Is it your belief that he should have never been arrested?
How is this tragedy political?
Wow you are really a cynical person. Unreal man.
I was simply responding to a poster who was commenting on the Rams Green Bay game this weekend. 2 human beings having a normal side conversation about an upcoming game. No sinister plot, no political motivations. Just normal people having a normal quick football conversation on a, ya know, football message board. Relax bro, there no boogie man round the corner here.
Yeah it’s easy when you message is Guns and America! A little tougher when you are actually trying to have some nuance.
I think Sabertooth may have hit a nerve. Did you want to address his statement about the Republican party of 2014 compared to now, or just deflect. Do you believe that the Republicans have not played up to the Radicals during the Trump years?
So white "woke liberals" are driving anti-white rhetoric? You realize that wanting everyone to have equality doesn't equal anti-white, right?1. The guy was at least partially driven by a lot of the anti-white rhetoric pushed by the woke liberals.
2. BLM has pushed for bail reform with lower bails. This guy is released on a ridiculously low bail for his crimes. He should have been locked up instead of being out killing people.
Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, QanonWhich radicals do you find were played to?
And what does he consider people like Boebert? Look at her recent comments about Ihan Omar. To ever claim only one party has radicals is to ignore the truth.I think Sabertooth may have hit a nerve. Did you want to address his statement about the Republican party of 2014 compared to now, or just deflect. Do you believe that the Republicans have not played up to the Radicals during the Trump years?
So white "woke liberals" are driving anti-white rhetoric? You realize that wanting everyone to have equality doesn't equal anti-white, right?
And BLM has caused lower bails? Like that hasn't been an issue long before BLM was even a thing? And when did BLM become the boogeyman for the right?
I have to say jon, you seem to live in a very different world than most of us. Most of us white guys look around, see the major power positions in society as completely dominated by white men, and realize that being a white guy is nothing but an advantage in this world. Your "anti-white/woke liberal" crusade is simply a fantasy. One I don't understand how anyone could possibly believe. What levels of power in this country aren't dominated by white men?
Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Qanon
How many non-whites are in Congress? How about governors? And we just had a black president? WAT?Lol...wokism is the exact opposite of equality. It is different rules for different groups. It is extremely prejudice against certain people. People of color are good-hearted folks who are victims, white folks are evil power-hungry oppressors. It is an absolute sickening political movement born of hate.
As far as power positions, we just have had a black president. I have a black school buddy who is a federal judge on the DC federal court of appeals. The Supreme Court has women, a Hispanic and an African American on it. There are African American generals, admirals, and CEOs. Sports, music and entertainment are dominated by people of color. There are more black millionaires in the US than the rest of the world combined. Sure not every position in the US has equal representation, but the biggest obstacles these days are within the groups. It is the victim mentality and a refusal to look within and do something about the crime-ridden inner-cities. We will only have a harmonious society when all people are respected and treated as equals and all people have a mentality of self-empowerment and personal responsibility.
This victim mentality which blames other races for their problem was the exact same formula used by some of the most evil authoritarian movements in history. There is nothing positive about the politically-correct wokism which dominates the ideology of modern liberalism.
Why the laughing emoji @BladeRunner?How many non-whites are in Congress? How about governors? And we just had a black president? WAT?
How many non-whites run Fortune 1000 companies? How many are presidents of colleges?
And sports, music, and entertainment are dominated by people of color? Jon your perception is really skewed. Whites dominate every aspect of life other than the NBA and NFL. Sure there's stupid wokism going on now, I agree with that and don't find it helpful. But to suggest that whites are somehow at a disadvantage is simply silly.
The inner cities are certainly an issue that needs to be addressed. But they've been an issue for decades and have nothing to do with a victim mentality.
Woke people never use the term "equality.". That's for people like me, who live in a world flavored by classical liberalism, which includes everybody from Hillary Clinton to Mitt Romney.So white "woke liberals" are driving anti-white rhetoric? You realize that wanting everyone to have equality doesn't equal anti-white, right?
And BLM has caused lower bails? Like that hasn't been an issue long before BLM was even a thing? And when did BLM become the boogeyman for the right?
I have to say jon, you seem to live in a very different world than most of us. Most of us white guys look around, see the major power positions in society as completely dominated by white men, and realize that being a white guy is nothing but an advantage in this world. Your "anti-white/woke liberal" crusade is simply a fantasy. One I don't understand how anyone could possibly believe. What levels of power in this country aren't dominated by white men?
Ok I agree. Do you believe that whites are now discriminated against and at a disadvantage in our country due to wokism?Woke people never use the term "equality.". That's for people like me, who live in a world flavored by classical liberalism, which includes everybody from Hillary Clinton to Mitt Romney.
The preferred woke term is "equity," which sounds similar to the uninitiated but is explicitly about treating people unequally.
Yes he should have been arrested. But once the evidence is reviewed in an impartial way, it would be clear that no case was there to make. The prosecutors were either pressured into bringing it to trial or did so on their own for reasons other than the law.Is it your belief that he should have never been arrested?
Yes he should have been arrested. But once the evidence is reviewed in an impartial way, it would be clear that no case was there to make. The prosecutors were either pressured into bringing it to trial or did so on their own for reasons other than the law.
So white "woke liberals" are driving anti-white rhetoric? You realize that wanting everyone to have equality doesn't equal anti-white, right?
And BLM has caused lower bails? Like that hasn't been an issue long before BLM was even a thing? And when did BLM become the boogeyman for the right?
I have to say jon, you seem to live in a very different world than most of us. Most of us white guys look around, see the major power positions in society as completely dominated by white men, and realize that being a white guy is nothing but an advantage in this world. Your "anti-white/woke liberal" crusade is simply a fantasy. One I don't understand how anyone could possibly believe. What levels of power in this country aren't dominated by white men?
Ok I agree. Do you believe that whites are now discriminated against and at a disadvantage in our country due to wokism?
Most of the time when people are talking about the topic, it's %s, not raw #s.Or you're just incredibly bad at math. There are 234 Million whites. there are 40 million blacks. 50 million Hispanics. Of course there will be more whites in all positions.
On the bolded - Please don't speak for me. I am not part of your silver spoon fed white guilt.
Most of the time when people are talking about the topic, it's %s, not raw #s.
She just called out that she married her brother to get around immigration law. How is that radical?And what does he consider people like Boebert? Look at her recent comments about Ihan Omar. To ever claim only one party has radicals is to ignore the truth.
And what does he consider people like Boebert? Look at her recent comments about Ihan Omar. To ever claim only one party has radicals is to ignore the truth.
Not saying we do. We will disagree on root causes, but I am not advocating doing the bolded.Plain and simple, less people equals less qualified people. Its BASIC math. If you want to get into the percentages then we have to talk about single parenthood, same race crime, lower test scores and so so forth. Those things all need to be addressed and healed. You can't just start at the top and lop off the head and think the body will follow.
She made a terrorism joke about her. I dont know if I would say it was radical, but it was certainly not ok.She just called out that she married her brother to get around immigration law. How is that radical?
She made a terrorism joke about her. I dont know if I would say it was radical, but it was certainly not ok.
How many non-whites are in Congress? How about governors? And we just had a black president? WAT?
How many non-whites run Fortune 1000 companies? How many are presidents of colleges?
And sports, music, and entertainment are dominated by people of color? Jon your perception is really skewed. Whites dominate every aspect of life other than the NBA and NFL. Sure there's stupid wokism going on now, I agree with that and don't find it helpful. But to suggest that whites are somehow at a disadvantage is simply silly.
The inner cities are certainly an issue that needs to be addressed. But they've been an issue for decades and have nothing to do with a victim mentality.
Lauren Boebert said she was recently in a Capitol elevator with Ilhan Omar when a fretful Capitol police officer ran up. Lauren Boebert said: “Well, she doesn’t have a backpack. We should be fine.” Boebert then called Ilhan Omar, “jihad squad.”She made a terrorism joke about her. I dont know if I would say it was radical, but it was certainly not ok.She just called out that she married her brother to get around immigration law. How is that radical?
So basically half of what a true representative % would be.You think my perception is skewed? You asked how many non-whites are in congress:
About a quarter of voting members (23%) of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate are racial or ethnic minorities, making the 117th Congress the most racially and ethnically diverse in history.
Seems like a reasonable number. You could argue it should be a little more, but we are close and the trend is in that direction. As far as Presidents, your argument is asinine. Of course this country presidents pre-1960's were white. We were still a country which was based on highly discriminatory policies. But in the three decades which followed, those policies were eliminated and we added many policies which protected the rights of minorities and outlawed discriminatory practices. In the last five elections we elected a black president twice and a black VP.
So you as a white man are at a disadvantage in the US. Give me an example from your life please.100%
Man, white guilt if we acknowledge that white men have an advantage in this country?Or you're just incredibly bad at math. There are 234 Million whites. there are 40 million blacks. 50 million Hispanics. Of course there will be more whites in all positions.
On the bolded - Please don't speak for me. I am not part of your silver spoon fed white guilt.
Thanks for your responsesAbsolutely. They should have investigated it, questioned him and let him go. They filed charges before the bodies were cold despite everything pointing towards legal self-defense.
Again....the only reason leftist rags are taking the 'high' road is because it is their side who has blood on their hands in this story. It is very embarrassing that their justice reform (lower bail for Black assailants) directly lead to 6 deaths and nearly 50 injuries. It is very embarrassing someone who supports their pet movement, BLM committed such horrific act. It is embarrassing that this is a black on white terrorist assault. Flip the facts, and it is 100 percent guaranteed that the left politicized the facts to a far greater extend than what Fox is doing. Guarant ####### teed. At least in this case the stories are factual. In the Rittenhouse case the left had to repeatedly and shamelessly lie to make it political.
So basically half of what a true representative % would be.
Now do Fortune 1,000 companies, college presidents, etc.
Thanks for your responses
Now back to the original reason I interacted with you in this thread, tell me more about your belief that bail reform is only for black people.
Here is your original post that I responded to
She made a terrorism joke about her. I dont know if I would say it was radical, but it was certainly not ok.
He turned a blind eye to the plot to kidnap that woman from Michigan. He didn’t turn a blind eye to these other three…he welcomed their support and does to this day.Oh did he turn a blind eye to them burning and looting, asking for a friend....
Again. Your poor math is showing. Let’s just use white and back for now to keep it real simple…So basically half of what a true representative % would be.
Now do Fortune 1,000 companies, college presidents, etc.
Jihad squad? You think all she did was that?She just called out that she married her brother to get around immigration law. How is that radical?
She should have. Id also call her one of the radicals of the left.Speaking of Omar did she ever apologize for for anti-sematic tropes?
And that makes Boebert what? What Omar said was wrong…it does not excise the other.Here is what Omar thinks about 9/11:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6mGc3l6kMs
"Some people did something."
She's a terrorist loving anti-semite. I have no problem with her being called out as such, either straight up or via a joke. A joke not based on actual conduct/comments would be reprehensible; one based upon the record is not.
do you mean like how I needed to have better grades than all of my black friends to get in the college? Or do you mean when the football coach in high school told me that he would never let a white boy play running back? Or do you mean when I got chased and got my ### beat on an almost daily basis in elementary school? Or do you mean when I was continually #### on for the color of my skin all throughout grade school?So you as a white man are at a disadvantage in the US. Give me an example from your life please.
So now you are trying to play the victim?What a moronic and offensive strawman. You accuse me of saying bail reform is only for black people??? How dare you state such a lie. Don't put those racist words in my mouth. Bail should be based on the crime committed, criminal history of the accused, and the risk of flight. Bail should have nothing to do with race.
In response to the post above, I asked if only black people were going to get lower bail. Instead of saying no, you kind of doubled down with a response about Rittenhouse’s bail.Again....the only reason leftist rags are taking the 'high' road is because it is their side who has blood on their hands in this story. It is very embarrassing that their justice reform (lower bail for Black assailants) directly lead to 6 deaths and nearly 50 injuries. It is very embarrassing someone who supports their pet movement, BLM committed such horrific act. It is embarrassing that this is a black on white terrorist assault. Flip the facts, and it is 100 percent guaranteed that the left politicized the facts to a far greater extend than what Fox is doing. Guarant ####### teed. At least in this case the stories are factual. In the Rittenhouse case the left had to repeatedly and shamelessly lie to make it political.
So now you are trying to play the victim?
I didn’t accuse you of anything nor did I put words in your mouth.
YOU typed the words yourself
I simply questioned what YOU typed.
I noticed how you “conveniently” left out your original post that I was questioning.
No worries I included it again for you, so that you can read what YOU typed.
In response to the post above, I asked if only black people were going to get lower bail. Instead of saying no, you kind of doubled down with a response about Rittenhouse’s bail.
I am not playing victim. I am calling you a liar.
Again....the only reason leftist rags are taking the 'high' road is because it is their side who has blood on their hands in this story. It is very embarrassing that their justice reform (lower bail for Black assailants) directly lead to 6 deaths and nearly 50 injuries. It is very embarrassing someone who supports their pet movement, BLM committed such horrific act. It is embarrassing that this is a black on white terrorist assault. Flip the facts, and it is 100 percent guaranteed that the left politicized the facts to a far greater extend than what Fox is doing. Guarant ####### teed. At least in this case the stories are factual. In the Rittenhouse case the left had to repeatedly and shamelessly lie to make it political.
If anyone is being disingenuous here it’s you.?????? Nowhere does it say anything near what you claim I said. You are not only a liar, but you are disinegenuous.
Again....the only reason leftist rags are taking the 'high' road is because it is their side who has blood on their hands in this story. It is very embarrassing that their justice reform (lower bail for Black assailants) directly lead to 6 deaths and nearly 50 injuries. It is very embarrassing someone who supports their pet movement, BLM committed such horrific act. It is embarrassing that this is a black on white terrorist assault. Flip the facts, and it is 100 percent guaranteed that the left politicized the facts to a far greater extend than what Fox is doing. Guarant ####### teed. At least in this case the stories are factual. In the Rittenhouse case the left had to repeatedly and shamelessly lie to make it political.
It depends on the context. In the criminal justice system? No, definitely not. In higher ed? Yeah, obviously.Ok I agree. Do you believe that whites are now discriminated against and at a disadvantage in our country due to wokism?
At least she isn't a bolshevickJihad squad? You think all she did was that?
She is most definitely a radical.