The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (1 Viewer)

[Zegras11]

How about a ranking on this?

On the GM Scale of 1-5 she is a 4.5. Killer body, lovely skin (actually enjoy that she's not fake tan) but her facial expressions give me a Sandra Bernhard feel and that's not a great thing. Still, she deserves a near flawless ranking.

1-5?Are you only half the man we think you are?

 

[Slider6]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

 

[John Bender]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

Her face is gross. We do this weird thing now where chicks think they are hot just because they have smoking bodies but disgusting faces. I'm getting sick of it. She's a total dog.

 

[offdee]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

Holy crap. She looks at least 35. My 40 year old ex/kinda still gf who hardly ever sees the sun looks younger than her. The sun is a killer on ladies in their later years.

 

[Wrigley]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

Her face is gross. We do this weird thing now where chicks think they are hot just because they have smoking bodies but disgusting faces. I'm getting sick of it. She's a total dog.

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

 

[Christo]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

Her face is gross. We do this weird thing now where chicks think they are hot just because they have smoking bodies but disgusting faces. I'm getting sick of it. She's a total dog.

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

 

[Clinton]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

 

[Major]

Her face is gross. We do this weird thing now where chicks think they are hot just because they have smoking bodies but disgusting faces. I'm getting sick of it. She's a total dog.

it annoys me as well....b/c they hit the gym and diet, they think look great and possess the attitude to match. Unfortunately, they fail to realize their has aged about 20 years past their prime.

 

[Major]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

between World of Warcraft and their wives, probably not

 

[Christo]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

For me, yes.

 

[Christo]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

between World of Warcraft and their wives, probably not

Not married and never played World of Warcraft.

 

[Major]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

between World of Warcraft and their wives, probably not

Not married and never played World of Warcraft.

sorry, I meant Dungeons and Dragons

 

[Wrigley]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

SIL is the 8 in this thread.But the answer is no, my wife would cut my nuts off.I do still have much younger wimmins hit on me.

 

[Fennis]

Here's a solid real life 8.5 I met at a party last week. Body was

Another GM 4.5. Very hot. I'd love to see more.

Shes a Triangle on the Fennis scale.

 

[Christo]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

Are these realistic possibilities for either of you?

between World of Warcraft and their wives, probably not

Not married and never played World of Warcraft.

sorry, I meant Dungeons and Dragons

Nope

 

[Fennis]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Im afraid I can only give her a Rectangle on the Fennis scale. Sorry.

 

[Fennis]

The chick on the left has got to be a solid 8 or 8.5

My link

Great body, but the face looks a little ragged. 7.5 IMO (8 max) Just can't have someone whose face is basically covered by Urkel glasses be part of the OFFICIAL visuals.

Yeah, I realize it wasn't a good face pic. I was showing body. I did a little digging and found a better face for a more accurate rating.My link

Not bad for 40.

I am curious...do you know the age of this chick Slider? I'm guessing she's younger than she looks, and all the tanning has taken it's toll.

Yeah, the tanning has definitely taken a toll. I think she's almost 27.

Jesus tell her to quit smoking stat.

 

[Fennis]

It's just a face shot, but how would you rank her?

7: Tops among boygirls locally.

Actually, tops among boygirls internationally.I was hoping someone would say how hot "she" is.

Shes hot. I give her an asterisk on the Fennis scale

 

[General Malaise]

Here's a solid real life 8.5 I met at a party last week. Body was

Another GM 4.5. Very hot. I'd love to see more.

I love the shtick where you want to change to a 1-5 scale and then start throwing out a bunch of half point ratings.

ARE YOU NOT ON BOARD???

 

[General Malaise]

How about a ranking on this?

On the GM Scale of 1-5 she is a 4.5. Killer body, lovely skin (actually enjoy that she's not fake tan) but her facial expressions give me a Sandra Bernhard feel and that's not a great thing. Still, she deserves a near flawless ranking.

1-5?Are you only half the man we think you are?

Much much less.My only point is if we move it to 1-5, we can just assign all the butt ugly women a 1 and be done with it. Offdee's 1,2,3 are all 1's on my scale. I will counter with a 2 on my scale momentarily. You will see a difference between a 1 and a 2 on the GM Scale.

 

[Clinton]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

For Christo: Nice face, soft bodyFor Wrigley: Hard body, slightly below average face

 

[Wrigley]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

For Christo: Nice face, soft bodyFor Wrigley: Hard body, slightly below average face

Wow, I did play D&D when I was a kid

 

[General Malaise]

Ladies and Gentlemen, I have your GM Scale #2™ .



Cute smile, nice eyes, but she's not attractive. She is surely better than Offdee's 1,2 and 3, which are ALL 1's on the GM Scale™ .

 

[Clinton]

How does the Offdee scale account for different body shapes or coloring?

Here are two everyday girls that are different, which is better?

1

2

 

[AcerFC]

How does the Offdee scale account for different body shapes or coloring?

Here are two everyday girls that are different, which is better?

1

2

Both 7s IMO

 

[General Malaise]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

 

[offdee]

Ladies and Gentlemen, I have your GM Scale #2 .



Cute smile, nice eyes, but she's not attractive. She is surely better than Offdee's 1,2 and 3, which are ALL 1's on the GM Scale .

4.5 (although this could have a shot at being the OFFICIAL pic for the elusive "offdee 5"----------

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)

 

[Christo]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

For Christo: Nice face, soft bodyFor Wrigley: Hard body, slightly below average face

Looks like I'm the winner.

 

[General Malaise]

How does the Offdee scale account for different body shapes or coloring?

Here are two everyday girls that are different, which is better?

1

2

Both are GM 4s, though girl #1 would be much cuter with a boob reduction. Those are just cartoonish. Girl #2 is right in my wheelhouse. Would love to see more.

 

[offdee]

How does the Offdee scale account for different body shapes or coloring?

Here are two everyday girls that are different, which is better?

1

2

Both 7s IMO

Agreed on the 7's for both. It's a package rating..combination of face and body. Many different looking face and body type combos can make up the same overall ranking.

 

[Wrigley]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

For Christo: Nice face, soft bodyFor Wrigley: Hard body, slightly below average face

Looks like I'm the winner.

I said slightly below average face......not slightly like a dude.

 

[offdee]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

Prototype 6.6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

ETA: need to ease up on the face only shots...a true rating cannot be done without some semblance of the body type

 

[Clinton]

Girl #2 is right in my wheelhouse. Would love to see more.

http://www.collegehumor.com/girl/3207007/jillian#2949923

 

[Major]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

Prototype 6.6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

ETA: need to ease up on the face only shots...a true rating cannot be done without some semblance of the body type

I have to dock her a point or two for looking like a female Mr. Magoo

 

[General Malaise]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

Prototype 6.6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

ETA: need to ease up on the face only shots...a true rating cannot be done without some semblance of the body type

Tell you what....make you a deal. I'll work harder to add full body shots, you work harder on crisper pics that we can enlarge and scrutinize better. Zooming in on some of these tiny photos is frustrating.

 

[offdee]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

Prototype 6.6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

ETA: need to ease up on the face only shots...a true rating cannot be done without some semblance of the body type

I have to dock her a point or two for looking like a female Mr. Magoo

I might've been a bit quick on the judgement there GB. After taking a 2nd look, I tend to agree that I was a bit overzealous.5.5 max (closer to a 5)

-----

6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

 

[General Malaise]

GM Scale #3

And I'm going to guess and Offdee 6? About right?

 

[offdee]

Zooming in on some of these tiny photos is frustrating.

We're not checking out their white blood cell count here GB.

 

[General Malaise]

BTW, I image googled College Volleyball and am finding some success out there.

 

[offdee]

GM Scale #3

And I'm going to guess and Offdee 6? About right?

link doesn't work for me.

 

[General Malaise]

Zooming in on some of these tiny photos is frustrating.

We're not checking out their white blood cell count here GB.

Yeah, but we shouldn't be looking at small pictures through binaculars either. Let's get some evidence in here, David Caruso.

 

[Christo]

I'd rather bang a smoking hot body, than a pretty face with a less than average body.

I'm exactly the opposite.

For Christo: Nice face, soft bodyFor Wrigley: Hard body, slightly below average face

Looks like I'm the winner.

I said slightly below average face......not slightly like a dude.

Deal with it.C

 

[General Malaise]

GM Scale #3

And I'm going to guess and Offdee 6? About right?

link doesn't work for me.

Try Now

 

[shuke]

GM Scale #3

And I'm going to guess and Offdee 6? About right?

4.5/10

 

[offdee]

GM Scale #3

And I'm going to guess and Offdee 6? About right?

link doesn't work for me.

Try Now

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more commonMy early favorite for the offdee 5 pic. Plain Jane with no real distinctive features either positive or negative. She's just there.

 

[jamny]

10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness)

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS10.png

who is she?

 

[mr roboto]

BTW, I image googled College Volleyball and am finding some success out there.

Sure it's not High School? Some of those girls look a bit young.

 

[Clinton]

We can all agree this is a 1 on either the GM or Offdee scale, right?

 

[General Malaise]

And now, a GM Scale #3

Offdee, take notes. See how you can ENLARGE this photo and get so close to this woman's face you can see her pores? This is what you need to start doing.

This girl is a 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. She's cuter than average, but I wouldn't go so far as to call her beautiful. She has gorgeous eyes, fabulous teeth and I'm guessing a nice, tan coating. Probably very thin to small, but from what I see here this is a confirmed GM Scale #3 and perhaps when she ages, loses the acne, calms down on the mascarra and loses the nose ring, she'll be a 3.5.

WINNING!

Prototype 6.6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

ETA: need to ease up on the face only shots...a true rating cannot be done without some semblance of the body type

I have to dock her a point or two for looking like a female Mr. Magoo

I might've been a bit quick on the judgement there GB. After taking a 2nd look, I tend to agree that I was a bit overzealous.5.5 max (closer to a 5)

-----

6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

But she has nice skin!

 

[Fennis]

How does the Offdee scale account for different body shapes or coloring?

Here are two everyday girls that are different, which is better?

1

2

Both rhombuses on the Fennis scale.