The Commish
Footballguy
Why does everyone keep talking about "negotiations" when it comes to Obamacare?? It's like the lawyers don't understand how the legal system works.
We actually agree on most of the state of Washington, but other things seem to get in the way of that.We generally disagree with the state of Washington (it least that's how it seems), but we do agree that the spin machine is front and center for both parties and they use it to their full advantage. This is probably THE biggest weapon either party has and it's been encouraged by the way our "media" does business in covering the issues. With all that said, it's hard to disagree that the GOP didn't whiff on this big time by not letting it play out and expending any credibility they have left. Yeah, when ACA fails to meet expectations the Dems are going to be firing up their spin machine and they're going to have WAY more credibility than the GOP does. Not because they are better or right but because the GOP used all their political capital in a VERY poor manner. Simply put, the Dems are playing the game way better than the GOP is. Unfortunately, that's the gauge most voters go by and a pretty significant part of why we're in the situation we are.humpback said:Of course it has to do with your point- spin influences public opinion. I agree with some of what Court Jester said, but he also pretty much made my point- the left still blames Bush for most of their problems, they'll find a way to spin this on them as well.
He's becoming Czar Of All Sports and nationalizing all the professional leagues in our New World Order.2004, the Democrats lost the Presidential election which they thought for sure they would win. They were devastated. Did they whine? Sure. But they dusted themselves off and figured out how to win. And they won the House and Senate in 2006.I'll get right on "winning elections"
Right now, the Republicans are still fighting the 2012 Presidential Election. They need to move on.![]()
Dems still talk about how Al Gore is REALLY their President.
Not much different. Probably worse for all involved.When Boehner folds (as he's already told people he will) how do you think those numbers will look?
63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.
I don't think it's delusional to think that one side is primarily to blame, and that one side will ultimately be held responsible. I continue to believe that anyone who blames Democrats either is partisan or not paying attention. The facts are as clear as they can be.63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.![]()
anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.
The right wing already hates Obama, now they'll hate the moderate GOP too. So approval falls for Republicans. You saw this with Obama's approval rating in 2011. It fell, but almost exclusively because left wing Democrats turned away from the perceived weakness of Obama in the last round of debt limit hostage taking.Not much different. Probably worse for all involved.When Boehner folds (as he's already told people he will) how do you think those numbers will look?
I don't think it's delusional to think that one side is primarily to blame, and that one side will ultimately be held responsible. I continue to believe that anyone who blames Democrats either is partisan or not paying attention. The facts are as clear as they can be.63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.![]()
anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.
"My team sucks slightly less than your team"
Is this the Jaguars vs. Rams game thread?I don't think it's delusional to think that one side is primarily to blame, and that one side will ultimately be held responsible. I continue to believe that anyone who blames Democrats either is partisan or not paying attention. The facts are as clear as they can be.63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.![]()
anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.![]()
"My team sucks slightly less than your team"
![]()
![]()
Both teams suck![]()
My team has always been the Republicans.Is this the Jaguars vs. Rams game thread?I don't think it's delusional to think that one side is primarily to blame, and that one side will ultimately be held responsible. I continue to believe that anyone who blames Democrats either is partisan or not paying attention. The facts are as clear as they can be.63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.![]()
anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.![]()
"My team sucks slightly less than your team"
![]()
![]()
Both teams suck![]()
It's possible the government shutdown and the debt limit will be decoupled -- in which case, who knows how long the shutdown will go. Maybe a long time.I know no one has a crystal ball, but any gut feelings when the gov't will re-open? Any chance this week or do you think we are in this for long haul?
I'm supposed to close on my house on the 15th, the buyers have a USDA loan and of course we cannot close next week with the gov't closed.![]()
It matters. Perhaps the public will get it right, perhaps they won't, but the truth matters anyhow. And it especially matters in this instance because so long as the Republican leadership is terrified of this small band of extremists, we're going to have this sort of dysfunction happen again and again.Ultimately it doesn't matter who actually did what because we don't have an informed populace, and we have a media that actively tries to distort facts. All that will matter when this is over is the money lost. Democrat media outlets will blame Republicans, and Republican media outlets will blame Democrats, Everyone gets a nice dose of confirmation bias, and we'll be set up to do the same thing next year.
The analogy used about 10 pages ago was Manning vs Ponder, so DEN vs MIN? HahaDelusionalIs this the Jaguars vs. Rams game thread?I don't think it's delusional to think that one side is primarily to blame, and that one side will ultimately be held responsible. I continue to believe that anyone who blames Democrats either is partisan or not paying attention. The facts are as clear as they can be.63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.![]()
anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.![]()
"My team sucks slightly less than your team"
![]()
Both teams suck
![]()
So you are, I take it?Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Some democrats will tell you that 6% difference means "America has spoken"63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.
no. this isnt a game. there are real consequences to screwing around like this. why would we want to default on expenses already incurred?Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Sometimes you actually dono. this isnt a game. there are real consequences to screwing around like this. why would we want to default on expenses already incurred?Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
i am all for sitting both sides down and balancing the budget, which would mean serious reform to social security, medicare, and defense. but that is a discussion you have after you start up the government and pay your bills.
the debt ceiling is your credit card bill. if after going on a fun vacation, spending a bunch more money on house renovations, and a big hospital bill you realize you need to reign in spending going forward, you dont start out by defaulting on the bills you already owe.
Harry Reid must be since he will not bring "Full Faith and Credit Act" to a vote in the Senate that would pay Americas debt even without raising the debt ceiling.Since government budget isn't like your household budget defaulting is not raising your credit card limit instead of not paying your credit card bill.Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Just need to find $80 billion or so in cuts per month to make that viable. Sounds entirely reasonable when the alternative is to lift an artificial cap.Harry Reid must be since he will not bring "Full Faith and Credit Act" to a vote in the Senate that would pay Americas debt even without raising the debt ceiling.Since government budget isn't like your household budget defaulting is not raising your credit card limit instead of not paying your credit card bill.Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
The world markets need the stability of Americas ever increasing debt. If America should somehow halt its debt at its current level the world would end.
Republicans want the world to end and that's why they will not increase the debt ceiling.
if youre going bk sure. not really the best route here if you want the us to have any clout as a leader in the financial sector.Sometimes you actually dono. this isnt a game. there are real consequences to screwing around like this. why would we want to default on expenses already incurred?Is any one else rooting for the default to happen?
i am all for sitting both sides down and balancing the budget, which would mean serious reform to social security, medicare, and defense. but that is a discussion you have after you start up the government and pay your bills.
the debt ceiling is your credit card bill. if after going on a fun vacation, spending a bunch more money on house renovations, and a big hospital bill you realize you need to reign in spending going forward, you dont start out by defaulting on the bills you already owe.
the shut down is making the crazies crazier. this is becoming lord of the flies on a national level.Truckers to shut down DC Oct 11. Tea party lunatics more than likely.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
man people are nutty.Truckers to shut down DC Oct 11. Tea party lunatics more than likely.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
"We want these people arrested, and we're coming in with the grand jury to do it," he said. "We are going to ask the law enforcement to uphold their constitutional oath and make these arrests. If they refuse to do it, by the power of the people of the United States and the people's grand jury, they don't want to do it, we will. ... We the people will find a way."Truckers to shut down DC Oct 11. Tea party lunatics more than likely.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
Obama closing anything with "optics", trying to inflict as much pain as possible for Americans, is reaching some pretty shameful lows.
Glad someone finally got hold of his dumb ### and said it might not have been the best idea to shut down the Amber Alert website
At least the first lady's Lets Move didn't get took down. Priorities.Obama closing anything with "optics", trying to inflict as much pain as possible for Americans, is reaching some pretty shameful lows.
Glad someone finally got hold of his dumb ### and said it might not have been the best idea to shut down the Amber Alert website
Should be fun. Glad I don't have to wait too long for this one -- the 11th is just around the corner."It's going to be real fun for anyone who is not a supporter," Conlon said, "[and] if cops decide to give us a hard time, we're going to lock the brakes up, we're going to stop right there, we're going to be a three lane roadblock."
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2013/10/Obama%20Debt%20Ceiling.JPGIs any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Close. Refusal to compare, contrast, and weigh the positions that make up issues makes it impossible to really understand the issues. And if you do those on both side may be generally guilty, but they will never be equal. One should look at things with an open mind, not come to conclusions with a blank mind.The Commish said:What do you mean by this. Are you saying refusal to argue about the issues makes it less likely to understand the issues?Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Read the comments. Totally insane. Sad really where we are. Too bad we can't do a ctrl-alt-delete on the last 13 or so years.man people are nutty.Truckers to shut down DC Oct 11. Tea party lunatics more than likely.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
And John Boehner voted to raise the Debt Ceiling during the Bush Erahttp://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2013/10/Obama%20Debt%20Ceiling.JPGIs any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Great stuff stat.Obama closing anything with "optics", trying to inflict as much pain as possible for Americans....
How will anyone know they having any effect - it's already the slowest most congested road in the country.Truckers to shut down DC Oct 11. Tea party lunatics more than likely.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
Isn't that how it always goes?63% upset with Reps
57% upset with Dems
53% upset with Obama
I'll state it again: No one's side is winning.
Yeah, I generally sympathize with "pox on both their houses" positions because they generally are both kind of awful. But there's only one side here that is holding the whole government hostage to try to accomplish a legislative priority they can't get through by normal means. If shutting down the government and threatening to default on the debt becomes a regular option for one party to get its way, it is very hard to see how it ends well.Close. Refusal to compare, contrast, and weigh the positions that make up issues makes it impossible to really understand the issues. And if you do those on both side may be generally guilty, but they will never be equal. One should look at things with an open mind, not come to conclusions with a blank mind.The Commish said:What do you mean by this. Are you saying refusal to argue about the issues makes it less likely to understand the issues?Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Democrats and republicans tend to have different perspectives on the relative merits of this relatively recent event. Removing the states ability to regulate every plan offered within its borders will result in the same things happening. Whether that is a good thing or not (as whole) is where the parties disagree.Anyone know why this isn't allowed under the present version of Obamacare? What's so bad about insurance being sold nationally?Jojo the circus boy said:
- Allow insurance companies to sell across state lines to increase competition.
Hoping for a totally non-partisan answer, but if none is forthcoming ... so be it.
I don't have a point and certainly don't care about Boehner or his past voting record. Just think it's funny and ironic.And John Boehner voted to raise the Debt Ceiling during the Bush EraSo what is your point?http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2013/10/Obama%20Debt%20Ceiling.JPGIs any one else rooting for the default to happen?
Half of the Republican Kooks think Obama was born in Africa and isnt qualified to be President. You cant be this dense.The Republicans are just as lame as Democrats these days.. neither is acting in the best interests of the people. HTH.Well, same back at you. Maybe the Republican KooKs should concentrate on defeating their political opponents at the ballot for a change?[icon] said:Wow. I love the "if you're not with us, you're a racist" play. I used to think you were a fairly intelligent poster but damn....Todd Andrews said:Wow, the KooKs really have nothing to say about trying to destroy the American economy.
They really hate our Soul Brother President.
Not sure what that has to do with your pathetic race-baiting though.
Please unpack this one for me as I dont know what you are claiming.And leave the Democrats to going back to defeating their political opponents from the bench, I guess?Well, same back at you. Maybe the Republican KooKs should concentrate on defeating their political opponents at the ballot for a change?[icon] said:Wow. I love the "if you're not with us, you're a racist" play. I used to think you were a fairly intelligent poster but damn....Todd Andrews said:Wow, the KooKs really have nothing to say about trying to destroy the American economy.
They really hate our Soul Brother President.