I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
I’ve only seen it on my smartwatch. Is that bad?9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
1917 was meant to be viewed on a smartwatch. Thrilling experienceI’ve only seen it on my smartwatch. Is that bad?9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
Eh, I still immediately think the following are better for 21st century films:My vote for greatest movie of the 21st Century (so far)
We just disagree. I go back to your first post and the use of the word enhanced.Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
If the film doesn't rely on a lot of dramatic scenery or special effects then it's not a big deal where you see it . Plenty of great films dont![]()
The Lives of Others ftw imoEh, I still immediately think the following are better for 21st century films:My vote for greatest movie of the 21st Century (so far)
The Dark Knight
Parasite
Get Out
No Country for Old Men
Zodiac
Spotlight
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
I agree, all movies are better in the theater. Some moreso.We just disagree. I go back to your first post and the use of the word enhanced.Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
If the film doesn't rely on a lot of dramatic scenery or special effects then it's not a big deal where you see it . Plenty of great films dont![]()
i don't care how good people's setup is at home, it is not theater level. Imo it matters a lot where and how you watch movies.
I am not a big Dano fan and he’s the weakest part of the movie for me but I think it’s a masterpiece and don’t see schmaltz. I am going to do a ranking of best movies of the first quarter of the century this summer and I don’t know where it will land but TWBB is going to land pretty high.Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
And Paul Dano staring doe-eyed into the camera for two plus hours made ME want to steal his milkshake. It was Spielbergian schmaltz.
Which is probably what major was getting at. For me the genre or style is irrelevant. Even dramas and comedies without f/x and sweeping epic shots are still to be seen in the theater as time and money allows. We also geek out about the minutia of the movies more than most as well.I agree, all movies are better in the theater. Some moreso.We just disagree. I go back to your first post and the use of the word enhanced.Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
If the film doesn't rely on a lot of dramatic scenery or special effects then it's not a big deal where you see it . Plenty of great films dont![]()
i don't care how good people's setup is at home, it is not theater level. Imo it matters a lot where and how you watch movies.
I didn't get the schmaltz comment either, but the Dano scenes, especially his sermons, was what came to mind when I read Andy's post. Also, they are that way for a reason. PTA has a pretty odd sense of humor and my read on the movie is that he views both characters as a bit of a joke. Both are performing for others most times, so there is a cartoonish delivery to their lines in those scenes.I am not a big Dano fan and he’s the weakest part of the movie for me but I think it’s a masterpiece and don’t see schmaltz. I am going to do a ranking of best movies of the first quarter of the century this summer and I don’t know where it will land but TWBB is going to land pretty high.Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
And Paul Dano staring doe-eyed into the camera for two plus hours made ME want to steal his milkshake. It was Spielbergian schmaltz.
What didn't make sense?I liked the first half despite the odd soundtrack.
But the second half stopped making sense and just dragged into weirdness.
The performances are excellent, though.
I am huge fan of the south korean film industry. The night Parasite won best picture was the greatest Oscars night of my life. i was getting phone calls like I had won. Haha.Eh, I still immediately think the following are better for 21st century films:My vote for greatest movie of the 21st Century (so far)
The Dark Knight
Parasite
Get Out
No Country for Old Men
Zodiac
Spotlight
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Midsommar
There are movies that I've given a fair enough shake to through multiple viewings that I feel confident in my negative opinion, See: The Birds.I didn't get the schmaltz comment either, but the Dano scenes, especially his sermons, was what came to mind when I read Andy's post. Also, they are that way for a reason. PTA has a pretty odd sense of humor and my read on the movie is that he views both characters as a bit of a joke. Both are performing for others most times, so there is a cartoonish delivery to their lines in those scenes.I am not a big Dano fan and he’s the weakest part of the movie for me but I think it’s a masterpiece and don’t see schmaltz. I am going to do a ranking of best movies of the first quarter of the century this summer and I don’t know where it will land but TWBB is going to land pretty high.Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
And Paul Dano staring doe-eyed into the camera for two plus hours made ME want to steal his milkshake. It was Spielbergian schmaltz.
Great idea for a list. I've been meaning to do similar since the first one of those I started was something like the "best" 50 movies of 2010+ about 10 years ago. It wasn't an all inclusive list and I have watched others so it would be fun to see how my rankings would look now. My #1 was Her, but again that didn't include 2000-2009. My top on that list was Eternal Sunshine. Not sure either of those would be my top movies now, but certainly would be very high up there.
It's been a long time since I've seen it but I recall that the closing scene had me saying WTF?What didn't make sense?I liked the first half despite the odd soundtrack.
But the second half stopped making sense and just dragged into weirdness.
The performances are excellent, though.
Paul Dano nearly killed that movie for me.Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
And Paul Dano staring doe-eyed into the camera for two plus hours made ME want to steal his milkshake. It was Spielbergian schmaltz.
We might have to team up againI didn't get the schmaltz comment either, but the Dano scenes, especially his sermons, was what came to mind when I read Andy's post. Also, they are that way for a reason. PTA has a pretty odd sense of humor and my read on the movie is that he views both characters as a bit of a joke. Both are performing for others most times, so there is a cartoonish delivery to their lines in those scenes.I am not a big Dano fan and he’s the weakest part of the movie for me but I think it’s a masterpiece and don’t see schmaltz. I am going to do a ranking of best movies of the first quarter of the century this summer and I don’t know where it will land but TWBB is going to land pretty high.Even the trademark "I drink your milkshake" bit was over the top for me. I get that Plainview is this domineering guy and that DDL created the character like all good actors do, but I just found it ridiculously over the top.Can you expand on what you mean here, or give an example? I have a couple scenes in mind, but curious on your take.Didn't make much of an impression on me. I probably should give it another chance but am in no hurry.
I thought the performances were cartoonish - similar to how I felt about Gary Oldman in Leon: The Professional.
![]()
And Paul Dano staring doe-eyed into the camera for two plus hours made ME want to steal his milkshake. It was Spielbergian schmaltz.
Great idea for a list. I've been meaning to do similar since the first one of those I started was something like the "best" 50 movies of 2010+ about 10 years ago. It wasn't an all inclusive list and I have watched others so it would be fun to see how my rankings would look now. My #1 was Her, but again that didn't include 2000-2009. My top on that list was Eternal Sunshine. Not sure either of those would be my top movies now, but certainly would be very high up there.
Which is probably what major was getting at. For me the genre or style is irrelevant. Even dramas and comedies without f/x and sweeping epic shots are still to be seen in the theater as time and money allows. We also geek out about the minutia of the movies more than most as well.I agree, all movies are better in the theater. Some moreso.We just disagree. I go back to your first post and the use of the word enhanced.Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
If the film doesn't rely on a lot of dramatic scenery or special effects then it's not a big deal where you see it . Plenty of great films dont![]()
i don't care how good people's setup is at home, it is not theater level. Imo it matters a lot where and how you watch movies.
Funny you should compare them, as I have them in about the same lane. I think I may like No Country a little more, though.Absolutely hated it when it first came out. All the hype over the years had me questioning that opinion so I watched it again in the past year. Reaffirmed my original opinion. It’s awful. The constant running music is like nails on a chalkboard.
The contemporary No Country for Old Men is a masterpiece and blows Blood out of the water imo.
Never, but its ok to not agree on this.Which is probably what major was getting at. For me the genre or style is irrelevant. Even dramas and comedies without f/x and sweeping epic shots are still to be seen in the theater as time and money allows. We also geek out about the minutia of the movies more than most as well.I agree, all movies are better in the theater. Some moreso.We just disagree. I go back to your first post and the use of the word enhanced.Of course it is, but as i said, so are most well made movies. All the best are meant to be seen on the big screen.I try not to dock movies too much because of this. IMO that bolded applies to every movie, mostly because of the sound.9/10 so I put really, really good. One of those movies that is enhanced on the big screen. Doubt it hits the same on a laptop or 50 inch.
I never docked it and I'm mostly talking visually. The oil rig scene is a site to see on a 50 ft+ screen.
If the film doesn't rely on a lot of dramatic scenery or special effects then it's not a big deal where you see it . Plenty of great films dont![]()
i don't care how good people's setup is at home, it is not theater level. Imo it matters a lot where and how you watch movies.
Pretty much. If I recommend something like Reservoir Dogs, it wont matter where you watch it. I may even argue it's best viewed in the comfort of your own home. 1917 or There Will Be Blood, not so much.
Similar to this, I also disliked how awful it made me feel. I don't need unicorns and rainbows, but I also don't enjoy films that make me wish God would take back his "no more global floods" promise.It’s as close to being with the greatest ever as you can but I voted really really good. I think I did that because of the dark nature of the film. I have to be in the mood to watch it or it just has to be on as I’m sitting down.
As much as I love it personally, I would have to pass up on quite a few movies before I chose this.
A big portion of my stance is that i think its highly unlikely people are watching movies undistracted at home. Maybe im wrong there, but image most on their phones + other stuff going on.
I think I might be the lone person who is warmish on him, or at least I have gotten to that point. I think Dano is a good actor and I appreciate his mind when I listen to interview and him talking about movies. I liked him in movies like Little Miss Sunshine and Prisoners. As for Blood, I think it's more about the character being grating and ridiculous. I love the quiet scene with him as Paul when he goes to sell them info on the oil. I think Eli is even more of a fraud than Plainview, and the more I watch the movie the more I am convinced even the character doesn't believe what he is saying. It's all goofy, performative BS like the cheesy TV evangelists to come later.I think we are learning here that Paul Dano is not our favorite actor. Not at all.
So the distractions was true back then too.A big portion of my stance is that i think its highly unlikely people are watching movies undistracted at home. Maybe im wrong there, but image most on their phones + other stuff going on.
The distraction thing is true today but my introduction to Reservoir Dogs was in a college dorm room with friends, snacks and a freshly packed bong. Conditions were perfect![]()
Good list.Eh, I still immediately think the following are better for 21st century films:My vote for greatest movie of the 21st Century (so far)
The Dark Knight
Parasite
Get Out
No Country for Old Men
Zodiac
Spotlight
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind