It was live in the UAE -- The US PPV version they just showed starting at 10pm was on a 10 hour delay.Wait, was this PPV rebroadcast for free later?![]()
hard to argue. Dana certainly agrees, and i would love to know what he spoke with Anderson about after the card. He left in the 4th round, and threw the belt at Ed Soares and told him to put the belt around him. So the big question is, what do Dana and Joe Silva do next? there is no one on in MW who can give Silva the motivation for a good fight. I would love to see some of the suggestions floated out there, like a Jon Jones vs. Silva. Personally, I think GSP at 170 would be a loss for Silva, and a fight with Jones at 205 may be a loss for Silva as well. outside of that, i am not sureAll of that would be a great article if AS had clowned him for two rounds and then KTFO'd him in the 3rd or 4th. To do what he did then run away for three rounds -- If he IS really that good, then it shows he's not serious about this thing at all. If he wasn't good enough to finish the fight tonight (and that's how it looked to me), then you take the pile of #### that comes your way when you show your ### for 2 rounds and then fizzle.
IMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.hard to argue. Dana certainly agrees, and i would love to know what he spoke with Anderson about after the card. He left in the 4th round, and threw the belt at Ed Soares and told him to put the belt around him. So the big question is, what do Dana and Joe Silva do next? there is no one on in MW who can give Silva the motivation for a good fight. I would love to see some of the suggestions floated out there, like a Jon Jones vs. Silva. Personally, I think GSP at 170 would be a loss for Silva, and a fight with Jones at 205 may be a loss for Silva as well. outside of that, i am not sureAll of that would be a great article if AS had clowned him for two rounds and then KTFO'd him in the 3rd or 4th. To do what he did then run away for three rounds -- If he IS really that good, then it shows he's not serious about this thing at all. If he wasn't good enough to finish the fight tonight (and that's how it looked to me), then you take the pile of #### that comes your way when you show your ### for 2 rounds and then fizzle.
Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.
Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.
in any event, hopefully tonight forced the hand of D White. Give Silva a mega fight or tell him to hit the road.Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.
I don't remember what Belfort's illness was, I'd still like to see that fight. maybe move up Silva to 205 for good.in any event, hopefully tonight forced the hand of D White. Give Silva a mega fight or tell him to hit the road.Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.
Vitor had shoulder surgery (I believe), and has started training again I believe.I don't remember what Belfort's illness was, I'd still like to see that fight. maybe move up Silva to 205 for good.in any event, hopefully tonight forced the hand of D White. Give Silva a mega fight or tell him to hit the road.Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.
I had it 48-47 for Frankie too. The judges' scorecards were zany, but at least they got the winner right in my book. Shocked me, though. When they read the first card 50-45, I thought for sure it would be for BJ.did anyone think BJ won that fight? It was a razor close fight but those scores were ridiculous. 50-45? 49-46? I had it 48-47 BJ but i didn't watch the fight at my house so i can't go back and rewatch the fight. I thought Penn clearly round one and Edgar clearly won round 5. 2 and 3 were close calls and i can't seem to remember what way i scored round 4.
Same here and i was pissed. You could see Frankie said something and i think he thought he was going to be robbed. I could have lived with the decision for either fighter but the scores were pretty lopsided. I read on sherdog that fight metric had it 49-47 Penn. I'm not exactly sure what there scoring criteria is though.I had it 48-47 for Frankie too. The judges' scorecards were zany, but at least they got the winner right in my book. Shocked me, though. When they read the first card 50-45, I thought for sure it would be for BJ.did anyone think BJ won that fight? It was a razor close fight but those scores were ridiculous. 50-45? 49-46? I had it 48-47 BJ but i didn't watch the fight at my house so i can't go back and rewatch the fight. I thought Penn clearly round one and Edgar clearly won round 5. 2 and 3 were close calls and i can't seem to remember what way i scored round 4.
watching it i thought Edgar won as well, but it was real close. I love to check fight metric when they have fights like these, and they have it for BJ and not as close as i thought:http://www.fightmetric.com/fights/Edgar-Penn.htmlI had it 48-47 for Frankie too. The judges' scorecards were zany, but at least they got the winner right in my book. Shocked me, though. When they read the first card 50-45, I thought for sure it would be for BJ.did anyone think BJ won that fight? It was a razor close fight but those scores were ridiculous. 50-45? 49-46? I had it 48-47 BJ but i didn't watch the fight at my house so i can't go back and rewatch the fight. I thought Penn clearly round one and Edgar clearly won round 5. 2 and 3 were close calls and i can't seem to remember what way i scored round 4.
That was about as bad as Penn could show, but I still think he won. Oh well.Agreed except that it seems pretty safe to bet anything you can afford on Penn. I only fear him losing by freak knee injury while hopping on one leg to avoid a takedown.I'm staying away from this card. If you're betting though make sure to get them in early. Main Card starts at 10am PT.
i really suggest looking at fightmetric.com. Real quality cite that does a good job of breaking down fights, and demonstrating what worked and what didn't. I do like how they compare takedown attempts and stuffed takedowns. http://www.fightmetric.com/Same here and i was pissed. You could see Frankie said something and i think he thought he was going to be robbed. I could have lived with the decision for either fighter but the scores were pretty lopsided. I read on sherdog that fight metric had it 49-47 Penn. I'm not exactly sure what there scoring criteria is though.I had it 48-47 for Frankie too. The judges' scorecards were zany, but at least they got the winner right in my book. Shocked me, though. When they read the first card 50-45, I thought for sure it would be for BJ.did anyone think BJ won that fight? It was a razor close fight but those scores were ridiculous. 50-45? 49-46? I had it 48-47 BJ but i didn't watch the fight at my house so i can't go back and rewatch the fight. I thought Penn clearly round one and Edgar clearly won round 5. 2 and 3 were close calls and i can't seem to remember what way i scored round 4.
I was wondering the same thing as well. Dana White is furious and threw the belt to Ed Soares (Silva's manager/interpreter) because he said he wasn't going to present him the belt after that performance.He also cut the press conference short (saying he can't listen to this #### anymore), alluded to putting Anderson on the undercard, and said that he isn't worthy of fighting GSP.After the Edgar/Penn decision, I expected Maia to be awarded the final three rounds and the win. It would make almost as much sense seeing as Silva ran for half the fight.And why didn't Buffer read the scores?
And one judge had it 50-45 Edgar. :insanity:Found this on sherdog....MMA JunkieRound 1: 10-9 PennRound 2: 10-9 PennRound 3: 10-9 EdgarRound 4: 10-9 EdgarRound 5: 10-9 EdgarSherdog (specifically, J-Breen’s judging)Round 1: 10-9 PennRound 2: 10-9 PennRound 3: 10-9 PennRound 4: 10-10Round 5: 10-9 EdgarMMAWeeklyRound 1: 10-9 PennRound 2: 10-9 PennRound 3: 10-9 EdgarRound 4: 10-9 EdgarRound 5: 10-9 EdgarBloody ElbowRound 1: 10-9 PennRound 2: 10-9 PennRound 3: 10-9 EdgarRound 4: 10-9 PennRound 5: 10-9 Edgar
Yea i had it 48-47 for Penn but i can't remember what round i gave to what fighter. I think i gave 1,2 to Penn (2 was close) and 4, 5 to Edgar (4 was close). Round 3 was the closest of all the round IMO and i gave that to Penn.I only watched it once and not incredibly closely, but I was absolutely shocked at the score cards. How can someone see it as 50-45 Edgar?I had it BJ winning 49-48. BJ wins round 1 and 2, Edgar wins round 5, and 3 and 4 were 10-10's.I'm guessing the line would be about Penn -160 for the rematch.
Shoulder injury.I don't remember what Belfort's illness was
Rematch would probably still see Penn around -350 to -400I hope that BJ gets an immediate rematch because that was a very close fight. What do you guys think the line will be on that fight? -200 Penn? +200 Edgar? I'd be willing to wager a lot of money on him beating Frankie in a rematch. I would also be willing to wager money on him finishing Frankie as well. (
This will be a difficult scenario because Penn has virtually cleaned out the entire LW division, with the exception of Gray Maynard who has coincidentally handed Frankie Edgar the only loss of his career. Logic suggest Edgar-Maynard for the next fight, but then what do they do with Penn? He's got nothing left to prove in the LW division other than rematch Edgar/fight Maynard, but I doubt they leave him on the shelf that long to take on the winner of Edgar-Maynard and nothing beforehand. I'd say Penn-Guilard, but Guilard's definitely not ready for that kind of step up in competition.You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).
Ok Mo, we got a little redemption - Frankie Edgar is beyond legit. Even if people feel Penn should have won that decision, you go 5 rounds with BJ Penn, you're a damn good fighter.Interesting in seeing what this Mousasi-Lawal line opens at. Given the Lawal hype train is possibly just as large as Mousasi's, I'm hoping to get something in the -200 range. The only thing I worry about is Lawal's wrestling ability, which is the big wild card in this fight. IF Lawal can take Mousasi down and hold him there with GNP, it could be ugly for Gegard. However, Lawal's never faced anyone remotely as good as Mousasi from a striking standpoint, or from a grappling standpoint. Lawal could take Mousasi down and just as easily get subbed, so we'll see what this opens at.I still haven't got over that one yet, but it is a good point you bring up, and i feel a little better about it too. And the card worked out well for me today. It wasn't as easy for some as i thought, but the account looks a lot better today then it did yesterday thanks to this card. Only big bet i have left in pending MMA wise is Mitrione over Slice. If Gegard opens well against King Mo i will hit that nicely. Same with Aldo over Urijah Faber later this month as well. not sure how much, but they are certainly the leans right nowEnded up with a parlay of Munoz, Davis and Hughes.
I believe Hughes is one of the safest plays on the card. Renzo's been out of the game for a while and was never a particularly formidable fighter as it was IMO. Hughes will certainly get the better of the standup, and his stiflying top game will not allow Gracie any room to operate from his back. I think Hughes grinds out a decision 75% of the time. The only thing that has kept me from making a straight play on this is the fear of Hughes showing up "old," which is probably unlikely given his style, but I'm not confident enough in a guy on the downside of his career to lay -400ish. Very strange that the line has dropped pretty drastically - are people betting on the Gracie name?
Sentimentally rooting for Frankie Edgar here (from NJ, and it'll help me feel better about my Sherk-Edgar debacle from last summer.)
I'd love to see Penn-Florian again. I think Kenny would look a lot better for their next fight, and it would be a good match-up. The Kenny that fought BJ the first time just didn't look like Kenny at all. And if the UFC just wanted to stall BJ, let us see Penn-Gomi.This will be a difficult scenario because Penn has virtually cleaned out the entire LW division, with the exception of Gray Maynard who has coincidentally handed Frankie Edgar the only loss of his career. Logic suggest Edgar-Maynard for the next fight, but then what do they do with Penn? He's got nothing left to prove in the LW division other than rematch Edgar/fight Maynard, but I doubt they leave him on the shelf that long to take on the winner of Edgar-Maynard and nothing beforehand. I'd say Penn-Guilard, but Guilard's definitely not ready for that kind of step up in competition.You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).
found a new one today: mmashare.com or mmator.comDoes anybody have a link to the Penn or Silva fights? mmalinker.com links are not working at the moment.
Disagree. Silva is too fast. He would own GSP. I hope we get to see it. I'd rather see it as a catchweight aropund 178. Don't have to waste the welterweight title for a mega match.Silva and Soares spoke earlier in the week (and mentioned a lot during the PPV) about possibly dropping to 170 to take on GSP. That is a heck of a lot different then taking on GSP at 185, and i think both guys would come in around the same weight at a 170 lb. weight. GSP can take Silva down and GNP a lot. ANd GSP's stand-up is devastatingly under-rated at this point. it would be a great fight, and my money would be on GSP.And Jon Jones is quite a few fights away from Silva, but the potential for that one would be fantasticIMO, Silva would destroy GSP. GSP's whole game now is to simply bullrush and overpower his opponents. Silva would KHTFO before GSp even shot in on him. Jones at 205? maybe due to the size/strength aspect.at 170 GSP would take Silva down. Silva wouldn't KHTFO because Silva doesn't engage he counters.
Fight metrics dissagrees with youhttp://www.fightmetric.com/fights/Edgar-Penn.htmlYou Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.
I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).
Awesome, thanks bro.found a new one today: mmashare.com or mmator.comDoes anybody have a link to the Penn or Silva fights? mmalinker.com links are not working at the moment.
It was live in the UAE -- The US PPV version they just showed starting at 10pm was on a 10 hour delay.Wait, was this PPV rebroadcast for free later?![]()
The version I bought started at 10 or 11 AM.The played it twice. Same price.It was live in the UAE -- The US PPV version they just showed starting at 10pm was on a 10 hour delay.Wait, was this PPV rebroadcast for free later?![]()
The version I bought started at 10 or 11 AM.
As a huge proponent of scoring 10-10 rounds, I could not disagree more with the idea that a 10-10 round means "I have no opinion." My opinion is that neither guy did appreciably more than the other to warrant giving him more points. In a 5, but especially 3, round fights giving someone a round that was very close is just terrible judging. Your opinion post fight should be reflected in your score card. So if there were two close rounds and one round that a fighter won clearly, anything but a 30-29 score card is just wrong. At the time of the fight, I thought there were 2 very close rounds, and 2 rounds BJ won and 1 round Frankie clearly won: 49-48 BJ wins.Although I think the decision was bad, the fact that Edgar won wasn't terrible. However, the 50-45 score card was so unbelievably terrible coupled with the fact that the UFC hand picked the judges (no athletic commission in Abu Daubi) should draw outrage. Cecil Peoples gets trashed for his judging, but that CP never scored a fight that terribly.The UFC has to a Penn-Edgar rematch as the next fight. BJ has beaten just about every LW except for Maynard, who is the most likely candidate for a title shot vs Edgar as he beat Edgar. BJ Penn is probably the 3rd biggest draw in the company so I think a rematch will be his next fight.You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).
As a huge proponent of scoring 10-10 rounds, I could not disagree more with the idea that a 10-10 round means "I have no opinion." My opinion is that neither guy did appreciably more than the other to warrant giving him more points. In a 5, but especially 3, round fights giving someone a round that was very close is just terrible judging. Your opinion post fight should be reflected in your score card. So if there were two close rounds and one round that a fighter won clearly, anything but a 30-29 score card is just wrong. At the time of the fight, I thought there were 2 very close rounds, and 2 rounds BJ won and 1 round Frankie clearly won: 49-48 BJ wins.Although I think the decision was bad, the fact that Edgar won wasn't terrible. However, the 50-45 score card was so unbelievably terrible coupled with the fact that the UFC hand picked the judges (no athletic commission in Abu Daubi) should draw outrage. Cecil Peoples gets trashed for his judging, but that CP never scored a fight that terribly.The UFC has to a Penn-Edgar rematch as the next fight. BJ has beaten just about every LW except for Maynard, who is the most likely candidate for a title shot vs Edgar as he beat Edgar. BJ Penn is probably the 3rd biggest draw in the company so I think a rematch will be his next fight.You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).
I'd love to see more 10-10s and 10-8s and even 10-7s. I'd also love to see less weight cutting, but I know none of that will ever happen.Only one judge out of three scored the Quarry / Starnes ####fest 30-24 -- if those three rounds aren't the exact definition of what a 10-8 round should be, then I hold little hope that we'll see them called anywhere.As a huge proponent of scoring 10-10 rounds, I could not disagree more with the idea that a 10-10 round means "I have no opinion." My opinion is that neither guy did appreciably more than the other to warrant giving him more points. In a 5, but especially 3, round fights giving someone a round that was very close is just terrible judging. Your opinion post fight should be reflected in your score card. So if there were two close rounds and one round that a fighter won clearly, anything but a 30-29 score card is just wrong. At the time of the fight, I thought there were 2 very close rounds, and 2 rounds BJ won and 1 round Frankie clearly won: 49-48 BJ wins.Although I think the decision was bad, the fact that Edgar won wasn't terrible. However, the 50-45 score card was so unbelievably terrible coupled with the fact that the UFC hand picked the judges (no athletic commission in Abu Daubi) should draw outrage. Cecil Peoples gets trashed for his judging, but that CP never scored a fight that terribly.The UFC has to a Penn-Edgar rematch as the next fight. BJ has beaten just about every LW except for Maynard, who is the most likely candidate for a title shot vs Edgar as he beat Edgar. BJ Penn is probably the 3rd biggest draw in the company so I think a rematch will be his next fight.You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).I'd love to see more 10-10s and 10-8s and even 10-7s. I'd also love to see less weight cutting, but I know none of that will ever happen.
The problem is that the system is there for them to call it 10-10. Perfectly legal. They just don't do it because they never did before because the guys before them didn;t do it before because the guys before them didn;t do it before. There is no real reason why they won't do it. They need to start, imo.I just don't see the point in saying, "I had this round 10-10," when that never happens in real life. Perhaps you think the scoring philosophy should change, and that's fine, but you can't say it "should be" scored 10-10 when no MMA judge would do that.
My only concern with this is that you would see more variance. There are so many fights where there are 3 different scores because all the judges scored it differently. With more variance in the judging (basically 95% is 10-9 now, with a few 10-8's and very, very few 10-10's), we could see scores that are not even close to eachother.I'd love to see more 10-10s and 10-8s and even 10-7s. I'd also love to see less weight cutting, but I know none of that will ever happen.
Edgar got a few shots in, but he looked far busier than he was. It worked for him.snorlax said:You Penn guys are crazy. I think he probably won the first two rounds, but Edgar probably had a slight edge in the final three rounds due to things like Octagon control. And anyone who scores a round 10-10 might as well just say, "I don't have an opinion"; that doesn't happen in real life.I thought Edgar fought well enough, and the decision wasn't outrageous enough, that he deserves at least one title defense before having to fight Penn again. I watched Penn live in Memphis and thought he was scary good the whole fight, but he just looked a little slow in the later rounds last night. Give Edgar the #1 contender, give Penn the #2 guy, and they can have a rematch if they both win. Maybe Penn will win that easily, but he's going to have to change up his strategy a bit then (maybe actually listen to his corner?).