Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Let’s see how the board views him
Last edited by a moderator:
In between for sureI think it’s somewhere between those two options. While I don’t think he’s terrible, I’ve seen enough of him to make the determination that he’s not the guy I’d want as the face of my franchise. It has to be a gut punch everytime Browns fans see him on yet another commercial.
If those are my only two options, I’m going to vote the one that he’s terrible.
He’s Andy Dalton - which isn’t necessarily the insult it seems to be. Still not particularly high praise.In between for sure
I like Dalton more than Mayfield, but it’s not a bad comp.’He’s Andy Dalton - which isn’t necessarily the insult it seems to be. Still not particularly high praise.
I probably should have had a middle option in the poll. I don’t think I can edit it now, but posting it in response gets that discussion going.we’re going to need a “if things break just right they can win with him but he’s highly unlikely to put the franchise on his shoulders for a season or longer “ option
What was the excuse the years before that?Hard to judge as he played with a broken shoulder last season.
What was the excuse the years before that?
keep in mind the kid had 2 of his first years absolutely slaughtered by hue and kitchens. welcome to the pros, kid.
It’s not asinine in the slightest.This is a really asinine poll.
Its basically surmising that you are either Mahomes/Allen etc. or you suck with no middle ground. By this logic there are only like 6-8 good QB's in the NFL.
A fair take.I don't think he's TERRIBLE.
I don't think he's special.
There has been a ton of "Baker is better than you realize" chatter online and on Twitter. I think he's average to a little better than average. And no one's going to convince me otherwise until he does it on the field.
If I'm building a team tomorrow, I'd rather have Ryan Tannehill. I'd rather have Carr. I'd rather have Cousins.
I don't think Baker is "The Problem." But I'm also not sold he's "The solution."
And under the right circumstances (good defense, good running game, good playcalling…etc) you can win with those quarterbacks. The difference is the margin of error to make it work is small. Baker had a healthy and productive 2020. They smashed Pitt in the wild card and lost a very close game to the Chiefs in Arrowhead the next week. Ball bounces a different way they could have easily contended for the Super Bowl that year and who knows how Baker would have been regarded differently at that point. Not giving him a pass for last years injury ridden debacle, but I do want to see if a healthy Baker looks more like the 2020 version.I don't think he's TERRIBLE.
I don't think he's special.
There has been a ton of "Baker is better than you realize" chatter online and on Twitter. I think he's average to a little better than average. And no one's going to convince me otherwise until he does it on the field.
If I'm building a team tomorrow, I'd rather have Ryan Tannehill. I'd rather have Carr. I'd rather have Cousins.
I'm 100% for player critiques, But the logic behind the options is basically that you either are an elite stud, or you are "the problem" and I think its a lot more complicated than that.It’s not asinine in the slightest.
The question is straightforward. Do you believe Mayfield is the problem, or not?
You’ve been making excuses for the guy on here for days now. You actually inspired the question, so…thanks!
I can get on board with this. I'd take all 3 of those guys over Mayfield, especially Tannehill.I don't think he's TERRIBLE.
I don't think he's special.
There has been a ton of "Baker is better than you realize" chatter online and on Twitter. I think he's average to a little better than average. And no one's going to convince me otherwise until he does it on the field.
If I'm building a team tomorrow, I'd rather have Ryan Tannehill. I'd rather have Carr. I'd rather have Cousins.
I don't think Baker is "The Problem." But I'm also not sold he's "The solution."
The logic is asking the question about this specific player. I’m not asking about every QB. I’m asking if Mayfield is the problem in CLE.I'm 100% for player critiques, But the logic behind the options is basically that you either are an elite stud, or you are "the problem" and I think its a lot more complicated than that.
Then why not make that an option? You made a poll that not even yourself feel comfortable voting onI agree he’s somewhere in the middle.
Then I would answer no, I don't think Mayfield is a terrible QB the Browns need to move on from, but I also don't think he's terrific and about to lead the Browns to a Super Bowl.The logic is asking the question about this specific player. I’m not asking about every QB. I’m asking if Mayfield is the problem in CLE.
At this point in his career, after the body of evidence we have, I think it’s a fair question.
I agree he’s somewhere in the middle. I put him closer to JimmyG than I do Pat Mahomes. I’ve seen him make head-scratchingly terrible decisions (like JimmyG) and I’ve seen him play at a decent level at times as well.
Will he ever be more than JimmyG?
Again, just because there are two options in the poll doesn’t mean you can’t express another one.
I agree with this take more than any.I think there's been enough going on around him and with him that it's difficult to tell. Unfortunately, it gets to the point where the "why" a guy can't put it together ceases to matter. It only matters that he can't (or didn't). He's nearing that checkpoint in his career.
I made it a binary - already said I probably should have.Then why not make that an option? You made a poll that not even yourself feel comfortable voting on![]()
I won't pick a Mayfield v Carr battle, but strongly disagree about Baker v most QB's in that tier. Baker has shown glimpses of being a guy capable and willing to put the team on his back whereas most of that tier showed some time ago that they can't (i.e. Cousins). Give me the volatile option with a Jimmy G floor over known mediocrity.I don't think he's TERRIBLE.
I don't think he's special.
There has been a ton of "Baker is better than you realize" chatter online and on Twitter. I think he's average to a little better than average. And no one's going to convince me otherwise until he does it on the field.
If I'm building a team tomorrow, I'd rather have Ryan Tannehill. I'd rather have Carr. I'd rather have Cousins.
I don't think Baker is "The Problem." But I'm also not sold he's "The solution."
At the moment, I think the Browns do need to move off of him. This year could convince me otherwise, but I won’t hold my breath. I’ve seen more bad out of him than good & I'm not sure AC is the answer to what ails him - in a run 1st offense, Cooper could become an irritant.Then I would answer no, I don't think Mayfield is a terrible QB the Browns need to move on from, but I also don't think he's terrific and about to lead the Browns to a Super Bowl.
I would prefer Mayfield to Jimmy G.
Ya he's probably in the 20's.As many of said somewhere in between. If I was ranking starting top 32 QB's in the league he'd be in the 20's. He's got a good arm and movement skills but for reasons I'm not entirely sure has not been able to work around his size limitations as well as some other smaller QB's have recently done. Biggest weakness so far has been that I literally don't think he can see down the field well while in the pocket.
But what QB would that be? There's none out there. Easy to say "draft one", but odds of hitting on one better than him are not that high, plus you're giving up a stud at another position.At the moment, I think the Browns do need to move off of him. This year could convince me otherwise, but I won’t hold my breath. I’ve seen more bad out of him than good & I'm not sure AC is the answer to what ails him - in a run 1st offense, Cooper could become an irritant.
Time will tell. I see the Browns as a QB away from winning it all.
That’s probably fair as well. Carr for whatever reason seems unwilling to take risks. I’m not sure if he’s shell shocked like his brother, or if he doesn’t trust himself, or his receivers - he looked better with Ruggs, but when he was gone & Waller fell off the map, Carr seemed to regress.I won't pick a Mayfield v Carr battle, but strongly disagree about Baker v most QB's in that tier. Baker has shown glimpses of being a guy capable and willing to put the team on his back whereas most of that tier showed some time ago that they can't (i.e. Cousins). Give me the volatile option with a Jimmy G floor over known mediocrity.
That’s a question for another subject. Could they have brought in Russell Wilson when he was available?But what QB would that be? There's none out there. Easy to say "draft one", but odds of hitting on one better than him are not that high, plus you're giving up a stud at another position.
Maybe, but they would have had to give up a ton to get Wilson. And you yourself have been critical of his play over the last couple years.That’s a question for another subject. Could they have brought in Russell Wilson when he was available?
if I’m the Browns, I probably make a big push for that.
But they didn’t, likely because they had that 5th year option.
good article. Not sure I completely agree, but it was a good read - thanks for sharing.This article best describes what I think about him right now.
i have - he’s not been as adept at escaping pressure and improvising, which was such an important part of his game in past seasons with that shaky OL. Theoretically in CLE (as is the hope in Denver) the OL will afford him enough protection/time that the step he’s lost in mobility isn’t as necessary.Maybe, but they would have had to give up a ton to get Wilson. And you yourself have been critical of his play over the last couple years.
Don’t disagree. Just basic math says there are 15 players in that “top 15”, and that leaves 17 teams without one.Just think it's harder to acquire a top 15 qb than people think. Literally the majority of the league doesn't have one.
I would agree with this, although this list is simply a who’s who of mediocre to terrible starting QB’s around the league. I think an argument can be made that Jimmy G is better, although I would not agree.Darnold, Teddy, Goff, Wentz, Tua, Winston, D.Jones, Hurts, Roethlisberger, Garoppolo, Heinicke
The main theme of the article is Baker is tough and has strong internal fortitude. Most players in the league have those qualities. So do lots of practice squad guys. But you still need Brett Favre's arm to be Brett Farve. The argument that he's tough and has a lionheart doesn't do much towards making the playoffs if the talent and accuracy are lacking.This article best describes what I think about him right now. The market has over corrected on him based on what happened as 2021 went along, but what happens in 2022 (and future years) when a similar hurdle emerges? Is he too head strong for his own good or will he heed the lessons learned from this past year.
That was my takeaway as well. The “there’s still hope for him” wasn’t clear - hope for what? Continued mediocrity, or continued toughness?The main theme of the article is Baker is tough and has strong internal fortitude. Most players in the league have those qualities. So do lots of practice squad guys. But you still need Brett Favre's arm to be Brett Farve. The argument that he's tough and has a lionheart doesn't do much towards making the playoffs if the talent and accuracy are lacking.
None of Wilson, Rodgers, nor Watson were ever coming here. It's fodder for those needing clicks during slow news season. The question is if the alternatives beyond them are worth considering a move. And they're not.That’s a question for another subject. Could they have brought in Russell Wilson when he was available?
if I’m the Browns, I probably make a big push for that.
But they didn’t, likely because they had that 5th year option.
a fair response. This poll, like any other, was intended to inspire thought / conversation.Chose not to vote.
Mostly because I don't feel Mayfield is the main problem in Cleveland.
Interesting take. I’m not sure I agree, but it’s certainly thoughtful, and worth discussing.I think the main reason for Cleveland's current run of mediocrity is a failure to capitalize on their players strengths. More often than not the Browns game plans simply don't take advantage of those strengths. They need to form an offensive philosophy that does, consistently. Same on defense I suppose but I notice it more on the offensive side of the ball. I think Mayfield would be a superb on-field general if his supporting cast was utilized to its maximum potential. That requires a big adjustment on the part of the coaching staff. A committed one also.
Rodgers, no - I felt he’d stay with the packers regardless.None of Wilson, Rodgers, nor Watson were ever coming here. It's fodder for those needing clicks during slow news season. The question is if the alternatives beyond them are worth considering a move. And they're not.
What was the excuse the years before that?
Talent isn't the issue. I think his accuracy issues returned due to the injuries. He never successfully adjusted his mechanics around them. Too tough for his own good aside my main concern with him is in his progressions. May have been a product of lack of trust in Beckham and spacing created by the rest of them though.The main theme of the article is Baker is tough and has strong internal fortitude. Most players in the league have those qualities. So do lots of practice squad guys. But you still need Brett Favre's arm to be Brett Farve. The argument that he's tough and has a lionheart doesn't do much towards making the playoffs if the talent and accuracy are lacking.
They have no trade clauses. They weren't ever coming here.Rodgers, no - I felt he’d stay with the packers regardless.
Wilson - not sure.
Watson? Might be possible. Would absolutely be an upgrade.
This is in the vein of “if the 49ers can make 1 SB & one NFCC with JimmyG, the Browns should be able to do that with Mayfield”.He's mediocre (minus maybe) and with that running game it almost feels like enough. The rub is that it isn't. Cleveland need a hero. Not one special player is running to the Browns to be apart of the uprising. Not one. Some can and will be bought. It will not be enough ever. Until they get a QB that can inspire some sense of renown it will be more of the same. That's all you need to know as of right now.