Video games...what ya playing? And what are you looking forward to? (8 Viewers)

[Chaka]

Out of the list you wrote...

Dark Souls

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Fallout 3: New Vegas

Fallout 3

Dragon Age Origins

Witcher 2

Dark Souls seems interesting but IIRC didn't people say it doesn't port very well to PC?

Place nutsack between two bricks. Bring bricks together rapidly. You've now had the Dark Souls experience. You're welcome.

Kinky.

 

[madshot31]

Out of the list you wrote...

Dark Souls

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Fallout 3: New Vegas

Fallout 3

Dragon Age Origins

Witcher 2

Dark Souls seems interesting but IIRC didn't people say it doesn't port very well to PC?

Place nutsack between two bricks. Bring bricks together rapidly. You've now had the Dark Souls experience. You're welcome.

Not true. Steep learning curve but once you know what you're doing and what equipment to use its actually shockingly easy.

Very similar to many online fps for non shooter gamers in respect that it provides a big learning curve and then clicks. After that point it can be easy for both types of games but until then it may seen very tough.

 

[NewlyRetired]

I am enjoying my early hours in Diablo 3 so far. The port to the PS3 looks very nicely done.

The only thing that I miss is leveling. I tend to enjoy having to make a choice when I level up, whether it be a skill choice or an attribute choice or something that makes me feel like I am controlling the growth of my character.

When I level in Diablo, I don't appear to have any choices outside of maybe unlocking a new skill every so often that I could choose to use.

 

[NewlyRetired]

Out of the list you wrote...

Dark Souls

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Fallout 3: New Vegas

Fallout 3

Dragon Age Origins

Witcher 2

Dark Souls seems interesting but IIRC didn't people say it doesn't port very well to PC?

Place nutsack between two bricks. Bring bricks together rapidly. You've now had the Dark Souls experience. You're welcome.

Not true. Steep learning curve but once you know what you're doing and what equipment to use its actually shockingly easy.

Very similar to many online fps for non shooter gamers in respect that it provides a big learning curve and then clicks. After that point it can be easy for both types of games but until then it may seen very tough.

I agree, I am an extremely weak game player but even I was able to get through Dark Souls and not just in a "damn I got lucky that time" type of feeling but in a "damn my character is better and I am a better player now" type of feeling.

Very satisfying game in that respect.

 

[TxBuckeye]

Out of the list you wrote...

Dark Souls

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Fallout 3: New Vegas

Fallout 3

Dragon Age Origins

Witcher 2

Dark Souls seems interesting but IIRC didn't people say it doesn't port very well to PC?

Place nutsack between two bricks. Bring bricks together rapidly. You've now had the Dark Souls experience. You're welcome.

Not true. Steep learning curve but once you know what you're doing and what equipment to use its actually shockingly easy.

Very similar to many online fps for non shooter gamers in respect that it provides a big learning curve and then clicks. After that point it can be easy for both types of games but until then it may seen very tough.

I agree, I am an extremely weak game player but even I was able to get through Dark Souls and not just in a "damn I got lucky that time" type of feeling but in a "damn my character is better and I am a better player now" type of feeling.

Very satisfying game in that respect.

I get the feeling it requires farming, as in you have to do it before you move on in places. That's the part I think I am missing. I try and move on when clearly I'm not ready to do so yet.

 

[SlaX]

HL2 Doesn't hold up.

I disagree. However, I'm biased considering it's my favorite series after Metroid and Zelda. With another Portal game, that may surpass Half-Life in the third spot. Which will we get first? Half-Life 3 or Portal 3? <insert "Valve can't count to three" joke here>

 

[SportsGuru311]

Really only pla PC games. I like the New Simcity allot and I also lay allot of roller coaster tycoon 3

 

[SlaX]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

 

[Insein]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

Do not play it for PC or you WILL hate it. I played it on XBox first and thought it was great. Picked it up during a steam sale a couple years ago for like $3 and the controls are awful. Had to play on easy just to survive the early enemies because my guy turned too slow.

 

[SlaX]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

Do not play it for PC or you WILL hate it. I played it on XBox first and thought it was great. Picked it up during a steam sale a couple years ago for like $3 and the controls are awful. Had to play on easy just to survive the early enemies because my guy turned too slow.

I think I found a fix for that when I started it up when I first got it. I only played through 30 minutes at the time. But anyway, I turned of V-sync and I think that did the trick. I'll check it again later. Possibly tomorrow night.

 

[Insein]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

Do not play it for PC or you WILL hate it. I played it on XBox first and thought it was great. Picked it up during a steam sale a couple years ago for like $3 and the controls are awful. Had to play on easy just to survive the early enemies because my guy turned too slow.

I think I found a fix for that when I started it up when I first got it. I only played through 30 minutes at the time. But anyway, I turned of V-sync and I think that did the trick. I'll check it again later. Possibly tomorrow night.

If I recall doing that turned it into barely playable from completely unplayable.

 

[TxBuckeye]

If anyone wants to buy or trade for a PS3 copy of Dark Souls, drop me a PM. I'll be out of town awhile starting Wednesday, but will keep an eye on the site if I can. Otherwise, I'll respond when I get back.

 

[Chaka]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

Do not play it for PC or you WILL hate it. I played it on XBox first and thought it was great. Picked it up during a steam sale a couple years ago for like $3 and the controls are awful. Had to play on easy just to survive the early enemies because my guy turned too slow.

I think I found a fix for that when I started it up when I first got it. I only played through 30 minutes at the time. But anyway, I turned of V-sync and I think that did the trick. I'll check it again later. Possibly tomorrow night.

If I recall doing that turned it into barely playable from completely unplayable.

I disagree. There were some limitations to DS1 but it was still highly playable. And the slow turning only happens while you are aiming and I think it may have been done on purpose to increase tension.

The PC controls in DS2 are incredibly fine tuned.

 

[Chaka]

Played Dead Space and now working through Dead Space 2. The first one had some fairly limited game play mechanics, which are significantly improved in DS2, but it really nailed the creepy ambiance. It will make you jump for sure.

Fun games with a very good story and highly creepy, definitely recommend.

Getting ready to start a play session for the month leading up to Halloween playing "horror" games. I have Dead Space 1 and 2 in my playlist along with Resident Evil 4 and Amnesia: The Dark Descent. I own all of these and either have only played through some of the game or haven't started them. Now's a good time. Aiming to be done by the release of Battlefield 4/Batman Arkham Origins.

Play Dead Space 1 at night with the lights off and the sound up. A 5.1 speaker set up would be nice too.

Why am I so hesitant to start this game? It's almost like I'm afraid I'm gonna hate it. Needless to say, I still haven't started it.

I was hesitant at first too, mostly because I thought it would be nothing more than a gore fest, but I couldn't have been more wrong. If you like good story driven games (ala Bioshock or ME3) then you will enjoy DS.

 

[Bull Dozier]

Haven't played FIFA since I think FIFA'10 on the Wii. Been thinking about getting a new one for the Xbox to play with my boys. We have a blast playing NBA2K the three of us on a team together. Is FIFA14 a huge step up from FIFA13, or should we save our money and get the older version?

 

[NCCommish]

So I downloaded Rainbow Six:Vegas because it was free. Controls are pretty confusing but the game play is kind of fun. I do like rappelling down the side of the building upside down and shooting people through windows. But the squad controls were really ticking me off. I think I'd like it better as a single player thing. I only want to worry about me. I love the lone wolf type approach. But I am going to try to get my head around the controls and see if I can't make it work. This is my first Clancy game I am hoping that once I get going the story is good.

 

[Sand]

So this weekend I finally finish the first real encounter with zombies (5 runners, one clicker) in the Downtown part of The Last of Us. It took me at least 75 tries. Good Lord I suck.

Love the game and ambiance. I figure there is about a 2% chance I have the ability to finish this, though.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I started off playing TLOU on hard and had to bump it down to Normal. Hard enough even with that.

And why does it take SO long to load?

It's a game that takes a while to get into. But I'm starting to really dig it.

 

[Arizona Ron]

So I played'm part of the Diablo 3 demo tonight. That game is sick. I'll hold off for the PS4 version but there is no way I'm not getting this.

After reading through a good bit of the guide, I have a feeling this game could break my record for most hours spent on a console game.

I can't wait to get it.

Diablo 3 was a huge let down. You'll beat it in a weekend and have zero interest in playing the same content at harder levels.

I don't consider beating a game playing the easiest level. For me beating a game is not only playing it at every level but also getting 100% trophy level.

I just recently played a game just like this on PC called Path of Exile and the repeatability did not bother me at all.

I'm playing it now on the 360, and really like it. It's a big game, with lots of options, and the classes play very differently. The constant influx of new gear and unlocking abilities keeps it very interesting.

Basically, it's exactly what you think it is. I'm surprised anyone is "let down" by it. AZ Ron, can you expand on this a bit? What were you expecting?

Blizzard makes pretty good games. Diablo II was fun and came out in 2000. When they announced that Diablo 3 was finally coming out after being developed for TEN YEARS I expected a lot more.

The world in Diablo III feels small and I didn't expect it to be as linier as it is. The professions seemed like a complete waste of time until Hell+ levels.

Also, I know that Diablo II was repeated content but I just expected Diablo III content so easy to run though after TEN YEARS.

It felt like they spent a solid two years on the game.

 

[Fly]

Am a couple hours in to Torchlight II. Holy #### this game is addicting. Loot heaven!

 

[jwb]

So I played'm part of the Diablo 3 demo tonight. That game is sick. I'll hold off for the PS4 version but there is no way I'm not getting this.

After reading through a good bit of the guide, I have a feeling this game could break my record for most hours spent on a console game.

I can't wait to get it.

Diablo 3 was a huge let down. You'll beat it in a weekend and have zero interest in playing the same content at harder levels.

I don't consider beating a game playing the easiest level. For me beating a game is not only playing it at every level but also getting 100% trophy level.

I just recently played a game just like this on PC called Path of Exile and the repeatability did not bother me at all.

I'm playing it now on the 360, and really like it. It's a big game, with lots of options, and the classes play very differently. The constant influx of new gear and unlocking abilities keeps it very interesting.

Basically, it's exactly what you think it is. I'm surprised anyone is "let down" by it. AZ Ron, can you expand on this a bit? What were you expecting?

Blizzard makes pretty good games. Diablo II was fun and came out in 2000. When they announced that Diablo 3 was finally coming out after being developed for TEN YEARS I expected a lot more.

The world in Diablo III feels small and I didn't expect it to be as linier as it is. The professions seemed like a complete waste of time until Hell+ levels.

Also, I know that Diablo II was repeated content but I just expected Diablo III content so easy to run though after TEN YEARS.

It felt like they spent a solid two years on the game.

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

 

[Arizona Ron]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

 

[jwb]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

 

[Bogeys]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

 

[madshot31]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

If you want to compare it to Skyrim then yes and no. They are completely different games. One is a open world do as you please rpg that can take years to beat. The other is a monster stomping loot driven rpg designed to be played many times at escalating difficulties. IMO they are both top of their classes for console and especially with Diablo III since there is almost nothing in the genre that functions properly. The functionality is flawless and has set the standard for games to come. It all depends if you like the style of game ala people comparing Call of Duty versus Gears of War, different strokes.

 

[jwb]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

 

[NewlyRetired]

Maybe it is just me, but I don't see any comparison in game play and style between Diablo III and Skyrim.

While they are both classified as action rpg's, they don't in any way feel similar to me.

I never played Diablo II so I can't compare but after about 10 hours into Diablo III, the game looks fun to me and I won't have any problems getting hundreds of hours out of this game.

 

[Arizona Ron]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

 

[Arizona Ron]

Maybe it is just me, but I don't see any comparison in game play and style between Diablo III and Skyrim.

While they are both classified as action rpg's, they don't in any way feel similar to me.

I never played Diablo II so I can't compare but after about 10 hours into Diablo III, the game looks fun to me and I won't have any problems getting hundreds of hours out of this game.

That's the point - The RPGs coming out now are so dynamic and Diablo III feels a decade behind them.

 

[Todem]

I started off playing TLOU on hard and had to bump it down to Normal. Hard enough even with that.

And why does it take SO long to load?

It's a game that takes a while to get into. But I'm starting to really dig it.

My favorite non sports game this generation. Right there with the Dead Space Series and Mass Effect series.

An instant classic.

Will get around to second playthrough next year. It is an exhausting experience.

Right now I am immersed with Madden 25 and NCAA 14 and I am starting my post season in my year one Yankees franchise on The Show 13.

Loving Red Dead Redemption and can't believe it took me this long to get around to it.

I really.....really want to start Dark Souls as my next non-sports game....and looks like I will in November.

Looking forward to Batman Arkham Origins as my last game purchase for this year. I love this series.

I will pick up GTA V next year on the cheap.

 

[Bogeys]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Okay, I get what you are saying now. I love the Diablo franchise and started playing it on a Windows95 (I don't think it was on 98) with the first Diablo and was hooked, but I haven't been excited for this one for some reason. Might be that I have migrated more towards shooters, but I burned many hours in Skyrim.

 

[NewlyRetired]

Maybe it is just me, but I don't see any comparison in game play and style between Diablo III and Skyrim.

While they are both classified as action rpg's, they don't in any way feel similar to me.

I never played Diablo II so I can't compare but after about 10 hours into Diablo III, the game looks fun to me and I won't have any problems getting hundreds of hours out of this game.

That's the point - The RPGs coming out now are so dynamic and Diablo III feels a decade behind them.

I don't know.

It just feels like a completely different game to me.

While Skyrim, Dark Souls and Diablo III all are based in RPG's, they are significantly different versions of RPG's, that each have their own pro's and cons.

Personally I like the variety. As good as Skyrim was, I would get tired of the identical game play every time I picked up an RPG.

 

[jwb]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

Jeez... it seems like you just want to argue/debate now.

Action RPG = Button masher = Diablo and it's like. Sacred, Dungeon Siege, Torchlight, etc. Top down camera / loot-fest / wave after wave of enemies / minimal story / multiplayer usually trumps single player / etc.

I'm sorry I even mentioned the word Skyrim, because the context is/was obviously lost.

 

[thecatch]

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

 

[Arizona Ron]

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

 

[Arizona Ron]

Jeez... it seems like you just want to argue/debate now.

Action RPG = Button masher = Diablo and it's like. Sacred, Dungeon Siege, Torchlight, etc. Top down camera / loot-fest / wave after wave of enemies / minimal story / multiplayer usually trumps single player / etc.

I'm sorry I even mentioned the word Skyrim, because the context is/was obviously lost.

Not arguing, just making a point that Blizzard hasn't evolved with the rest of the gaming community.

If you're having fun with Diablo III, have at it. Again, it's just a decade behind other RPGs.

 

[Run It Up]

The problem with game genres is the same problem with music genres. Different gameplay elements create completely different experiences and some would argue entirely new genres - this coupled with decades of misnomers makes for a lot of confusing nomenclature.

The reality is Action RPG is actually an expansive genre that covers a ton of games, its just that its typically used to refer to the hack and slash genre specifically. Why, I have no idea.

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

Why fix something that isn't broken, Starcraft is the best strategy game to have ever existed and Starcraft 2 is right there next to it, with Warcraft 2 bringing up the rear.

 

[jwb]

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

Jeez... it seems like you just want to argue/debate now.

Action RPG = Button masher = Diablo and it's like. Sacred, Dungeon Siege, Torchlight, etc. Top down camera / loot-fest / wave after wave of enemies / minimal story / multiplayer usually trumps single player / etc.

I'm sorry I even mentioned the word Skyrim, because the context is/was obviously lost.

Not arguing, just making a point that Blizzard hasn't evolved with the rest of the gaming community.

If you're having fun with Diablo III, have at it. Again, it's just a decade behind other RPGs.

If you want to lump all of these games that derived from DnD as simply "RPG's", then I do agree. But I didn't buy Diablo III expecting anything but a linear, button mashing, loot-driven, co-op multiplayer game. And it shines as that.

I did not expect any kind of deep story, open world, exploration, etc. That's simply not the (sub) genre it occupies.

I guess that's it - I see these RPG's as several different styles. I suppose some people don't.

 

[thecatch]

The problem with game genres is the same problem with music genres. Different gameplay elements create completely different experiences and some would argue entirely new genres - this coupled with decades of misnomers makes for a lot of confusing nomenclature.

The reality is Action RPG is actually an expansive genre that covers a ton of games, its just that its typically used to refer to the hack and slash genre specifically. Why, I have no idea.

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

Why fix something that isn't broken, Starcraft is the best strategy game to have ever existed and Starcraft 2 is right there next to it, with Warcraft 2 bringing up the rear.

Well, I got bored of SC2 a lot more quickly than I did 1, because I basically played the same to death 10 years earlier. But the bigger issue is that Blizzard has been a top 3 developer for decades but isn't making any new IP or dramatically advancing the genres in which it has a presence (at least since WoW, to my knowledge) That's a little disappointing given the bar they have set for themselves.

 

[Chaka]

Ok, I can see why you would feel let down then, but I also think that shows limitations of any particular genre. They prettymuch perfected it a decade ago - kill / loot / level - to the point where it can't change all that radically (the game has to be somewhat linear for balance). There have been a lot of action RPG's over the last five to seven years, all with the same basic structure, and Diablo III still outshines them all.

I don't see how it could be much better, really. But I also agree that if you were expecting a "Thief series to Dishonored" leap (or Morrowind to Skyrim), it will fall short.

So Diablo III is better than Skyrim?

??? How on earth do you get that?

I was simply making a comparison in series / genre "leaps" - if you were expecting a Morrowind to Skyrim kind of leap, (which it seems you were, by emphasizing the dev time), I could see why you'd be disappointed.

Not to speak for AR, but that is what I got from the bolded also.

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

I have never played any of the Diablo franchise but I would love to hear your list of 10 games.

 

[jwb]

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

I have never played any of the Diablo franchise but I would love to hear your list of 10 games.

This actually evolved into a pretty interesting topic.

If you want to include Skyrim, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Fallout, Dark Souls, etc, sure, there are a ton of "RPG's" better than Diablo III.

However, I definitely prefer not to lump them all into the moniker "rpg" and leave it at that. In my mind, the Diablo franchise occupies a fairly narrow space - multiplayer first, button mashing lootfest. You have the Sacred and Dungeon Siege franchises. There's the Baulder's gate console offerings, and the XBL Arcade games like Torchlight and such. You can even include the Marvel Ultimate Alliance games if you like. But that's prettymuch it. What else is there that you can realistically compare Diablo III to?

 

[NewlyRetired]

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

I have never played any of the Diablo franchise but I would love to hear your list of 10 games.

This actually evolved into a pretty interesting topic.

If you want to include Skyrim, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Fallout, Dark Souls, etc, sure, there are a ton of "RPG's" better than Diablo III.

However, I definitely prefer not to lump them all into the moniker "rpg" and leave it at that. In my mind, the Diablo franchise occupies a fairly narrow space - multiplayer first, button mashing lootfest. You have the Sacred and Dungeon Siege franchises. There's the Baulder's gate console offerings, and the XBL Arcade games like Torchlight and such. You can even include the Marvel Ultimate Alliance games if you like. But that's prettymuch it. What else is there that you can realistically compare Diablo III to?

Path of Exile is the closest I have seen (on pc, not console).

 

[jwb]

"action rpg's" = Diablo / Sacred / etc (button mashers).

That's what I meant. Diablo is prettymuch the top of that genre. I don't see how you could buy Diablo III and expect more than it's giving, that's all. They almost have nowhere to go with that genre.

Name some of these games you had in mind that aren't better than Diablo III. I can think of about 10 RPGs that came out in the last 5 - 7 years or so that are better than Diablo III

I have never played any of the Diablo franchise but I would love to hear your list of 10 games.

This actually evolved into a pretty interesting topic.

If you want to include Skyrim, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Fallout, Dark Souls, etc, sure, there are a ton of "RPG's" better than Diablo III.

However, I definitely prefer not to lump them all into the moniker "rpg" and leave it at that. In my mind, the Diablo franchise occupies a fairly narrow space - multiplayer first, button mashing lootfest. You have the Sacred and Dungeon Siege franchises. There's the Baulder's gate console offerings, and the XBL Arcade games like Torchlight and such. You can even include the Marvel Ultimate Alliance games if you like. But that's prettymuch it. What else is there that you can realistically compare Diablo III to?

Path of Exile is the closest I have seen (on pc, not console).

Yea, I was more or less thinking console, but you are correct. There's another one that was on PC... titan-something?

 

[NCCommish]

The problem with game genres is the same problem with music genres. Different gameplay elements create completely different experiences and some would argue entirely new genres - this coupled with decades of misnomers makes for a lot of confusing nomenclature.

The reality is Action RPG is actually an expansive genre that covers a ton of games, its just that its typically used to refer to the hack and slash genre specifically. Why, I have no idea.

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

Why fix something that isn't broken, Starcraft is the best strategy game to have ever existed and Starcraft 2 is right there next to it, with Warcraft 2 bringing up the rear.

I keep hearing that, and maybe I tried it too late, but I found it quite boring.

 

[IvanKaramazov]

I started off playing TLOU on hard and had to bump it down to Normal. Hard enough even with that.

And why does it take SO long to load?

It's a game that takes a while to get into. But I'm starting to really dig it.

Your second playthrough will be a lot easier even on a higher difficulty. Most areas can be stealthed once you know what's going on.

 

[Sand]

I'm sorry I even mentioned the word Skyrim, because the context is/was obviously lost.

Just for the record I understood what you meant when I read it.

I started off playing TLOU on hard and had to bump it down to Normal. Hard enough even with that.

And why does it take SO long to load?

It's a game that takes a while to get into. But I'm starting to really dig it.

Your second playthrough will be a lot easier even on a higher difficulty. Most areas can be stealthed once you know what's going on.

I did stealth that area.

Though, I will say, the next area was a lot more fun. Firebombs and flaming zombies =

 

[jwb]

I'm sorry I even mentioned the word Skyrim, because the context is/was obviously lost.

Just for the record I understood what you meant when I read it.

heh, thanks. It actually bugs me more than most, because I write for a living, and being clear is important

 

[Run It Up]

The problem with game genres is the same problem with music genres. Different gameplay elements create completely different experiences and some would argue entirely new genres - this coupled with decades of misnomers makes for a lot of confusing nomenclature.

The reality is Action RPG is actually an expansive genre that covers a ton of games, its just that its typically used to refer to the hack and slash genre specifically. Why, I have no idea.

Come to think of it, Starcraft 2 was basically just a Starcraft 1 remake too. Still a great game but I wonder if Blizzard has gotten complacent after printing money off of these franchises and Warcraft.

Why fix something that isn't broken, Starcraft is the best strategy game to have ever existed and Starcraft 2 is right there next to it, with Warcraft 2 bringing up the rear.

Well, I got bored of SC2 a lot more quickly than I did 1, because I basically played the same to death 10 years earlier. But the bigger issue is that Blizzard has been a top 3 developer for decades but isn't making any new IP or dramatically advancing the genres in which it has a presence (at least since WoW, to my knowledge) That's a little disappointing given the bar they have set for themselves.

In case you weren't aware, in 2007 Blizzard was acquired by Activision, they were mid development of SC2 and D3 at the time of the acquisition (which imo is likely the cause of most of the horrible design choices, although SC2 seems to have escaped most of them, but there were some) - that being said they have also been in production of two entirely new games that have been delayed several times:

Hearthstone, a free to play TCG based on the WoW TCG that is receiving rave reviews and looks pretty solid in my opinion will be released by next year I think and will go into open beta in October I think.

Blizzard All-stars, before Valve officially acquired the rights to DOTA 2, Blizzard All-stars was going to be a DOTA style game featuring heroes from all the Blizzard franchises - there have been multiple delays including a lawsuit with Valve over the rights of DOTA 2

But its not all doom and gloom for the developer, as Activision has been making a lot of solid decisions lately as well as Blizzard and most recently they are trying to become independent again from the majority owners - the infamous French media company Vivendi.

 

[Run It Up]

Based gaming overlord Gabe Newell presents: SteamOS

They said they were going to compete with Microsoft directly, they said they were going to beat Apple into the living room, and I doubted them.

I've never been happier to be wrong.

 

[fasteddie_21]

Valve = WIN!

Very, very excited about this!