What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (2 Viewers)

'Walton Goggins said:
'iamsmilin said:
'Walton Goggins said:
The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.
Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS
Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.
Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.
Im pretty sure I have seen a pic of Smilin. It was a small pic but I would say between a 6.5 and 7
I remember a thread years ago that many of the FBGals were posting pics of themselves in - smilin, Mac, cocoa, maybe Mrs BSR & a few others. At least by the pic I remember, smilin was/is pretty damned hot. I would've ranked her between a 7 & 8, but I'm naturally attracted to lots of dark hair and non-pasty skin. As I recall, all of the ladies that posted pics were attractive.
 
This is why your scale sucks balls. This chick is "average"? Do you know what the definition of average is? This chick has to be in the top 20 percent of all women. That is not average. Your scale is way too skewed for hot chicks. Basically, take the world's hottest 20% of all women and they would fall in your 4 to 10 range. This is why no one likes your scale and why this thread is an absolute trainwreck, because no one really comprehends what you are trying to do.Carry on, morons. :lmao:
That woman is gorgeous. She's at least an 8 (not knowing what her body's like) and I don't even like redheaded palefaces that much.
 
Need some rulings:

Link 1 - 6, without the gap in her teeth, she moves up

Link 2 - 7

Link 3 - 5, she is athletic, has a nice smile and no facial flaws....just kind of plain. This is a good 5 baseline, IMO.

Link 4 - 7

Link 5 - 8

Link 6 - 4, that nose is a killer

Link 7 - 5, my first thought was 4, but I can't see any major flaws

Link 8 - 4, only problem there is her weight, pretty girl otherwise

Link 9 - 7

Link 10 - 9, she'd be an 8 without seeing below her shoulders, but...wow.....

Bonus Link 11 - 5, cuteish, but has a big schnozz
 
Understandable that the hottest and ugliest get the most play, but for this exercise need some more of those "Average/Cute" types.http://www.paknetzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/city-communication.jpghttp://www.sugarslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/american-idol-haley-reinhart.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_f09YP6bu4Vw/TBTCyXZJ7qI/AAAAAAAAB0s/hXt5cn0XAMs/s400/Cute+Long+Bob+Hairstyles+for+Women+2.jpghttp://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpghttp://grrlplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tina-fey-tanktop.jpg
4 4 5 6 8
:lmao:you are insane
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.

Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.

Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?"

:lmao:

 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
:goodposting:
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:lmao:
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:goodposting: it's a BUST. Should have stuck with the GD draft! :nerd:
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:goodposting: it's a BUST. Should have stuck with the GD draft! :nerd:
:goodposting:
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:lmao:
A no major flaw girl that isn't fat is NOT average in today's world. Average is carrying 40 pounds and looks like they got run over by a tractor. Half of all women look worse than this.
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:lmao:I rest my case.
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?" :lmao:
Average girl is somewhere on the 2/3 line.
:lmao:
A no major flaw girl that isn't fat is NOT average in today's world. Average is carrying 40 pounds and looks like they got run over by a tractor. Half of all women look worse than this.
I don't think you understand what is making him laugh.
 
Name one PHYSICAL flaw on her. Just one.
She's about 15lbs overweight
:lmao: It's called body type. She is not overweight. Your standards for weight do not match the reality for a woman with her body type.

Some of you in here are either complete pimps who literally only surround themselves with perfect models

or, and FAR more likely, watch too much porn.

 
Name one PHYSICAL flaw on her. Just one.
She's about 15lbs overweight
:lmao: It's called body type. She is not overweight. Your standards for weight do not match the reality for a woman with her body type.

Some of you in here are either complete pimps who literally only surround themselves with perfect models

or, and FAR more likely, watch too much porn.
I think it's more on location. I have hotter chicks than her serve me coffee at my local Starbucks.
 
Name one PHYSICAL flaw on her. Just one.
She's about 15lbs overweight
Maybe in her chest, but I wouldn't call that a flaw.
Hips are also too big perfect.
Fixed.I like women, not little boys.

 
LOTS of "not smart" in here.

A couple things that need to be declared so some of you guys can rethink your positions:

1. A 5 is average. By definition, HALF are better looking then a 5 and half are worse looking.

2. Any woman who has a nice body is NO WORSE then a 5.

3. Any woman who is not overweight is ABOVE average in the body department.

4. Sadly, women that are slightly overweight are still ABOVE AVERAGE due to all the fatties running around.

5. I'm not a fan, but anyone thinking there are three categories of hot above Kim Kardonothingandgetpaid has no business participating in this discussion.

 
Name one PHYSICAL flaw on her. Just one.
She's about 15lbs overweight
:lmao: It's called body type. She is not overweight. Your standards for weight do not match the reality for a woman with her body type.

Some of you in here are either complete pimps who literally only surround themselves with perfect models

or, and FAR more likely, watch too much porn.
I think it's more on location. I have hotter chicks than her serve me coffee at my local Starbucks.
OK, but a 7?If curves like that aren't your thing, fine, but she is not a 7. AT LEAST and 8, objectively speaking.

I am fascinated by the ridiculously high standards of most of you. If one of your 7's hit on you in real life, you'd be stuttering and stammering and tripping all over yourselves to ask her out.

It's real easy to sit back with some imageshack links and pretend you could get any of these women.

 
OK, but a 7?If curves like that aren't your thing, fine, but she is not a 7. AT LEAST and 8, objectively speaking.I am fascinated by the ridiculously high standards of most of you. If one of your 7's hit on you in real life, you'd be stuttering and stammering and tripping all over yourselves to ask her out.It's real easy to sit back with some imageshack links and pretend you could get any of these women.
Let's agree that you have no idea what kind of women I've pulled and can pull.
 
OK, but a 7?If curves like that aren't your thing, fine, but she is not a 7. AT LEAST and 8, objectively speaking.I am fascinated by the ridiculously high standards of most of you. If one of your 7's hit on you in real life, you'd be stuttering and stammering and tripping all over yourselves to ask her out.It's real easy to sit back with some imageshack links and pretend you could get any of these women.
Let's agree that you have no idea what kind of women I've pulled and can pull.
:lmao:
 
OK, but a 7?If curves like that aren't your thing, fine, but she is not a 7. AT LEAST and 8, objectively speaking.I am fascinated by the ridiculously high standards of most of you. If one of your 7's hit on you in real life, you'd be stuttering and stammering and tripping all over yourselves to ask her out.It's real easy to sit back with some imageshack links and pretend you could get any of these women.
Let's agree that you have no idea what kind of women I've pulled and can pull.
Sure. Not directed specifically at your Ron. I don't know you or anyone else on this board IRL. Congrats on whatever you can 'pull.'I think most of the tough graders of women in this thread are full of it though.
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.

Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.

Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?"

:lmao:
:goodposting: As always, there are a lot of people who need to step away from the internet for a little while. It seems to have skewed reality, perhaps permanently.

I thought about posting this and this as who's hottest polls the other day, but really didn't want to deal with the inevitable "none of the above" or " :X " posts. So I didn't bother.

BTW, I was at that event and saw a lot of "cute" to "hot" girls. Most would probably rank in the 3-5 range the way this is going though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.

Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.

Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?"

:lmao:
:goodposting: As always, there are a lot of people who need to step away from the internet for a little while. It seems to have skewed reality, perhaps permanently.

I thought about posting this and this as who's hottest polls the other day, but really didn't want to deal with the inevitable "none of the above" or " :X " posts. So I didn't bother.

BTW, I was at that event and saw a lot of "cute" to "hot" girls. Most would probably rank in the 3-5 range the way this is going though.
4 (she's a 6) and 3 (she's an 8) :thumbup:
 
LOTS of "not smart" in here.A couple things that need to be declared so some of you guys can rethink your positions:1. A 5 is average. By definition, HALF are better looking then a 5 and half are worse looking.2. Any woman who has a nice body is NO WORSE then a 5.3. Any woman who is not overweight is ABOVE average in the body department. 4. Sadly, women that are slightly overweight are still ABOVE AVERAGE due to all the fatties running around.5. I'm not a fan, but anyone thinking there are three categories of hot above Kim Kardonothingandgetpaid has no business participating in this discussion.
:goodposting:Nothing signifies the trainwreck that this thread has become better than the guy saying average = 2/3, when by the very definition of the scale we are using, average = 5. :loco:
 
LOTS of "not smart" in here.A couple things that need to be declared so some of you guys can rethink your positions:1. A 5 is average. By definition, HALF are better looking then a 5 and half are worse looking.2. Any woman who has a nice body is NO WORSE then a 5.3. Any woman who is not overweight is ABOVE average in the body department. 4. Sadly, women that are slightly overweight are still ABOVE AVERAGE due to all the fatties running around.5. I'm not a fan, but anyone thinking there are three categories of hot above Kim Kardonothingandgetpaid has no business participating in this discussion.
:goodposting:Nothing signifies the trainwreck that this thread has become better than the guy saying average = 2/3, when by the very definition of the scale we are using, average = 5. :loco:
The single biggest problem with the scale is the woman he describes as Average is not average. If you have a certain minimum qualification and leave out the bottom 25%-35% which you would never even look twice at then 5=average. Under this scale as it is described 5 is not average.
 
OK, but a 7?If curves like that aren't your thing, fine, but she is not a 7. AT LEAST and 8, objectively speaking.I am fascinated by the ridiculously high standards of most of you. If one of your 7's hit on you in real life, you'd be stuttering and stammering and tripping all over yourselves to ask her out.It's real easy to sit back with some imageshack links and pretend you could get any of these women.
Let's agree that you have no idea what kind of women I've pulled and can pull.
:lmao:
:lmao: :lmao:
 
The single biggest problem with the scale is the woman he describes as Average is not average. If you have a certain minimum qualification and leave out the bottom 25%-35% which you would never even look twice at then 5=average. Under this scale as it is described 5 is not average.
Many are focusing on the word "average" incorrectly.Average is associated specifically with the rating scale definitions...aka, being right in the middle of a 1 and a 10 looks-wise. Not the average of the entire female population.If you see the bell curve visual there are actually more 4's in the world than 5's and there are more 1 thru 4's than there are 6 thru 10's. Majority of the world is skewing towards the ugly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The single biggest problem with the scale is the woman he describes as Average is not average. If you have a certain minimum qualification and leave out the bottom 25%-35% which you would never even look twice at then 5=average. Under this scale as it is described 5 is not average.
Many are focusing on the word "average" incorrectly.Average is associated specifically with the rating scale definitions...aka, being right in the middle of a 1 and a 10 looks-wise. Not the average of the entire female population.If you see the bell curve visual there are actually more 4's in the world than 5's and there are more 1 thru 4's than there are 6 thru 10's. Majority of the world is skewing towards the ugly.
:goodposting: To be fair, the scale was originally created without anything below a 4 in mind. It was meant to provide for more differentiation among the upper end due to that being where the primary amount of rankings would take place.Only recently in view of the "2 vs. 9" poll did the need arise for the lower rankings to be even considered.As such, the lower end of the scale has been developed over time as more of an add on as opposed to being a scientific representation of the entire population.Clearly with the volume of old people alone, the majority of the population falls below the 5 area. Add in America's propensity for obesity, and we have an extremely crowded 3-5 range.
 
Seriously, some of you either live in a dreamland where all women are drop dead completely hot and gorgeous, or are completely and totally full of ####.

Those of you throwing out "7" to models with perfect bodies, and 4s to extremely cute girls wiwth very nice bodies, are in over your heads in here.

Go to the DMV, then come back to this thread and tell me some of these 4s are "below average." Do you guys really understand what "average means?"

:lmao:
:goodposting: As always, there are a lot of people who need to step away from the internet for a little while. It seems to have skewed reality, perhaps permanently.

I thought about posting this and this as who's hottest polls the other day, but really didn't want to deal with the inevitable "none of the above" or " :X " posts. So I didn't bother.

BTW, I was at that event and saw a lot of "cute" to "hot" girls. Most would probably rank in the 3-5 range the way this is going though.
From Stu's linked website:

8, with some serious "upside"

Winner - 9

 
I think you can go ahead and eliminate the olds from consideration. Say ratings are intended for under 50 only. Maybe even younger.

That brings the realistic "average" up closer to a 5, and cuts off the "hot for her age angle" that can complicate things.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top