What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trent Richardson (2 Viewers)

Can someone tell me what the difference is between Richardson and Donald Brown?

Wasn't he taken in the first round as well? Isn't that all we use to judge the value of a player? What round they were taken in?

 
Well for what it's worth guys, I think he looks terrible for all the hype. I just offered an 0-4 team who has Ray Rice the following package: t-Rich, James jones and Pierce for Julio Jones, Lamar miller and Ronnie Hillman. He accepted.

 
Well for what it's worth guys, I think he looks terrible for all the hype. I just offered an 0-4 team who has Ray Rice the following package: t-Rich, James jones and Pierce for Julio Jones, Lamar miller and Ronnie Hillman. He accepted.
Nice. I would definitely take the Julio side there.

 
KCitons said:
Can someone tell me what the difference is between Richardson and Donald Brown?

Wasn't he taken in the first round as well? Isn't that all we use to judge the value of a player? What round they were taken in?
I think it's unfair to compare Trent Richardson to Donald Brown. Brown is crappy at pass blocking whereas Richardson is crappy at running. Completely different.
 
I tried to move Richardson ever since the deal was announced but had no luck so decided to take the risk and move Foster. I had RB depth and filled my other holes. If you're bullish on Richardson still I would move someone with greater value to improve your team.

 
Sabertooth said:
What would you pay for him? And I'm interested to hear your reasoning for wanting to buy following this weekend's game?

I've got TR in two big money leagues and am about to start sending out feelers for him.

 
Sabertooth said:
What would you pay for him? And I'm interested to hear your reasoning for wanting to buy following this weekend's game?

I've got TR in two big money leagues and am about to start sending out feelers for him.
I find it unlikely that many trades for TR will go down. If you are buying him now, you are likely trying to "buy low," and I think he would have more value to his current owners than others would be willing to pay.

If I had a deep WR core, I'd be willing to offer a WR2. Eddie Royal, Nate Washington, Brian Hartline, Eric Decker. Guys in that range. I doubt that would get it done, though.

As far as why I'd be interested: He's going to be the GL back, I believe. He's going to get carries, even if he only averages 3.5 YPC, you give him 15 carries at 3.5 YPC, that's 52 yards. Throw in a TD every other game, and you get between 5-12 FF points/game. That gives him value as a flex play/RB2 option.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a 12 team Dynasty league - sent out feelers after last week..

Was offered the likes of:

Chris Johnson

Bilal Powell

Joique Bell

My team will be 1-3 as I sank last 2 weeks with Rice and Trent and no RB depth.

Impossible to upgrade as there are no trades ever made in this league.

looking at a top 5 rookie pick next year i guess.

 
In a 12 team Dynasty league - sent out feelers after last week..

Was offered the likes of:

Chris Johnson

Bilal Powell

Joique Bell

My team will be 1-3 as I sank last 2 weeks with Rice and Trent and no RB depth.

Impossible to upgrade as there are no trades ever made in this league.

looking at a top 5 rookie pick next year i guess.
Look on the bright side, the Browns are probably going to take a RB in the top 3 picks next years. And the circle is complete.

 
In a 12 team Dynasty league - sent out feelers after last week..

Was offered the likes of:

Chris Johnson

Bilal Powell

Joique Bell

My team will be 1-3 as I sank last 2 weeks with Rice and Trent and no RB depth.

Impossible to upgrade as there are no trades ever made in this league.

looking at a top 5 rookie pick next year i guess.
Look on the bright side, the Browns are probably going to take a RB in the top 3 picks next years. And the circle is complete.
Great...Something to look forward to...

 
we really, really should've seen this coming. between mark ingram (the REAL "next ron dayne", not many worse RBs in the NFL right now) and now this, i think it's time to conclude that bama RBs are a product of that monster o-line. this has me thinking lacy is a must-sell in dynasty...

the reason i say we should've seen this coming is that the template for this situation was right in front of our eyes just a few years ago: carroll's USC teams. just think of how many fantasy guys from there turned out to be hot garbage in the NFL - i'm thinking "beware of guys from absurdly stacked college teams" could be a good general rule going forward!

 
I'm thinking TRich for Chris Johnson could be a steal after the Titans week 9 bye ... their run defense schedule becomes incredibly easy from weeks 10-16. Meanwhile the Colts run defense is pretty much brutal the rest of the way.

Plus, CJ is getting the touches.... he's gotta break one at some point, right?

I am baffled by the lack of use of CJ in the passing game. Isn't the point of someone with his skill-set to get him into space???

 
Last edited by a moderator:
we really, really should've seen this coming. between mark ingram (the REAL "next ron dayne", not many worse RBs in the NFL right now) and now this, i think it's time to conclude that bama RBs are a product of that monster o-line. this has me thinking lacy is a must-sell in dynasty...

the reason i say we should've seen this coming is that the template for this situation was right in front of our eyes just a few years ago: carroll's USC teams. just think of how many fantasy guys from there turned out to be hot garbage in the NFL - i'm thinking "beware of guys from absurdly stacked college teams" could be a good general rule going forward!
If he were some inferior talent who went to Alabama and excelled I would blame the system, but he was a 5 star recruit who also had exceptional strength and size/speed ratio. I always thought Ingram was over-rated since he wasn't a special athlete. Trent is, but maybe he's not a special RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sabertooth said:
What would you pay for him? And I'm interested to hear your reasoning for wanting to buy following this weekend's game?

I've got TR in two big money leagues and am about to start sending out feelers for him.
My reasoning to pay for him is that he had a crappy game and still put up 13.6 FP in PPR. People act like the sky is falling but in reality he was the 17th best PPR back yesterday just a week after joining the team. He outshone guys like Giovani Bernard and Doug Martin. Nobody is bailing on them yet. He outscored Lesean McCoy and Demarco Murray too.

 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.

 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.
The play calling the whole first half was strange. They didn't even really try to run it. That sequence at the goal line was really dumb imo. They would have had an easy td if they had just handed it to trich.. he's going to score alot of tds in this offense. I like those more than yards

 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.
That scenario might pacify the people in this thread arguing about Richardson's fantasy value, but there are numerous people in this thread who are instead arguing Richardson's real life talent. Even had Richardson converted that one yard plunge people looking at the box score still would have seen a 3.0 yards per carry average, and people watching the game still would have seen Richardson run slow and indecisively.
 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.
That scenario might pacify the people in this thread arguing about Richardson's fantasy value, but there are numerous people in this thread who are instead arguing Richardson's real life talent. Even had Richardson converted that one yard plunge people looking at the box score still would have seen a 3.0 yards per carry average, and people watching the game still would have seen Richardson run slow and indecisively.
Exactly, A back taken (twice) in the first round should be able to salt away a game when you are up by 2-3 scores. Richardson's low YPC makes that difficult to do.

Again, we are talking about the JAGUARS defense. They were giving up over 5 ypc to the top running backs over the first three games. I really wish Colts coaches would have given Brown a few more carries to confirm what was happening. Three carries is too small of a sample size to say for certain. But, you can certainly argue Richardson had multiple opportunities to break a run longer than 12 yards.

Charles' longest run week two was kept under 20 yards. Otherwise, every team had at least one player (and sometimes 2) break long runs against the Jax defense every week.

 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.
That scenario might pacify the people in this thread arguing about Richardson's fantasy value, but there are numerous people in this thread who are instead arguing Richardson's real life talent. Even had Richardson converted that one yard plunge people looking at the box score still would have seen a 3.0 yards per carry average, and people watching the game still would have seen Richardson run slow and indecisively.
Exactly, A back taken (twice) in the first round should be able to salt away a game when you are up by 2-3 scores. Richardson's low YPC makes that difficult to do.

Again, we are talking about the JAGUARS defense. They were giving up over 5 ypc to the top running backs over the first three games. I really wish Colts coaches would have given Brown a few more carries to confirm what was happening. Three carries is too small of a sample size to say for certain. But, you can certainly argue Richardson had multiple opportunities to break a run longer than 12 yards.

Charles' longest run week two was kept under 20 yards. Otherwise, every team had at least one player (and sometimes 2) break long runs against the Jax defense every week.
I haven't read through this thread and it has probably been mentioned, but seriously: how much does it matter whether Trent is effective in real life? I know this sounds like a bad question and it will obviously matter to some extent, but the Colts just spent a first on him and he'll obviously get his shot. His 3.6 YPC and 63 YPG last year weren't anything to write home about, but he accumulated 12 total TDs .... He should get similar opportunities to score at the goal line, and will hopefully break off some 15 yard TDs (he had 4 TDs from 15-35 yards out last season). So perhaps the real question isn't about Trent's ability, but more about Bradshaw's ability to leech away Trent's fantasy value.

My point is, he can suck and still have great value....look at last season. Just something to keep in mind before people start selling super low.

 
I wonder how different this thread would be if Indy would have ran the ball on 1st and goal at the 4 instead of 3 straight passes, and Trent punched it in for another TD. He was that close to having a 2 TD game people. He won't get you 6 YPC, but he will produce fantasy points in this offense. You all are over thinking things.
That scenario might pacify the people in this thread arguing about Richardson's fantasy value, but there are numerous people in this thread who are instead arguing Richardson's real life talent. Even had Richardson converted that one yard plunge people looking at the box score still would have seen a 3.0 yards per carry average, and people watching the game still would have seen Richardson run slow and indecisively.
Exactly, A back taken (twice) in the first round should be able to salt away a game when you are up by 2-3 scores. Richardson's low YPC makes that difficult to do.

Again, we are talking about the JAGUARS defense. They were giving up over 5 ypc to the top running backs over the first three games. I really wish Colts coaches would have given Brown a few more carries to confirm what was happening. Three carries is too small of a sample size to say for certain. But, you can certainly argue Richardson had multiple opportunities to break a run longer than 12 yards.

Charles' longest run week two was kept under 20 yards. Otherwise, every team had at least one player (and sometimes 2) break long runs against the Jax defense every week.
I haven't read through this thread and it has probably been mentioned, but seriously: how much does it matter whether Trent is effective in real life? I know this sounds like a bad question and it will obviously matter to some extent, but the Colts just spent a first on him and he'll obviously get his shot. His 3.6 YPC and 63 YPG last year weren't anything to write home about, but he accumulated 12 total TDs .... He should get similar opportunities to score at the goal line, and will hopefully break off some 15 yard TDs (he had 4 TDs from 15-35 yards out last season). So perhaps the real question isn't about Trent's ability, but more about Bradshaw's ability to leech away Trent's fantasy value.

My point is, he can suck and still have great value....look at last season. Just something to keep in mind before people start selling super low.
I agree with your statements to an extent. The difference for me is where he will fall in a fantasy football draft as compared to real NFL draft. When it comes to fantasy, I want my first round RB to perform every week and be in the top 12-16 (depending on league) in scoring. When a player fails to do that over a long enough period of time, then I consider him a bust.

The Colts may have well brought Richardson in to be part of a RBBC with Bradshaw. Using each for a specific talent. But again, when it comes to fantasy football, rarely does a RBBC work out well for everyone owner.

 
I haven't read through this thread and it has probably been mentioned, but seriously: how much does it matter whether Trent is effective in real life? I know this sounds like a bad question and it will obviously matter to some extent, but the Colts just spent a first on him and he'll obviously get his shot. His 3.6 YPC and 63 YPG last year weren't anything to write home about, but he accumulated 12 total TDs .... He should get similar opportunities to score at the goal line, and will hopefully break off some 15 yard TDs (he had 4 TDs from 15-35 yards out last season). So perhaps the real question isn't about Trent's ability, but more about Bradshaw's ability to leech away Trent's fantasy value.

My point is, he can suck and still have great value....look at last season. Just something to keep in mind before people start selling super low.
In redraft that may hold true, as he may continue to get a lot of work through the end of the year based just on what they gave up for him. Even on that front though, it could not only mean that he'll wind up with more lame duck games when he doesn't find the endzone (since he won't be able to make up for it with yardage), but it could be the difference between him being a feature back on an explosive offense vs him being just another guy in a 50/50 timeshare with Bradshaw. It's also worth noting that Bradshaw has a pretty good nose for the endzone himself, so if he doesn't distance himself from a production standpoint he could easily be splitting those carries as well.

It makes a much bigger difference in dynasty, obviously. Bradshaw is on a 1-year deal and Richardson's real life ability could be the difference between him being the #1 FF RB for the next 7 years vs him being some guy that splits carries as a solid RB2 for a couple years before fizzling out of the league. The difference between him being the next LT or the next Rashard Mendenhall.

 
I'm a TRich owner and I'm a bit worried with his hesitant nature and was contemplating trading him, but in the end I'm just going to roll with him due to the fact I will not get in return where I drafted him.

What I want to bring up,If it wasn't already, when Brown was in the game the size of the holes he was running through we're massive compared to when TRich was in. I may be bias with this observation but I don't believe I am.

 
I'm a TRich owner and I'm a bit worried with his hesitant nature and was contemplating trading him, but in the end I'm just going to roll with him due to the fact I will not get in return where I drafted him.

What I want to bring up,If it wasn't already, when Brown was in the game the size of the holes he was running through we're massive compared to when TRich was in. I may be bias with this observation but I don't believe I am.
No bias....the hole on the 50 yard run was HUGE.

 
I'm debating this in dynasty myself. Paid a high price for Trent this offseason believing he was a top-3 dynasty back. I still believe that to an extent, and I think the Colts offense is a definite good thing for him, but selling on a player like this is tricky. What if he is the next Ingram? Then you're certainly getting more now than you would later, based on similar arguments to what's alreayd been said in this thread - he's been with the team 10 days and his running reflects unfamiliarity with the system, not a lack of decisiveness or ability.

I'll admit I'm nervous. In my 16-team dynasty, RBs are incredibly valuable - especially 3-down horses. But one team in the league that's loaded with depth is interested, and has said the only untouchables on his roster were Cam, Dez, and AJ Green. That leaves me to put together an offer from the following:

RBs - Spiller, Wilson, Miller, Vereen, Christine Michael

WRs - Antonio Brown, Austin, Givens, Randle

TE - Gronk

Picks - (2) 2014 Firsts -- one late, one likely to be top 5

It's tricky. If Trent puts it together... watch out. If he's mediocre talent in a good situation, than Gronk + Wilson may be worth it, or heck Gronck plus a 1st.

 
I'm a TRich owner and I'm a bit worried with his hesitant nature and was contemplating trading him, but in the end I'm just going to roll with him due to the fact I will not get in return where I drafted him.

What I want to bring up,If it wasn't already, when Brown was in the game the size of the holes he was running through we're massive compared to when TRich was in. I may be bias with this observation but I don't believe I am.
from PFF

Sunday was a wakeup call for all those that thought Trent Richardson would be the answer to the Colts running woes. Poor blocking up front forced the newly acquired running back to gain 46 of his 60 yards after contact. Donald Brown had the complete opposite day. On his three runs he saw two gaping holes. In the middle of the second quarter, on the only trap the Colts ran all day, Brown ran 20 yards in a straight line before he was even touched. It was still quite the display by Richardson though as he dragged defenders almost every play, he had just one run on which he didn’t gain any yards after contact.
 
I'm a TRich owner and I'm a bit worried with his hesitant nature and was contemplating trading him, but in the end I'm just going to roll with him due to the fact I will not get in return where I drafted him.

What I want to bring up,If it wasn't already, when Brown was in the game the size of the holes he was running through we're massive compared to when TRich was in. I may be bias with this observation but I don't believe I am.
from PFF

Sunday was a wakeup call for all those that thought Trent Richardson would be the answer to the Colts running woes. Poor blocking up front forced the newly acquired running back to gain 46 of his 60 yards after contact. Donald Brown had the complete opposite day. On his three runs he saw two gaping holes. In the middle of the second quarter, on the only trap the Colts ran all day, Brown ran 20 yards in a straight line before he was even touched. It was still quite the display by Richardson though as he dragged defenders almost every play, he had just one run on which he didnt gain any yards after contact.
Wow nice Kool,guess I wasn't seeing things
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RB Trent Richardson, IND - Richardson doesn't have an elite burst like LeSean McCoy or Jamaal Charles, but he is getting what is there and adding yards after contact in the Colts running game. His 3.0 yards per carry might discourage some, but he is running hot in the red zone, and Richardson is still poised to be the ball control back in a good offense on a winning team

 
Don't think anyone ever questioned his running power. Its his burst, vision and ability to avoid tacklers that people are wondering about. The fact that he gets most of his yards after contact can be seen as a positive or negative.

 
Don't think anyone ever questioned his running power. Its his burst, vision and ability to avoid tacklers that people are wondering about. The fact that he gets most of his yards after contact can be seen as a positive or negative.
Yeah, it seems like it takes a bunch of guys to bring him down, but he's not really moving forward at all. His yards after contact were actually pretty close to the bottom among RBs last year (1.6 / carry IIRC).

 
I have a decent feeling he will get better each and every week. I think it is way too early to call him a bust. He will be heavily involved in this offense going forward and we all know Bradshaw has a bum foot and now neck.....he can't stay on the field.

T-Rich will have plenty of red zone chances and will get even more involved in the passing game.

 
rjv said:
Kool-Aid Larry said:
rjv said:
I'm a TRich owner and I'm a bit worried with his hesitant nature and was contemplating trading him, but in the end I'm just going to roll with him due to the fact I will not get in return where I drafted him.

What I want to bring up,If it wasn't already, when Brown was in the game the size of the holes he was running through we're massive compared to when TRich was in. I may be bias with this observation but I don't believe I am.
from PFF

Sunday was a wakeup call for all those that thought Trent Richardson would be the answer to the Colts running woes. Poor blocking up front forced the newly acquired running back to gain 46 of his 60 yards after contact. Donald Brown had the complete opposite day. On his three runs he saw two gaping holes. In the middle of the second quarter, on the only trap the Colts ran all day, Brown ran 20 yards in a straight line before he was even touched. It was still quite the display by Richardson though as he dragged defenders almost every play, he had just one run on which he didnt gain any yards after contact.
Wow nice Kool,guess I wasn't seeing things
I noticed last week too that the o-line just seemed to try harder when Brown was running the ball. :shrug:

 
Hey I'd say if you own Richardso trade him for someone more valuable but less notable right now, I'm not sure this gets any better and if you wait to long to find out then everyone else will too.

 
There's talk of Bradshaw possibly needing season-ending surgery. I know Trent hasn't looked good and is probably very overrated as a runner, but I could certainly warm up to the idea of him in that offense with only Brown behind him instead of the possibility of a RBBC of some sort with Bradshaw.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top