What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Watson vs Williams value (1 Viewer)

Torew

Footballguy
If Rudi is out for a couple more weeks how much does that bump Watson?

Anyone have an update on Rudi Johnson? Didn't see the post on the injury but have now.

Also how much value does D. Williams have in CAR with Foster running decent?

Foster is prone to his yealry injury.

So who would be the better HC?

What other hand cuff would have good value with what we have seen so far?

Besides the obvious - Young and Leonard.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Rudi is out for a couple more weeks how much does that bump Watson?Anyone have an update on Rudi Johnson? Didn't see the post on the injury but have now.Also how much value does D. Williams have in CAR with Foster running decent?Foster is prone to his yealry injury.So who would be the better HC? What other hand cuff would have good value with what we have seen so far?Besides the obvious - Young and Leonard.
Rudi missed practice again today. Palmer says that Watson will get plenty of carries Sunday.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I should have put it different, With what you will find on waivers what 2nd string RB will have more imp[act through the end of the year, In this case if you had Williams would you drop him for Watson or would you hold onto WIlliams gambling that he will get his turn soon. Or what 2nd string RB's, that has a chance on being on waivers, do you think might have more value than these 2.

 
I would hold onto Deangelo, although it won't get any easier to run the ball in Carolina with Carr at QB. Foster could go down at any time and I think I read something about Perry eligible to return for Cincy, but do a search to double check his status this year. I don't think Watson holds much long term value.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top