jdoggydogg
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been meaning to check this out for a while.....still haven't seen it.Awesome. Watched the original with the parents last weekend. Great movie, holds up really well.
It's excellent. Stone's best work IMO. What's really cool about it is that the fashion and culture is VERY 80's. WHen it came out it was "current." Now, the movie looks like it could be released tomorrow as an 80's period piece. That's what I mean by holding up well.I've been meaning to check this out for a while.....still haven't seen it.Awesome. Watched the original with the parents last weekend. Great movie, holds up really well.
Like a lot of Stone's movies, it doesn't necessarily age well. But Douglas' character is a great icon, and all the performances are really enjoyable.I've been meaning to check this out for a while.....still haven't seen it.Awesome. Watched the original with the parents last weekend. Great movie, holds up really well.
I agree that it's a bad idea on paper. But I must say that the trailer is really entertaining.No idea why they would make a sequel. Loved the original, but a terrible idea IMO.
I think it ages perfectly. Cocaine in the limo, big cell phones, old school computer monitors. Daryl Hannah's stupid hat with beads hanging off of it. It takes about 5 minutes to realize that the movie is set in NYC on Wall Street in the 1980s.jdoggydogg said:Like a lot of Stone's movies, it doesn't necessarily age well. But Douglas' character is a great icon, and all the performances are really enjoyable.eoMMan said:I've been meaning to check this out for a while.....still haven't seen it.Abraham said:Awesome. Watched the original with the parents last weekend. Great movie, holds up really well.
I agree. I don't see why they would make a sequel other than pure money grab.Abraham said:Great movie, holds up really well.
Are you kidding? With the public's current bipolar relationship with Wall Street, as in they love Wall Street as long as their 401ks keep going up but loathe Wall Street with the rampant greed and bailouts and bonuses, it's a brilliant idea to make a sequel.Course it could suck if the plot isn't up to snuff, but I have hopes it could be good.Michael Fox said:No idea why they would make a sequel. Loved the original, but a terrible idea IMO.
Don't get me wrong. I love the movie. I just think that Stone's movies are almost always zeitgeists.I think it ages perfectly. Cocaine in the limo, big cell phones, old school computer monitors. Daryl Hannah's stupid hat with beads hanging off of it. It takes about 5 minutes to realize that the movie is set in NYC on Wall Street in the 1980s.jdoggydogg said:Like a lot of Stone's movies, it doesn't necessarily age well. But Douglas' character is a great icon, and all the performances are really enjoyable.eoMMan said:I've been meaning to check this out for a while.....still haven't seen it.Abraham said:Awesome. Watched the original with the parents last weekend. Great movie, holds up really well.
I wonder if there's a scene where Shia and his buddies are sitting around watching and quoting "Boiler Room."
I'm all for it - one of the things that made the original so good (IMO) was that the main protagonist (Wall Street and the stock market) was displayed with some depth. YOu can watch the movie with a cursory knowledge of the stock market. But if you really enjoy the nuances of trading then you can "pick up" all kinds of things on repeated viewings. I like films like that. I just hope the new one has some brains that way and isn't simply a "thriller" (it's apparently a murder mystery thing).
Good luck with that.This movie will be an abomination.Abraham said:I'm all for it - one of the things that made the original so good (IMO) was that the main protagonist (Wall Street and the stock market) was displayed with some depth. YOu can watch the movie with a cursory knowledge of the stock market. But if you really enjoy the nuances of trading then you can "pick up" all kinds of things on repeated viewings. I like films like that. I just hope the new one has some brains that way and isn't simply a "thriller" (it's apparently a murder mystery thing).
Why would he have brought that to prison?That was just a gratuitous shot by Stone.Sarnoff said:they included the brick cell phone. Was hoping for that.
"What are you eating over there, a little tube steak smothered in underwear?"I wonder if there's a scene where Shia and his buddies are sitting around watching and quoting "Boiler Room."
I agree. I don't think Stone would have made this movie without a good script and a good plot in place.Oliver Stone really doesn't have a history of blatant money grabs. Cases could be made about his recent World Trade Center and W films, but I think they were more pieces focused on Oliver getting his opinion out, which again looks like the case here. He's not the type of guy to just pump films out for the hell of it, this is the first sequel he has ever been involved in and I doubt he's broke.It will be interesting even if he has to force ridiculousness, it will be twisted, and it will piss some people off, that's Mr. Stone and I love him for it.Greed is good.
YUP, he has a part in the movieIs Carlos Estevez making an appearance in this flick?
Why would he have brought that to prison?That was just a gratuitous shot by Stone.they included the brick cell phone. Was hoping for that.
Good point...and I like a lot of his work. I guess I am skeptical of how good this can be. I hope I am pleasantly suprised.Oliver Stone really doesn't have a history of blatant money grabs. Cases could be made about his recent World Trade Center and W films, but I think they were more pieces focused on Oliver getting his opinion out, which again looks like the case here. He's not the type of guy to just pump films out for the hell of it, this is the first sequel he has ever been involved in and I doubt he's broke.It will be interesting even if he has to force ridiculousness, it will be twisted, and it will piss some people off, that's Mr. Stone and I love him for it.Greed is good.
Good move on their part. Tax time leaves everyone frazzled.Delayed, moving from an April release to September 24th.
Ruh Roh. September is where bad movies go to die.Delayed, moving from an April release to September 24th.
Not nearly as bad as a Jan/February release. I'm not worried yet.Ruh Roh. September is where bad movies go to die.Delayed, moving from an April release to September 24th.
Unless they heavily edited it and reshot most of the film, this is incorrect. The plot centers on the murder orbs hedge fund manager. Josh brolin is the bad guy. Gecko works to redeem himself by helping the kid "get" brolin.newteech said:Watching the previews of this, I think it looks ridiculous. They must have offered Michael Douglas a truckload of money to reup.It looks like they're going to copy the exact same story from the first film. Gecko mentors a young broker who in the end discovers Gecko is evil and turns on him. Oh and a woman comes between them.I loved Wall Street but this looks like an abortion.
pantherclub said:how does shia lebouf keep getting acting jobs?
I want to beat Shia Lebouf with a tire iron
pantherclub said:how does shia lebouf keep getting acting jobs?
I am skeptical. No way this is as good as the first simply because the passage of time. I am sure Douglas will be good, but Shia? This wreaks of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Spielberg is just as highly touted as Stone, and look what he put together. Stone may put out the exact same ridiculous movie. It will be hard to make the original parts anything but caricatures of themselves.pantherclub said:how does shia lebouf keep getting acting jobs?![]()