I left myself short at the skill positions, but that was done by design. My strategy is to not waste roster spots on guys who won't really contribute. I could've picked a guy like Bobby Engram instead of another defense, but why? Only your top 3-4 WR's will count, and I already have the best 3-4 WR's I could get. I could've picked up a couple more scrub WR's, but the difference between their contribution and the four WR's that I already have would be marginal at best. The same theory goes for RB and TE. I see that as a waste of roster space. Space that could be better used by drafting multiple defenses and kickers.
Totally untrue. That's the beauty of best ball... and WRs are so erratic, that your 5 and 6 WR one week may actually be your top 2.Maybe for RBs, that's a good strategy... but loading up on WRs in this league is what gets you the gold.
Morris, Sammy NEP RBat Chargers Sun 8:15 p.m. ET 2.6 26 Rushing Yards
6.0 1 Rushing TDs
4.9 49 Receiving Yards
4.0 4 Receptions
17.5 Subtotal
Pittman, Michael DEN RB
vs Jaguars Sun 4:05 p.m. ET 10.9 109 Rushing Yards
1.6 16 Receiving Yards
3.0 3 Receptions
15.5 Subtotal
Davis, Rashied CHI WR
at Falcons Sun 1:00 p.m. ET 4.1 41 Receiving Yards
6.0 1 Receiving TDs
4.0 4 Receptions
14.1 Subtotal
Wasted roster spots??? I think not.
Satch still has Edwards, but will be eating at least one donut to join a 1.2 and 2.3. His best scoring defense posted 11 points. the others...7, 7, 2, 2, and 0.