What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trent Edwards ! (1 Viewer)

Traders2001

Footballguy
He had a decent beginning of the season, but for the last 4 weeks he struggled big time .

Team doesnt respect his arm , stack the line and shuts down their RB .

I think they should consider giving another chance to Losman before they are out of the playoff picture.

 
I really think Losman got the raw end of the deal in Buffalo, but I think Edwards will be a descent QB for the Bills going forward. Edwards has though stunk it up the last little bit, but you have to take your bumps along the road with young QB's. This o-line is terrible at run blocking which is not helping out anything.

 
Losman seems to come in off the bench and look great for a game and then struggle after getting his opportunity. He's very inconsistent.

 
I don't think he'll ever set the world on fire, but Losman's not the answer either.

Buffalo still desperately needs a 2nd WR next to Evans. Hardy's a great goalline option but to expect him to be more at this time is not realistic.

 
Losman sucks.

Edwards looked awesome for through week seven. The last three games have been brutal, though. He's clearly regressed as of late.

 
Their OL has WAY underperformed, & not only that, Edwards has below-average weapons to work with (as well as a below-average running game). Give this kid time (& give the Bills time to make some improvements). Edwards will get better & better. Big upside, but like any QB, he needs some help.

I do believe Edwards will finish strong, tho.

 
Good QB with an average arm. He's going to struggle at times because his best weapon is a deep threat and he doesn't have a great deep ball.

 
Oh how soon people forget:

Losman

2004 0 TD, 1 INT, 1 FUM

2005 8 TD, 8 INT, 3 FUM

2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM

2007 4 TD, 6 INT, 2 FUM

2008 1 TD, 1 INT, 2 FUM

Has more losses than wins as a starter.

He does throw a pretty bomb and that's what people remember.

 
IvanKaramazov said:
Losman sucks. Edwards looked awesome for through week seven. The last three games have been brutal, though. He's clearly regressed as of late.
That's a pretty good synopsis. Also, the idea that teams "stack the line" couldn't be more wrong. Stopping Evans are priorities 1, 2, and 3 for any halfway smart defensive coordinator since they can't run against 7 man fronts and there's no 2nd threat in the passing game.
 
Oh how soon people forget:Losman2004 0 TD, 1 INT, 1 FUM2005 8 TD, 8 INT, 3 FUM2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM2007 4 TD, 6 INT, 2 FUM2008 1 TD, 1 INT, 2 FUMHas more losses than wins as a starter.He does throw a pretty bomb and that's what people remember.
:bag: The most popular guy in town is always the backup QB.
 
IvanKaramazov said:
Losman sucks.

Edwards looked awesome for through week seven. The last three games have been brutal, though. He's clearly regressed as of late.
That's a pretty good synopsis. Also, the idea that teams "stack the line" couldn't be more wrong. Stopping Evans are priorities 1, 2, and 3 for any halfway smart defensive coordinator since they can't run against 7 man fronts and there's no 2nd threat in the passing game.
I disagree on the assessment that teams are not stacking the line against the Bills on our running plays and likewise flooding the zone with defenders on passing plays. I have harped on this in other threads, but the Bills' playcalling has become woefully predictable to the point where teams know exactly what is coming. A great writeup on this was done on buffalorumblings.com a few weeks ago and the problem only became much, much, much worse today against the Patriots. At any rate, it is impossible for any QB in the NFL to excel when your play callers are tipping your plays before they are even snapped and that is what Edwards is suffering from now.

With that being said, today was the first game of the season that I thought Edwards was simply inaccurate on his throws. Give credit to the Patriots as our receivers were not getting any separation the whole afternoon not giving Edwards much margin for error.

As to those who don't think Edwards can throw the deep ball, I don't think they have really watched this team very much this year. Teams realize that Evans' biggest threat are the deep routes (really, just go routes) and they have schemed accordingly with cover 2 and cover 3 defenses over the top. When Edwards has gone deep this year, he has been fairly accurate. No, he does not have Losman's arm, but he has exhibited the ability to get the ball down the field when the plays are there... whereas Losman while invariably just chuck it up there no matter what and hope for the best.

To flesh out the comparison to Losman even more, Losman simply does not compare to Edwards' ability to read defenses, throw consistently accurate balls and get rid of the ball in the face of defensive pressure. The only areas where Losman is better are pure arm-strength (which is negated by his lack of accuracy and poor reading abilities) and his mobility (which is negated by his poor pocket presence). Losman is a great teammate who has a some decent skills, but on the whole is not as good of a quarterback as Edwards.

 
Oh how soon people forget:Losman2004 0 TD, 1 INT, 1 FUM2005 8 TD, 8 INT, 3 FUM2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM2007 4 TD, 6 INT, 2 FUM2008 1 TD, 1 INT, 2 FUMHas more losses than wins as a starter.He does throw a pretty bomb and that's what people remember.
:goodposting: The most popular guy in town is always the backup QB.
I don't get it..... These stats are not that back. If you look at them a little more objectively....2004 (He threw 5 Balls) was a rookie2005 His first meaningful action he threw 8 TD's to 8 Pics while starting 8 games. Not totally bad.2006 His first full season as the starter as a 25 year old threw for 3,051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 ints with a 62% completion percentage2007 Cheap shot to his knee in the third game of the year. 4 of his 7 starts were against very good defenses, Pit, Ne, Jac and Den.2008 has played in one game, and played well.So other than 2006 his first full year as a starter it is tough to gauge him. I know he has had some problems with decision making and extending drives, but any more than Edwards has I don't quite know yet.Also, JP did this with less then Edwards has at this point. Now, I think Edwards is going to be a descent QB, but I still think Losman will get another shot at starting somewhere during his time in the NFL or at least a shot to compete for a role. He is still young enough 27 that someone will have a look at him.I mean people keep saying Edwards is leaps and bounds ahead of Losman. I don't agree with that. It had appeared Edwards had the ability to make better decisions but this season he has 7 td's to 7 int's and 5 fumbles with 4 of them being lost. Edwards career.... 14 TD's to 15 ints. This Edwards is much better than Losman stuff is not entirely true.
 
I mean that's pretty much why I don't post on Bills boards anymore. It's always the coach's fault. The only good non-predictable O coordinator we've had in 20 years just happened to have Jim Kelly at QB. Amazing coincidence. A month ago when Trent was playing well Schonert was way smarter than Fairchild. Now Schonert sucks. Whatever. The OL, TE, and WR depth sucks and the 2nd year QB is in a slump.

As to those who don't think Edwards can throw the deep ball, I don't think they have really watched this team very much this year.
Well that's definitely true. "I don't see 60 yard bombs on sportscenter so he must have a weak arm!"
 
This is an example of trusting your eyes. I've seen Edwards do things that remind me of good quarterbacks while I've seen Losman do things that remind me of bad quarterbacks. I'll take Edwards, thanks.

 
This is an example of trusting your eyes. I've seen Edwards do things that remind me of good quarterbacks while I've seen Losman do things that remind me of bad quarterbacks. I'll take Edwards, thanks.
I just don't know about this argument any more with Edwards vs Losman. I would loved to see what Losman would have done after his good year as a starter had he not been injured. Losman was not part of this camp and therefore they went with "their guy" Edwards. I think Edwards is going to be descent but Losman was still not given a fair shot thats a fact.
 
This is an example of trusting your eyes. I've seen Edwards do things that remind me of good quarterbacks while I've seen Losman do things that remind me of bad quarterbacks. I'll take Edwards, thanks.
Yah I was going to go thru a longer response about how horrible JP was vs. Denver & Pittsburgh last year, but that works too. One startling difference in addition to the intelligence is that they actually utilize the middle of the field with Edwards....it's like crossing routes don't exist with JP.
 
Losman is like the dufus you had in gym class who had some raw talent but would always make the same stupid mistake, I really think he is too dumb to be an NFL QB and this perspective comes from watching every NFL game he's played.

Until you have around a five game sample of veiwing this guy you can't really understand what his little quirks are, the guys a friggin disaster area. When he comes in the game its like your psycho ex girfriend walking in the room in terms of gut reaction.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haven't watched the Bills since their slide but I can't help but note that the slide began after Edwards had his brains scrambled, I have to believe that could be one of the contributing factors to Edwards' regression. I'll let the homers vent about the play calling, I don't know, haven't watched. Any truth to the oline regressing too? Heard that from a few different sources.

 
I mean that's pretty much why I don't post on Bills boards anymore. It's always the coach's fault. The only good non-predictable O coordinator we've had in 20 years just happened to have Jim Kelly at QB. Amazing coincidence. A month ago when Trent was playing well Schonert was way smarter than Fairchild. Now Schonert sucks. Whatever. The OL, TE, and WR depth sucks and the 2nd year QB is in a slump.

As to those who don't think Edwards can throw the deep ball, I don't think they have really watched this team very much this year.
Well that's definitely true. "I don't see 60 yard bombs on sportscenter so he must have a weak arm!"
The numbers on the playcalling don't lie. Defenses simply know what we are going to do and when we are doing it. And I am not the type of guy to automatically point fingers at the coaches... I thought both Gregg Williams and Mike Mularky did not get a fair shake from media and fans.With respect to Schonert in particular, I give him a lot of credit in being more aggressive in the passing game particularly in terms of trying to stretch the field. But now it is too the point where we run less than even all of the run & shoot teams from the '90s.
 
Haven't watched the Bills since their slide but I can't help but note that the slide began after Edwards had his brains scrambled, I have to believe that could be one of the contributing factors to Edwards' regression. I'll let the homers vent about the play calling, I don't know, haven't watched. Any truth to the oline regressing too? Heard that from a few different sources.
I think the pass protection has regressed considerably this year, particularly during this losing streak. Both the Dolphins and Jets defended the pass by flooding the zone with eight defenders and only rushing three or four... and they still were able to bring consistent pressure. Peters has been beaten on a number of big plays for sacks, but everyone else on the line has had their share of bad moments. We have had particularly awful play at center (although this is not a new problem), but what is troubling is that our guards are still ineffective at providing doubleteams against good nose tackles (see the lost two losses). Injuries have hurt to some extent as well (i.e., reserve tackle Kirk Chambers had no business starting at guard yesterday in place of Brad Butler, and it showed).Teams have figured out that Edwards is actually good at beating the blitz with quick reads and a quick release. The opposite strategy of bringing only four while putting more men in coverage has worked wonders against us and we will likely continue to see it until (i) our offensive line can provide consistent protection against three and four man rushes, and (ii) we show a commitment to running against the soft fronts.
 
IvanKaramazov said:
Losman sucks.

Edwards looked awesome for through week seven. The last three games have been brutal, though. He's clearly regressed as of late.
That's a pretty good synopsis. Also, the idea that teams "stack the line" couldn't be more wrong. Stopping Evans are priorities 1, 2, and 3 for any halfway smart defensive coordinator since they can't run against 7 man fronts and there's no 2nd threat in the passing game.
I disagree on the assessment that teams are not stacking the line against the Bills on our running plays and likewise flooding the zone with defenders on passing plays. I have harped on this in other threads, but the Bills' playcalling has become woefully predictable to the point where teams know exactly what is coming. A great writeup on this was done on buffalorumblings.com a few weeks ago and the problem only became much, much, much worse today against the Patriots. At any rate, it is impossible for any QB in the NFL to excel when your play callers are tipping your plays before they are even snapped and that is what Edwards is suffering from now.

With that being said, today was the first game of the season that I thought Edwards was simply inaccurate on his throws. Give credit to the Patriots as our receivers were not getting any separation the whole afternoon not giving Edwards much margin for error.

As to those who don't think Edwards can throw the deep ball, I don't think they have really watched this team very much this year. Teams realize that Evans' biggest threat are the deep routes (really, just go routes) and they have schemed accordingly with cover 2 and cover 3 defenses over the top. When Edwards has gone deep this year, he has been fairly accurate. No, he does not have Losman's arm, but he has exhibited the ability to get the ball down the field when the plays are there... whereas Losman while invariably just chuck it up there no matter what and hope for the best.

To flesh out the comparison to Losman even more, Losman simply does not compare to Edwards' ability to read defenses, throw consistently accurate balls and get rid of the ball in the face of defensive pressure. The only areas where Losman is better are pure arm-strength (which is negated by his lack of accuracy and poor reading abilities) and his mobility (which is negated by his poor pocket presence). Losman is a great teammate who has a some decent skills, but on the whole is not as good of a quarterback as Edwards.
this is exactly how i'd sum it up!
 
Buffalorumblings.com has a fantastic follow-up on the Bills' offensive play-calling issues. The numbers are eye-poppingly brutal...

Link

Predictable Bills play calling inexplicably continues

by Brian Galliford on Nov 11, 2008 12:15 AM EST in News

Bills OC Turk Schonert(-Fairchild) (buffalobills.com)

Warning: what you are about to read is not news. It may be to the Buffalo Bills - specifically, offensive coordinator Steve Fairchild Turk Schonert - but it's not news. Not to anybody who pays the slightest bit of attention, at least. I mean, for the love of the football gods, we talked about this exact topic two weeks ago.

The Buffalo Bills are painfully predictable on offense. In other news, the Earth is round, dinosaurs are dead and Ralph Wilson is really, really old.

We can talk ad nauseum about Buffalo's problems offensively. Most of them have to do with what has been awful offensive line play; a few center around QB Trent Edwards, as well. I'm of the opinion, however, that it's close to impossible to accomplish anything when an opponent - a professional, National Football League opponent - can reasonably guess what's coming from Edwards and the offense 91 percent of the time. Yeah - it's that bad, based on statistical evidence from Sunday's 20-10 loss to the New England Patriots. The facts...

Pass plays at New England

Buffalo called 25 pass plays on Sunday. 23 of them came from the shotgun formation; that means that on 92 percent of his passes, Edwards is in the gun. The two plays that came from under center represent 33 percent of Buffalo's "unpredictable" offensive play-calling in New England; the other two-thirds were split between ill-timed draws and the Wildcat formation. More on that in a moment.

Of the 23 shotgun pass attempts, three of them came on 3rd and 2 yards or fewer to go. The Bills did not run a single play-action pass all day, nor did they dial up a single traditional screen pass.

Run plays at New England

Buffalo called 20 run plays on Sunday. 16 of them came with Edwards lined up under center; two were shotgun draws (one of which was negated by a New England penalty), and two more came out of the Wildcat formation. The Wildcat plays are being counted as obvious runs, because let's face it - not even Miami throws consistently out of that formation. That means 18 of 20 (90 percent) Bills run plays fall under the "predictable" category.

The complete picture

Of the 45 plays the Bills dialed up in New England, a whopping 41 of them - 91.1 percent - were as predictable as a pro wrestling match. 91.1 percent of the time on Sunday, we could quite easily predict what the Bills were about to do offensively in terms of run and pass. If we knew what was coming, what the hell did Bill Belichick know?

I laughed out loud on numerous occasions as I re-watched the film on this game. Watching the Bills' offense is like behind handed the winning numbers for the lottery. It's laughable knowing what's coming - until, that is, you realize how incredibly pathetic it is.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this predictability is, in fact, the root of all of Buffalo's issues offensively. 92 percent of the time, opponents can blitz without gambling and confuse Edwards with complex coverages. 90 percent of the time, opponents can stack the box with Edwards under center and not worry about getting beat deep. Want to blame Edwards? Want to blame the offensive line? Feel free. Nothing is going to change, however, until the Bills start getting a bit more creative offensively.

Anyone know somebody "famous"?

Spread the word, Bills fans. Know Turk Schonert-Fairchild? Print this article off and slap him across the face with it. Know someone in the "traditional" media? Politely request that they stop asking stupid questions and explore this one. This needs to be discussed on a much broader level than it currently is. The vast majority of Buffalo's issues during this losing streak of theirs can be traced back to this singular problem.

We're just lowly bloggers, after all. What do we know, right? Apparently nothing - except what ails the Buffalo Bills, that is.
 
In looking at these percentages, it is stunning that the Bills were able to score any points in the last 3 weeks. Without exaggerating, I don't know if I have ever seen a more predictable offense than this one.

 
Do they have anything to lose by giving Losman a chance? Seriously.
Losman had his chances. 2005-2007. He showed flashes, but never looked like a consistent winner.Edwards is a young player suffering through some growing pains. They're not going to yank him just because he hit a rough patch.
 
I think the pass protection has regressed considerably this year, particularly during this losing streak.
Probably true, I've only seen the Bills sporadically this year...but they were awesome tonight, Edwards had several plays where he had 4-5 seconds to go through his progressions, and he made terrible decisions. Deer in the headlights after that start.Great throw to Royal late in the game, but he played scared the rest of the night.
 
Do they have anything to lose by giving Losman a chance? Seriously.
Losman had his chances. 2005-2007. He showed flashes, but never looked like a consistent winner.Edwards is a young player suffering through some growing pains. They're not going to yank him just because he hit a rough patch.
Fist off Edwards is 25 vs Losman who is 27.Secondly, Losman was never ever given a fair shot with this regime after Edwards was drafted they looked for any reason to pull him. Losman was never allowed to play through his bumps as a "young player." Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td. Edwards as a 25 year old starter with a better team is on pace for 12 TDs to 16 int's. So Losman deserves to get yanked through his rough patch, but Edwards gets the pass???
 
Do they have anything to lose by giving Losman a chance? Seriously.
Losman had his chances. 2005-2007. He showed flashes, but never looked like a consistent winner.Edwards is a young player suffering through some growing pains. They're not going to yank him just because he hit a rough patch.
Fist off Edwards is 25 vs Losman who is 27.Secondly, Losman was never ever given a fair shot with this regime after Edwards was drafted they looked for any reason to pull him. Losman was never allowed to play through his bumps as a "young player." Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td. Edwards as a 25 year old starter with a better team is on pace for 12 TDs to 16 int's. So Losman deserves to get yanked through his rough patch, but Edwards gets the pass???
Ask any Bills fan about Losman. They'll tell you that he's simply not a very good QB. He throws a nice deep ball, but is inconsistent and easily rattled in the pocket. The coaches had plenty of time to evaluate him in games and in practice. He had over three full seasons in Buffalo before the Bills staff decided to go with Edwards. The people who actually see these guys practice every day (the Bills front office and coaches) have much more riding on this decision than either of us and they clearly saw something that made them favor Edwards. Losman had his chance and didn't deliver. Barring utterly abysmal play from Edwards, Losman is done in Buffalo.
 
Buffalo has giving Trent the supporting cast he needs and got rid of the old off cord and he still can't get the job done. Anyone can throw check downs ( except for last night) and have a high pert of completions. Trent has a rb (where jp didnt), he has the #2 wr (Hardy) where JP didnt. JP is the better qb in Buffalo. But the team might as well stay w/ Trent since they invested so much in him....

just my $.02

 
Oh how soon people forget:2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM
2006 His first full season as the starter as a 25 year old threw for 3,051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 ints with a 62% completion percentage
Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td.
You keep quoting Losman's 1 average year, but you intentionally keep omitting his 7 fumbles. Why?
 
I wanted JP Losman to succeed more than anything, but I readily acknowledge he is NOT the answer.

With that being said, Edwards was abysmal tonight. I cannot recall watching an NFL quarterback, particularly a starting quarterback, play with less confidence than Edwards did tonight after the first quarter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do they have anything to lose by giving Losman a chance? Seriously.
Losman had his chances. 2005-2007. He showed flashes, but never looked like a consistent winner.Edwards is a young player suffering through some growing pains. They're not going to yank him just because he hit a rough patch.
Fist off Edwards is 25 vs Losman who is 27.Secondly, Losman was never ever given a fair shot with this regime after Edwards was drafted they looked for any reason to pull him. Losman was never allowed to play through his bumps as a "young player." Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td. Edwards as a 25 year old starter with a better team is on pace for 12 TDs to 16 int's. So Losman deserves to get yanked through his rough patch, but Edwards gets the pass???
Ask any Bills fan about Losman. They'll tell you that he's simply not a very good QB. He throws a nice deep ball, but is inconsistent and easily rattled in the pocket. The coaches had plenty of time to evaluate him in games and in practice. He had over three full seasons in Buffalo before the Bills staff decided to go with Edwards. The people who actually see these guys practice every day (the Bills front office and coaches) have much more riding on this decision than either of us and they clearly saw something that made them favor Edwards. Losman had his chance and didn't deliver. Barring utterly abysmal play from Edwards, Losman is done in Buffalo.
I'm one of those Bills fans and I'm still miffed at how JP was handled. And still think he is the better QB.I'm no expert, but neither are you. And, unfortunately, neither are the clowns that routinely pass through Buffalo masquerading as coaches.
 
I wanted JP Losman to succeed more than anything, but I readily acknowledge he is NOT the answer.

With that being said, Edwards was abysmal tonight. I cannot recall watching an NFL quarterback, particularly a starting quarterback, play with less confidence than Edwards did tonight after the first quarter.
It sure looked liked Edwards had open receivers downfield last night but was hesitant to throw the ball more than 10 yards. I guess opening up with 3 picks in the 1st quarter really shook him up.
 
I wanted JP Losman to succeed more than anything, but I readily acknowledge he is NOT the answer.

With that being said, Edwards was abysmal tonight. I cannot recall watching an NFL quarterback, particularly a starting quarterback, play with less confidence than Edwards did tonight after the first quarter.
It sure looked liked Edwards had open receivers downfield last night but was hesitant to throw the ball more than 10 yards. I guess opening up with 3 picks in the 1st quarter really shook him up.
He was terrible last night, but he's been playing with a lot less confidence ever since the Miami game. It's like all the sudden he's completely scared every time he drops back. Good quarterbacks are capable of shrugging off bad plays, but Edwards obviously isn't there.
 
Oh how soon people forget:2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM
2006 His first full season as the starter as a 25 year old threw for 3,051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 ints with a 62% completion percentage
Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td.
You keep quoting Losman's 1 average year, but you intentionally keep omitting his 7 fumbles. Why?
I don't know if this is something that you want brought up when Edwards has 5 lost fumbles on the season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The biggest beef I have with Edwards right now are the turnovers. Not throwing the ball downfield is frustrating and really takes a huge burden off of the defense (while handicapping their best WR), but the strength of Edwards was supposed to be making smart decisions and not turning the ball over. One of the biggest reasons that Losman lost the job was because he turned the ball over too much. Losman made some fantastic throws and forced the secondary to respect the deep ball, but fumbled the ball and threw INTs too often.

Edwards was supposed to change that. We all know that he doesn't have the cannon arm, but he's supposed to be able to keep the offense moving and take pressure off of the defense by not turning the ball over. And yet Edwards has turned the ball over ELEVEN times in the last 4 games. That's just not going to get the job done. If you're not going to make the big plays and force the defense to back off of the line a bit, then you certainly can't be turning the ball over 3 times a game.

 
Oh how soon people forget:2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM
2006 His first full season as the starter as a 25 year old threw for 3,051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 ints with a 62% completion percentage
Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td.
You keep quoting Losman's 1 average year, but you intentionally keep omitting his 7 fumbles. Why?
I don't know if this is something that you want brought up when Edwards has 5 lost fumbles on the season.
Why? Just because Edwards looks lousy doesn't mean that Losman suddenly got better. He still sucks.
 
Oh how soon people forget:2006 19 TD, 14 INT, 7 FUM
2006 His first full season as the starter as a 25 year old threw for 3,051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 ints with a 62% completion percentage
Losman had a very good season as a 25 year old throwing for 3, 051 yards with 19 TD's to 14 int's with a passing percentage of 62.5 %; he also ran for 140 yards and a td.
You keep quoting Losman's 1 average year, but you intentionally keep omitting his 7 fumbles. Why?
I don't know if this is something that you want brought up when Edwards has 5 lost fumbles on the season.
I was going to post this. And I would love a list of 25 year old QB's that had seasons as good as Losman did or at least comparable. The problem here is Edwards may be good, but Losman may be just as good but was not given that fair shot. People keep on saying Losman just does not have it. The problem is if you play that card it appears that Edwards too just does not have it. I think Losman will probably be given another shot somewhere to at least compete for a starting job and only time will tell how he does with it.
 
It was clear last night from the opening kickoff on that Buffalo's chances of winning were being greatly diminished by Edwards. That he was so embarrassingly outplayed by Quinn, making his second start on the road on MNF, should tell Buffalo fans all they need to know about Edwards. Having Losman behind center at least presents the credible threat of a passing game. Now that the Bills have been all but eliminated from playoff contention, Losman should be given another shot, if only for this reason.

 
It was clear last night from the opening kickoff on that Buffalo's chances of winning were being greatly diminished by Edwards. That he was so embarrassingly outplayed by Quinn, making his second start on the road on MNF, should tell Buffalo fans all they need to know about Edwards. Having Losman behind center at least presents the credible threat of a passing game. Now that the Bills have been all but eliminated from playoff contention, Losman should be given another shot, if only for this reason.
It does no good to give Losman another shot at this point. His contract is up at the end of the season. And unless the Bills gave him a huge guaranteed signing bonus, there's no way he'd re-sign with Buffalo. They've put their eggs in the Edwards basket, for better or worse for now.
 
It was clear last night from the opening kickoff on that Buffalo's chances of winning were being greatly diminished by Edwards. That he was so embarrassingly outplayed by Quinn, making his second start on the road on MNF, should tell Buffalo fans all they need to know about Edwards. Having Losman behind center at least presents the credible threat of a passing game. Now that the Bills have been all but eliminated from playoff contention, Losman should be given another shot, if only for this reason.
It does no good to give Losman another shot at this point. His contract is up at the end of the season. And unless the Bills gave him a huge guaranteed signing bonus, there's no way he'd re-sign with Buffalo. They've put their eggs in the Edwards basket, for better or worse for now.
What a lousy situation for all parties -- particularly Bills fans. That must have been some concussion Edwards suffered -- poor kid is seeing ghosts all over the field.
 
It was clear last night from the opening kickoff on that Buffalo's chances of winning were being greatly diminished by Edwards. That he was so embarrassingly outplayed by Quinn, making his second start on the road on MNF, should tell Buffalo fans all they need to know about Edwards. Having Losman behind center at least presents the credible threat of a passing game. Now that the Bills have been all but eliminated from playoff contention, Losman should be given another shot, if only for this reason.
It does no good to give Losman another shot at this point. His contract is up at the end of the season. And unless the Bills gave him a huge guaranteed signing bonus, there's no way he'd re-sign with Buffalo. They've put their eggs in the Edwards basket, for better or worse for now.
TE is the perfect "Jauron QB" - play not to lose. TE is our QB because DJ is our coach. The only way the Bills can get Losman under center, or another QB that takes chances throwing the football over 10 yards, is to get rid of the weeny that decides the lineup.JP really adopted the city, and would stay for a reasonable offer if he was the starter./ OK. I'm done with my fantasy thinking. To even imagine that the Bills would get rid of Jauron (after a 3 year extension) is to pretend that Ralph became a big spender in his sleep last night. One thing Ralph has always been consistent with was this - hire the cheapest staff /head coach that he thinks gives the team a chance to win. And avoid the 'big' personalities - too high maintenance. Its hard to even imagine a guy like Bill Polian leading the Bills front office 15 years ago. Of course he came cheap (from the CFL.) But really, there must have been some kind of warp in the time-space continuum that would result in RW hiring someone that dang competent.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top