Highway Robbery
Footballguy
In the end you still need RBs and they don't grow on trees. They may crap out every 3-4 years, but you have to keep going after them at all costs. Further you retain them at all costs. When you do get a RB you hold onto him, only trading him away for another RB or multiple RBs.We're in agreement there. Only difference being I think you really need that stud RB to win in the end. Even if you only have him for a few years, a true stud RB outscores everyone else by leaps and bounds. Very hard for a WR based team to compete with a solid team led by a RB who has over 2000 combined yards and 20+ TDs. We're definitely on the same page though. I love basing my dynasty teams on stud WRs.That's certainly true. One of the reasons that I advocate building dynasty squads around WRs and QBs is because they're more stable assets than RBs. They tend to get injured less frequently and generally have longer careers. That's why I recommend acquiring a top flight proven WR like Holt, Ward, or C. Johnson as part of the package if you deal away a player like Alexander or LJ. Think about a guy like Larry Fitzgerald. I know it's dangerous to assume that he'll be around forever (Koren Robinson, Germane Crowell, Marcus Robinson, etc.), but he's only 23 years old. Given that many WRs have remained productive into their mid thirties, it's entirely possible that Fitzgerald will be a top 10-20 WR for the next 12 years. To me, that makes him a lot more valuable in most leagues than someone like Edgerrin James or Shaun Alexander.Point taken. But in two years anyone could be in Dillon or Ahman land. Ahman was only 27-28 when he entered Ahman land.
WRs and QBs are nice, and they do stick around for a while but you can always get a veteran for cheap like Rod Smith. You know in 2 years Hines Ward will be 32 and inexpensive.