What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vikings sign TE Visanthe Shiancoe (1 Viewer)

Minnesota Vikings: The Vikings signed former Giants tight end Visanthe Shiancoe to a five-year, $18.5 million deal, with $7 million guaranteed and $8.2 million in the first year. The Vikings also signed Vinny Ciurciu. Source: ESPN.comAm I missing something here.... 18.5-mill for a virtual after-thought of a TE?!??!?! This is some crazy market.
Why the hell can't I be a really crappy TE that is undersized who can't catch or block all that well but is a FA in 2007?
Cuz you'd rather be a .220 hitting backup 2nd baseman and make three times as much.
 
My point is that they paid him the money to use him. They aren't going to go out and get him and then say "Oh, but you know what? He was only ranked #10 in 2003. Nevermind." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. What matters is that the Viking braintrust (some would call that an oxymoron) has determined he's going to be their guy at TE, Childress offenses utilize the TE in the passing game, and that will translate into production. Not Gonzo or Heap prodution, but not Carolina Panther production either.
two words, Tarvaris Jackson.
Yeah, there's certainly that. The whole Minny aerial attack is a problem. It's worth noting though that their WR group is (as of now) the weakest in the league which may mean more TE utilization. Truth is, until this transaction came across the news VS (I don't even want to bother trying to spell his name) never would have entered my mind. So I'm not personally sol don anything about him. This for me is about reliance on the motives and tendencies of Childress, and the likely role VS has in their offense.
I've taken players in the past based upon the coaching staff's tendencies, and it hasn't worked out all that well for me. Maybe it will with Childress for you.
 
My point is that they paid him the money to use him. They aren't going to go out and get him and then say "Oh, but you know what? He was only ranked #10 in 2003. Nevermind." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. What matters is that the Viking braintrust (some would call that an oxymoron) has determined he's going to be their guy at TE, Childress offenses utilize the TE in the passing game, and that will translate into production. Not Gonzo or Heap prodution, but not Carolina Panther production either.
two words, Tarvaris Jackson.
Yeah, there's certainly that. The whole Minny aerial attack is a problem. It's worth noting though that their WR group is (as of now) the weakest in the league which may mean more TE utilization. Truth is, until this transaction came across the news VS (I don't even want to bother trying to spell his name) never would have entered my mind. So I'm not personally sol don anything about him. This for me is about reliance on the motives and tendencies of Childress, and the likely role VS has in their offense.
I've taken players in the past based upon the coaching staff's tendencies, and it hasn't worked out all that well for me. Maybe it will with Childress for you.
Nothing to lose. I cut my 20th guy on the roster for him. You know how it goes in these leagues. These 2 PPR TEs can be gold.Off to watch a movie. See ya Chuck. Hope the old bod is feeling good.
 
My point is that they paid him the money to use him. They aren't going to go out and get him and then say "Oh, but you know what? He was only ranked #10 in 2003. Nevermind." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. What matters is that the Viking braintrust (some would call that an oxymoron) has determined he's going to be their guy at TE, Childress offenses utilize the TE in the passing game, and that will translate into production. Not Gonzo or Heap prodution, but not Carolina Panther production either.
two words, Tarvaris Jackson.
Thats an even better reason to go after him.
I know what you're thinking, the ol' TE dump off for the bad QB. Somehow I don't think that will happen enough to warrent a roster spot for Mr. Vishante Shiancoe.
You still havent responded to my previous posts so I'll say it again.Why not take a flyer on the guy if you have the roster room? nobody is saying to drop your #3 wr for him but if i have a backup Def or Kicker or even a backup TE that has proven he stinks why not take a shot? seriously?
 
My point is that they paid him the money to use him. They aren't going to go out and get him and then say "Oh, but you know what? He was only ranked #10 in 2003. Nevermind." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. What matters is that the Viking braintrust (some would call that an oxymoron) has determined he's going to be their guy at TE, Childress offenses utilize the TE in the passing game, and that will translate into production. Not Gonzo or Heap prodution, but not Carolina Panther production either.
two words, Tarvaris Jackson.
Yeah, there's certainly that. The whole Minny aerial attack is a problem. It's worth noting though that their WR group is (as of now) the weakest in the league which may mean more TE utilization. Truth is, until this transaction came across the news VS (I don't even want to bother trying to spell his name) never would have entered my mind. So I'm not personally sol don anything about him. This for me is about reliance on the motives and tendencies of Childress, and the likely role VS has in their offense.
I've taken players in the past based upon the coaching staff's tendencies, and it hasn't worked out all that well for me. Maybe it will with Childress for you.
Nothing to lose. I cut my 20th guy on the roster for him. You know how it goes in these leagues. These 2 PPR TEs can be gold.Off to watch a movie. See ya Chuck. Hope the old bod is feeling good.
The new hip is doing well. You know what they say, "We can rebuild him", "We can make him better than he was before". :unsure:
 
My point is that they paid him the money to use him. They aren't going to go out and get him and then say "Oh, but you know what? He was only ranked #10 in 2003. Nevermind." Your opinion doesn't matter, nor does mine. What matters is that the Viking braintrust (some would call that an oxymoron) has determined he's going to be their guy at TE, Childress offenses utilize the TE in the passing game, and that will translate into production. Not Gonzo or Heap prodution, but not Carolina Panther production either.
two words, Tarvaris Jackson.
Thats an even better reason to go after him.
I know what you're thinking, the ol' TE dump off for the bad QB. Somehow I don't think that will happen enough to warrent a roster spot for Mr. Vishante Shiancoe.
You still havent responded to my previous posts so I'll say it again.Why not take a flyer on the guy if you have the roster room? nobody is saying to drop your #3 wr for him but if i have a backup Def or Kicker or even a backup TE that has proven he stinks why not take a shot? seriously?
Sure, why not :wink:
 
One of the arguments against Shiancoe in this thread is that he didn't do much when Shockey's been injured.

In Shiancoe's rookie season, he was considered a huge project with good measurables. They had another TE on the roster (Rivers I think), and when Shockey went down for the last 6-7 games, it was no surprise that Shiancoe wasn't the main guy.

Since then, Shockey has sat out the last week of each season which was useless each year, but hasn't missed any other games.

It seems like Shiancoe hasn't had a real chance to show anything.

If someone has watched him extensively in practices and preseason, I'd love to hear what they have to say.

 
One of the arguments against Shiancoe in this thread is that he didn't do much when Shockey's been injured.In Shiancoe's rookie season, he was considered a huge project with good measurables. They had another TE on the roster (Rivers I think), and when Shockey went down for the last 6-7 games, it was no surprise that Shiancoe wasn't the main guy.Since then, Shockey has sat out the last week of each season which was useless each year, but hasn't missed any other games.It seems like Shiancoe hasn't had a real chance to show anything.If someone has watched him extensively in practices and preseason, I'd love to hear what they have to say.
He played more than that and had more chances. You're right Rivers was clearly ahead of him. In fact Rivers did quite well then and closing the season 2 seasons ago with the Texans. Anyhow Shockey has had a bum ankle for a while now. There's been a few weeks where he didn't have his a game and Visanthe was looked to. Eli looked lost without Amani. When Tim Carter did well they didn't keep going to him, same with Tyree. Their passing O was horrible and well I still think Visanthe looked bad. He can get open on just about anyone with his combo of size and speed but suddenly he looks dopey. Concrete hands or routes way off or catching with his chest....just dopey.Remember David Patten in preseason? Visanthe's about the same, he rocks if he gets alot of passes. If it's just a couple here N there then he catches a diving one or somesuch and.....he's an all pro.He could be a "practice player" I suppose. The biggest thing the Vikes need to do is get him comfy in real games. Loads of talent to work with but ...I'd compare him to Kris Wilson in KC but ya know, when called upon Kris came thru this year. That's the difference there IMO. Otherwise probably quite similar
 
I am hoping the Vikings are right bringing Shiancoe in to be thier main TE.

However no matter how well he does there is no way I can think he was worth this ammount of money. It is bad business imho. This tells me that players do not want to sign in Minnesota and that the Vikings overpayed to keep him from visiting another team. I highly doubt another team would have made a similarly high offer to him even if they really liked him. He has done nothing to earn this kind of contract that I can see.

 
I did find this:

Tony Gonzalez's five-year contract includes $17.75 million guaranteed.

It's a record for NFL tight ends by a wide margin. The extension Antonio Gates signed in 2005 included roughly $10 million guaranteed; Jason Witten's included $12 million. Gonzo will also average $6.25 million-per-season in base pay and collect $18.75 million over the first three years. This contract could be a problem for the Chiefs by 2008.
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...nfl&id=1331Still looking for somthing more comprehensive on how much the elite TEs are making in the NFL today.

But 8.2 guaranteed is close to what Gates and Witten got on thier recent contracts. So this is a joke that Shiancoe is being paid this much for having done so little.

I can only hope he performs close to what Witten has done although I think that is unlikely.

ETA- Just to be clear Shiancoe is making 3.7 million over 5 years with 8.2 million being paid up front in 2007.

4 million/year is still quite a bit less than Gonzalez average of 6.25 million but it is getting ridiculously close compared to the other elite TEs in the league. He might be making more than Gates does.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vikes aren't spending this year. They need to get above the minimum salary cap. A definite sign that they're going with a young QB this year. Not sure if that's Travaris or drafted one? That's how I'm viewing this signing.

 
Vikes aren't spending this year. They need to get above the minimum salary cap. A definite sign that they're going with a young QB this year. Not sure if that's Travaris or drafted one? That's how I'm viewing this signing.
Agreed.The Vikings are writing this season off as a developmental year allready and just alocating enough money to reach the cap minimum. Pushing contracts forward to make more cap room in 2008 when there will not likely be as much compitition in FA.
 
So. Who do you think the Vikings should take with the #1 overall pick in the 2008 draft?

I personally think they should trade out of the spot and get more picks. I wonder if that's ever been thought of before...

:lmao:

 
I know Shiancoe has some potential (albeit limited), but the money the Vikes gave him is ridiculous, IMO. I'm not familiar with their front office structure so I'm wondering who to blame for this move. Either way, I thought Childress had a better grasp of things there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Minnesota Vikings: The Vikings signed former Giants tight end Visanthe Shiancoe to a five-year, $18.5 million deal, with $7 million guaranteed and $8.2 million in the first year. The Vikings also signed Vinny Ciurciu. Source: ESPN.comAm I missing something here.... 18.5-mill for a virtual after-thought of a TE?!??!?! This is some crazy market.
Just when I thought the Ovie Mughelli deal would be the most ridiculous of the off season the Vikes overpay for a guy most teams wouldn't take..I can tell you the Giants loved his athletic ability when he came out of the draft, but the best you can say about his TE play is he looks good in his uniform.
 
I don't understand the skepticism. Visanthe Shiancoe already leads the league in superfluous letters, so the sky for him is the limit as far as I'm concerned.

 
"...He can block and I think he can catch. So he gives you a little bit of everything." Childress quote.

 
"...He can block and I think he can catch. So he gives you a little bit of everything." Childress quote.
Yikes.In his defense, I don't think the Giants were sour on him at all. I think they liked him. And he can block, I am not sure where people got the impression he couldn't. He was the blocking tight end in two tight sets. Still, the money is a little puzzling.
 
So is Childress or any one else connected with the Vikings saying anything about this signing and why they gave Shiancoe comparable money to Gates for example?

Or are they all being quiet and hoping Viking fans don't really notice how much we have paid this guy?

 
Giant fans should be VERY happy. This should translate into a very nice compensatory pick.

Vikings fans should feel confident that they now have confirmed their suspicions of the Vikings' coach & GM's capability level.

 
JohnnyU said:
Tag said:
Jeff Pasquino said:
JohnnyU said:
OK, now be honest. How many of you ran out and picked this guy up in your dynasty league? Again, be honest.
You know two at least.....
JohnnyU must've been offline when the story broke :crazy:
I could still pick him up in 4 of 5 leagues. It doesn't look like there's a mad rush to pick him up.
I bid 50 on him in three Z leagues. I don't expect anything from him, but I'm always willing to spend 50 zbucks to hold a guy for awhile to see what happens in preseason.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top