keith Brooking, Vince Young, picks #18 and 34I figure VY = ML, Brooking = Schweigert, so Portis and 2 picks for 1.01
WoW OZ* I hate to say it but I think you got whooped in that deal.. I bet the guy would have given a little more :thumbdown:
 
Johnson, Andre HOU WR

for

Williams, Ricky FA RB; Year 2007 1.02 Draft Pick

Both were dynasty PPR 10 man leagues (2 flex).

 
Just got an offer of:

Lee Evans and Brandon Jacobs

for

1.02 and Brandon Marshall

I'm thinking about it.

 
Just paid through the nose for the 1.1. I gave up Laurence Maroney, Lee Evans, and 1.7 pick. However, I think I could afford to overpay. I have a strong WR corps and I didn't care about 1.7. For me this basically boiled down to Maroney vs AP/Calvin Johnson. I like the latter 2 guys better.
you could have almost had lt2 for that...
 
Our Gang said:
Just paid through the nose for the 1.1. I gave up Laurence Maroney, Lee Evans, and 1.7 pick. However, I think I could afford to overpay. I have a strong WR corps and I didn't care about 1.7. For me this basically boiled down to Maroney vs AP/Calvin Johnson. I like the latter 2 guys better.
you could have almost had lt2 for that...
Got an offer for the 1.1 I acquired. A guy offered the 1.3, 1.5, and DeAngelo Williams for 1.1
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top