with every post, you make what was already a very weak argument, worse.The argument that the Texans used a 3rd round pick to draft a "backup" rb is irrelevant. Originally DD was drafted to be exclusively a special teams player and a 3rd down back.
As stated before opposing defences are perfectly happy to let DD pile up receptions as long as they can contain him.
DD is not that good at rushing the ball on 1st and 2nd downs.
Morrency is comeing from a very similiar scheme at Oklahoma St and could step in immediately if given the opportunity.
Lets be honest this is a way more open competition than some would like to admit.
The fact that DD has yet to be signed to a contract extension tells me that Texas management wants to see if Morrency (or Hollings) can emerge.
Hollings hasn't had a fair shake because of injuries and Morrency is still an unknown at this point.
Davis should be fimrly entrenched as the 3rd down back and also be regulated to return duties.
1 injury to DOM and I think his days as the starting TB on this team are done
God, you're a goofball.DD still not signed to an extension
Morency will have a fair shake at this job by mid-season
I don't need a coaching staff to tell me what they think - everything in the NFL is coach speak
At some point Capers will figure out that he needs some yardage on 1st and 2nd downs
Macdaddy_2004, please do me a favor and let this thread die. I own Davis in a dynasty league and would like to draft Morency late as a handcuff. The more pub he gets, the harder that will be.TIADD still not signed to an extension
Morency will have a fair shake at this job by mid-season
I don't need a coaching staff to tell me what they think - everything in the NFL is coach speak
At some point Capers will figure out that he needs some yardage on 1st and 2nd downs
And why would you want to draft Morrency ?? The rest here seem to think that he is no threat to Davis and his playtimeMacdaddy_2004, please do me a favor and let this thread die. I own Davis in a dynasty league and would like to draft Morency late as a handcuff. The more pub he gets, the harder that will be.TIADD still not signed to an extension
Morency will have a fair shake at this job by mid-season
I don't need a coaching staff to tell me what they think - everything in the NFL is coach speak
At some point Capers will figure out that he needs some yardage on 1st and 2nd downs
Because I think you're right! Now let's just let Morency slip back under the radar so we can get him cheaperAnd why would you want to draft Morrency ?? The rest here seem to think that he is no threat to Davis and his playtime
Cool, just as long as you wait until after the season startsAlright than
I'll bump this thread come week 10
Perhaps maybe even before
perhaps? you've bumped it like 3 times in the last 7 days, and it's barely full blown training camp season.Alright than
I'll bump this thread come week 10
Perhaps maybe even before
Haven't you been reading this thread? VM is gonna be stealing carries by week 10! Really, i think VM's best case senario is to get some work if DD goes down. IF he shows something then, I could see him getting some significant carries till DD comes back.Just a note from a Texans homer -- the team is completely sold on DDavis and will likely grant a 5-year extension at some point this preseason/season. Wells is not a true backup and will be used at fullback this year, but moreso like Alstott is used at FB. Wells will never be confused for a true tailback, but he can be a great contributor. Hollings was the Texans' project, but with injuries, he's just never panned out. One thing you have to understand about Capers and Casserly -- they are a one-back team, but they do believe that you can never have enough good RBs. With free agency, injuries, and potential contract issues, they just want to be covered. Morency will see no more of the field this year than Hollings did last year, barring serious injury to DD. Morency will be developed and either win the job outright (not this year and maybe never), traded away, or kept in reserve until contractual or injury situations merit his use.
I don't believe Morency will cut into DD's carries right away, but if he proves that he can do it on 1st and 2nd when he's given a chance, it could happen. DD is a very excellent receiver and I don't see him not being in on 3rd downs regardless of what happens.Hate to re-bump, AGAIN, but there is actually a lot of statistical data supporting MacDaddy's assertion that DD has not done particularly well rushing the ball on 1st and 2nd down. He's 48th in the league over 2003 and 2004 in yards per attempt on 1st and 2nd down.
That said, he is 6th in that same time period in yards per rush on 3rd, he's 21st in yards per reception (that is very high, actually) on 1st-3rd down and 22nd on third downs only in yard per reception.
These numbers def, support the assertion that he has not been good (at least statistically) at rushing the ball on 1st and 2nd down, and that he is excellent on third downs.
Whether that is because of DD or because of the OL is up for debate, I am just throwing the numbers out there.
That said, MacDaddy attacked DD's receiving ability as well, and there he's simply off his rocker.
Could it be his stats are so good on 3rd down since he is so bad on 1st and 2nd? When it's 3rd and 4 or 5 it is a lot easier to run, and it also puts him in a position to get a lot of dump off passes. So his sucking on 1st and 2nd actually helps him get a lot of stats on 3rd down.I agree that DD is a great recieving back, so even if down the line he loses some touches on 1st and 2nd he will always have a role on 3rd down.That said, he is 6th in that same time period in yards per rush on 3rd, he's 21st in yards per reception (that is very high, actually) on 1st-3rd down and 22nd on third downs only in yard per reception.These numbers def, support the assertion that he has not been good (at least statistically) at rushing the ball on 1st and 2nd down, and that he is excellent on third downs. That said, MacDaddy attacked DD's receiving ability as well, and there he's simply off his rocker.
That's a cop-out argument as you igtnored the final statement - up for debate is whether that is DD or the OL. Especially the 2003 numbers that are, admittedly, behind a poor expansion offensive line.This year will determine OL v. DD as the OL went through a drastic improvement between game 1 2004 and game 10 2004, and they are now yet another year into the system, and they return the same personnel as last year for the first time in their short history.Could it be his stats are so good on 3rd down since he is so bad on 1st and 2nd?
deja vu all over again
:cough: tony hollings :cough:
Newsflash: Domanick Davis is good
Wells won't play at FB. He got some snaps in mini camp because he isn't cutting it as a running back. Many times guys on the edge get a look at another position before they are launched. He can't beat out Norris and he will battle Baxter (the back up fullback) for a roster spot.I think one thing to remember is the Texans wanted to move Jonathon Wells to FB - this meant their depth chart was down to Dom and Hollings - who is injury prone himself. They entered the draft knowing they were going to get a back - and they did - but not as Dom's repalcement.
They have talked contract extension - when it happens hopefully it will cool off some of this talk.
I did the Houston team spotlight last year and was impressed with the Texans' fullback crew.Wells won't play at FB. He got some snaps in mini camp because he isn't cutting it as a running back. Many times guys on the edge get a look at another position before they are launched. He can't beat out Norris and he will battle Baxter (the back up fullback) for a roster spot.I think one thing to remember is the Texans wanted to move Jonathon Wells to FB - this meant their depth chart was down to Dom and Hollings - who is injury prone himself. They entered the draft knowing they were going to get a back - and they did - but not as Dom's repalcement.
They have talked contract extension - when it happens hopefully it will cool off some of this talk.
you got it - barring season-ending injury to either player before week 10, of course.Morency will not have anywhere near as many carries as DD in the Texans offense from week 10 onwards.My definition of commitee is from game 10 onwards Morrency will have as many (if not more) carries in the houston offence as DD
Wanna go on that sig bet levin ??
Cool, just as long as you wait until after the season startsAlright than
I'll bump this thread come week 10
Perhaps maybe even before
Not J-Wells as the handcuff?I have had Morency almost all season as a sort of handcuff. With one more week of tranactions, I am going to drop him and possibly pick up a defense to go with the Cowboys. Worthlesss.
he'll definitely be in my top-10 RBs next year and I'sd probably select him ahead of all the QBs and probably all the WRs except CJohn.why's everyone always dogging dom davis?
this is probably not totally on topic, but having the guy on my team-he produces. more than a lot of other RBs. he seems to have more doubters than a lot of other RBs though.
Ummm - read MacDaddy's comments and his insistence on some kind of bet that he didn't follow through with and his guarantee to bump this in week 10 (which he didn't do) and you'll see why I keep bumping it each week.I will stop now since I have obviously made my point - but I am surprised you don't understand why I'd keep bumping this thread.This is not about Davis detraction- it was about Morency pimping at Davis' expense.edit - if it was about Davis detraction on the points you mentioned - fine. But it was not. This thread was WAY more than that. And DD has CLEARLY been the most productive and most explosive Houston back - his catch for the 30+ yard TD was beautiful. He has been anything except mediocre for Houston - and he has looked good doing it (by the limited amount of Houston games I have been exposed to, DD has looked very good).Levin, I was (and am) one of the Davis detractors this off-season, and I have a hard time figuring out why you'd want to make such a big deal out of this.
Hilarious, I thought the same thing when I saw the Joe Horn topic.since I saw MacDaddy post a new thread less than an hour ago . . .
Won't be an easy decision for Houston, no matter what.Keep both and start Reggie in part time duty with DD.
Maybe trade DD in 2 ab (year 2 After Bush). They DID just committ a LOT of cap money to DD. Bush WILL need a few games before giving him the reins and the Texans could really use a spark plug on KR/PR. Also, it is really hard to figure what the new Houston Texans will do once Capers is gone.
Also, I could see Houston as one of the few teams willing to trade down out of the Bush derby to the #3 or #4 and pick up a world of picks (ala SD with River/Manning) and be content with Vince Young or Ferguson from the #3 or #4 spot (assuming it goes Bush then Leinert 1-2)
Unlike most teams, the cap situation probably doesn't impact their decision with DD if they draft Bush. They're rebuilding, which means they will likely be well below the cap anyway with a lot of younger players next year. I happen to think that DD is a good "buy low" candidate right now to grab on speculation. His value can't get much lower even if they draft Bush because his days there will be numbered. His upside is huge however because 1) they may not in fact draft Bush; 2) the team's simply got to improve over what it's doing this year; and 3) if they do draft Bush and trade him, only a team needing a starting RB will be a trade partner (which is why I mentioned AZ), which means he lands there as the primary ball carrier.Keep both and start Reggie in part time duty with DD.
Maybe trade DD in 2 ab (year 2 After Bush). They DID just committ a LOT of cap money to DD. Bush WILL need a few games before giving him the reins and the Texans could really use a spark plug on KR/PR. Also, it is really hard to figure what the new Houston Texans will do once Capers is gone.
Also, I could see Houston as one of the few teams willing to trade down out of the Bush derby to the #3 or #4 and pick up a world of picks (ala SD with River/Manning) and be content with Vince Young or Ferguson from the #3 or #4 spot (assuming it goes Bush then Leinert 1-2)
And (this is key) pay a king's ransom for that given that Bush is the player they're inevitably trading up for. This is why I think Houston could in fact trade down, because they could receive this and next year's 1st's, as well as this year's 2nd and 3rd or thereabouts, and all from a team that's drafting early in each round.Any of the teams currently lookin at the #3, #4 and #5 spots would probably be willing to move up for Bush.
Yup - exactly my point.With DD on board, trading down to 3 or 4, getting Ferguson, and having some other crappy team's #1 and #2 next year could be a huge move for them.And (this is key) pay a king's ransom for that given that Bush is the player they're inevitably trading up for. This is why I think Houston could in fact trade down, because they could receive this and next year's 1st's, as well as this year's 2nd and 3rd or thereabouts, and all from a team that's drafting early in each round.Any of the teams currently lookin at the #3, #4 and #5 spots would probably be willing to move up for Bush.
Do you agree with the idea that DD's a good "buy low" right now?Yup - exactly my point.With DD on board, trading down to 3 or 4, getting Ferguson, and having some other crappy team's #1 and #2 next year could be a huge move for them.And (this is key) pay a king's ransom for that given that Bush is the player they're inevitably trading up for. This is why I think Houston could in fact trade down, because they could receive this and next year's 1st's, as well as this year's 2nd and 3rd or thereabouts, and all from a team that's drafting early in each round.Any of the teams currently lookin at the #3, #4 and #5 spots would probably be willing to move up for Bush.
Yes, but it is not at the lowest it'll be - if Hou is draftring #1, that is when you buy DD.Do you agree with the idea that DD's a good "buy low" right now?Yup - exactly my point.With DD on board, trading down to 3 or 4, getting Ferguson, and having some other crappy team's #1 and #2 next year could be a huge move for them.And (this is key) pay a king's ransom for that given that Bush is the player they're inevitably trading up for. This is why I think Houston could in fact trade down, because they could receive this and next year's 1st's, as well as this year's 2nd and 3rd or thereabouts, and all from a team that's drafting early in each round.Any of the teams currently lookin at the #3, #4 and #5 spots would probably be willing to move up for Bush.