What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (1 Viewer)

Watch a video of her talking, you'll drop this number fast...
 
Watch a video of her talking, you'll drop this number fast...
I hate you.
 
http://pastamanvibra...son-stokke1.jpg

http://freshpics.blo...le-athlete.html

(scroll down for more pics)

I realize we have to be judicious in giving high ratings but she has to be near the top.
:wub: That's a winner in my book.
She's a 10. Skin like that is rare.
:goodposting:
Watch a video of her talking, you'll drop this number fast...
Yes, because when I'm ogling her picture I'm clearly imagining the stimulating conversations we could have.
 
:wub: That's a winner in my book.
She's a 10. Skin like that is rare.
:goodposting:ESPECIALLY given that this is a candid photo ant an athletic event. Not only is she not made up, and no air brushing, but quite the opposite. To look that good under that scenario is incredible.
 
Let’s try and get these visuals as close to perfect as possible.

What I’ll do for the next week is post 2 base pictures a day...than for 24 hours anybody can post a more accurate picture of that rating in their opinion. At the end of the day, I’ll be the deciding factor if someone has a more “accurate” picture to depict the specific rating number.

Today: 1 & 10

Wed: 2 & 9

Thurs: 3 & 8

Fri.: 4 & 7

Sat: 5 & 6

Edit to add:

- pics of well-known "celebrities" do not count. We're looking for regular girls or lesser knowns.

- Videos do not count

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
See post #924 for background...

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png
To be fair, shouldn't we be able to see THE ENTIRE body of work? For example, what if your first example miraculously has fantastic legs? A leg man might be able to make a case for her being a 2. In addition, a boob man might ignore the fact that this woman has the face of a silverback and point out her enormous cans. And hey, she is in a wedding dress. Somebody is getting an erection to this, right? And with the second example, I tend to agree that she is flawless and would have no problem giving her a 10. But this photo looks airbrushed to death. She might have chest acne, but we'll never know it because they applied a tan-coating on the touch-up work and any of her moles, freckles, warts or hairs are taken out. I mean...does she just NOT have a hair on her body? Kinda doubt that. But we won't see it here. As well, let's see her calves. I'm a leg man. I want to see the ankles, knees, thighs and feed. I'm weird like that, but then again, you are asking me to give her a 10. I'm not opposed to it, but I'd like to see an un-doctored, full picture to judge.

 
See post #924 for background...

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png
To be fair, shouldn't we be able to see THE ENTIRE body of work? For example, what if your first example miraculously has fantastic legs? A leg man might be able to make a case for her being a 2. In addition, a boob man might ignore the fact that this woman has the face of a silverback and point out her enormous cans. And hey, she is in a wedding dress. Somebody is getting an erection to this, right? And with the second example, I tend to agree that she is flawless and would have no problem giving her a 10. But this photo looks airbrushed to death. She might have chest acne, but we'll never know it because they applied a tan-coating on the touch-up work and any of her moles, freckles, warts or hairs are taken out. I mean...does she just NOT have a hair on her body? Kinda doubt that. But we won't see it here. As well, let's see her calves. I'm a leg man. I want to see the ankles, knees, thighs and feed. I'm weird like that, but then again, you are asking me to give her a 10. I'm not opposed to it, but I'd like to see an un-doctored, full picture to judge.
Gotta make our judgement by the best visual at hand. Nothing we can do about airbrushing or unshown limbs...it's a vision that best represents the definition.These are the 2 best I could come up with for these rankings. That's the point of this exercise...if you can find a better representing picture of a non well-known celebrity than post it here and will be up for consideration to become the new OFFICIAL representative.

 
See post #924 for background...

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png
To be fair, shouldn't we be able to see THE ENTIRE body of work? For example, what if your first example miraculously has fantastic legs? A leg man might be able to make a case for her being a 2. In addition, a boob man might ignore the fact that this woman has the face of a silverback and point out her enormous cans. And hey, she is in a wedding dress. Somebody is getting an erection to this, right? And with the second example, I tend to agree that she is flawless and would have no problem giving her a 10. But this photo looks airbrushed to death. She might have chest acne, but we'll never know it because they applied a tan-coating on the touch-up work and any of her moles, freckles, warts or hairs are taken out. I mean...does she just NOT have a hair on her body? Kinda doubt that. But we won't see it here. As well, let's see her calves. I'm a leg man. I want to see the ankles, knees, thighs and feed. I'm weird like that, but then again, you are asking me to give her a 10. I'm not opposed to it, but I'd like to see an un-doctored, full picture to judge.
Gotta make our judgement by the best visual at hand. Nothing we can do about airbrushing or unshown limbs...it's a vision that best represents the definition.These are the 2 best I could come up with for these rankings. That's the point of this exercise...if you can find a better representing picture of a non well-known celebrity than post it here and will be up for consideration to become the new OFFICIAL representative.
Well, I think it's a lot more fun to go on a search for a perfect 10 than it is to find an uglier picture than the one you posted. That said, it's not like I have "Perfect 10 non well-known celebrities" in my 'favorites', so I can't just whip 'em out in machine gun fashion. I'll give it a go, though....
 
Can't find much to argue with on these first two. You might find a better 10 based strictly on very narrow preferences, but that chick is pretty much perfect.

The "1" does have all her teeth...she might be a 1.5.

 
Okay, I looked around for a while today and came up with my perfect 10. I'm sure others will find a flaw, but I cannot. Here is an un-doctored, non-professional picture of a non-celeb female. 2nd from the left, green bikini. my 10
Very hot, but her face is nowhere near as flawless as my 10, and bodies are comparable. Can't overrule on the present 10. I'd say to take a run at this submission in the 8 area...that nose can only take her so high.
 
Okay, I looked around for a while today and came up with my perfect 10. I'm sure others will find a flaw, but I cannot. Here is an un-doctored, non-professional picture of a non-celeb female. 2nd from the left, green bikini. my 10
Very hot, but her face is nowhere near as flawless as my 10, and bodies are comparable. Can't overrule on the present 10. I'd say to take a run at this submission in the 8 area...that nose can only take her so high.
Alright, I'll keep looking. I still say my girl is hotter on the basis that this is an un-airbrushed, non-professional shot. Also, the fake boobs on yours are pretty bad. Boobs on mine are much better looking. Prettier smile too.
 
The 10 and 1 visuals are now locked. Use them for reference points for future comparisons.

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

---------------------

Next up, 2 and 9: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

2: The ugliest girl in school, the ugliest girl at work (couldn't even get into a club)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS2.jpg

9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS95.jpg

 
The 10 and 1 visuals are now locked. Use them for reference points for future comparisons.

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png

1: Absolutely disgusting and hard to look at. Young children point and adults look away upon seeing (not one single redeeming quality)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS1.jpg

---------------------

Next up, 2 and 9: Below are present visuals, please provide more accurate, if able...

2: The ugliest girl in school, the ugliest girl at work (couldn't even get into a club)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS2.jpg

9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS95.jpg
big fan of the offdee 10. If she was my g/f, I probably wouldn't cheat on her for at least a year or two.
 
fwiw, IMHO, a 10 isn't just flawless and rare- she's legendary and borderline unique worldwide (eta: and throughout history). That will always be subjective, but for me it's the rare beauties like Raquel Welch and Grace Kelly. So for me, there are only a handful of 10s- which takes that unbelievably hot broad in the 10 pic down to a 9-9.5... I'm feeling like there a bunch of gorgeous young swim-suit model types out there who could fit that bill.

So for me, the 9 becomes more of what your 10 is, with some merging between 7/8/9 happening to take up the... so to speak... slack.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't like your "9" just because it's really difficult to tell what this chick really looks like. She's airbrushed beyond recognition, IMO. I'm looking for a submission.

As for your "2"...that's a "1". If I had a gun held to my head, I probably would climb on the balding, fatty in the wedding dress before this creature. Talk about scaring children. It's Carrot Top with yellow teeth, bad acne, and splotchy cans.

 
- pics of well-known "celebrities" do not count. We're looking for regular girls or lesser knowns.
10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS95.jpg
So much for the celebrities do not count. And 9 meets 10 criteria? (playboy centerfold)? If you are going to keep celebrities in this 9 and 10 should be swapped IMO.
 
fwiw, IMHO, a 10 isn't just flawless and rare- she's legendary and borderline unique worldwide (eta: and throughout history). That will always be subjective, but for me it's the rare beauties like Raquel Welch and Grace Kelly. So for me, there are only a handful of 10s- which takes that unbelievably hot broad in the 10 pic down to a 9-9.5... I'm feeling like there a bunch of gorgeous young swim-suit model types out there who could fit that bill.

So for me, the 9 becomes more of what your 10 is, with some merging between 7/8/9 happening to take up the... so to speak... slack.
NTTAWT, but not my thing....those women are kind of old/dead :shrug:
 
fwiw, IMHO, a 10 isn't just flawless and rare- she's legendary and borderline unique worldwide (eta: and throughout history). That will always be subjective, but for me it's the rare beauties like Raquel Welch and Grace Kelly. So for me, there are only a handful of 10s- which takes that unbelievably hot broad in the 10 pic down to a 9-9.5... I'm feeling like there a bunch of gorgeous young swim-suit model types out there who could fit that bill.

So for me, the 9 becomes more of what your 10 is, with some merging between 7/8/9 happening to take up the... so to speak... slack.
NTTAWT, but not my thing....those women are kind of old/dead :shrug:
:lmao: But I'd still hit Raquel.

 
fwiw, IMHO, a 10 isn't just flawless and rare- she's legendary and borderline unique worldwide (eta: and throughout history). That will always be subjective, but for me it's the rare beauties like Raquel Welch and Grace Kelly. So for me, there are only a handful of 10s- which takes that unbelievably hot broad in the 10 pic down to a 9-9.5... I'm feeling like there a bunch of gorgeous young swim-suit model types out there who could fit that bill.So for me, the 9 becomes more of what your 10 is, with some merging between 7/8/9 happening to take up the... so to speak... slack.
If you look back in the offdee scale annals you'll see that I was originally with you on this...a 10 was basically unachievable and the measuring stick for all to strive for but most likely could never be. Since that time FBGs feedback has been received and the scale parameters adjusted to what it is today...now a 10 is more attainable for a larger group of females.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't like your "9" just because it's really difficult to tell what this chick really looks like. She's airbrushed beyond recognition, IMO. I'm looking for a submission.
As replied earlier to GM...we can only go on the visual pic at hand. It's a visual representation of what represents that #..if it's airbrushed than oh-well, it's what all should strive for and be compared to visuall at that standard.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top