Just because you don’t think he’s droppable doesn’t make the question absurd. I don’t generally play in ppr leagues and he’s only topped double digit points 3 times his year (weeks 3,4,5) in those leagues.This is an absurd question. Cohen has been droppable for weeks and Duke is a top 15 guy in PPR. Just becuase you don't have the stones to start him, doesn't make him droppable. He has been an extremely pleasant surprise this year
His first game back is against Jacksonville. But yeah... Jordy is now irrelevant.Someone talk me out of dropping Jordy for Corey Coleman.
Ekeler was heavily leaned on in the Jax game, but after his fumble I don't think he went back in. But he's dynamic. Obviously the size limitations will always make him a short leash, but this isn't the first week he has outplayed Gordon.I'd think that Ekeler would have some Flex Appeal as a change-of-pace RB. He's not going to unseat Gordon by any measure, but he does have value.IMO Ekeler is only valuable if you have Gordon.
The last couple of weeks, I've accumulated Corey Davis, Inman, and Crowder. Now I need to figure out who to start. I'm leaning toward Davis, but I really feel uneasy about Thursday night games.Not too bad.
In my big league, I got ekeler, perine, and Elliott.
In the other I got burkhead, Tucker, and Jordan Reed
I may have to make another move for a wr if Hogan doesn't play. Inman? May drop Mack. Might do it regardless
Reed owner dropped him for Davis, and Jordan didn't get picked up last night. I dropped ASJ (bye) for a 2nd DST last night, rolling with Witten until Olsen comes back. Any reason to think Reed's hammy will be a go this week?Not too bad.
In my big league, I got ekeler, perine, and Elliott.
In the other I got burkhead, Tucker, and Jordan Reed
I may have to make another move for a wr if Hogan doesn't play. Inman? May drop Mack. Might do it regardless
I'm taking a chance. Have Henry as well. I dropped asj for Reed as I hate the jets Ros schedule. He practiced last week and I will start him if he plays. Worth the risk to meReed owner dropped him for Davis, and Jordan didn't get picked up last night. I dropped ASJ (bye) for a 2nd DST last night, rolling with Witten until Olsen comes back. Any reason to think Reed's hammy will be a go this week?
Right, but you have a plan B if he doesn't go. I'd be dropping my only TE, and if I wait, he'll probably be gone. I guess I could drop LAC but I like their pairing with BAL.I'm taking a chance. Have Henry as well. I dropped asj for Reed as I hate the jets Ros schedule. He practiced last week and I will start him if he plays. Worth the risk to me
So Mays or McKissic for better stash in dynasty?Agree that Mckissic is electric with the ball in his hands, I hope he slips through waivers so I don't have to put a claim in for him.
Is dropping Rawls for McKissic something to consider?So Mays or McKissic for better stash in dynasty?
I think so, yes.Is dropping Rawls for McKissic something to consider?
I would make that move.Is dropping Rawls for McKissic something to consider?
Absolutely. If the Seahawks are smart, they will turn him into Chris Thompson or James White and mostly abandon traditional runningI would make that move.
In PPR slam dunk yes. In standardI'd say the reality is a 50/50 bet but McKissic has shiny new toy written all over him.Is dropping Rawls for McKissic something to consider?
You may know more about the situation but Prosise was hurt off and on. SEA started trying to use Lacy and then Carson. Of course, Carson was injured opening the door for the other RBs. Lacy has struggled. Seems like Prosise is the best option left for a team that cannot run the ball. In PPR, Prosise, has some potential value.Im confused about the sudden McKissic love. How many games has Prosise played in this year?
I believe you mean McKissic, Prosise is on IRYou may know more about the situation but Prosise was hurt off and on. SEA started trying to use Lacy and then Carson. Of course, Carson was injured opening the door for the other RBs. Lacy has struggled. Seems like Prosise is the best option left for a team that cannot run the ball. In PPR, Prosise, has some potential value.
He's had a bigger market share of targets than Drake, but 3 targets is nothing special. McKissic had 5 targets / 4 catches last week, I guess everyone wants to find the next Chris Thompson.Does Williams catch many passes? I have to decide between him and Mckissic in ppr
Off and on? Before last week (which Prosise barely played, he hadn't played since week 3.You may know more about the situation but Prosise was hurt off and on. SEA started trying to use Lacy and then Carson. Of course, Carson was injured opening the door for the other RBs. Lacy has struggled. Seems like Prosise is the best option left for a team that cannot run the ball. In PPR, Prosise, has some potential value.
No one knows. A lot will depend on whether the Pack stay competitive.I know it's a little early, but there any insight into Aaron Rodgers' possible return in week 15? I know in a lot of leagues he was dropped outright and IF he can come back for the 2nd round of the FF playoffs, he'd likely be an upgrade over most other QB's...right?
I agree on this.Somehow, with the last waiver spot, I landed Jamaal Williams and Perine. Hopefully will never have to start either as I have Fournette and Howard, but I'm happy with the depth.
I kind of like being in the last waiver spot, especially this time of year. There's a couple of guys that don't put claims in and then pickup players at like 3:00am after they run, trying to move up in the waiver order. Fine by me, I'll stay here at the back and just keep claiming all the players I want.
Rodgers is eligible to return Wk 15 vs. Carolina.No one knows. A lot will depend on whether the Pack stay competitive.
In 2013 Rodgers hurt his non-throwing shoulder, and I guess they took a lot pictures while he was healing - which actually slows the process. So this time around (throwing shoulder), they are not monitoring his progress through MRI or X-rays. So no one really knows where he's at, and if GB loses at Pittsburgh and at Carolina, I'd say the odds are pretty low we'll see him in again in 2017.
The Lions are two back but it's really one game because they beat the Vikings once already. If Detroit wins on Thanksgiving, they have a relatively easy path to a division title. The Pack are the 9th seed right now and cannot afford losses between now and the Vikings/@Lions finish.
Because of:Why?
The guy has been a healthy scratch who hasn't played a single snap on offense yet this year. He last played special teams in week 5 and hasn't even been used for that for many weeks now.
He may actually be active now with Jones injured and get some opportunity, but I don't see any reason why he will be more valuable than Williams.
If you think Williams is trash RIpkowski likely a better add than Mayes is.
I'm just looking for a guaranteed few points for my last flex spot at this pointHe's had a bigger market share of targets than Drake, but 3 targets is nothing special. McKissic had 5 targets / 4 catches last week, I guess everyone wants to find the next Chris Thompson.
Thanks for pointing that out. Yes. I meant McKissic has some potential in PPR.I believe you mean McKissic, Prosise is on IR
Seems like pretty heavy reliance on the combine metricsBecause of:
This: https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/devante-mays/
vs
This: https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/jamaal-williams/
Mays has not been deactived all year and there were times in preseason and during the year whete the pecking order was unclear. If you’re picking up Williams you’re hoping for catches and TD’s because I expect him to prove himself a plodder pretty quickly.
I would rather have Perine. Better offensive line and coaching.Drake or Perine ROS? Both are sitting on my wire
I prefer this too.Somehow, with the last waiver spot, I landed Jamaal Williams and Perine. Hopefully will never have to start either as I have Fournette and Howard, but I'm happy with the depth.
I kind of like being in the last waiver spot, especially this time of year. There's a couple of guys that don't put claims in and then pickup players at like 3:00am after they run, trying to move up in the waiver order. Fine by me, I'll stay here at the back and just keep claiming all the players I want.
I actually don’t think Mays profile is fantastic (low collegiate production, low target share) so let’s not put words in my mouth. I think Williams is a backup level talent. Guys like him come and go. His ceiling sucks. At very least Mays has a very high ceiling.Seems like pretty heavy reliance on the combine metrics
Mays wasn't invited to the combine. He did work out at his pro day.
Just looking at the pro day times, I don't find those to be particularly impressive except for the jump numbers.
Weight 230 lbs
40 yard dash 4.52
3 cone drill 7.43
Shuttle 4.53
Vertical jump 40.5"
Broad Jump 10' 9"
The metrics that actually matter for a RB are 40 yard dash, 3 cone drill and weight. The only one that might be considered good is his weight.
Andre Williams had similarly high jump numbers to Mayes with a better 3 cone and shuttle times (not that I think shuttle matters) but he wasn't a very good NFL RB. He got a lot of opportunity to prove he wasn't good enough as well.
The formulas being used by Kelly that you cite factor in weight too much in their formulas for the speed score.
It seems you are putting a lot of faith in the jump numbers that I haven't seen evidence of those mattering enough to care.
I don't think I am putting words in your mouth. I asked why you think Mayes is a better prospect than Williams is.I actually don’t think Mays profile is fantastic (low collegiate production, low target share) so let’s not put words in my mouth. I think Williams is a backup level talent. Guys like him come and go. His ceiling sucks. At very least Mays has a very high ceiling.
I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying I never understood why they had Williams ahead of Jones other than pass pro. Williams has never impressed me (contrary to Jones). From the highlights I've seen of Mays, he may pass Williams just as easily as Jones did ... that was my point.I disagree. Jones is actually good.
In the Mays thread guys pointed out how outstanding Mays' production was as a junior. He then battled injuries his entire senior year, so that's part of the potential excitement for Mays -- he looked like a 3rd or 4th round guy in his own right during his junior season.I don't think I am putting words in your mouth. I asked why you think Mayes is a better prospect than Williams is.
Your response was because of the player profiler graphs. The measured athleticism.
The graphs themselves are very misleading showing Williams as below 50 percentile while for Mayes several metrics that are above 50 percentile.
When looking at the actual numbers you find that the two players are actually very similar to each other, Williams 4.53 forty time at his pro day and Mayes 4.52 forty time.
The main difference metric wise between the two players is the weight, 230 lbs for Mayes compared to 212 lbs for Williams.
In Kellys formula this makes Mayes speed score 78th percentile while Williams speed score 42nd percentile. So what I am trying to point out here is that the speed score is very flawed metric to show this large of a difference, when the actual speed is only one hundredth of a second difference. I am guessing that Kelly is mixing combine metrics with pro day metrics, which is a big no no to do. He does adjust Mayes 40 time down to 4.57 I assume because it was pro day, but a more apples to apples comparison would be using both players pro day metrics instead of his imprecise adjustment. I am not even sure if he used the adjusted 40 time in his speed score formula.
I am just trying to help you out here. The graphs show a big difference between these players, when the actual metrics are hardly any discernible difference.
The advanced metrics that Kelly is selling are riddled with noise and misinformation.
The athletic metrics should only be 10% of the entire player evaluation in my view, but since this is the only thing I have heard you point to as why Mays might have a higher ceiling, that is what I have focused on. As you say the college production for Williams was much better than Mays, and how they have earned opportunity so far in the NFL is clearly in Williams favor as well. Yet you are quick to dismiss Williams as having low upside, while saying that Mayes has higher upside based purely off these largely irrelevant metrics.
That seems to be Bojangs point as well.I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying I never understood why they had Williams ahead of Jones other than pass pro. Williams has never impressed me (contrary to Jones). From the highlights I've seen of Mays, he may pass Williams just as easily as Jones did ... that was my point.
Copying the following from the Mays Thread:That seems to be Bojangs point as well.
I don't see any reason to think that.
While I am not particularly impressed with Williams either compared to other RB prospects I do think there is hard evidence that shows he is a better player than Mays. Such as the college production. Draft position and watching Williams play.
To be fair I haven't really watched Mays to evaluate him on that basis as I didn't think it was worth my time to do so.
ETA - only 37 carries his senior season due to those aforementioned injuries.Excellent production in 2015, rushing for 996 yards on 165 carries (5.9 YPC). Mays ranked 84th in the country in carries, but 71st in yards and 29th (!!) in runs of 20+ yards. His long run % of 6.7% was better than what Fournette (6.0%) and McCaffrey (5.6%) did that season.
Misinformation? There can be problems with any metric if you want to make it so. Do 40 numbers tell the whole story? No, because 10, 20 and 40 yard splits do matter. Each number is only a piece of the puzzle. I hardly watch or “scout” anymore because I realized I am not a scout and I don’t know the X’s and O’s of football. Where you can decifer whether a player is good or not is combined in these metrics plus stats. Does that occasionally put you behind when you look at a player like Adam Thielen and can’t totally decifer where his end point is? Sure, but it also helps when as that player evolves you can see he is a star while others are still confused about his profile. If I had to put money on either of these players being a star, I wouldn’t. Williams lacks the high level traits to maintain a starting RB position in the NFL. When you say he can play the position, I have no doubt about that. He produced in college despite the inferior athleticism and appears to be able to catch the ball out of the backfield. Mays is the opposite where he has a subpar collegiate profile but ticks the boxes on what you want to see in an RB athletically. When discussing who I am taking in Williams vs Mays I am going to go with the guy who most resembles the athletic profile I want in a RB with the ceiling to make an impact. There are other reasons why Mays collegiate production looks inferior which include transferring from a small school and injuries. Perhaps I should have given a clearer thought at the beginning to say that if I was doing waivers this week with any semblance of FAAB budget I would focus on Burkhead and if I wanted a piece of GB backfield I would take Mays for nothing over chasing around what I think is a ghost in Williams. Williams probably does offer value in getting volume with TyMont out, I just don’t know how far that will get you. Could be wrong though even if it is a short term being wrong. Worse backs then Williams have had nice stretches of play. Look at Samkon Gado, Rob Kelley and Mike Anderson.I don't think I am putting words in your mouth. I asked why you think Mayes is a better prospect than Williams is.
Your response was because of the player profiler graphs. The measured athleticism.
The graphs themselves are very misleading showing Williams as below 50 percentile while for Mayes several metrics that are above 50 percentile.
When looking at the actual numbers you find that the two players are actually very similar to each other, Williams 4.53 forty time at his pro day and Mayes 4.52 forty time.
The main difference metric wise between the two players is the weight, 230 lbs for Mayes compared to 212 lbs for Williams.
In Kellys formula this makes Mayes speed score 78th percentile while Williams speed score 42nd percentile. So what I am trying to point out here is that the speed score is very flawed metric to show this large of a difference, when the actual speed is only one hundredth of a second difference. I am guessing that Kelly is mixing combine metrics with pro day metrics, which is a big no no to do. He does adjust Mayes 40 time down to 4.57 I assume because it was pro day, but a more apples to apples comparison would be using both players pro day metrics instead of his imprecise adjustment. I am not even sure if he used the adjusted 40 time in his speed score formula.
I am just trying to help you out here. The graphs show a big difference between these players, when the actual metrics are hardly any discernible difference.
The advanced metrics that Kelly is selling are riddled with noise and misinformation.
The athletic metrics should only be 10% of the entire player evaluation in my view, but since this is the only thing I have heard you point to as why Mays might have a higher ceiling, that is what I have focused on. As you say the college production for Williams was much better than Mays, and how they have earned opportunity so far in the NFL is clearly in Williams favor as well. Yet you are quick to dismiss Williams as having low upside, while saying that Mayes has higher upside based purely off these largely irrelevant metrics.
966 rushing yards in 2015 according to this not a huge difference, if 6 was 9.Copying the following from the Mays Thread:
ETA - only 37 carries his senior season due to those aforementioned injuries.