bigmarc27
Footballguy
It’s f’ing awesome. Seriously.Is this worth watching or no? Liked the 1st season. Could not stand the 2nd season despite Adams.
It’s f’ing awesome. Seriously.Is this worth watching or no? Liked the 1st season. Could not stand the 2nd season despite Adams.
They were shown a couple of episodes back. Doesn’t bother me too much. That was a huge story / political scandal in this world where these kids went missing. I don’t see it as any different than bringing up Columbine every time there’s a school shooting.The direct reference to Season 1's a little ####### weird imo.
I’m not watching. Too many cigarettes.
You're both gonna feel really silly when the finale shows how integral smoking was to the show.Surprised lung cancer hasn't gotten them all in the present day scenes TBH.
Yup be fair, he usually gets ####ty roles.Came in here to say the same. I really felt that. Never thought much of Dorf's acting skills prior to this series but he's coming through.
His “I’m not going to say it, but I want you to know I’m thinking it” line was electric. They’ve both done amazing work.Yup be fair, he usually gets ####ty roles.
You are killing America and cinema buttercupCould we work in some gum?
FingerIntense. Hope we get some closure with only episode left but I think there will still be many questions regarding Hoyt,etc. I could do with another 2-3 episodes fleshing out this story.
On another note, makes me sad to see these guys age when they used to be young and so full of life. Not looking forward to getting old![]()
Contraband cigarettesDid we ever find out what was in the bag?
We will find out this Sunday. Looking forward to a great finale.Why kill the boy?
I'm thinking it was accidental maybe?Why kill the boy?
Gwyneth Paltrow's head.OrtonToOlsen said:Did we ever find out what was in the bag?
That would be goofy to me. Why work this hard trying to solve an unsolved case when you literally know the answer to all the questions.My pure guess: Eliza (the interviewer) is Julie or another kidnapped girl. She just knows too much.
Different Streep daughter.Y'all gotta start watching Mr. Robot. She's pretty great in that as well, and not as hard on the eyes.
It is really goofy which is why I didn't put it into spoilers or anything. I just can't believe that she'd know this much about the case.That would be goofy to me. Why work this hard trying to solve an unsolved case when you literally know the answer to all the questions.
Theory on Amelia:eoMMan said:Hope they say what happened to Amelia and Becca.
I believe it. I actually mentioned something similar to my wife last night. It would clean and neat to write them off that way with no lead up.Theory on Amelia:
She dies on her way to college in a car accident that is Wayne's fault and Wayne suffer a TBI.
This was a thought I had early on but don't think so anymore. The interviews do have a feeling of being a bit "off" though. I think it's just their way to get the show fueled in 2015 and possibly to link Season 1.My pure guess: Eliza (the interviewer) is Julie or another kidnapped girl. She just knows too much.
limit your smoking and drinkingIntense. Hope we get some closure with only episode left but I think there will still be many questions regarding Hoyt,etc. I could do with another 2-3 episodes fleshing out this story.
On another note, makes me sad to see these guys age when they used to be young and so full of life. Not looking forward to getting old![]()
I'm thinking it was accidental maybe?
Did Hoyt's daughter lose a husband and a daughter? Maybe they had to kill the boy just to eliminate him so it's just Julie to be Hoyt's daughter's fantasy daughter.
That's good. If it's not how it plays out, it should be.To punish hays for not finding her as the lead detective. And she gets to ruin his sons life as a bonus.That would be goofy to me. Why work this hard trying to solve an unsolved case when you literally know the answer to all the questions.
Hays was never the lead detective...West certainly would have been the lead in 1990To punish hays for not finding her as the lead detective.
I hope you are way off base - that would make this season a train wreckTo punish hays for not finding her as the lead detective. And she gets to ruin his sons life as a bonus.
Dow e know he doesn't remember? I am with you as last week sure points to a villain and somehow the case never gets solved.How does 2015 Mays have no recollection of 1990 Mays getting in the car with Hoyt?
I sort of get the the whole memory loss schtick - but its playing out like there was some closure in 1990 - that should have been recalled somewhere along the line.
It certainly appears that Hoyt does not fess up when he has Hays in the car - but, seems like everything lined up.
That would also be a train wreckI’m not completely convinced Roland isn’t some how mixed up in things. There was a moment in the barn where him and the Hoyt security guy exchanged a look that stuck with me.
If that’s the case, this season will go from great to completely jumping the shark for me.To punish hays for not finding her as the lead detective. And she gets to ruin his sons life as a bonus.
There's plenty that he remembers that he has not let on to.Dow e know he doesn't remember?How does 2015 Mays have no recollection of 1990 Mays getting in the car with Hoyt?
I sort of get the the whole memory loss schtick - but its playing out like there was some closure in 1990 - that should have been recalled somewhere along the line.
It certainly appears that Hoyt does not fess up when he has Hays in the car - but, seems like everything lined up.
Agree. It would feel like a twist for a twists sake.I hope you are way off base - that would make this season a train wreck
This would surprise me more than if Roland were a figment of Wayne’s imagination (which I don’t think is the case either).I’m not completely convinced Roland isn’t some how mixed up in things. There was a moment in the barn where him and the Hoyt security guy exchanged a look that stuck with me.
It’s called an “unreliable narrator” and it’s not that uncommon of a story-telling technique.I see that they wanted to use a third timeline to differentiate from season 1 - but does anybody buy a tv show spending so much time on a guy with so limited a memory?
I noticed that too. I haven’t gone back and checked but just assumed it was the Hoyt security former cop that he and Roland killed.I keep thinking back to the hallucination Wayne had in his study. There are a bunch of Vietnamese soldiers so I’m assuming these are men he killed.
But there’s one unrecognizable white guy in there. Wayne looks sympathetic to him. I gotta think this scene means something.
That would make sense but I don’t think it was him. Wayne didn’t actually kill him.I noticed that too. I haven’t gone back and checked but just assumed it was the Hoyt security former cop that he and Roland killed.
Sure, but he’s certainly responsible and as a human you still carry that same guilt. And we know he carried the guilt of goating Roland into taking the dude to the barn as he said as much to Roland. But like I said I haven’t gone back and looked so you could totally be right too.That would make sense but I don’t think it was him. Wayne didn’t actually kill him.
I just think Roland is prolly a little gay. Him and Tom really shared a special bond.I’m not completely convinced Roland isn’t some how mixed up in things. There was a moment in the barn where him and the Hoyt security guy exchanged a look that stuck with me.