What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Video games...what ya playing? And what are you looking forward to? (6 Viewers)

I recommend half.com - its an ebay site but you don't have to go hunting for auctions, you can buy the game immediately, and you can get some price certainty as a seller. You can pay with a credit card or Paypal just like at amazon or any other online merchant.
If I buy through plain ol' ebay, do I have to do that bidding crap? Or are there set prices there too? I have no interest in sitting and trying to out-bid folks at the last second to ensure I get a game.
You can buy either way. Games are sold through auctions or via Buy It Nows. There are so many on sale you can find what ever you want. I tend to do better with auctions but I understand the appeal of buy it nows. Roughly 13k used games are sold on ebay, every day. It is a massive market.
 
I recommend half.com - its an ebay site but you don't have to go hunting for auctions, you can buy the game immediately, and you can get some price certainty as a seller. You can pay with a credit card or Paypal just like at amazon or any other online merchant.
If I buy through plain ol' ebay, do I have to do that bidding crap? Or are there set prices there too? I have no interest in sitting and trying to out-bid folks at the last second to ensure I get a game.
You can buy either way.Games are sold through auctions or via Buy It Nows. There are so many on sale you can find what ever you want. I tend to do better with auctions but I understand the appeal of buy it nows.Roughly 13k used games are sold on ebay, every day. It is a massive market.
So is the half.com site just the ebay instant buy ads then? Or is it a completely different site? Sorry for asking, but it is all blocked here.

 
I recommend half.com - its an ebay site but you don't have to go hunting for auctions, you can buy the game immediately, and you can get some price certainty as a seller. You can pay with a credit card or Paypal just like at amazon or any other online merchant.
If I buy through plain ol' ebay, do I have to do that bidding crap? Or are there set prices there too? I have no interest in sitting and trying to out-bid folks at the last second to ensure I get a game.
You can buy either way.Games are sold through auctions or via Buy It Nows. There are so many on sale you can find what ever you want. I tend to do better with auctions but I understand the appeal of buy it nows.Roughly 13k used games are sold on ebay, every day. It is a massive market.
So is the half.com site just the ebay instant buy ads then? Or is it a completely different site? Sorry for asking, but it is all blocked here.
I have never used half.com but here is the wiki definition. Not sure how this is any different than buying on regular ebay with buy it now fixed prices. ==================Half.com is a subsidiary of eBay, in which sellers offer items at fixed prices, usually items that have a UPC, ISBN or other kind of SKU, rather than rare, old or collectible items. The items available on half.com are limited to books, textbooks, music, movies, video games, and video game consoles.
 
I recommend half.com - its an ebay site but you don't have to go hunting for auctions, you can buy the game immediately, and you can get some price certainty as a seller. You can pay with a credit card or Paypal just like at amazon or any other online merchant.
If I buy through plain ol' ebay, do I have to do that bidding crap? Or are there set prices there too? I have no interest in sitting and trying to out-bid folks at the last second to ensure I get a game.
You can buy either way.Games are sold through auctions or via Buy It Nows. There are so many on sale you can find what ever you want. I tend to do better with auctions but I understand the appeal of buy it nows.Roughly 13k used games are sold on ebay, every day. It is a massive market.
So is the half.com site just the ebay instant buy ads then? Or is it a completely different site? Sorry for asking, but it is all blocked here.
I have never used half.com but here is the wiki definition. Not sure how this is any different than buying on regular ebay with buy it now fixed prices.==================Half.com is a subsidiary of eBay, in which sellers offer items at fixed prices, usually items that have a UPC, ISBN or other kind of SKU, rather than rare, old or collectible items. The items available on half.com are limited to books, textbooks, music, movies, video games, and video game consoles.
That's prettymuch it - Half.com is basically for people who want to buy/sell books, CD's, movies, and games without bidding.

 
Which series should I jump into first; Mass Effect or The Witcher?
If you are starting from the beginning, Witcher 1 is pretty dated and tough to slog through at this point. Witcher 2 is great.
I'd say the same thing for Mass Effect 1, both are a little dated, but i still find them fun. I just played Witcher last summer and still thought it was a great game. A lot more limited of an RPG then the open world stuff that's around, but still thought it was a fun game with a good story. I'd recomend playing it personally.
I didn't dislike W1, but it is a top down RPG that's much more similar in presentation and style to older games like Baldur's Gate or Diablo than modern RPGs like ME1 or Witcher 2.
Are ME1 and Witcher 1 really important from a story perspective to better enjoy ME2 & 3 and Witcher 2?

 
That's prettymuch it - Half.com is basically for people who want to buy/sell books, CD's, movies, and games without bidding.
So what is the difference between this and Buy It Now on ebay?
Almost none to the buyer, save that he/she didn't have to search for a buy it now.

to the seller, I believe Half collects the $$ and pays you (my wife uses it to sell books).

 
Are ME1 and Witcher 1 really important from a story perspective to better enjoy ME2 & 3 and Witcher 2?
I had started ME2 on the PS3 before they announced the orginial was going to be released and found I felt lost during most of the conversations. For that reason, I shelved it for a long, long time, finding it to be a bit of a disappointment. Once I heard about the PS3 release of ME, I went back and played it and enjoyed it immensely. Having not played any of the other ME games for other than that one short period, it didn't seem dated to me at all. I then rolled right in to ME2 and find myself enjoyingit MUCH more having played the original. So I believe it definitely enhances the ME2 experience.

 
I would suggest simply putting ME1 on "easy" setting and blasting through only the main missions though.

The side missions just aren't that fun. Unless you like driving round a big planet while in 2nd gear.

 
That's prettymuch it - Half.com is basically for people who want to buy/sell books, CD's, movies, and games without bidding.
So what is the difference between this and Buy It Now on ebay?
For the buyer, probably not that much. I haven't used eBay in a while, but half lists all the sellers of a game with their ratings, item conditions, prices and descriptions in an easy to scan format that eBay doesn't (or at least didnt used to) have - couldn't be easier as a buyer or seller.
 
Which series should I jump into first; Mass Effect or The Witcher?
If you are starting from the beginning, Witcher 1 is pretty dated and tough to slog through at this point. Witcher 2 is great.
I'd say the same thing for Mass Effect 1, both are a little dated, but i still find them fun. I just played Witcher last summer and still thought it was a great game. A lot more limited of an RPG then the open world stuff that's around, but still thought it was a fun game with a good story. I'd recomend playing it personally.
I didn't dislike W1, but it is a top down RPG that's much more similar in presentation and style to older games like Baldur's Gate or Diablo than modern RPGs like ME1 or Witcher 2.
Are ME1 and Witcher 1 really important from a story perspective to better enjoy ME2 & 3 and Witcher 2?
The writing in Witcher 1 isn't anything special and the plot is kind of weird - you aren't missing anything by reading a wiki summary and diving into Witcher 2, IMO. ME has a much more complicated and intricate set of character interactions that you are missing out on if you skip the first.
 
I would suggest simply putting ME1 on "easy" setting and blasting through only the main missions though. The side missions just aren't that fun. Unless you like driving round a big planet while in 2nd gear.
I liked them :shrug: but to each their own.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My first XCOM playthrough on Classic difficulty very nearly ended in disaster. I screwed up in the very first month by choosing $ over engineers, with the result being that I had no satellites at the end of the first month and only one at the end of month two. By the third month, I had lost every single country in Africa and South America (including my base -- a UFO shot down my preexisting satellite over Argentina; I don't know how the hell I was supposed to prevent that so early in the game). I was dangerously close to Game Over.

Fortunately I managed panic so as to keep all my losses contained to specific continents. Now I'm just a couple weeks away from getting satellites up over every remaining country but one, and I'll take care of that one next month. And I managed to get two snipers equipped with Double Tap and plasma sniper rifles, which means they're at that point where they absolutely wreck every alien that comes into their line of sight. And this is with the alien base mission coming up next. Quite a bit of the story left to go, but I feel like I've basically got the game won now.

Classic is such a huge step up from Normal that it's like a different game. I absolutely have to stun aliens for their gear, because the stuff you have to buy eats up so much of your budget that you just can't pass up free plasma rifles. Resources and cash are really hard to manage in this one, and I ran with default weapons and armor seemingly forever before I got my firepower up. Doing this on Ironman would be super-hard since relatively small mistakes or even just unlucky rolls are catastrophic when you're that underpowered. Now I understand all the posts about how it took people 10+ tries before they beat Classic Ironman.

 
Just finished Bioshock. Wow. Might be a game I hold on to in order to get the DLC, which is rare for me as I like trading them in.

Did anyone replay it to see how many more things made sense? Without getting into spoilers, of course.

 
I would suggest simply putting ME1 on "easy" setting and blasting through only the main missions though. The side missions just aren't that fun. Unless you like driving round a big planet while in 2nd gear.
I liked them :shrug: but to each their own.
There are some side missions that really set up ME2. A lot dealing with Cerberus, etc. I never got the hate for ME1. It was fantastic. The whole journey, aside from the last, was just amazing. I think that was the real problem with the ending. You had an emotional connection to the universe, the characters, etc. It was like they had just served you an elegant 7-course meal, and for the dessert, they had an elephant crap on a plate and then they force feed you that.

 
ME2 gameplay was exponentially better than ME1, but I think ME1 is valuable because of the story, which at the end of the day, is the true strength of the series. At times though, ME1 was like pulling teeth. Ironically, ME2's overall story as relatively week and didn't do a lot to advance the main storyline, but it did do a ton with character development and backstories and whatnot.

I would recommend playing all 3, but I agree some of the ME1 sidestories weren't worth the time.

 
I guess I'm one of the few that thought one of the best parts of the original ME was driving around in the Mako looking for mineral deposits and wrecks. I really enjoyed that thing. It could go anywhere. Had a powerful main gun. But after playing ME2 for awhile, I can see why folks would think it was "clunky." But if you play the series in order, I don't think you'll feel it is "clunky" at all.

In ME2, I have yet to drive the vehicle. I am on a side quest where I have to use it for the first time. So maybe this weekend I can compare.

 
My first XCOM playthrough on Classic difficulty very nearly ended in disaster. I screwed up in the very first month by choosing $ over engineers, with the result being that I had no satellites at the end of the first month and only one at the end of month two. By the third month, I had lost every single country in Africa and South America (including my base -- a UFO shot down my preexisting satellite over Argentina; I don't know how the hell I was supposed to prevent that so early in the game). I was dangerously close to Game Over.

Fortunately I managed panic so as to keep all my losses contained to specific continents. Now I'm just a couple weeks away from getting satellites up over every remaining country but one, and I'll take care of that one next month. And I managed to get two snipers equipped with Double Tap and plasma sniper rifles, which means they're at that point where they absolutely wreck every alien that comes into their line of sight. And this is with the alien base mission coming up next. Quite a bit of the story left to go, but I feel like I've basically got the game won now.

Classic is such a huge step up from Normal that it's like a different game. I absolutely have to stun aliens for their gear, because the stuff you have to buy eats up so much of your budget that you just can't pass up free plasma rifles. Resources and cash are really hard to manage in this one, and I ran with default weapons and armor seemingly forever before I got my firepower up. Doing this on Ironman would be super-hard since relatively small mistakes or even just unlucky rolls are catastrophic when you're that underpowered. Now I understand all the posts about how it took people 10+ tries before they beat Classic Ironman.
Sniper development was key for me. Once I had two good ones most battles were a done deal as long as I stayed patient. Some of the missions you have enclosed spaces and it can get dicey for your snipes. The nice thing about Classic is the enemies are more aggressive which helps your overwatch. Instead of normal where they just camp out.

 
I guess I'm one of the few that thought one of the best parts of the original ME was driving around in the Mako looking for mineral deposits and wrecks. I really enjoyed that thing. It could go anywhere. Had a powerful main gun. But after playing ME2 for awhile, I can see why folks would think it was "clunky." But if you play the series in order, I don't think you'll feel it is "clunky" at all.

In ME2, I have yet to drive the vehicle. I am on a side quest where I have to use it for the first time. So maybe this weekend I can compare.
I loved the mako. They exploration honestly was what drew me in at first. I didn't know what to make of the story because it started fast and then tapered off a bit. The exploration of the galaxy to me was the best part of the early game. Obviously the story got really good after those first 2 main missions but the Mako gave me many hours of enjoyment.

 
I didn't mind the mako until about halfway through my second play through. After that a flip switched and I couldn't take it anymore. Not a bad mechanic but just a little too much of it IMO.

 
I didn't mind the mako until about halfway through my second play through. After that a flip switched and I couldn't take it anymore. Not a bad mechanic but just a little too much of it IMO.
I think I'm going to have enjoyed the Mako way more than I am mining planets. I spent today's play sessions mostly learning to move around the galaxy, knocking out a few easy side quests, and mining out three planetary systems I was in. The mining can eat some serious time if you really want to be thourough. And it seems to me that the minerals are going to be important enough that it is fairly necessary. But I am definitely settling in to the controls, the ship systems, etc. I died once because of being overly aggressive. But after the reload, I had no problem.

 
The mako was okay for combat, but exploring in the first game was incredibly boring. It was pretty much the same planet over and over, just textured differently.

 
The mako was okay for combat, but exploring in the first game was incredibly boring. It was pretty much the same planet over and over, just textured differently.
It was. But it was also 2007. Saved a lot of space doing that. They were different enough to be entertaining.

 
The Comedian said:
Just finished Bioshock. Wow. Might be a game I hold on to in order to get the DLC, which is rare for me as I like trading them in. Did anyone replay it to see how many more things made sense? Without getting into spoilers, of course.
Many of us have played through numerous times - something that I rarely ever do anymore. In fact I rarely even finish most games one time these days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Comedian said:
Just finished Bioshock. Wow. Might be a game I hold on to in order to get the DLC, which is rare for me as I like trading them in. Did anyone replay it to see how many more things made sense? Without getting into spoilers, of course.
Many of us have played through numerous times - something that I rarely ever do anymore. In fact I rarely even finish most games one time these days.
Bioshock ended a streak of not finishing games because of losing interest - I think it was about 5-6 games, with the exception of Arkham City right in the middle of that group.

 
The Comedian said:
The mako was okay for combat, but exploring in the first game was incredibly boring. It was pretty much the same planet over and over, just textured differently.
I guess that's true. Though I imagine most people that got bored with it did multiple playthroughs. I could see it really wearing thin then. For me though, I only played through once, and never got bored with that aspect of the exploration. Actually, now that I think about it though, each ship and most buildings on side quests were exactly the same also. I think that bothered me more than the repeated planetary surfaces.

 
I didn't mind the Mako, as someone said it lent itself to that grand feeling that you were exploring the galaxy aspect of the game. I was obsessed with finding every Ancient Asari writing and Prothean Data disc and all that other stuff. More annoying to me was the lack of variety in the building/ship layouts (same freaking container vessel over and over again) and the deciding to do the elevators instead of a load screen. It was a great idea in theory but watching your three characters just stand in elevator for 30 seconds listening to news stories got old fast. Nice idea instead of load screens, it just didn't work. I still think ME1 had the best story of the 3, but it's helped out by the fact its the original and was a fresh idea whereas the others are sequels. I was pretty disappointed in the story in ME2, it felt a lot less grand, like you were only visiting a much smaller portion of the galaxy and it was the seedy, underbelly at that. Although it was helped out by how much they expanded your team of characters with their own loyalty missions plus

that a lot of your teammates and even yourself could die was pretty cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Started ME1 last night. Interesting game so far, I like it. I had been playing the hell out of Borderlands 2 and before that Skyrim and this feels like much more of a slow burn, at least initially, than those two.

 
Started ME1 last night. Interesting game so far, I like it. I had been playing the hell out of Borderlands 2 and before that Skyrim and this feels like much more of a slow burn, at least initially, than those two.
Very different styles. Mass Effect is much more linear even with the side quests than BL2 or SR. But overall the story is infinitely better. I think you'll enjoy it.

 
I enjoyed driving around in the Mako in ME1 as well, but I understand that those of us that enjoyed it are in the minority. It was fun just checking out the new planetscapes.

I really wish they had just come up with a way to make that a little more diverse in ME2/3 instead of aborting it altogether.

But yea, it was interesting how the series evolved and while possibly my favorite series of all time, never really gave us that perfect blend of ME1 story and RPG elements with ME2/3 gameplay.

ME1 gameplay = meh

ME1 exploration = awesome

ME1 story = awesome

ME2 gameplay = awesome

ME2 exploration = non-existant

ME2 main story = meh

ME2 character stories = awesome

ME3 gameplay = awesomest

ME3 exploration = meh

ME3 main story = solid

It's pretty crazy the advances they made in gameplay between games. By the time we got to ME3 even if you removed the huge backstory, the RPG elements, the dialogue, the characters, the interweaving plot that moves from game to game based on your decisions from the last one, etc you'd still have probably one of the best pure shooters of this generation. The way that they were able to combine one of the most engaging universes/stories of any RPG alongside some of the best gameplay of any shooter is an almost exclusive feat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.

 
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
The game itself is really good. The ending was just really disappointing after all the hours you put into building your character to be the way you wanted it to be. But it doesn't take away from some of the best scenes and drama from all 3 games. Plus the gameplay is the best of the 3. The customization from 1 combined with the ease of control from 2.

If you played the first 2, you need to finish it up. Well worth it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
I liked the original ending. I also liked the endings they developed after the outrage (which I'm pretty sure you still need to download as DLC).

Win/win, IMO.

Another plus for ME3 is that it has a terrific soundtrack. We're talking John Williams Hollywood movie good.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
The game itself is really good. The ending was just really disappointing after all the hours you put into building your character to be the way you wanted it to be. But it doesn't take away from some of the best scenes and drama from all 3 games. Plus the gameplay is the best of the 3. The customization from 1 combined with the ease of control from 2. If you played the first 2, you need to finish it up. Well worth it.
We beat every angle of the ending to death in the ME3 thread, but here ill just remind any new players to make sure to DL the extended ending (if its not already included in the trilogy package). Had that been in place from the outset, there wouldn't have been massive Internet outrage over the issue.
 
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
The game itself is really good. The ending was just really disappointing after all the hours you put into building your character to be the way you wanted it to be. But it doesn't take away from some of the best scenes and drama from all 3 games. Plus the gameplay is the best of the 3. The customization from 1 combined with the ease of control from 2. If you played the first 2, you need to finish it up. Well worth it.
We beat every angle of the ending to death in the ME3 thread, but here ill just remind any new players to make sure to DL the extended ending (if its not already included in the trilogy package). Had that been in place from the outset, there wouldn't have been massive Internet outrage over the issue.
Exactly. Definitely make sure you download the new ending before ever seeing the old one. You'll be fine then.

 
Hmmmm...I kind of want to play through to the original ending to see what all the outrage is about before going on to the sanitized Shawshank ending.

 
My only words of advice (and I don't think I'm giving anything away here) is that the impact of your choices from the first two games is felt throughout ME3 in ways both big and small.

The problem people had was that the ending wasn't as influenced by those decisions as they were led to believe or interpreted on their own.

 
My only words of advice (and I don't think I'm giving anything away here) is that the impact of your choices from the first two games is felt throughout ME3 in ways both big and small.

The problem people had was that the ending wasn't as influenced by those decisions as they were led to believe or interpreted on their own.
I am not sure I understand this; do you mean this literally as in ME3 uses game save info from ME1 & 2 to alter the story you play?

 
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
I didn't get to the ending until they had released all the "fixes" and I loved the ending. I'm sure part of it is in people's heads. Once you've gotten a bad impression of the original ending some additions here and there aren't going to totally change your opinion. That disappointment can't be un-remembered.

Hmmmm...I kind of want to play through to the original ending to see what all the outrage is about before going on to the sanitized Shawshank ending.
As I understand it, the "new" ending isn't actually different, it just contains some additional scenes that fill in some large holes the original ending left out. Watching the old ending won't be different scenes, it will just be shorter.

 
My only words of advice (and I don't think I'm giving anything away here) is that the impact of your choices from the first two games is felt throughout ME3 in ways both big and small.

The problem people had was that the ending wasn't as influenced by those decisions as they were led to believe or interpreted on their own.
I am not sure I understand this; do you mean this literally as in ME3 uses game save info from ME1 & 2 to alter the story you play?
By the time you get to ME3 there are so many possible webs that your decisions from 1 & 2 don't drastically alter the main story. But yes, people that died in ME1/ME2 are still dead in ME3 (and since ANYONE could die in ME2 that can alter things quite a lot), smaller story points/directions are altered by decisions you made in previous games, etc.

Same idea as ME2 was to ME1.

 
My only words of advice (and I don't think I'm giving anything away here) is that the impact of your choices from the first two games is felt throughout ME3 in ways both big and small.

The problem people had was that the ending wasn't as influenced by those decisions as they were led to believe or interpreted on their own.
I am not sure I understand this; do you mean this literally as in ME3 uses game save info from ME1 & 2 to alter the story you play?
That's correct. The cutscenes and conflict resolutions (e.g. the Genophage, the Geth vs. Quarians) have differences based on your decisions from ME1&2.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm glad to hear a good review of ME3. I bought the trilogy and stopped after ME1-2 (to play GOW, needed some Kratos time) and I've been apprehensive about ME3 after reading angry reviews of the ending.
I didn't get to the ending until they had released all the "fixes" and I loved the ending. I'm sure part of it is in people's heads. Once you've gotten a bad impression of the original ending some additions here and there aren't going to totally change your opinion. That disappointment can't be un-remembered.

>Hmmmm...I kind of want to play through to the original ending to see what all the outrage is about before going on to the sanitized Shawshank ending.
As I understand it, the "new" ending isn't actually different, it just contains some additional scenes that fill in some large holes the original ending left out. Watching the old ending won't be different scenes, it will just be shorter.
The additional stuff is more of a post-script.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top