What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (26 Viewers)

I said GGG, not the players...my comment had nothing to do with MLS players although SeaBass did suck.

  GGG is not a world class coach and is getting exposed IMHO.
I am not a Lletget fan either but he had one of the few good plays tonight on the whole team when he spun and sweetly put Aaronson through which resulted in Pulisic awkwardly hitting the post.

Lletget's problem is that he plays scared to me.  He rarely if ever plays positive.

 
 Canada had many more than 2 chances.  Off the top of my head, Buchanan missed that one chance and then they had 3 or so crosses that were screaming for a tap in.  
No one was in ten feet of those crosses that went through the box.  The Buchanan play was very nice though and I did forget about that.  He made Brooks look like a folding lawn chair.

What was the xG tonight?  I have not seen it yet..

 
No one was in ten feet of those crosses that went through the box.  The Buchanan play was very nice though and I did forget about that.  He made Brooks look like a folding lawn chair.

What was the xG tonight?  I have not seen it yet..
I think it was 1.6 to 1.5 or so for us.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
                                                           Turner (while he's the hot hand)

A. Robinson                        M. Robinson               McKenzie                Bello

                 Swag                                      Adams                         Acosta

                                  Aaronson                                   Konrad

                                                              Zardes

With evidence of teams going at our weak link and trying to overrun him, I propose we go with a more flexible, dare I say dynamic lineup that can cover and support each other better on both ends of the field than what we've seen these last 2 games. You know that group of MFs can boss the middle of the field as well as give extra punch on offense and extra cover of defense.  They're not individually the best players we have, but for CONCACAF, I think all they would need is GGG to say 'go win this one'.                                         


Wait...  Am I reading this right?  You want to sit Pulisic because he's not "CONCACAF" enough?  The Pulisic that scored 7 goals and had 6 assists in WCQ last cycle as a 17/18 year old?

I've seen overreactions to losses in my day, but I think this one wins.

 
I put out a survey before qualifying started that a bunch of people answered.

No one had Aaronson as the first goal scorer.

In terms of total points, we have one responder who is almost out already after just two games.  He chose 38 total points and the only way to get there is to win the last 12 in a row.

 
I put out a survey before qualifying started that a bunch of people answered.

No one had Aaronson as the first goal scorer.

In terms of total points, we have one responder who is almost out already after just two games.  He chose 38 total points and the only way to get there is to win the last 12 in a row.
If I would have responded....

 
Wait...  Am I reading this right?  You want to sit Pulisic because he's not "CONCACAF" enough?  The Pulisic that scored 7 goals and had 6 assists in WCQ last cycle as a 17/18 year old?

I've seen overreactions to losses in my day, but I think this one wins.
WHO GOT THE GOAL TONIGHT? AARONSON. HOW DID HE GET IT? BY NOT GETTING HACKED DOWN AND THROWING HIS BODY INTO HARM'S WAY.

Do you have the 2018 WCQ Pulisic in your back pocket?  The 2021 CP missed the ELS game because of jet lag, and got thrown around like a rag doll against one of the more mild teams in the federation, ON OWN HOME SOIL.

I'm conceding that CP is our best offensive player, but his track record in regular league play works against him withstanding the rigors of getting pushed around like he did tonight. I'll repeat it: CP is like a Jaguar E-Type--good looking and desirable but the last thing you'd enter in a demolition derby, and CONCACAF qualifying is definitely more demolitions derby than beauty contest.

This is CONCACAF, where no matter how talented the US is, everyone, including the powers that be, have a different set of rules for us, and for once we have a deep enough talent pool to beat them at their own game. CONCACAF isn't pretty and we need to stop trying to make it such and instead embrace it and beat them at their own game.  We have guys who can play into this stacked deck and get the results we want while playing by a double standard.  When it comes to taking on the world, give me Brooks, CP and all the guys who play the way the rest of the world plays, but to get there, give me guys who can withstand the fires of hell and not wilt or have to benched as a precaution.

Aaronson isn't as good as CP, but he is tough enough to run through a wall with his hair on fire for 75 minutes or more and not have the entire fate of the team live and die with his health. Again, he's not CP, but that's not a bad thing, and maybe even be exactly what we need in this dogfight.

 
@Sammy3469 has won me over. Looking back at the lineup tonight - we really are asking a lot out of Lletget and Acosta. There isn’t enough creativity there. We need to play Pulisic or Aaronson centrally and go from there against Honduras IMO. We have looked so listless so far, and tonight at least it’s easy to see why.

At what point is Berhalter in trouble? We wouldn’t need anyone special to qualify, and the tournament isn’t that far away, so it’s not the worst scenario for a caretaker manager.

 
WHO GOT THE GOAL TONIGHT? AARONSON. HOW DID HE GET IT? BY NOT GETTING HACKED DOWN AND THROWING HIS BODY INTO HARM'S WAY.

Do you have the 2018 WCQ Pulisic in your back pocket?  The 2021 CP missed the ELS game because of jet lag, and got thrown around like a rag doll against one of the more mild teams in the federation, ON OWN HOME SOIL.

I'm conceding that CP is our best offensive player, but his track record in regular league play works against him withstanding the rigors of getting pushed around like he did tonight. I'll repeat it: CP is like a Jaguar E-Type--good looking and desirable but the last thing you'd enter in a demolition derby, and CONCACAF qualifying is definitely more demolitions derby than beauty contest.

This is CONCACAF, where no matter how talented the US is, everyone, including the powers that be, have a different set of rules for us, and for once we have a deep enough talent pool to beat them at their own game. CONCACAF isn't pretty and we need to stop trying to make it such and instead embrace it and beat them at their own game.  We have guys who can play into this stacked deck and get the results we want while playing by a double standard.  When it comes to taking on the world, give me Brooks, CP and all the guys who play the way the rest of the world plays, but to get there, give me guys who can withstand the fires of hell and not wilt or have to benched as a precaution.

Aaronson isn't as good as CP, but he is tough enough to run through a wall with his hair on fire for 75 minutes or more and not have the entire fate of the team live and die with his health. Again, he's not CP, but that's not a bad thing, and maybe even be exactly what we need in this dogfight.


2021 CP is better than 2018 Pulisic, so even if I did have 2018 CP in my back pocket I'd still prefer today's version.  CP had COVID.  The team didn't feel he was up to 3 games in 6 days physically after battling the current day plague.  That doesn't make him soft.  He's played against teams willing to hack him to death that are 50 times better than this Canadian team(Porto and their 12 fouls on Pulisic in UCL comes to mind).

What the USMNT is missing? 

A coach willing to get fined to call out the lack of cards given to a Canadian team not willing to even attempt to play the ball before just knocking our best player to the turf. 

Two or three defenders willing to get a card on the defensive side by reciprocating against Davies all game long and telling Canada they'll stop it once Canada stops fouling CP(I think this is where a Matt Miazga type would work well). 

A set piece setup that gives us a decent chance to score on those fouls near the box.  We didn't look up for scoring a set piece once today and we had a dozen chances in decent spots thanks to Pulisic's penchant for getting hacked.

What we absolutely don't need to do is sit our best player because we can't figure out how to either neutralize or capitalize on the fouls he given during these games.  A well coached side would be able to do both.

 
I know Yedlin is taking the brunt of the blame for the Canada goal but I still can't figure out what Brooks did here.  Brooks took the right angle, and made a good recovery run and he knew where Larin was and then just stopped running when one more step could have seen him cut out the cross.

https://twitter.com/MattDoyle76/status/1434733382827712513?s=20
I bet he thought Miles Robinson or Turner were in position to cut that ball out.  But then Davies smoked it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No way they fire Berhalter until after 22 WC ( or WCQ if they don't make it). You don't axe him after these three matches and you don't want a caretaker manager going into the March rotation (toughest part of schedule).

If they fire him Thursday, who gets brought in? One of his assistants? A USSoccer yes man? An MLS assistant maybe?

Better to let this play out and conduct a thorough search next summer. Only scenario I see him fired is if they get a big fat L on Wednesday and team starts infighting.

 
The current 4-3-3 is not cutting it offensively.  We have way too many games in a row where we are not creating enough chances on goal, much less scoring.  It seems decent enough defensively but we can't ignore half the game.

We either need to go with 3 in the back or two natural strikers, or both.

With Dest likely out, the right side is compromised offensively because Yedlin is too limited.

Would something like this work if Weston is available?

.............................Turner

........Miles.........Sands..........Brooks

Weston.........Adams.........Acosta...........Antonee

...Aaronson................Pepi....................Pulisic

======

I am fairly certain Weston has played a similar role quite a few times last year.  But if Weston is out, I have no idea who we can put there.  I guess we have to see who the new players are and that may give us a hint as to what GGG is planning.

 
. Only scenario I see him fired is if they get a big fat L on Wednesday and team starts infighting.
Agreed.  I do think a loss will force Earnie's hand to fire.  Earnie would not be doing his job if he doesn't already have a short list of candidates prepared.

Like you said though, I have no idea who it could be.  JK is still available :)

 
No way they fire Berhalter until after 22 WC ( or WCQ if they don't make it). You don't axe him after these three matches and you don't want a caretaker manager going into the March rotation (toughest part of schedule).

If they fire him Thursday, who gets brought in? One of his assistants? A USSoccer yes man? An MLS assistant maybe?

Better to let this play out and conduct a thorough search next summer. Only scenario I see him fired is if they get a big fat L on Wednesday and team starts infighting.
what is Roberto Martinez doing these days?

 
I am not a Lletget fan either but he had one of the few good plays tonight on the whole team when he spun and sweetly put Aaronson through which resulted in Pulisic awkwardly hitting the post.

Lletget's problem is that he plays scared to me.  He rarely if ever plays positive.
I like Lletget as a consistent, steady pro. But just like we saw with his 9 experiment, he lacks the upside and ability to be a central lynchpin for this team. He was one of the few players that actually had space behind him consistently on the night- never or rarely turned to attack it. I was screaming TURN at the tv every time he'd receive the ball. it didn't work.

and if Aaronson had hit the pass into CPs feet or stride instead of behind him...

I know Yedlin is taking the brunt of the blame for the Canada goal but I still can't figure out what Brooks did here.  Brooks took the right angle, and made a good recovery run and he knew where Larin was and then just stopped running when one more step could have seen him cut out the cross.

https://twitter.com/MattDoyle76/status/1434733382827712513?s=20
ah. I had Miles and Brooks switched there...thought Brooks took the near post run (which explains Scoob's confusion at my confusion), not Miles.

only thing I can think is that with Brooks cutting off the angle, Brooks was setting up to defend the cut back. why he'd do that instead of covering the runner (and more immediate danger), I don't know. But you make decisions like that in a micro-second and he obviously chose wrong. 

My last college game was in the NCAAs round of 16. I was in an 8 role in a 3-5-2. we were up 1-0 with almost 5 mins left when the guy who had been my main defensive charge and attacking part of the opposition started making a run into a seam on top of the box. The guy on the ball started carrying the ball forward from midfield had just subbed in, and was a scrawny freshman.

My recently subbed in teammate forward didn't follow the guy with the ball, so I was left with the decision to follow the runner, or step to the guy with the ball who was about 40 yards from goal. All of those things went through my brain in a microsecond. I chose what seemed the most dangerous option in that microsecond...the known quantity and quality of the runner. the scrawny freshman took another two touches on the ball forward and ripped a howitzer from about 30-35 yards into the upper left 90. I hadn't considered there was a reason they had subbed this exact kid in, losing 0-1 at the end of the game.

all of that to say...I think Brooks made that split second decision based on a bunch of professionally considered options- not because he sucks or didn't want to make another two steps on that run. He just chose wrong when he's typically chosen right.

 
all of that to say...I think Brooks made that split second decision based on a bunch of professionally considered options- not because he sucks or didn't want to make another two steps on that run. He just chose wrong when he's typically chosen right.
I watched this again a few times and am pretty sure he's calculating that he doesn't want to over-commit to a pass he thinks either Robinson or Turner can handle.  He outsmarted himself I think.

But honestly, if you're saying Brooks sucks you probably just need to find another sport to watch.  He's probably (definitely?) the most accomplished CB the US has had.  190 appearances for Bundesliga teams and he's only 28.  His team is in the CL this year, and top of the Bundesliga table.  There's really not a question about whether Brooks is a good player -- especially in the context of the US pool.

 
I don't blame that Canadian goal on Brooks. Everything about after we scored was wrong.

The only way Canada was going to beat us what on the flanks. Hell, I would have been all for us to bunker in tight after we scored that goal. Make Canada try and break us down and chase that tying goal for 30 minutes.

Leaving the field that wide open was a recipe for disaster. Heck, we are lucky Canada didn't score AGAIN. And for Berhaltertop to wait until the 85th minute to sub was criminal.

side rant: it would be lovely to see our American players at least give a token effort of pride and sing our National Anthem as a group. watching these other teams belt out THEIR national anthems with gusto and passion makes our guys look listless and aloof and like this is just another game. someone please talk to them about that.

 
The only way Canada was going to beat us what on the flanks.
The one player I think you can be hard on is Yedlin.  He's a defend-first guy with a ton of speed matched up against Canada's best player.  He has to be in position there.

Add McKennie for the suspension.

And Adams for the ridiculous xG killing foul.

None of those things are on Berhalter.

The one thing I noticed during the game is that anytime we got the ball into the middle -- whether to Acosta in space or to Pulisic who'd turn and put defenders under pressure -- good things happened.  Why we were so content to pass the ball around the outside instead of finding those passes more often (or breaking the lines with a defender) is a mystery.  Maybe that's on Berhalter, I'm not sure.  But the players need to be able to figure that out too.  He can't make the passes for them -- and they were too passive overall.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The one player I think you can be hard on is Yedlin.  He's a defend-first guy with a ton of speed matched up against Canada's best player.  He has to be in position there.

Add McKennie for the suspension.

And Adams for the ridiculous xG killing foul.

None of those things are on Berhalter.

The one thing I noticed during the game is that anytime we got the ball into the middle -- whether to Acosta in space or to Pulisic who'd turn and put defenders under pressure -- good things happened.  Why we were so content to pass the ball around the outside instead of finding those passes more often (or breaking the lines with a defender) is a mystery.  Maybe that's on Berhalter, I'm not sure.  But the players need to be able to figure that out too.  He can't make the passes for them -- and they were too passive overall.


The issue is that GGG's system essentially forces two outside guys into the same space (Dest/Aaronsson on the right and CP/Robinson on the left).  That works when they can isolate the outside back and another MF (I mean you take your chances 2v2 in those scenarios).  The only issue is the opposition knows this, gameplans for this, and then throws an extra defender or two at it.  The CB ends up shading more, the D-mid slides over, etc.    That then sucks in Acosta/Llegett to provide support.  At that point your formation is kaput and switching the field is all but impossible (you end up having to go back to recycle).  

GGG seems to think we can play out of these tight quarters with quick passes.  We're now on 3 years of that not happening against CONCACAF teams.

 
GGG seems to think we can play out of these tight quarters with quick passes.  We're now on 3 years of that not happening against CONCACAF teams.
What you're describing is exactly how City and Liverpool play.

So the issue for you is that we don't have the players/midfielders to make the linking, quick-passing interplay work when the defense rotates to help against the FB/winger duo?  Is that it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What you're describing is exactly how City and Liverpool play.

So the issue for you is that we don't have the players/midfielders to make the linking, quick-passing interplay work when the defense rotates to help against the FB/winger duo?  Is that it?
We may lineup in the same formation and press in the same manner, but most assuredly don’t play the possession game the same way. We play inside out and hope the 6 can find passing space out to wings, they rely outside back to switch the field early.

To put it more succinctly, they actually use the width of the field tactically while we like to think we use the width of the field when we really don’t.   

 
Watching the post-game presser, Pulisic's first reply in the presser is "we need new ideas" and "new solutions.
A poster on another board said this, but I didn’t watch the post game stuff. I doubt we will can Gregg until after this round and/or WC, but this seems like an indictment of him. 
 

Also, someone else who attended the game said they kept looking for Gregg on the field in pregame, but they couldn’t find him for most of it. Players were pretty much doing their own thing. I’m not a soccer coach and certainly not at that level, but it seems off. Also, that person said a few players were constantly #####ing at each other throughout, not seeming to know what the others were supposed to be doing. 

 
I am still confused by the subs.

GGG proved to himself and to the team, that if he was aggressive with his subs early in the second half, that the flow of the games significantly improved.  We won multiple games based off of this pattern.

Did anyone in the post game interview ask him why he waited 20 minutes longer than she should have for the first group of subs especially when he was successful doing it before?

 
I am conflicted on Antonee Robinson.  On the one hand, I thought he had his best game for the US yesterday.  That is the type of player we need to see every game.

However, and some of this is likely on GGG, Robinson and Pulisic appear to have zero chemistry together on the left.  In fact no one seems to have any chemistry with Pulisic.

I wonder if it is worth while to return to an old fashioned two striker set up and let Pulisic play underneath them in the middle.

 
However, and some of this is likely on GGG, Robinson and Pulisic appear to have zero chemistry together on the left.  In fact no one seems to have any chemistry with Pulisic.
I kind of wonder if Pulisic is trying to do too much.  He gets isolated on the wing, so drops to the middle.  He doesn't see the ball much so when he does he's trying to dribble 15 guys.  etc.

 
What you're describing is exactly how City and Liverpool play.

So the issue for you is that we don't have the players/midfielders to make the linking, quick-passing interplay work when the defense rotates to help against the FB/winger duo?  Is that it?


We may lineup in the same formation and press in the same manner, but most assuredly don’t play the possession game the same way. We play inside out and hope the 6 can find passing space out to wings, they rely outside back to switch the field early.

To put it more succinctly, they actually use the width of the field tactically while we like to think we use the width of the field when we really don’t.   
quicker passing can mean those short triangles tiki taka that the best trained teams with the best players can do. The US has had moments of this, but not lately.

To me it means quicker side to side and switching (or hitting a diagonal) of the ball, usually short, short, to suck the defense in, and then long to open it up.

the problem I've seen tactically from the US is two fold: the ball isn't moving quick enough to draw and then open up the opposition...they can calmly stay organized and keep their shape with the ball moving slower. But equally bad or worse is that the US weak-side players pinch into the middle swallowing/packing up space for the short balls to work well, and then leaving nobody there for the longer ball to open up the field wide or diagonally. It all becomes super easy for the opposing teams to defend.

That there doesn't seem to be an understanding between players on the same side of the field, with players ending up on top of each other is most definitely not helping. that could be a young team thing, or an individual lack of awareness thing, or a GGG lack of proper preparation thing.

 
I kind of wonder if Pulisic is trying to do too much.  He gets isolated on the wing, so drops to the middle.  He doesn't see the ball much so when he does he's trying to dribble 15 guys.  etc.
I don't think GGG or his teammates know what to do when he is forced to drop deeper to get on the ball. We all agree he needs to be getting the ball higher up the field facing goal, and not at midfield with his back to goal. But if that's what it comes to, the team needs to react to keep shape and numbers to provide opportunities moving the ball forward, not back.

he seems to have license at Chels to take guys on the way he's doing with the US...but he also has teammates providing support in good spots for him when he does.

 
I had forgotten that McKennie got suspended by Juventus for throwing a party during covid.  :(

I hate to see repeat offenses.  A single mistake is fine, it happens with their age but doubling down on the mistake is very concerning......

 
I had forgotten that McKennie got suspended by Juventus for throwing a party during covid.  :(

I hate to see repeat offenses.  A single mistake is fine, it happens with their age but doubling down on the mistake is very concerning......
and I'm sure this going to go down well once he gets back to his club in Italy. 

 
he seems to have license at Chels to take guys on the way he's doing with the US...but he also has teammates providing support in good spots for him when he does.
The biggest difference is that when he starts taking guys on at Chelsea, he has 3 guys making runs through the back line and two guys positioning themselves for potential give and goes, which means the defense can’t triple team him or they get beat by a simple pass.

The US, on the other hand, watches Pulisic dribble, then makes a run IF he beats the defenders.  That’s something that needs to happen as soon as he gets the ball.

I too, would like to see the US try a two striker setup with CP as a false nine allowed to roam. 

 
The biggest difference is that when he starts taking guys on at Chelsea, he has 3 guys making runs through the back line and two guys positioning themselves for potential give and goes, which means the defense can’t triple team him or they get beat by a simple pass.

The US, on the other hand, watches Pulisic dribble, then makes a run IF he beats the defenders.  That’s something that needs to happen as soon as he gets the ball.

I too, would like to see the US try a two striker setup with CP as a false nine allowed to roam. 
Or go with 3 at the back and put him as a wingback. ####, Chelsea tried it...

 
The biggest difference is that when he starts taking guys on at Chelsea, he has 3 guys making runs through the back line and two guys positioning themselves for potential give and goes, which means the defense can’t triple team him or they get beat by a simple pass.

The US, on the other hand, watches Pulisic dribble, then makes a run IF he beats the defenders.  That’s something that needs to happen as soon as he gets the ball.

I too, would like to see the US try a two striker setup with CP as a false nine allowed to roam. 
yeah...I think we're saying the same thing. the US players have to be proactive in their support, whether he's showing back deep, dribbling at guys or receiving the ball further up the field. as it is, there's not much of anything, so the dribbles at two or three guys that opens up teammates and space at Chelsea, don't for the US and just allow defenses to close on him and outnumber him or hack him

 
Landon says he knows what Weston did, and he is hammering Weston unlike anything I have heard him say before. :(

He says it is "almost beyond repair"  :eek:

WTF did he do????????

https://twitter.com/__adel22/status/1434962895629131776?s=20
Clearly had a party or broke quarantine in some way by going out.

That's enough during the first WCQ window.  It's not about you.  What a #######.  No wonder Juventus aren't sold on him.  

Landon's right to go in with the studs up.  Can't imagine how mad his teammates must be right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thinking about how the Italian press will cover this story and how much he let his teammates down, McKennie has to be praying for three points Wednesday night.  Becoming the John Harkes of a failed WCQ cycle would be a heavy burden to carry.

 
ugh. Weston.

I was coming in because I remembered...David and Buchanan both only played part of that game. Canada had an easy time of it without 2 of their best players. Not because they were hurt or selfish morons...because Canada wasn't all out trying to win this game.

 
Reading between the lines, I almost get the feeling Weston screwed up, was warned and simply did it again.

I wonder who told Landon the details?  His playing days only barely crossed with Ream so I don't see it being any players.  No one in the media knows the full details.   I assume it must have been some one on the staff.

 
ugh. Weston.

I was coming in because I remembered...David and Buchanan both only played part of that game. Canada had an easy time of it without 2 of their best players. Not because they were hurt or selfish morons...because Canada wasn't all out trying to win this game.
I had no fear of David.  I think both of our CB's could have handled him.  But Buchanan would have torn us apart over 90 minutes.   Even in his short time, he showed how easy he could turn the corner.  He almost drew a near pk and almost had a goal after a long run into the box when he sent it far post.

 
I had no fear of David.  I think both of our CB's could have handled him.  But Buchanan would have torn us apart over 90 minutes.   Even in his short time, he showed how easy he could turn the corner.  He almost drew a near pk and almost had a goal after a long run into the box when he sent it far post.
I'm saying we didn't have to face David, Davies and Buchanan playing together. that thought is scary.

 
I sometimes feel I have been sold a false bill of goods.

I can't even begin to count how many times people preached, "send the kids to Europe, they will mature faster, and be forced to develop faster"

JK was always saying "American players need to seek out the champions league as that is where the music is played"

We have done, as a program, everything that was asked and I don't see much of a difference in my eyes.   Maybe some of that is due to the youth on the team but that excuse is starting to wear thinner and thinner with me.

========================

In a similar situation last cycle, the US went down to CR and simply flat out quit, I believe in an attempt to get JK fired (which may have been warranted but karma is a ##### as they say).

If that happens again against Honduras in the hopes to get GGG fired (whether justified or not), I will really struggle to be a fan of this team.

I will take any sort of fluke win as long as the effort is there.  I can excuse failure on the pitch, as painful as it is.  I can't excuse either lack of effort or what ever da #### Weston did to hurt this team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@SoccerInsider: Weston McKennie will not travel to Honduras with USMNT and is returning to Italy today. Jackson Yueill added to roster ahead of World Cup qualifier against Honduras. Sergiño Dest has been diagnosed with a right ankle sprain and will not be available.

 
well that went as well as expected

:wall: :wall: :wall:

===============

-Jackson Yueill has been added to the roster ahead of the World Cup Qualifier against Honduras. Yueill, 24, is one of four players who appeared in the Nations League Final Four and the 2021 Gold Cup. The midfielder has made seven appearances in 2021 and has 15 caps to his credit overall.

-Weston McKennie will not travel to Honduras and is returning to Italy later today.

-"Weston will return to Italy and will be unavailable for the match against Honduras due to a violation of team policy,” USMNT head coach Gregg Berhalter. “There are high expectations for those who are a part of the U.S. Men’s National Team, and in order to be successful it’s important that everyone in the group is accountable."

-Sergiño Dest has been diagnosed with a right ankle sprain and will not be available for the game against Honduras. Dest was injured in the 44th minute in the 1-1 draw against Canada.

 
Sending McKennie home is the right call, though I'm sure he'll be criticized for it if we lose.  If a guy doesn't care about being here enough to do even the basics, he doesn't deserve to play.

Hopefully they rally around each other.

 
I am still a bit confused on the Weston situation.

If US Soccer wanted him suspended 2 games, why not just say that yesterday?  Why did they have to wait until today?  Since he is returning to Italy, he can clearly be allowed on a plane.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top