I Got This Thread From The "Official Pick Thread" So Sorry If I'm Wrong. Just Looking For Insight..This is not an official thread. No way I'll take part in it.
Do you say this also because of the addition of Norv Turner?Richardson.
(ETA: Trent. Not Daryl, who might be a reach at 1.03)
As I've said elsewhere, but I don't mind preaching the gospel everywhere I can, he brings (to my mind) the best combo of ANY RB in the draft when taking into account...Stryker said:Do you say this also because of the addition of Norv Turner?Man of Zen said:Richardson.
(ETA: Trent. Not Daryl, who might be a reach at 1.03)
Not a terrible pick, Graham at TE is almost like having a WR1 to be honest, but I would have gone Marshall to feel a little more confident in the WR position, your WRs didnt turn out to be too bad though, if they stay healthy.Confused why this thread only talks about who you pick in the first round. Is that all that matters?!
Just rank the top runningbacks 1 thru 3 and take the guy highest on your list in the first. Ok. We got that out of the way.
How about the remaining rounds?...
I drafted from the 3 tonight in a 12 team, non-ppr, 1/2/2/1TE/1flex/K/D and decided to mix it up and go Graham in the 2nd round.
It certainly hurt my WRs, since I want to grab 3 RBs to start, including the flex spot. My draft ended up like this:
QB: Romo 7, Vick 9
RB: Charles 1, Wilson 3, Matthews 4, Ingram 8
WR: Bowe 5, Nelson 6, Stevie Johnson 10, E Sanders 12, Blackmon 13
TE: Graham 2
K: Hauschka 14
D: Dnver 11
I gotta say that I hated taking Graham the second after I did it even though it might have been the "right" thing to do. I'm high on Wilson (obviously) so happy he was there at 3.03. Hopefully Matthews stays healthy (he pulled something just by me typing that). If Nelson gets/stays healthy and gets half way back to his 2011 form, I'm ok with my WRs. But if I didn't go Graham, I could've had Brandon Marshall and I would've felt better slumming in the TE dept.
Basically, I'm left unsure on this approach but this is generally a guppy work league so I decided to try something a little different.
Thoughts?
I feel the same way when I look at my roster after drafting Graham. The difference between him and other TE's is more than the drop off of production from other positions. I think it's going to work out fine.Confused why this thread only talks about who you pick in the first round. Is that all that matters?!
Just rank the top runningbacks 1 thru 3 and take the guy highest on your list in the first. Ok. We got that out of the way.
How about the remaining rounds?...
I drafted from the 3 tonight in a 12 team, non-ppr, 1/2/2/1TE/1flex/K/D and decided to mix it up and go Graham in the 2nd round.
It certainly hurt my WRs, since I want to grab 3 RBs to start, including the flex spot. My draft ended up like this:
QB: Romo 7, Vick 9
RB: Charles 1, Wilson 3, Matthews 4, Ingram 8
WR: Bowe 5, Nelson 6, Stevie Johnson 10, E Sanders 12, Blackmon 13
TE: Graham 2
K: Hauschka 14
D: Dnver 11
I gotta say that I hated taking Graham the second after I did it even though it might have been the "right" thing to do. I'm high on Wilson (obviously) so happy he was there at 3.03. Hopefully Matthews stays healthy (he pulled something just by me typing that). If Nelson gets/stays healthy and gets half way back to his 2011 form, I'm ok with my WRs. But if I didn't go Graham, I could've had Brandon Marshall and I would've felt better slumming in the TE dept.
Basically, I'm left unsure on this approach but this is generally a guppy work league so I decided to try something a little different.
Thoughts?
Interested as to who was gone at 3 and why you choose richardson over the other available backs. I have a league with the same settings as yours and I was thinking of going Richardson with my first pick as well but I am also thinking Charles or Spiller. I was thinking of going RB/RB/WR but I may go RB/RB/RB with flex position. flex position is new to league.LOCO said:drafted today. 12 team, h2h, redraft, flex. start 2 WR long time league:
qd - luck
rb - trent richardson, ridley, reggie bush, lacy, vereen
wr - decker, nicks, gordon, jennings, randle
te - fred davis
K - legatron
D - by committee
went RB heavy. 1st 4 picks were rbs. WR i think are serviceable, set up nicely to trade a RB if i need to.
APInterested as to who was gone at 3 and why you choose richardson over the other available backs. I have a league with the same settings as yours and I was thinking of going Richardson with my first pick as well but I am also thinking Charles or Spiller. I was thinking of going RB/RB/WR but I may go RB/RB/RB with flex position. flex position is new to league.LOCO said:drafted today. 12 team, h2h, redraft, flex. start 2 WR long time league:
qd - luck
rb - trent richardson, ridley, reggie bush, lacy, vereen
wr - decker, nicks, gordon, jennings, randle
te - fred davis
K - legatron
D - by committee
went RB heavy. 1st 4 picks were rbs. WR i think are serviceable, set up nicely to trade a RB if i need to.
Injury warts? I can maybe see shuffling the rankings a little based on the health of some of those guys. But all? Not seeing it.I've got third as well in my main league tomorrow night. (Thursday)
Most of the options have injury warts - Charles, Shady, Foster, TRich, Spiller.
I think everyone is in love with the upside of the injury picks listed above and not worried about the safe play?
In a .5 PPR league I'm thinking Ray Rice as the safe pick here. Talk me out of my logic.
How should I be looking at it then?Injury warts? I can maybe see shuffling the rankings a little based on the health of some of those guys. But all? Not seeing it.I've got third as well in my main league tomorrow night. (Thursday)
Most of the options have injury warts - Charles, Shady, Foster, TRich, Spiller.
I think everyone is in love with the upside of the injury picks listed above and not worried about the safe play?
In a .5 PPR league I'm thinking Ray Rice as the safe pick here. Talk me out of my logic.
I have the third pick tonight. Right now I have my rankings as ADP/Charles/Richardson.As I've said elsewhere, but I don't mind preaching the gospel everywhere I can, he brings (to my mind) the best combo of ANY RB in the draft when taking into account......current health (seems 100%)Do you say this also because of the addition of Norv Turner?Richardson.
(ETA: Trent. Not Daryl, who might be a reach at 1.03)
....willingness and ability to play through injury (really solid year in a lot of pain last year)
...coach and system (Norv backs who have gotten anywhere near feature back touches for a whole year have never fallen shy of 1600yfs/11, and all but one have been significantly better than that)
...line (a top 5 OL by most accounts)
...competition for backfield touches (less than none)
...age/mileage
This - But to be fair I am an Eagles fan. The lanes that this offense is going to open are going to be huge and a much improved O-Line = a monster year for McCoy.McCoy and run to the podium with the pick.
So am I but apparently my negativity in the Eagles' thread makes me a horrible fan. That said, I think McCoy may be the number one RB and the only thing holding back is an unforeseen injury to him or extensive injuries to the OL. I'd grab Brown as insurance late because he looks to be just as big if the unforeseen injury happens.This - But to be fair I am an Eagles fan. The lanes that this offense is going to open are going to be huge and a much improved O-Line = a monster year for McCoy.McCoy and run to the podium with the pick.