"Dow Jones falls 10%"That would be awesome for you, you could start another thread! :banana:Back on topic: I know that everyone assumes that in 12 days Boehner is going to fold. But what if he doesn't?
"Dow Jones falls 10%"That would be awesome for you, you could start another thread! :banana:Back on topic: I know that everyone assumes that in 12 days Boehner is going to fold. But what if he doesn't?
Black helicopters of course. Well except they use drones now.Did pittstownkiller get banned? Wiped off the map?Member name Posts timschochet 319 Doctor Detroit 65 Bottomfeeder Sports 64 The Commish 64 dparker713 60 wdcrob 57 Jojo the circus boy 52 jon_mx 50 Matthias 48 [icon] 46 DrJ 44 MaxThreshold 42 humpback 38 Slapdash 38 BigSteelThrill 36 badmojo1006 34 Scoresman 34 Fennis 31 cstu 29 Joe T 29 Rich Conway 28 igbomb 27 drummer 27 Dr Oadi 26 TheIronSheik 24 snogger 24 B-Deep 24 Flying Spaghetti Monster 24 TPW 22 TobiasFunke 22 KCitons 20 pittstownkiller 20 5 digit know nothing 19 Yankee23Fan 19 Politician Spock 18 jamny 18 Premier 18 Don Quixote 16 shader 16 Leeroy Jenkins 16 quickhands 15 17seconds 14 Clifford 14 tommyGunZ 14 Willie Neslon 14 spreagle 13 Mario Kart 13 Ramblin Wreck 13 Joe McGee 13 pantagrapher 13 matuski 12 jonessed 12 Statorama 12 Sand 12 parasaurolophus 12 Rush Limbaugh 12 rascal 12 PlasmaDogPlasma 12 Mark Davis 12 Mr. Pickles 11 Doug B 11 Koya 11 Henry Ford 11 IvanKaramazov 10 joffer 10 Homer J Simpson 10 Abraham 10 Maelstrom 10 baymen 9 bagger 9 Otis 9 matttyl 9 Phil Elliott 9 msommer 9 Ballstein 8 Christo 8 Jim11 8 GoFishTN 7 DanFouts 7 Jackstraw 7 CBusAlex 7 32 Counter Pass 7 greenroom 7 tom22406 7 Lutherman2112 7 Apple Jack 7 3C's 6 omahawildcat25 6 Rohn Jambo 6How can you see how many posts people have in a thread?Its got to be some sort of record for a 30+ thread to have more posts from one guy than everyone else in the thread combined. This is like the Madden Franchise threads by that Raiders94 guy.
Like posting on a message board?Dude, get a hobby. Or something.I wish I had 1,000 posts in this thread. I'm working on it.
I wouldn't give a #### except that it seems to annoy some of you so much. I would find that fact amusing, except it's so ####### boring. Put me on ignore; then you'll never have to read my posts.
 This.Really couldn't tell right now if the government was shut down or not.
Before I'm painted as some paranoid conspiracy theorist (since that's what they do best in here), I'll RE-state that all of my weapons are dual purpose for sporting use (competitive sport shooting, IDPA, hunting, etc) but also double as self/home defense. I have short range (Shotguns w/ 18.5" & 28" barrels), and long range assault (Colt AR-15) rifles as well as an assortment of handguns, plus plenty of magazines and ammunition for all.I'm curious how big your arsenal is that makes you feel secure. If there's an insurrection, you've gotta figure the rebels would demand shelter and supplies by force. How many armed rebels do you think you could fend off?If, god forbid, the #### hits the fan and there is some uprising, I won't be getting involved, but I am glad I will have the means to protect myself and my family.
Such a great song.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0wHQYY-etQand as the decibels of this disenchanting discoursecontinue to dampen the day
the coin flips again and again, and again, and again
as our sanity walks away
all this discussion though politically correct
is dead beyond destruction
though it leaves me quite erect
Wow. I love the "if you're not with us, you're a racist" play. I used to think you were a fairly intelligent poster but damn....Wow, the KooKs really have nothing to say about trying to destroy the American economy.
They really hate our Soul Brother President.
You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.Matthias said:This like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.Only awful when the Republicans do it I guess?It only means their tactics are awful.
The only thing that is going to destroy our economy is if we don't fix our current budget nightmare.Wow, the KooKs really have nothing to say about trying to destroy the American economy.
They really hate our Soul Brother President.
Welcome to liberal utopia, where barriers are not erected against terrorists or illegal aliens on our nation's borders, but rather against citizens, and where wheelchair-bound veterans enroute to honor their comrades face tighter security than terrorists enroute to murder a US Ambassador. This is where up is down, wrong is right, illegality is celebrated as progress, and where Constitutionalism is derided as racist. No longer relegated to the fever swamps of academic fancy, utopia has acquired real estate and made known its demands.
"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual…" the First Lady warned us, and she wasn't just whistling Alinsky either. Under King Barack's Reign of Error, your life is no longer your own, for you are now commanded to enter into private contracts by virtue of your simple existence on the planet. Why? Because our Sovereign and his fellow travelers are compassionate, of course. Their hearts bleed for you,…almost as much as your pocketbook will bleed for them.
as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacareMatthias said:What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.Matthias said:This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.
You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
I find it amusing how so many people want things to be this way? lolWhen the Bleeding Heart Becomes the Iron Fist
http://ricochet.com/main-feed/When-The-Bleeding-Heart-Becomes-The-Iron-Fist
Welcome to liberal utopia, where barriers are not erected against terrorists or illegal aliens on our nation's borders, but rather against citizens, and where wheelchair-bound veterans enroute to honor their comrades face tighter security than terrorists enroute to murder a US Ambassador. This is where up is down, wrong is right, illegality is celebrated as progress, and where Constitutionalism is derided as racist. No longer relegated to the fever swamps of academic fancy, utopia has acquired real estate and made known its demands.
"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual…" the First Lady warned us, and she wasn't just whistling Alinsky either. Under King Barack's Reign of Error, your life is no longer your own, for you are now commanded to enter into private contracts by virtue of your simple existence on the planet. Why? Because our Sovereign and his fellow travelers are compassionate, of course. Their hearts bleed for you,…almost as much as your pocketbook will bleed for them.
I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
The American public voted to elect people that would pass Obamacare and keep it. If it was such a concern to Americans they would have elected a Republican President.as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacareMatthias said:What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.Matthias said:This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.
You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
My mind has been changed on a lot of things from listening to people here. I still haven't heard a convincing argument that this is the Democrats fault, other than they should give up something that has been the dream of the Party for decades.I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
72% of Americans say that shutting down government to defund Obamacare is a bad idea. Only 25% support it.as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacare
Roughly the same percentage of people voted to elect a Republican president. And the people that are doing this were elected to do this.The American public voted to elect people that would pass Obamacare and keep it. If it was such a concern to Americans they would have elected a Republican President.as much of the public that wanted the democrats to shut down the government to fund obamacareMatthias said:What %age of the American public do you think wants the Republicans to shut down the government to try to defund Obamacare?You're delusional if you think the American public wants Obamacare, but please continue hurling insults when you can't prove a simple point. It's people like you that degrade these boards.Matthias said:This is like earlier in the thread when you were attacking someone for implying that a party with a super-majority could pass legislation that polled negatively with the American public after spending the whole thread (or at least the parts I read) defending and advocating for a party with a minority trying to force through something that polled even more negatively with the American public.
You've spend this whole thread defending bull#### positions and then try to jump and attack someone whenever they espouse a position which would be less bull####. You really should just stop, figure out if you have a position on anything, and then defend that position (and not attack people holding the same one). And if your position is Republicans GOOD, Democrats BAD... well, then don't be an asswipe to someone who's your mirror.
Oh, dear.Really couldn't tell right now if the government was shut down or not.
Or how many young people will finally realize what this will cost them. I'm sure there are plenty who will come around to realize why Republicans are against it.I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
haha tom, suck it....I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
And that's fair. I shouldn't have used a blanket statement.My mind has been changed on a lot of things from listening to people here. I still haven't heard a convincing argument that this is the Democrats fault, other than they should give up something that has been the dream of the Party for decades.I don't think so. I'm not neutral on everything. I'm saying in this case I think both sides are doing wrong. And I don't have blinders on. I'm simply saying that I have no desire to argue politics on the Internet. Mainly because no one's mind will be changed.Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Fascinating Raw Story article about the Republican base:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/05/to-understand-the-shutdown-you-have-to-grasp-the-mindset-of-the-republican-base/
Boasting an average 2.5 million readers per month (2013),[3] the site is described by Newsweek as, "Muck, raked: If you're looking for alleged GOP malfeasance, the folks at rawstory.com are frequently scooping the mainstream media."[4] It was referred to as a "liberal blog" by Howard Kurtz in 2005.[5]
If it was only about Obamacare I'd agree with you. I assume their motives are linked to the debt ceiling and they are trying to gain leverage, we won't know if that is successful for another 10 days.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
RESIZE:AAA
And BOOM goes the dynamite.Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.Matthias said:It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
 Fascinating Raw Story article about the Republican base:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/05/to-understand-the-shutdown-you-have-to-grasp-the-mindset-of-the-republican-base/Boasting an average 2.5 million readers per month (2013),[3] the site is described by Newsweek as, "Muck, raked: If you're looking for alleged GOP malfeasance, the folks at rawstory.com are frequently scooping the mainstream media."[4] It was referred to as a "liberal blog" by Howard Kurtz in 2005.[5]
  The article gives a brief narrative of a study conducted by reputable pollsters regarding the Republican base. Why don't you read it and tell us what you take issue with, rather than shooting the messenger?Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
Of course. They already do. Supporters believe it would be even better if not for the concessions made to Republicans. Any failure will be blamed on the right.Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
This shutdown is really having an impact.I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now.![]()
 $100 a month is a far cry from the $10k extra annual premium this father will be paying. And if "monopolies are driving up the price", wouldn't that already be the case for the father? He's not moving his address, only his coverage (cause he has to).Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.Matthias said:It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
Basically, it appears health care monopolies are driving up the price in the bay area.
People who already support Obamacare are not the ones who will decide whether it's popular or not. That will be the general public.Of course. They already do. Supporters believe it would be even better if not for the concessions made to Republicans. Any failure will be blamed on the right.Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE.. LEFT VS RIGHT! You morons that are using this country as some sort of turf war are the biggest problem of all.... on BOTH sides.So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?
 A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.$100 a month is a far cry from the $10k extra annual premium this father will be paying. And if "monopolies are driving up the price", wouldn't that already be the case for the father? He's not moving his address, only his coverage (cause he has to).Couple of key points in that article: more hospitals in the Bay Area are owned by hospital groups that can demand higher rates because of the lack of competition. (yah free market!) A frustrated Vinson went on the Covered California site to see what she would pay for the same policy if she lived in Los Angeles or Sacramento. She discovered she would save at least $100 monthly. Not all of the sticker shock can be blamed on Obamacare.Matthias said:It's amazing. Health care costs and premiums didn't go up at all in the last 20 years, but only since the passage of the ACA.I wonder how many libs would still support Obamacare if they got this letter in the mail?
Sticker Shock: Californians suddenly discover why all the Republican shouting over #Obamacare. By: Moe Lane (Diary) | October 6th, 2013 at 11:00 AM | 59
And BOOM goes the dynamite.
Meet Tom Waschura, Californian, father of two – oh, and right: Obama supporter. Just got a letter from his healthcare provider telling him that his private health insurance just went up by ten grand a year:
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.”
Ever since Congress passed ObamaCare, eating hamburgers and french fries make you fat. THANKS OBAMA!!!!
Basically, it appears health care monopolies are driving up the price in the bay area.
What do you mean by this. Are you saying refusal to argue about the issues makes it less likely to understand the issues?Those that look only to confirm their belief that both sides are at fault have the same blinders that any partisan participant. And usually having checked out of the political debate those blinders are even worst. Does being neutral really mean refusal to weigh the choices at all?I'm not going to get pulled back into a political argument. I've stated here many times that I do not have a "side" in this. And as a impartial observer, my opinion is that both sides are wrong.
Please note that I have said "my opinion."
I don't think I'm the one being dense here.IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE!So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?![]()
Jesus you're dense.
I'm taken aback, here. An astute quote from Joe? You sure there isn't a ******* joke or something in here that I've missed?One of my favorite political quotes is from Joe Biden. He was on Jay Leno and Leno asked him a question about George W.'s policies and he said his dad told him this: "Never question another man's motive. Question his judgement, but not their motive. It's not your role."
Well, my wife is furloughed. And I have a lot of friends furloughed too. Yes, my softball league is a minor casualty, but that does not mean there are not greater impacts out there.This shutdown is really having an impact.I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now.![]()
![]()
Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.
I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
Wrong. The person "saving $400" is getting the exact same plan.Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.
I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
I've heard of quite a few people paying less - most of the time thanks to subsidies. And the person "saving $400" isn't getting the exact same plan (more than likely) as 99% of current plans don't meet all the mandated EHBs. Some older and sicker folks will also be paying less, as this is how the new system is set up.
Really??? You funnin' us about this here furlough bidness? Cause Statorama can detect no sign that the GOVERNMENT IS EVEN SHUT DOWN. Your story sure sounds fishy! #toidiotsWell, my wife is furloughed. And I have a lot of friends furloughed too. Yes, my softball league is a minor casualty, but that does not mean there are not greater impacts out there.This shutdown is really having an impact.I play in a fall softball league on the Ellipse. They are apparently starting to kick teams off the Ellipse. I just got notice that all games are cancelled until the shutdown is over, and with winter coming soon, games might be postponed until spring now.![]()
![]()
It isn't difficult Tim. It just requires a little bit of an open mind. If Obamacare is as terrible as the Tea Party believes it will be, then 6 months from now, they will say "See... We did what we could. We tried to stop this terrible law and were laughed at for it. We need to repeal this law and make life better for Americans." They will now be in a position to be able to say that. It will resonate with the American public.I don't think I'm the one being dense here.IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE!So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?![]()
Jesus you're dense.
If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
So the 40-something times they voted to repeal it was just for show?It isn't difficult Tim. It just requires a little bit of an open mind. If Obamacare is as terrible as the Tea Party believes it will be, then 6 months from now, they will say "See... We did what we could. We tried to stop this terrible law and were laughed at for it. We need to repeal this law and make life better for Americans." They will now be in a position to be able to say that. It will resonate with the American public.I don't think I'm the one being dense here.IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE!So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?![]()
Jesus you're dense.
If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
If there was no shutdown, then Dems would be blaming concessions to the Republicans as the reason there was so much wrong with Obamacare. They would argue not for its repeal, but for reforming it to what they "originally" planned. Even with Republicans denying this, it would become a fight of who does the American public believe. Despite both sides being snakes in the grass and ready to lie at a moment's whim to get their way, right now the public would likely take Democratic word before Republican.
So, what this shutdown really did is make the Democrats OWN this law. They can no longer say with any conviction that the Republicans are at fault for what is wrong with the law. It is a Democratic law. It's their baby. If it bombs, it will all be on them. So, while public opinion may dislike the Republican tactics right now, 6 months from now, it may look like a genius move. However, that's only the case if Obamacare is as bad as they believe it will be.
Tim - I'm with you on this one. I agree that this catastrophe is entirely on the Republicans. But you gotta know that you've said the same thing dozens of times in this thread and the people you're arguing with aren't exactly going to change their tune. At this point you're just feeding the trolls.I don't think I'm the one being dense here.IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS...US VS THEM...RED VS BLUE!So the Republican party is going to serve the best interests of the country by LOSING political capital?Perhaps because some people are more interested in the best interest in the country, rather than sacrificing the welfare of the American people in exchange for political capital in a stupid slapfight between a battle of two ####ty parties.A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?![]()
Jesus you're dense.
If you truly want to get rid of Obamacare and reduce spending, you need political capital to do so. In other words, you need to win elections. That means, in this instance, it absolutely IS all about Republicans vs. Democrats. The only way for Republicans to accomplish their goals is to win more elections. Shutting down the government, threatening to not raise the debt ceiling- these things will cause them to lose elections, not win. The net result of these actions will be to make Obamacare more permanent, not less.
That's the only thing you have to respond to? Nothing about the original father getting the ridiculous increase?Wrong. The person "saving $400" is getting the exact same plan.Wouldn't that same "monopoly" have already driven the cost up of his current plan? Again, he's not moving his address - only his coverage. The new plan is apparently $10k per year more.A monopoly is driving up his cost. As pointed out, Obamacare is not the sole (key word) reason for his increase. I know several people who have had their rates decrease. When's the last time you heard that? One is saving $400/yr for the exact same plan/coverage. Another is saving $600.
I'll know soon what the "damage" is to my plan. I fully expect to pay more as it's gone up every year for as long as I can remember.
I've heard of quite a few people paying less - most of the time thanks to subsidies. And the person "saving $400" isn't getting the exact same plan (more than likely) as 99% of current plans don't meet all the mandated EHBs. Some older and sicker folks will also be paying less, as this is how the new system is set up.
"They" is the left. Do you really think they'd just sit back and say "Our bad"? No, they'd spin the blame on the right, just like both sides do on every issue now.Who is "they"? I'm speaking of public opinion. You believe that if Obamacare were allowed to just happen and was unpopular, the public would blame the right?It's not unanswerable at all, in fact it's already been answered. They would blame the failure on the right, and use it to push for more "reform".A few conservatives here, like Court Jester, have raised the unanswerable question: if Obamacare is so disastrous and going to be so unpopular, why not just let it happen? Wouldn't the GOP be far better off with a public which is focused on Obamacare and rejecting it? Why distract attention away from the ACA with a government shutdown?