What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Tea Party is back in business! (2 Viewers)

Its got to be some sort of record for a 30+ thread to have more posts from one guy than everyone else in the thread combined. This is like the Madden Franchise threads by that Raiders94 guy.
How can you see how many posts people have in a thread?
Member name Posts timschochet 319 Doctor Detroit 65 Bottomfeeder Sports 64 The Commish 64 dparker713 60 wdcrob 57 Jojo the circus boy 52 jon_mx 50 Matthias 48 [icon] 46 DrJ 44 MaxThreshold 42 humpback 38 Slapdash 38 BigSteelThrill 36 badmojo1006 34 Scoresman 34 Fennis 31 cstu 29 Joe T 29 Rich Conway 28 igbomb 27 drummer 27 Dr Oadi 26 TheIronSheik 24 snogger 24 B-Deep 24 Flying Spaghetti Monster 24 TPW 22 TobiasFunke 22 KCitons 20 pittstownkiller 20 5 digit know nothing 19 Yankee23Fan 19 Politician Spock 18 jamny 18 Premier 18 Don Quixote 16 shader 16 Leeroy Jenkins 16 quickhands 15 17seconds 14 Clifford 14 tommyGunZ 14 Willie Neslon 14 spreagle 13 Mario Kart 13 Ramblin Wreck 13 Joe McGee 13 pantagrapher 13 matuski 12 jonessed 12 Statorama 12 Sand 12 parasaurolophus 12 Rush Limbaugh 12 rascal 12 PlasmaDogPlasma 12 Mark Davis 12 Mr. Pickles 11 Doug B 11 Koya 11 Henry Ford 11 IvanKaramazov 10 joffer 10 Homer J Simpson 10 Abraham 10 Maelstrom 10 baymen 9 bagger 9 Otis 9 matttyl 9 Phil Elliott 9 msommer 9 Ballstein 8 Christo 8 Jim11 8 GoFishTN 7 DanFouts 7 Jackstraw 7 CBusAlex 7 32 Counter Pass 7 greenroom 7 tom22406 7 Lutherman2112 7 Apple Jack 7 3C's 6 omahawildcat25 6 Rohn Jambo 6
Did pittstownkiller get banned? Wiped off the map?
Black helicopters of course. Well except they use drones now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So really, armed rebellion is being considered because a minority of the population doesn't like that the majority is gravitating towards single payer health care?

My new world order has a lot bigger agenda than that. ;)

 
Really couldn't tell right now if the government was shut down or not.
This.

If, god forbid, the #### hits the fan and there is some uprising, I won't be getting involved, but I am glad I will have the means to protect myself and my family.
I'm curious how big your arsenal is that makes you feel secure. If there's an insurrection, you've gotta figure the rebels would demand shelter and supplies by force. How many armed rebels do you think you could fend off?
Before I'm painted as some paranoid conspiracy theorist (since that's what they do best in here), I'll RE-state that all of my weapons are dual purpose for sporting use (competitive sport shooting, IDPA, hunting, etc) but also double as self/home defense. I have short range (Shotguns w/ 18.5" & 28" barrels), and long range assault (Colt AR-15) rifles as well as an assortment of handguns, plus plenty of magazines and ammunition for all.

I also keep a few cases of MREs, some water, and basic necessities in a guest room closet in event services are interrupted (almost were during the MS flood 3 years ago, and likely will be when the New Madrid fault finally releases. If nothing ever necessitates their need, then it's of minimal inconvenience to be prepared. I also have quite a few good friends who are much more "prepared" than I that I would likely network together with in the highly unlikely chance of a SHTF event.

I'm certainly not stockpiling for Custer's last stand and am under no delusions (nor intention) of taking on the government as some of the dummies in here like to imply. There certainly are plenty of "that type" around though. That said, if things do somehow destabilize (unlikely), I've got the means to not be low hanging fruit, and the means to "get outta dodge" (capable vehicle, camping gear, etc) for a bit if that's not enough. Most of my camping gear is dual purpose as well as it's used a half dozen weekends a year recreationally. Thankfully I'm hopeful and fairly confident it won't ever come to any of this, though.

and as the decibels of this disenchanting discoursecontinue to dampen the day

the coin flips again and again, and again, and again

as our sanity walks away

all this discussion though politically correct

is dead beyond destruction

though it leaves me quite erect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0wHQYY-etQ
Such a great song.

Wow, the KooKs really have nothing to say about trying to destroy the American economy.

They really hate our Soul Brother President.
Wow. I love the "if you're not with us, you're a racist" play. I used to think you were a fairly intelligent poster but damn....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Matthias said:
It only means their tactics are awful.
Only awful when the Republicans do it I guess?
This like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.

 
When the Bleeding Heart Becomes the Iron Fist

http://ricochet.com/main-feed/When-The-Bleeding-Heart-Becomes-The-Iron-Fist

Welcome to liberal utopia, where barriers are not erected against terrorists or illegal aliens on our nation's borders, but rather against citizens, and where wheelchair-bound veterans enroute to honor their comrades face tighter security than terrorists enroute to murder a US Ambassador. This is where up is down, wrong is right, illegality is celebrated as progress, and where Constitutionalism is derided as racist. No longer relegated to the fever swamps of academic fancy, utopia has acquired real estate and made known its demands.

"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual…" the First Lady warned us, and she wasn't just whistling Alinsky either. Under King Barack's Reign of Error, your life is no longer your own, for you are now commanded to enter into private contracts by virtue of your simple existence on the planet. Why? Because our Sovereign and his fellow travelers are compassionate, of course. Their hearts bleed for you,…almost as much as your pocketbook will bleed for them.
 
Matthias said:
Matthias said:
This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.

You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.
What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?
as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacare

 
Good morning. Part of the reason this shutdown is continuing is because conservatives are deluding themselves that they are winning public opinion. Here is an example, Erik Erickson's Red State Blog: http://www.redstate.com/2013/10/07/obamacare-or-the-debt-ceiling/

Republicans are winning the shutdown fight, and Democrats know it.

The polls are shifting against the Democrats.

Both of these statements are entirely false. But, just as many conservatives were extremely confident until the last moment that Romney would crush Obama, they seem to be lying to themselves here. This is one of the inevitable results when you ignore the mainstream media as "liberally biased" and receive all your news from FOX and right wing talk show hosts and bloggers like Erickson. They live in their own cocoon.

 
When the Bleeding Heart Becomes the Iron Fist

http://ricochet.com/main-feed/When-The-Bleeding-Heart-Becomes-The-Iron-Fist

Welcome to liberal utopia, where barriers are not erected against terrorists or illegal aliens on our nation's borders, but rather against citizens, and where wheelchair-bound veterans enroute to honor their comrades face tighter security than terrorists enroute to murder a US Ambassador. This is where up is down, wrong is right, illegality is celebrated as progress, and where Constitutionalism is derided as racist. No longer relegated to the fever swamps of academic fancy, utopia has acquired real estate and made known its demands.

"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual…" the First Lady warned us, and she wasn't just whistling Alinsky either. Under King Barack's Reign of Error, your life is no longer your own, for you are now commanded to enter into private contracts by virtue of your simple existence on the planet. Why? Because our Sovereign and his fellow travelers are compassionate, of course. Their hearts bleed for you,…almost as much as your pocketbook will bleed for them.
I find it amusing how so many people want things to be this way? lol

 
I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.

Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?
I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.

 
Matthias said:
Matthias said:
This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.

You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.
What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?
as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacare
The American public voted to elect people that would pass Obamacare and keep it. If it was such a concern to Americans they would have elected a Republican President.

 
I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.

Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?
I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.
My mind has been changed on a lot of things from listening to people here. I still haven't heard a convincing argument that this is the Democrats fault, other than they should give up something that has been the dream of the Party for decades.

 
Matthias said:
Matthias said:
This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.

You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.
What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?
as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacare
The American public voted to elect people that would pass Obamacare and keep it. If it was such a concern to Americans they would have elected a Republican President.
Roughly the same percentage of people voted to elect a Republican president. And the people that are doing this were elected to do this.

 
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”

 
Fascinating Raw Story article about the Republican base:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/05/to-understand-the-shutdown-you-have-to-grasp-the-mindset-of-the-republican-base/

It’s widely understood that the government has been shut down by a relatively small number of Republican lawmakers who represent deeply red districts. They’re insulated from public opinion at large. They don’t fear a general election loss to a Democrat; they’re motivated by avoiding a primary challenger from their right flank.

So to fully understand what’s driving the Republican Party’s brinkmanship, one has to look at the motivations of its base voters – how they see the world around them. This lies at the heart of what’s happening in the Capitol today.

Democracy Corps – a Democratic-leaning polling firm – released a study this week based on a series of focus groups they conducted with loyal Republican voters. They divided them up into three sub-groups which together represent the base of the party. Evangelicals represent the largest group, followed by Republicans who identify with the tea party movement. “Moderates,” the third group, make up about a quarter of the party’s base, according to the pollsters.

Fear of a changing society is one thing that unites all three factions. The battle over Obamacare, write the study’s authors, “goes to the heart of Republican base thinking about the essential political battle.”

They think they face a victorious Democratic Party that is intent on expanding government to increase dependency and therefore electoral support. It starts with food stamps and unemployment benefits; expands further if you legalize the illegals; but insuring the uninsured dramatically grows those dependent on government. They believe this is an electoral strategy — not just a political ideology or economic philosophy. If Obamacare happens, the Republican Party may be lost, in their view.
And while few explicitly talk about Obama in racial terms, the base supporters are very conscious of being white in a country with growing minorities. Their party is losing to a Democratic Party of big government whose goal is to expand programs that mainly benefit minorities. Race remains very much alive in the politics of the Republican Party.
They worry that minorities, immigrants, and welfare recipients now believe it is their “right” to claim [public] benefits. Tea Party participants, in particular, were very focused on those who claim “rights” in the form of government services, without taking responsibility for themselves.
They are also unified in their belief that Obama is a usurper who has hoodwinked the public into re-electing him by hiding his true beliefs, which are essentially Marxist. They also think that Democrats have won the major political battles of our time because Republican legislators in Washington didn’t put up a fight.

But there are also deep divisions within the base, according to the analysis. Evangelicals still focus overwhelmingly on social issues. They think gay rights are the biggest threat to our society, but they also worry about the loss of what they see as an idyllic small-town culture. They feel besieged as the cultural ground shifts beneath them, and see themselves as a beleaguered, “politically incorrect” minority.

Tea partiers display a libertarian streak, and are far less concerned with social issues. They are staunchly pro-business. But there’s an easy alliance between these two groups – which make up well over half of the GOP base – because Evangelicals think the tea partiers are fighting back, and vice versa.

Both groups displayed a high level of paranoia, according to the researchers who conducted the study. They noted that this was the first time, in many years of conducting focus groups, that participants worried that their participation might trigger surveillance by the NSA or an audit by the IRS. In addition to thinking that Obama is a liar, and a covert Communist, these two groups were also more likely to express the belief that he is secretly a Muslim.

The moderates were, as one might expect, quite different. Like the tea partiers, they don’t worry as much about social issues. Their concerns are traditionally conservative – they worry about excessive regulation and taxation. They have a hard time taking Fox News seriously, and hold a deep disdain for the tea party faction. They are also keenly aware of their waning influence within the coalition.

Moderates are not so sure about their place in the current Republican Party. They worry about the ability of Republicans in Congress to make government work. They believe the party is stuck, not forward-looking, and representative of old ideas. They worry about the Republican Party’s right turn on social and environmental issues — which makes it difficult, especially for young moderates — to view the Republican Party as a modern party.
Unlike the tea partiers and Evangelicals, the moderate faction desperately wants lawmakers in Washington to find a common middle ground. They are less likely to worry about unauthorized immigration than the rest of the base, and some went so far as to speak positively about immigrants’ contributions to our society and economy.

Climate change is another dividing line between moderate Republicans and the hard-right. GOP moderates may be unsure of the science on climate change, but they don’t reject it out of hand, and some are legitimately worried about the effects of a changing climate.

In this, they stand out from the Evangelical and tea party wings. The study’s authors write:

Moderates are not even in the same conversation as Evangelicals who deeply doubt scientists writ large and Tea Party Republicans who are consumed by the big government and regulations that inevitably result from climate science.
Evangelicals and Tea Party Republicans share and are consumed by skepticism about climate science — to the point where they mistrust scientists before they begin to speak.
The whole study is fascinating. You can read it here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
Or how many young people will finally realize what this will cost them. I'm sure there are plenty who will come around to realize why Republicans are against it.

 
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
haha tom, suck it....

 
I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.

Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?
I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.
My mind has been changed on a lot of things from listening to people here. I still haven't heard a convincing argument that this is the Democrats fault, other than they should give up something that has been the dream of the Party for decades.
And that's fair. I shouldn't have used a blanket statement.

I guess I should say that I have no interest arguing about politics on this site. Every so often, I'll add a comment or speak my mind, but I'm more about the humor. I also believe that when it comes to most political issues, they usually come down to opinions. And I think everyone should have one. I love that we are so vocal of our beliefs. But, for the most part, discussions about politics on the Internet quickly transform into arguments. And I'm not looking for that.

One of my favorite political quotes is from Joe Biden. He was on Jay Leno and Leno asked him a question about George W.'s policies and he said his dad told him this: "Never question another man's motive. Question his judgement, but not their motive. It's not your role."

We all want what's best for this country. But we all have different ideas of how to get it done.

 
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boasting an average 2.5 million readers per month (2013),[3] the site is described by Newsweek as, "Muck, raked: If you're looking for alleged GOP malfeasance, the folks at rawstory.com are frequently scooping the mainstream media."[4] It was referred to as a "liberal blog" by Howard Kurtz in 2005.[5]
 
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
If it was only about Obamacare I'd agree with you. I assume their motives are linked to the debt ceiling and they are trying to gain leverage, we won't know if that is successful for another 10 days.

ETA: Also I don't think it is completely fruitless, the R's make their point by making a stink. In a few months when it sinks in with the public how much this is actually going to cost them they may look back at this shutdown favorably, it's easy to say today that's not the case, but in a few months who knows?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.

 
Matthias said:
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.

Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.

Basically, it appears health care monopolies are driving up the price in the bay area.

 
I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now. :kicksrock:

 
Boasting an average 2.5 million readers per month (2013),[3] the site is described by Newsweek as, "Muck, raked: If you're looking for alleged GOP malfeasance, the folks at rawstory.com are frequently scooping the mainstream media."[4] It was referred to as a "liberal blog" by Howard Kurtz in 2005.[5]
:lol: The article gives a brief narrative of a study conducted by reputable pollsters regarding the Republican base. Why don't you read it and tell us what you take issue with, rather than shooting the messenger?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".
Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".
Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?
Of course. They already do. Supporters believe it would be even better if not for the concessions made to Republicans. Any failure will be blamed on the right.

 
I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now. :kicksrock:
This shutdown is really having an impact. :mellow:

 
Matthias said:
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.

Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.

Basically, it appears health care monopolies are driving up the price in the bay area.
$100 a month is a far cry from the $10k extra annual premium this father will be paying. And if "monopolies are driving up the price", wouldn't that already be the case for the father? He's not moving his address, only his coverage (cause he has to).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".
Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?
Of course. They already do. Supporters believe it would be even better if not for the concessions made to Republicans. Any failure will be blamed on the right.
People who already support Obamacare are not the ones who will decide whether it's popular or not. That will be the general public.

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE.. LEFT VS RIGHT! You morons that are using this country as some sort of turf war are the biggest problem of all.... on BOTH sides. :lmao:

Jesus you're dense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Matthias said:
I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?

Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59

And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:

“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.

“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.

Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.

Basically, it appears health care monopolies are driving up the price in the bay area.
$100 a month is a far cry from the $10k extra annual premium this father will be paying. And if "monopolies are driving up the price", wouldn't that already be the case for the father? He's not moving his address, only his coverage (cause he has to).
A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.

I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.

Please note that I have said "my opinion."
Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?
What do you mean by this. Are you saying refusal to argue about the issues makes it less likely to understand the issues?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE! :lmao:

Jesus you're dense.
I don't think I'm the one being dense here.

If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.

 
One of my favorite political quotes is from Joe Biden. He was on Jay Leno and Leno asked him a question about George W.'s policies and he said his dad told him this: "Never question another man's motive. Question his judgement, but not their motive. It's not your role."
I'm taken aback, here. An astute quote from Joe? You sure there isn't a ******* joke or something in here that I've missed?

 
I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now. :kicksrock:
This shutdown is really having an impact. :mellow:
Well, my wife is furloughed. And I have a lot of friends furloughed too. Yes, my softball league is a minor casualty, but that does not mean there are not greater impacts out there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.

I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.

I've heard of quite a few people paying less - most of the time thanks to subsidies. And the person "saving $400" isn't getting the exact same plan (more than likely) as 99% of current plans don't meet all the mandated EHBs. Some older and sicker folks will also be paying less, as this is how the new system is set up.

 
A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.

I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.

I've heard of quite a few people paying less - most of the time thanks to subsidies. And the person "saving $400" isn't getting the exact same plan (more than likely) as 99% of current plans don't meet all the mandated EHBs. Some older and sicker folks will also be paying less, as this is how the new system is set up.
Wrong. The person "saving $400" is getting the exact same plan.

 
I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now. :kicksrock:
This shutdown is really having an impact. :mellow:
Well, my wife is furloughed. And I have a lot of friends furloughed too. Yes, my softball league is a minor casualty, but that does not mean there are not greater impacts out there.
Really??? You funnin' us about this here furlough bidness? Cause Statorama can detect no sign that the GOVERNMENT IS EVEN SHUT DOWN. Your story sure sounds fishy! #toidiots

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE! :lmao:

Jesus you're dense.
I don't think I'm the one being dense here.

If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
It isn't difficult Tim. It just requires a little bit of an open mind. If Obamacare is as terrible as the Tea Party believes it will be, then 6 months from now, they will say "See... We did what we could. We tried to stop this terrible law and were laughed at for it. We need to repeal this law and make life better for Americans." They will now be in a position to be able to say that. It will resonate with the American public.

If there was no shutdown, then Dems would be blaming concessions to the Republicans as the reason there was so much wrong with Obamacare. They would argue not for its repeal, but for reforming it to what they "originally" planned. Even with Republicans denying this, it would become a fight of who does the American public believe. Despite both sides being snakes in the grass and ready to lie at a moment's whim to get their way, right now the public would likely take Democratic word before Republican.

So, what this shutdown really did is make the Democrats OWN this law. They can no longer say with any conviction that the Republicans are at fault for what is wrong with the law. It is a Democratic law. It's their baby. If it bombs, it will all be on them. So, while public opinion may dislike the Republican tactics right now, 6 months from now, it may look like a genius move. However, that's only the case if Obamacare is as bad as they believe it will be.

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE! :lmao:

Jesus you're dense.
I don't think I'm the one being dense here.

If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
It isn't difficult Tim. It just requires a little bit of an open mind. If Obamacare is as terrible as the Tea Party believes it will be, then 6 months from now, they will say "See... We did what we could. We tried to stop this terrible law and were laughed at for it. We need to repeal this law and make life better for Americans." They will now be in a position to be able to say that. It will resonate with the American public.

If there was no shutdown, then Dems would be blaming concessions to the Republicans as the reason there was so much wrong with Obamacare. They would argue not for its repeal, but for reforming it to what they "originally" planned. Even with Republicans denying this, it would become a fight of who does the American public believe. Despite both sides being snakes in the grass and ready to lie at a moment's whim to get their way, right now the public would likely take Democratic word before Republican.

So, what this shutdown really did is make the Democrats OWN this law. They can no longer say with any conviction that the Republicans are at fault for what is wrong with the law. It is a Democratic law. It's their baby. If it bombs, it will all be on them. So, while public opinion may dislike the Republican tactics right now, 6 months from now, it may look like a genius move. However, that's only the case if Obamacare is as bad as they believe it will be.
So the 40-something times they voted to repeal it was just for show?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE! :lmao:

Jesus you're dense.
I don't think I'm the one being dense here.

If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
Tim - I'm with you on this one. I agree that this catastrophe is entirely on the Republicans. But you gotta know that you've said the same thing dozens of times in this thread and the people you're arguing with aren't exactly going to change their tune. At this point you're just feeding the trolls.

 
A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.

I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.

I've heard of quite a few people paying less - most of the time thanks to subsidies. And the person "saving $400" isn't getting the exact same plan (more than likely) as 99% of current plans don't meet all the mandated EHBs. Some older and sicker folks will also be paying less, as this is how the new system is set up.
Wrong. The person "saving $400" is getting the exact same plan.
That's the only thing you have to respond to? Nothing about the original father getting the ridiculous increase?

As for the person saving $400, is that per month? Are they getting a subsidy? What's their approximate age (just curious on that one)?

 
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".
Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?
"They" is the left. Do you really think they'd just sit back and say "Our bad"? No, they'd spin the blame on the right, just like both sides do on every issue now.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top