What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Warren Sapp Out BountyGate WhistleBlower (1 Viewer)

This isn't "football"--this is intentionally injuring human beings, rewarding it and celebrating it. It's not murder but it's disgusting.
Freaking hilarious...Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
It's the difference between a sanctioned MMA event and you telling your buddy you'll give him some cash if he starts a bar fight.Then lying about a possible bar fight. Then being told not to do it by the authorities. Then doing it, lying about it again, convincing others to cover it up, and then getting busted red handed with an e-mail and other incriminating information.

So yes, it's freaking hilarious (that you fail to understand the difference).
I guess you failed to read the post I was commenting on.. Because he said none of this^ nonsense..

 
Shockey, Sapp and Vilma all went to the U...wonder if that's just a coincidence or if there's a little something more to this that lead Sapp to throwing Shockey under the bus here...wouldn't bother me one bit if this got Sapp booted off of the NFL Newtwork either...
How does he not get canned? He is on the NFL payroll and he exposed an alleged whistle blower. I hope it bankrupts this clown.
Well, AFTER Sapp tweeted that it was Shockey he went on the NFLN and talked about it. So if Sapp is going down, so are the people that condoned his action by then rewarding him with airtime to talk about it.
 
Kluwe said it best.

@chriswarcraft: It's rant time! Hold on tight boys and girls. It's about to get dangerous in here.
@chriswarcraft: To everyone who thinks the source was a "snitch" and a bad person - #### you. #### you and your glorification of criminality.
@chriswarcraft: #### you and your degradation of ethics and morality. #### you and your short-sighted, narrow-minded hypocrisy. #### you and your idiocy.
@chriswarcraft: Try doing the right thing for once and standing up for what's important in life - the proper treatment of your fellow man.#####ing#######s
 
Why is someone a dirtbag if they report something going on that is against the rules, something the team was warned to stop doing and refused?
Here ya go.
I guess that works if you're a criminal or sociopath.
It works if you've ever been part of a team/family, or have experienced camaraderie. Shockey went to battle with all those guys week in and week out. I'd imagine that they trusted him. Oh well.
What if he had a buddy or ex-teammate that had a bounty placed on them?
Wasn't Shockey's teammate (Cam Newton) one of the QB's the Saints had a bounty on?
 
Kluwe said it best.

@chriswarcraft: It's rant time! Hold on tight boys and girls. It's about to get dangerous in here.
@chriswarcraft: To everyone who thinks the source was a "snitch" and a bad person - #### you. #### you and your glorification of criminality.
@chriswarcraft: #### you and your degradation of ethics and morality. #### you and your short-sighted, narrow-minded hypocrisy. #### you and your idiocy.
@chriswarcraft: Try doing the right thing for once and standing up for what's important in life - the proper treatment of your fellow man.#####ing#######s
Kluwe can come play/punt for the Steelers anytime.
 
at first I was really surprised that someone could understand what warren sapp actually said. then i saw he tweeted it and i understood

 
From what I understood it was opposing teams such as the Vikings that complained enough to initiate the investigation. So if there was a "whistleblower" it was someone just providing corroborating evidence. In other words, being honest after the investigation had already begun.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was waiting for the guy who would compare telling on a murder of someone family and football....head to different extremes much?
This isn't "football"--this is intentionally injuring human beings, rewarding it and celebrating it. It's not murder but it's disgusting.
Freaking hilarious...Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
:goodposting: I know, I see a lot of "high and mighty" views in here. The hit on Warner was clean, I dont care who hit him and if he got paid extra. It was clean, as a matter of fact i have seen very few dirty hits.

Its ok to complain when a player gets $1500 to make a hit on a player and hurt him, but its no big deal to sign Mario williams to a gazillion dollar contract to do the same thing. I'm sure some naive people will say he is not trying to hurt people, then i will laugh at you. We have been told since kids to hit a player to make him not get up.

The high fake moral ground is whats disgusting. Go ahead lay into me for disagreeing with you, call me names and tell me how stupid I am, blah blah blah.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"I made him a household name and $42 million," Sapp said. "What's the problem here? I still don't understand. You wouldn't know who Chad Clifton is if it wasn't for me. But now I'm so vile that I put a block on the guy?

"Really? C'mon. Stop it."

Sapp offered his take.

"In the trenches, we play a different game," he said. "We play a game that none of you are familiar with. We do things to each other that only linemen are allowed to do to each other.

"He needed his head on a swivel. He understands that now."

 
Shockey, Sapp and Vilma all went to the U...wonder if that's just a coincidence or if there's a little something more to this that lead Sapp to throwing Shockey under the bus here...wouldn't bother me one bit if this got Sapp booted off of the NFL Newtwork either...
How does he not get canned? He is on the NFL payroll and he exposed an alleged whistle blower. I hope it bankrupts this clown.
Well, AFTER Sapp tweeted that it was Shockey he went on the NFLN and talked about it. So if Sapp is going down, so are the people that condoned his action by then rewarding him with airtime to talk about it.
Of all the things we get on the media about we get on them for calling out a snitch who has had a bad rep not only in college but in the pros? :confused: Is this a sensitivity circle or footballguys.com?
 
From what I understood it was opposing teams such as the Vikings that complained enough to initiate the investigation. So if there was a "whistleblower" it was someone just providing corroborating evidence. In other words, being honest after the investigation had already begun.
I believe it was more like... the NFL investigated after the Vikings especially, and also maybe the Cardinals, made allegations based on what happened in their games in 2009. The NFL investigated but the Saints staff and players concealed what was going on well enough the NFL didn't find all the hardcore evidence they have now. The NFL told the Saints to knock it off and closed the investigation in 2010.Then after the 2010 season was over, someone with knowledge of the bounty program went to the NFL and gave specifics that let them find the paper trail and bust the whole thing open.So without the whistle blower, we're probably not having this discussion today.
 
On Sapp... was never much of a fan of him as a player because I wasn't much of a fan of him as a person.

I've actually enjoyed having him on NFLN because at times he almost turns into the anti-diva and will say things bluntly that you'll never hear from a Michael Irvin or Deon Sanders.

But this was just an idiotic move on many levels, especially exposing himself legally.

I hope PFT is right and he got the name wrong.

 
Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
I see what you did there. Maybe you should chock it up to experience.Ok, no more spelling police from me. Seriously folks, this "code of honor" crap is just crap. It's one thing to protect your school buddy from getting caught sneaking into class late. It's another entirely when something illegal is involved.

I still go back to this: Injuries are a part of football, but they're the byproduct of a violent game. Injuries shouldn't be tools to use in the pursuit of victory. Yes, there's a fine line, but it's a line nonetheless.

Whoever the whistleblower is, they deserve anonymity. Sapp deserves to be fired (and I expect he will be.)

And I will enjoy the NFL network more because of his absence.

 
Why is someone a dirtbag if they report something going on that is against the rules, something the team was warned to stop doing and refused?
If he'd reported it while he was with the Saints, then you can argue it was a moral or ethical stand. Instead he waits until he goes to a division rival--making it something much different.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?

 
Kluwe said it best.

@chriswarcraft: It's rant time! Hold on tight boys and girls. It's about to get dangerous in here.
@chriswarcraft: To everyone who thinks the source was a "snitch" and a bad person - #### you. #### you and your glorification of criminality.
@chriswarcraft: #### you and your degradation of ethics and morality. #### you and your short-sighted, narrow-minded hypocrisy. #### you and your idiocy.
@chriswarcraft: Try doing the right thing for once and standing up for what's important in life - the proper treatment of your fellow man.#####ing#######s
Kluwe can come play/punt for the Steelers anytime.
:goodposting: GG Kluwe.#### Sapp. Hopefully this feud between him and Shockey ends in a cage.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
It's bad to out whistle blowers because it stops others from coming forward in future when organizations are breaking the law.If you don't even have proof it's the right person then your accusation is defamatory.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Read these two articles. There are multiple reasons there, but especially note the example of fan violence against someone they felt wronged their team.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/06/nfl-needs-to-protect-the-saints-snitch/http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/21/nfl-outs-suspected-saints-whistleblower-on-its-own-network/
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Read these two articles. There are multiple reasons there, but especially note the example of fan violence against someone they felt wronged their team.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/06/nfl-needs-to-protect-the-saints-snitch/http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/21/nfl-outs-suspected-saints-whistleblower-on-its-own-network/
Sapp needs to go.
 
On Sapp... was never much of a fan of him as a player because I wasn't much of a fan of him as a person.I've actually enjoyed having him on NFLN because at times he almost turns into the anti-diva and will say things bluntly that you'll never hear from a Michael Irvin or Deon Sanders.But this was just an idiotic move on many levels, especially exposing himself legally. I hope PFT is right and he got the name wrong.
Even if he got the name wrong, Shockey is in a position to claim damages against Sapp and the NFL.
 
I was waiting for the guy who would compare telling on a murder of someone family and football....head to different extremes much?
This isn't "football"--this is intentionally injuring human beings, rewarding it and celebrating it. It's not murder but it's disgusting.
Freaking hilarious...Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
:goodposting: I know, I see a lot of "high and mighty" views in here. The hit on Warner was clean, I dont care who hit him and if he got paid extra. It was clean, as a matter of fact i have seen very few dirty hits.

Its ok to complain when a player gets $1500 to make a hit on a player and hurt him, but its no big deal to sign Mario williams to a gazillion dollar contract to do the same thing. I'm sure some naive people will say he is not trying to hurt people, then i will laugh at you. We have been told since kids to hit a player to make him not get up.

The high fake moral ground is whats disgusting. Go ahead lay into me for disagreeing with you, call me names and tell me how stupid I am, blah blah blah.
Could I just buy you a Fresca and tell ya everything is gonna be OK?
 
Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
I see what you did there. Maybe you should chock it up to experience.Ok, no more spelling police from me. Seriously folks, this "code of honor" crap is just crap. It's one thing to protect your school buddy from getting caught sneaking into class late. It's another entirely when something illegal is involved.

I still go back to this: Injuries are a part of football, but they're the byproduct of a violent game. Injuries shouldn't be tools to use in the pursuit of victory. Yes, there's a fine line, but it's a line nonetheless.

Whoever the whistleblower is, they deserve anonymity. Sapp deserves to be fired (and I expect he will be.)

And I will enjoy the NFL network more because of his absence.
Internet was down and was posting from my phone.. autocorrect.. :shrug:
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Read these two articles. There are multiple reasons there, but especially note the example of fan violence against someone they felt wronged their team.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/06/nfl-needs-to-protect-the-saints-snitch/http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/21/nfl-outs-suspected-saints-whistleblower-on-its-own-network/
I think the insinuation that some nutball fan is going to go kill Shockey now is a little absurd. I don't recall anyone fearing for Eric Mangini's life.That said, I get it now. It makes sense if you view the NFL and its teams as a company, which they are. If people working for Countrywide had tried to report their company's wrongdoing, there's obvious and good reasons why they should be kept anonymous. Same in the NFL.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Federal Law down?
I'd be happy to check out whichever federal law Sapp violated here. Thanks in advance for posting it.
It was in the linked article...maybe read the subject of this thread before commenting in it?
Federal labor law protects employees against retribution as result of complaining about unsafe work environments. The fact that Sapp, an analyst for the NFL Network, might have outed a whistle-blower could pose a problem for Sapp and the league, Los Angeles-based employment lawyer Arthur Whang told FOXSports.com.“Sapp is technically a league employee,” said Whang, the principal of the Whang Law Firm. “If Shockey is the whistle-blower, he is protected. So, by outing him, Sapp may have opened Shockey up to retaliation, such as someone not signing him.”The 1970 Occupational Safety and Health Act specifically addresses whistle-blower retaliation:“No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this act or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this act.”
 
Anyone that thinks "snitches get stitches" is funny or somehow a legitimate point of view is either a scumbag gang member or someone that is sheltered enough to not understand the devastation and innocent lives lost caused by this philosophy in the inner cities. I'd love to send some violent drug dealers to your neighborhood so that you can get some perspective.

 
Anyone that thinks "snitches get stitches" is funny or somehow a legitimate point of view is either a scumbag gang member or someone that is sheltered enough to not understand the devastation and innocent lives lost caused by this philosophy in the inner cities. I'd love to send some violent drug dealers to your neighborhood so that you can get some perspective.
In the suburbs, our Drug dealers are mostly non-violent white kids. :)
 
Anyone that thinks "snitches get stitches" is funny or somehow a legitimate point of view is either a scumbag gang member or someone that is sheltered enough to not understand the devastation and innocent lives lost caused by this philosophy in the inner cities. I'd love to send some violent drug dealers to your neighborhood so that you can get some perspective.
This is a football forum... Lighten up
 
Why is someone a dirtbag if they report something going on that is against the rules, something the team was warned to stop doing and refused?
If he'd reported it while he was with the Saints, then you can argue it was a moral or ethical stand. Instead he waits until he goes to a division rival--making it something much different.
Well that certainly changes what the Saints did. Roger! Call off the sanctions!
 
Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
I see what you did there. Maybe you should chock it up to experience.Ok, no more spelling police from me. Seriously folks, this "code of honor" crap is just crap. It's one thing to protect your school buddy from getting caught sneaking into class late. It's another entirely when something illegal is involved.

I still go back to this: Injuries are a part of football, but they're the byproduct of a violent game. Injuries shouldn't be tools to use in the pursuit of victory. Yes, there's a fine line, but it's a line nonetheless.

Whoever the whistleblower is, they deserve anonymity. Sapp deserves to be fired (and I expect he will be.)

And I will enjoy the NFL network more because of his absence.
very :goodposting: especially the bolded.

 
I don't know all the alegations of Sapp and Shockey, etc but in general:

As Business Law teaches us, The truth is always a vaiable defense. So if something was being done wrong and it was reported, regardless of motive, then it is just and proper. Actually, a case could be made that the person who brought it forth is more honarable than the guys that knew and kept silent because you can talk about "codes" as much as you want, all those things pale in comparison to what is legal, moral, and ethical.

And that is just what this is: Sometimes we miss things when people make extreme examples to make their point but the reality is there is no defense for supporting a stance that literally can end a person's career, negatively impact their quality of life, or end their life.

If there is a "code" to follow in the NFL, it not the "keep quiet when guys are trying to make a thousand dollars by getting the John Deere Tracker/stretcher on the field at another guy's expense". The code to follow is to be professional, be a good teammate (which doesn't mean cover up stuff), and be respectful to the game, yourself, and others. We have seen many many times, hard fought, nasty hitting games WITHIN THE RULES that, when over, the competitors embrace each other, tell one another "good luck" in following weeks, etc. When a player is significantly injured on a field, you commonly see players form both sides comforting the person, praying for them, etc.

You hear players talking all the time that there is a "brotherhood" in the NFL. We all know that, yes we fight with our brothers and sisters, but there IS a line that you don't cross with your brothers; your family. The REAL code in the NFL is understanding just how precarious their entire livelihood is and understanding their responsibility.

The old Uncle Ben to Spiderman line might be cheesy but it fits here: "With great power comes great responsibility." That is fitting here. There is a responsibility these men have in playing by the rules and not being so irresponsible, wreckless, and immature in that they are basically willing to cause life-long injuries to people in exhchange for enough bucks to buy the new iPad.

The real sad fact in all this, if its true about Shockey, is that he will be villanized by some when he should be lauded. But unfortunately some people don't understand that he may have just inderectly saved someone's life; maybe theirs. And the person who reports the wrongdoing should always be protected and remain anonymous because if soemthing happens or he catches backlash, then it doesn't encourage the next guy to do what's right the next tiem something comes up. And its hard to do the right thing; even harder when it appears you will be punished for doing it.

And Sapp, (again if this is all true), well he is a media guy and in some sense you could say he was "reporting". Question the methods, etc, but at the end of the day, if its factual, then it was reported. All that does is seal his own fate as a media person because people won't talk to him in confidence as freely. So be it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JB just said on the news it wasn't a former player who blew the whistle, it was a former employee under Sean Payton that did it.

 
I don't know all the alegations of Sapp and Shockey, etc but in general:

As Business Law teaches us, The truth is always a vaiable defense. So if something was being done wrong and it was reported, regardless of motive, then it is just and proper. Actually, a case could be made that the person who brought it forth is more honarable than the guys that knew and kept silent because you can talk about "codes" as much as you want, all those things pale in comparison to what is legal, moral, and ethical.

And that is just what this is: Sometimes we miss things when people make extreme examples to make their point but the reality is there is no defense for supporting a stance that literally can end a person's career, negatively impact their quality of life, or end their life.

If there is a "code" to follow in the NFL, it not the "keep quiet when guys are trying to make a thousand dollars by getting the John Deere Tracker/stretcher on the field at another guy's expense". The code to follow is to be professional, be a good teammate (which doesn't mean cover up stuff), and be respectful to the game, yourself, and others. We have seen many many times, hard fought, nasty hitting games WITHIN THE RULES that, when over, the competitors embrace each other, tell one another "good luck" in following weeks, etc. When a player is significantly injured on a field, you commonly see players form both sides comforting the person, praying for them, etc. You hear players talking all the time that there is a "brotherhood" in the NFL. We all know that, yes we fight with our brothers and sisters, but there IS a line that you don't cross with your brothers; your family. The REAL code in the NFL is understanding just how precarious their entire livelihood is and understanding their responsibility.

The real sad fact in all this, if its true about Shockey, is that he will be villanized by some when he should be lauded. But unfortunately some people don't understand that he may have just inderectly saved someone's life; maybe theirs. And the person who reports the wrongdoing should always be protected and remain anonymous because if soemthing happens or he catches backlash, then it doesn't encourage the next guy to do what's right the next tiem something comes up. And its hard to do the right thing; even harder when it appears you will be punished for doing it.

And Sapp, (again if this is all true), well he is a media guy and in some sense you could say he was "reporting". Question the methods, etc, but at the end of the day, if its factual, then it was reported. All that does is seal his own fate as a media person because people won't talk to him in confidence as freely. So be it.
:goodposting: Not that I agree with everything you had to say there, but very well written and well thought out response.

 
I don't know all the alegations of Sapp and Shockey, etc but in general:

As Business Law teaches us, The truth is always a vaiable defense. So if something was being done wrong and it was reported, regardless of motive, then it is just and proper. Actually, a case could be made that the person who brought it forth is more honarable than the guys that knew and kept silent because you can talk about "codes" as much as you want, all those things pale in comparison to what is legal, moral, and ethical.

And that is just what this is: Sometimes we miss things when people make extreme examples to make their point but the reality is there is no defense for supporting a stance that literally can end a person's career, negatively impact their quality of life, or end their life.

If there is a "code" to follow in the NFL, it not the "keep quiet when guys are trying to make a thousand dollars by getting the John Deere Tracker/stretcher on the field at another guy's expense". The code to follow is to be professional, be a good teammate (which doesn't mean cover up stuff), and be respectful to the game, yourself, and others. We have seen many many times, hard fought, nasty hitting games WITHIN THE RULES that, when over, the competitors embrace each other, tell one another "good luck" in following weeks, etc. When a player is significantly injured on a field, you commonly see players form both sides comforting the person, praying for them, etc. You hear players talking all the time that there is a "brotherhood" in the NFL. We all know that, yes we fight with our brothers and sisters, but there IS a line that you don't cross with your brothers; your family. The REAL code in the NFL is understanding just how precarious their entire livelihood is and understanding their responsibility.

The real sad fact in all this, if its true about Shockey, is that he will be villanized by some when he should be lauded. But unfortunately some people don't understand that he may have just inderectly saved someone's life; maybe theirs. And the person who reports the wrongdoing should always be protected and remain anonymous because if soemthing happens or he catches backlash, then it doesn't encourage the next guy to do what's right the next tiem something comes up. And its hard to do the right thing; even harder when it appears you will be punished for doing it.

And Sapp, (again if this is all true), well he is a media guy and in some sense you could say he was "reporting". Question the methods, etc, but at the end of the day, if its factual, then it was reported. All that does is seal his own fate as a media person because people won't talk to him in confidence as freely. So be it.
:goodposting: Not that I agree with everything you had to say there, but very well written and well thought out response.
x2.
 
I was waiting for the guy who would compare telling on a murder of someone family and football....head to different extremes much?
This isn't "football"--this is intentionally injuring human beings, rewarding it and celebrating it. It's not murder but it's disgusting.
Freaking hilarious...Every NFL game is chalked full of people intending to hurt other human beings...
:lmao:
:goodposting: I know, I see a lot of "high and mighty" views in here. The hit on Warner was clean, I dont care who hit him and if he got paid extra. It was clean, as a matter of fact i have seen very few dirty hits.

Its ok to complain when a player gets $1500 to make a hit on a player and hurt him, but its no big deal to sign Mario williams to a gazillion dollar contract to do the same thing. I'm sure some naive people will say he is not trying to hurt people, then i will laugh at you. We have been told since kids to hit a player to make him not get up.

The high fake moral ground is whats disgusting. Go ahead lay into me for disagreeing with you, call me names and tell me how stupid I am, blah blah blah.
Could I just buy you a Fresca and tell ya everything is gonna be OK?
Cool response. Many valid points you just made. Kudos to you. I love FBG for the comedy it offers in certain threads. Watching people cry and complain over someone snitching on a snitch is just funny and ironic.Saying Sapp should get fired for reporting something, really, I wonder if everyones morals are the same behind their four walls.

Actually can you get me that Fresca while I watch all these fake football ANALysts report their opinion which no one reads anyways, unless its a response to their own comment. The only reason every thread is full of hate and nothing positive, unless its complimenting a mod, is because the people who disagree will never post because they do not want to deal with the childish insults that come their way for disagreeing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, I went to an extreme to prove a point. Ok, how about this. Someone stole a picture of your family from your desk at work. Wouldn't you want a co-worker to tell you who did it? Is that innocent enough for you, or do you need every possible example spelled out? And I'd say intentionally trying to hurt someone, potentially ending their career or worse, is serious enough. But hey, I'm not a tough guy that thinks snitches are scum and if you're doing something wrong it's ok as long as you don't get caught.
:goodposting: Agree 100%
 
Sure, I went to an extreme to prove a point. Ok, how about this. Someone stole a picture of your family from your desk at work. Wouldn't you want a co-worker to tell you who did it? Is that innocent enough for you, or do you need every possible example spelled out? And I'd say intentionally trying to hurt someone, potentially ending their career or worse, is serious enough. But hey, I'm not a tough guy that thinks snitches are scum and if you're doing something wrong it's ok as long as you don't get caught.
:goodposting: Agree 100%
But it wasnt a picture, or a murder, or a even $10 dollars - it was a guy calling out a bitter rat/snitch who cried because he got cut. Keep trying to compare football, a game played by millionaires, to everyday life. Good luck.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Think it was lame of Sapp to "out" Shockey as the "snitch". First of all, it's just hearsay and Sapp said he didn't check the facts, but he believed his source. Secondly, Sapp has repeatedly said that they should be punished and that there was no place for this kind of thing in football. By calling Shockey a snitch, he's saying that even though it's wrong, nothing should be said about it. Thirdly...Hey Sapp :potkettle: for snitching on Shockey.
 
I'm genuinely at a loss as to why this would be something that Sapp should not report. This isn't like a witness against the mafia, can someone explain to me why this is such a bad thing?
Think it was lame of Sapp to "out" Shockey as the "snitch". First of all, it's just hearsay and Sapp said he didn't check the facts, but he believed his source. Secondly, Sapp has repeatedly said that they should be punished and that there was no place for this kind of thing in football. By calling Shockey a snitch, he's saying that even though it's wrong, nothing should be said about it. Thirdly...Hey Sapp :potkettle: for snitching on Shockey.
FYI...What Sapp did is in no way snitching.
 
Sure, I went to an extreme to prove a point. Ok, how about this. Someone stole a picture of your family from your desk at work. Wouldn't you want a co-worker to tell you who did it? Is that innocent enough for you, or do you need every possible example spelled out? And I'd say intentionally trying to hurt someone, potentially ending their career or worse, is serious enough. But hey, I'm not a tough guy that thinks snitches are scum and if you're doing something wrong it's ok as long as you don't get caught.
:goodposting: Agree 100%
But it wasnt a picture, or a murder, or a even $10 dollars - it was a guy calling out a bitter rat/snitch who cried because he got cut. Keep trying to compare football, a game played by millionaires, to everyday life. Good luck.
Pretty sure it was a guy snitching on the wrong snitch. :loco: :rolleyes:
 
Sure, I went to an extreme to prove a point. Ok, how about this. Someone stole a picture of your family from your desk at work. Wouldn't you want a co-worker to tell you who did it? Is that innocent enough for you, or do you need every possible example spelled out? And I'd say intentionally trying to hurt someone, potentially ending their career or worse, is serious enough. But hey, I'm not a tough guy that thinks snitches are scum and if you're doing something wrong it's ok as long as you don't get caught.
:goodposting: Agree 100%
But it wasnt a picture, or a murder, or a even $10 dollars - it was a guy calling out a bitter rat/snitch who cried because he got cut. Keep trying to compare football, a game played by millionaires, to everyday life. Good luck.
So these football players don't exist in everyday life? How about the guys living with mental illness or depression because of the brain injuries they've suffered? Or the ones living with crippling pain from the injuries they've suffered? Yes, the sport is an inherently violent sport, but intentional injury is outside of the game of football. Trying to add more pain and misery to someone's life after football than what they'll already suffer is disgusting.But hey, they're rich. Screw the rich. Amiright?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top