A very, very distant #3 option after LT and Gates.VJax will be the #3 option which has value but it will often be feast or famine like last week.
I notice that half the throws to VJAX are almost interceptions, they cant seem to get him openA very, very distant #3 option after LT and Gates.VJax will be the #3 option which has value but it will often be feast or famine like last week.
And if it's the one I'm thinking of, that pass was slightly deflected, so not VJax's fault. I think it comes down to Rivers getting comfortable with him and trusting him like he does Gates and LT. When that happens (and I believe it will some time this year), he will become an upper tier WR2.One reason I'm a little optimistic is that a few weeks ago he dropped what would have been a 40+ yd TD against KC. Even with so few opportunities, if he catches that one pass in my league he jumps from WR33 to WR17.
Right, a defender got a hand on it at the last second; but that goes to gregjcross's point above.Also, as mon says, the Chargers may end up spreading the ball around more -- but it remains to be seen whether that will work in VJ's favor. They did spread the ball around yesterday, and that's why VJ didn't get so many looks. Craig Davis, Malcom Floyd, and even Brandon Manumaleuna got in on the action, which kind of diluted the targets for VJ.He could be a buy-low candidate because he's got the physical talent to be a very good WR. But I don't know if he's going to be a big enough part of the SD offense this year for him to put up good fantasy numbers. Gates and Tomlinson are the focus, and I think that Davis and Floyd may continue to get looks. Eric Parker will be back soon as well.And if it's the one I'm thinking of, that pass was slightly deflected, so not VJax's fault.One reason I'm a little optimistic is that a few weeks ago he dropped what would have been a 40+ yd TD against KC. Even with so few opportunities, if he catches that one pass in my league he jumps from WR33 to WR17.
that's been the story of his career so far. Lots of dropped balls and concentration lapses.One reason I'm a little optimistic is that a few weeks ago he dropped what would have been a 40+ yd TD against KC. Even with so few opportunities, if he catches that one pass in my league he jumps from WR33 to WR17.
Patience
Update on this: Parker may be headed to IR.Eric Parker will be back soon as well.
not that he had any numbers but what about busters role. they love jacksons blocking and he might be better off in the 2 roleChambers is now a Charger. There goes Jackson's value...
####ing A.... just traded for VJax last night....Chambers is now a Charger. There goes Jackson's value...
If you liked the price before then you'll love it now. Rock bottom, baby.I know he doesn't get a ton of looks with Gates and LT, but he has a relatively easy schedule here on out and has decent talent. After a disappointing week and a relatively pedestrian start to the season, it may be a good time to move on him. Any thoughts on a buy low?
I agree - this is a huge overreaction. I just bought love on VJax myself AFTER the Chambers deal. This will just open the offense up that much more.KellysHeroes said:I wanted to bump this up... I was thinking about this last nightlooking at the stats.. I noticed that LT2 is 2nd on the team with 38 Targets and 25 recs (that makes him #3 for RBs)... IMO, thats a problem.The RB on a team this talent shouldn't be the #2 passing option; even if it is LT2... remember during the offseason; the plan was to give LT less touches, well right now hes tied for total touches by an RB. After reviewing this; I believe LT owners in PPR leagues are going to feel an the impact from Chambers (if any; this is Chris Chambers). as for VJax... I'm not so sure SD is just going to hand him the WR1 spot.. Vjax has 35 targets; the rest of the WRs have 31... I don't think that Jax will be affected too much by this move... he will still be a great Redzone target... I would still target VJax during this week as a buy low
Good for you... I paid for him the night before the trade... and I felt I gave a little too much then; imagine how I felt yesterday.I agree - this is a huge overreaction. I just bought love on VJax myself AFTER the Chambers deal. This will just open the offense up that much more.
I'm not sure what plan you're referring to. The plan for LT since training camp was to get LT more receptions and possibly a few less carries, touch wise probably about the same. Chambers acquisition will not impact LT's touch's. As far as targetting him as a buy low, he will certainly be cheaper this morning than he was yesterday.KellysHeroes said:I wanted to bump this up... I was thinking about this last nightlooking at the stats.. I noticed that LT2 is 2nd on the team with 38 Targets and 25 recs (that makes him #3 for RBs)... IMO, thats a problem.The RB on a team this talent shouldn't be the #2 passing option; even if it is LT2... remember during the offseason; the plan was to give LT less touches, well right now hes tied for total touches by an RB. After reviewing this; I believe LT owners in PPR leagues are going to feel an impact from Chambers (if any; this is Chris Chambers). as for VJax... I'm not so sure SD is just going to hand Chambers the WR1 spot.. Vjax has 35 targets; the rest of the WRs have 31... I don't think that Jax will be affected too much by this move... he will still be a great Redzone target... I would still target VJax during this week as a buy low
The publicly stated plan was to get the ball into LT's hands more often by involving him more in the passing game (although there is always reason to be skeptical of publicly stated plans).KellysHeroes said:I wanted to bump this up... I was thinking about this last night
looking at the stats.. I noticed that LT2 is 2nd on the team with 38 Targets and 25 recs (that makes him #3 for RBs)... IMO, thats a problem.
The RB on a team this talent shouldn't be the #2 passing option; even if it is LT2... remember during the offseason; the plan was to give LT less touches, well right now hes tied for total touches by an RB. After reviewing this; I believe LT owners in PPR leagues are going to feel an impact from Chambers (if any; this is Chris Chambers).
as for VJax... I'm not so sure SD is just going to hand Chambers the WR1 spot.. Vjax has 35 targets; the rest of the WRs have 31... I don't think that Jax will be affected too much by this move... he will still be a great Redzone target...
I would still target VJax during this week as a buy low
Again... you can't just assume that Chambers is going to be handed the WR1 role an out target Jackson... we haven't seen them in action yet and Chambers isn't anything special. If anything it could become like Philly where the 2 WRs are 1a and 1b; where Jackson is more valuable because hes more of the Redzone target. But we need to wait till week 8 to know how this will play out.The reason, IMO, that Chambers was brought in is because the rest of the WRs were under performancing terribly and Eric Parker is clearly toast. And JVax is 100xs the WR Jenkins is... if anything, I would Compare Jackson to larger / stronger version of Reggie Brown.Not really sure what some of you are thinking here. He was the third option, now he's headed to fourth, with a first round pick at WR already on the roster. Plus he struggles catching the ball. I think we are looking at the next Micheal Jenkins.
Um, you do know that Chambers went to the probowl in 2005 with Gus Frerotte and Sage Rosenfels as his QBs. He's also had other studs like Jay Fiedler and Joey Harrington recently. I don't own VJax or have any personal vendetta against the guy. I just see a WR that struggles catching the ball, and in the last 6 months his team has drafted a WR in the first round and traded for a Pro Bowl WR.Again... you can't just assume that Chambers is going to be handed the WR1 role an out target Jackson... we haven't seen them in action yet and Chambers isn't anything special. If anything it could become like Philly where the 2 WRs are 1a and 1b; where Jackson is more valuable because hes more of the Redzone target. But we need to wait till week 8 to know how this will play out.The reason, IMO, that Chambers was brought in is because the rest of the WRs were under performancing terribly and Eric Parker is clearly toast. And JVax is 100xs the WR Jenkins is... if anything, I would Compare Jackson to larger / stronger version of Reggie Brown.Not really sure what some of you are thinking here. He was the third option, now he's headed to fourth, with a first round pick at WR already on the roster. Plus he struggles catching the ball. I think we are looking at the next Micheal Jenkins.
The problem is he was already the 3rd redzone target and already inconsistent as a WR.I don't think he is a "buy" low candidate. I think he is a sleeper to pick up off of the waiver wire in another week or two if he is not already there.He is there in my league (though, 10 teamer and you only start 2 WRs). And I put him there and have no regrets in doing so after that 1 catch for 5 yard performance.Helps that I have Ocho Cinco, Crayton, Jennings, and Javon Walker in front of him though.Again... you can't just assume that Chambers is going to be handed the WR1 role an out target Jackson... we haven't seen them in action yet and Chambers isn't anything special. If anything it could become like Philly where the 2 WRs are 1a and 1b; where Jackson is more valuable because hes more of the Redzone target. But we need to wait till week 8 to know how this will play out.The reason, IMO, that Chambers was brought in is because the rest of the WRs were under performancing terribly and Eric Parker is clearly toast. And JVax is 100xs the WR Jenkins is... if anything, I would Compare Jackson to larger / stronger version of Reggie Brown.Not really sure what some of you are thinking here. He was the third option, now he's headed to fourth, with a first round pick at WR already on the roster. Plus he struggles catching the ball. I think we are looking at the next Micheal Jenkins.
doesn't Chambers have the most drops than another other WR in the past 3 yrs.... the Pro-Bowl means nothing to me...Um, you do know that Chambers went to the probowl in 2005 with Gus Frerotte and Sage Rosenfels as his QBs. He's also had other studs like Jay Fiedler and Joey Harrington recently. I don't own VJax or have any personal vendetta against the guy. I just see a WR that struggles catching the ball, and in the last 6 months his team has drafted a WR in the first round and traded for a Pro Bowl WR.Again... you can't just assume that Chambers is going to be handed the WR1 role an out target Jackson... we haven't seen them in action yet and Chambers isn't anything special. If anything it could become like Philly where the 2 WRs are 1a and 1b; where Jackson is more valuable because hes more of the Redzone target. But we need to wait till week 8 to know how this will play out.The reason, IMO, that Chambers was brought in is because the rest of the WRs were under performancing terribly and Eric Parker is clearly toast. And JVax is 100xs the WR Jenkins is... if anything, I would Compare Jackson to larger / stronger version of Reggie Brown.Not really sure what some of you are thinking here. He was the third option, now he's headed to fourth, with a first round pick at WR already on the roster. Plus he struggles catching the ball. I think we are looking at the next Micheal Jenkins.
Chambers and Owens are both up there -- I'm not sure who's ahead.doesn't Chambers have the most drops than another other WR in the past 3 yrs.... the Pro-Bowl means nothing to me...