Week 14 Waiver Wire (1 Viewer)

[PhantomJB]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Dumbest reason I ever heard for not picking up a player.

+1What does that have to do with fantasy?

Freedom of speech, freedom of reasons to make FF choices. Let the man do what he wants for the reason he wants.

 

[qimqam]

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

Wilson

Geno

Ponder

Newton

Bridgewater

Two of those QBs are pathetic. One of them is a rookie, Newton was an absolute train wreck in that game and Wilson doesn't throw much and didn't need to in Week 1 to beat Green Bay.

I think the best comps in terms of possible game flow for Ryan may be the two games against Chicago and then the game against Philly. All of those games were decisive wins by Green Bay but featured the opponent having to throw a lot to try and keep up. In those games the QBs produced:

Cutler 256-2-2

Cutler 272-1-2

Sanchez 346-2-2

The reasons why I used those games were because the Bears (like Atlanta) have an above-average talent at QB and a wealth of talent in the passing game. Sanchez isn't on Cutler's or Ryan's level in terms of talent in my opinion but the Chip Kelly system pretty much guarantees fantasy passing production.

I do think the Packers will get some sacks and 1-2 takeways. But if Ryan is throwing it around 40 times which I think is very likely (Sanchez attempted 44 in his game while Cutler averaged 35.5 in his two games) I could see him reaching 300 yards passing. Combine that with Julio and Roddy's talent and 2-3 TDs is not unrealistic at all.

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

FYI ... 220 passing yards sucks! Especially in the playoffs!

 

[theothervcruz]

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

Wilson

Geno

Ponder

Newton

Bridgewater

Two of those QBs are pathetic. One of them is a rookie, Newton was an absolute train wreck in that game and Wilson doesn't throw much and didn't need to in Week 1 to beat Green Bay.

I think the best comps in terms of possible game flow for Ryan may be the two games against Chicago and then the game against Philly. All of those games were decisive wins by Green Bay but featured the opponent having to throw a lot to try and keep up. In those games the QBs produced:

Cutler 256-2-2

Cutler 272-1-2

Sanchez 346-2-2

The reasons why I used those games were because the Bears (like Atlanta) have an above-average talent at QB and a wealth of talent in the passing game. Sanchez isn't on Cutler's or Ryan's level in terms of talent in my opinion but the Chip Kelly system pretty much guarantees fantasy passing production.

I do think the Packers will get some sacks and 1-2 takeways. But if Ryan is throwing it around 40 times which I think is very likely (Sanchez attempted 44 in his game while Cutler averaged 35.5 in his two games) I could see him reaching 300 yards passing. Combine that with Julio and Roddy's talent and 2-3 TDs is not unrealistic at all.

A very realistic figure IMO is 325 yards - assuming he has to play catch up and air it out - 2 tds 2 ints. Excluding any puny rushing yards and assuming no lost fumbles, then with a 3 point bonus for hitting 300 yards, that is 20 fantasy points. I'd be more than happy with that.

If one of those TDs was to Roddy, who is my WR2 if he plays, all the better.

 

[packersfan]

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

Wilson

Geno

Ponder

Newton

Bridgewater

Two of those QBs are pathetic. One of them is a rookie, Newton was an absolute train wreck in that game and Wilson doesn't throw much and didn't need to in Week 1 to beat Green Bay.

I think the best comps in terms of possible game flow for Ryan may be the two games against Chicago and then the game against Philly. All of those games were decisive wins by Green Bay but featured the opponent having to throw a lot to try and keep up. In those games the QBs produced:

Cutler 256-2-2

Cutler 272-1-2

Sanchez 346-2-2

The reasons why I used those games were because the Bears (like Atlanta) have an above-average talent at QB and a wealth of talent in the passing game. Sanchez isn't on Cutler's or Ryan's level in terms of talent in my opinion but the Chip Kelly system pretty much guarantees fantasy passing production.

I do think the Packers will get some sacks and 1-2 takeways. But if Ryan is throwing it around 40 times which I think is very likely (Sanchez attempted 44 in his game while Cutler averaged 35.5 in his two games) I could see him reaching 300 yards passing. Combine that with Julio and Roddy's talent and 2-3 TDs is not unrealistic at all.

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

FYI ... 220 passing yards sucks! Especially in the playoffs!

I agree. I was replying to the post with the 225-1-2 prediction for Ryan. Anything can happen in this crazy game but I think he tops that yardage easily.

 

[just_want_2_win]

The Packers have allowed at least 220 yards passing to every QB they have faced except the following:

Wilson

Geno

Ponder

Newton

Bridgewater

Two of those QBs are pathetic. One of them is a rookie, Newton was an absolute train wreck in that game and Wilson doesn't throw much and didn't need to in Week 1 to beat Green Bay.

I think the best comps in terms of possible game flow for Ryan may be the two games against Chicago and then the game against Philly. All of those games were decisive wins by Green Bay but featured the opponent having to throw a lot to try and keep up. In those games the QBs produced:

Cutler 256-2-2

Cutler 272-1-2

Sanchez 346-2-2

The reasons why I used those games were because the Bears (like Atlanta) have an above-average talent at QB and a wealth of talent in the passing game. Sanchez isn't on Cutler's or Ryan's level in terms of talent in my opinion but the Chip Kelly system pretty much guarantees fantasy passing production.

I do think the Packers will get some sacks and 1-2 takeways. But if Ryan is throwing it around 40 times which I think is very likely (Sanchez attempted 44 in his game while Cutler averaged 35.5 in his two games) I could see him reaching 300 yards passing. Combine that with Julio and Roddy's talent and 2-3 TDs is not unrealistic at all.

Excellent points. As usual your analysis is strong; I've always enjoyed reading your posts over the years, packersfan. You have a long history of great posts.

However, I think your projected numbers are bit overly optimistic. That's because Ryan's O line hasn't exactly been stout lately and because Ryan has a long history of poor (well, in comparison to his home games) road outings.

According to his splits at pro-football-reference.com, Ryan is 39-13 at home with a 66.8% completion rate with 86 TDs and 33 INT and a 98.2 QB rating. By contrast, on the road he's 26-28 with a 61.51% completion rate, 88TDs, and 54 INTs along with a 85.1 QB rating. His Dec. Won-Loss record isn't really much worse than it is for earlier months but his Completion rate is its lowest, 62.32%.

His ESPN stats page shows this year his completion rate is 64.3% outdoors and that he has 10 TDs and 7 INTs. Indoors this year he has a 68.1% comp rate with 11 TDs and 3 INTs. That is with the caveat that this year he has 89 more attempts outdoors than inside.

I definitely could be wrong but I doubt 3 TDs unless there's some generous garbage time. I think 2 is possible but 1 is the likeliest because of the conditions, GB's play, Ryan's outdoor history, poor line, and Roddy's uncertain health. I also expect a couple of INTs.

 

[packersfan]

Thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated.

Definitely agree a full-out implosion by the Falcons' line is possible. So my predictions could be on the optimistic side. But I'm looking at two things here which I think can outweigh Atlanta's o line issues - 1. Passing volume and 2. Julio. I think the former will definitely be there if the game goes the way I anticipate and I just don't think the Packers can slow down Julio. He's just far too talented.

Now considering we just saw a week where Ryan Fitzpatrick threw six freakin touchdowns I'm not ruling out anything. But just looking at how similar comps have produced in similar situations I think 275+ with at least 2 TDs is reasonable with 300+ and 3 TDs not out of the question. I could see the Packers winning this by something like 41-21. I don't think the Falcons will make a game of this but that could lend itself to Ryan having to throw it all night long.

ETA - I'm definitely banking on GTP here and I agree that's risky. But I really think this game will either be a Packers' blowout which likely will force Ryan to throw a lot or a competitive game which features both teams scoring (which also likely will mean Ryan is throwing a lot). A defensive struggle or a game where Atlanta just does nothing offensively isn't something I think will happen given how Green Bay's games have typically unfolded this season.

 

[just_want_2_win]

Thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated.

Definitely agree a full-out implosion by the Falcons' line is possible. So my predictions could be on the optimistic side. But I'm looking at two things here which I think can outweigh Atlanta's o line issues - 1. Passing volume and 2. Julio. I think the former will definitely be there if the game goes the way I anticipate and I just don't think the Packers can slow down Julio. He's just far too talented.

Now considering we just saw a week where Ryan Fitzpatrick threw six freakin touchdowns I'm not ruling out anything. But just looking at how similar comps have produced in similar situations I think 275+ with at least 2 TDs is reasonable with 300+ and 3 TDs not out of the question. I could see the Packers winning this by something like 41-21. I don't think the Falcons will make a game of this but that could lend itself to Ryan having to throw it all night long.

ETA - I'm definitely banking on GTP here and I agree that's risky. But I really think this game will either be a Packers' blowout which likely will force Ryan to throw a lot or a competitive game which features both teams scoring (which also likely will mean Ryan is throwing a lot). A defensive struggle or a game where Atlanta just does nothing offensively isn't something I think will happen given how Green Bay's games have typically unfolded this season.

Hmmmm, well I might have to bank on your analysis over my own because I'm in a bad spot too when it comes to starting Ryan or one of the dudes mentioned here that are on the wire (to pull this thread back on topic). I have gone by what you've said in the past and it's panned out well so at least there's that.

 

[rdoanecu]

Our 14 team 0.5 PPR league has early playoffs (started last week).

The A. Ellington injury is causing me to have some trouble with my flex this upcoming week. I currently have D. Baldwin (vs. @Phi) and D. Adams (vs. Atl)

Just and FYI, I am also starting R. Wilson and J. Nelson.

C. Johnson (Minn vs. Jets) and K. Wright (vs. NYG) are available on waivers.

Thoughts?

 

[packersfan]

Thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated.

Definitely agree a full-out implosion by the Falcons' line is possible. So my predictions could be on the optimistic side. But I'm looking at two things here which I think can outweigh Atlanta's o line issues - 1. Passing volume and 2. Julio. I think the former will definitely be there if the game goes the way I anticipate and I just don't think the Packers can slow down Julio. He's just far too talented.

Now considering we just saw a week where Ryan Fitzpatrick threw six freakin touchdowns I'm not ruling out anything. But just looking at how similar comps have produced in similar situations I think 275+ with at least 2 TDs is reasonable with 300+ and 3 TDs not out of the question. I could see the Packers winning this by something like 41-21. I don't think the Falcons will make a game of this but that could lend itself to Ryan having to throw it all night long.

ETA - I'm definitely banking on GTP here and I agree that's risky. But I really think this game will either be a Packers' blowout which likely will force Ryan to throw a lot or a competitive game which features both teams scoring (which also likely will mean Ryan is throwing a lot). A defensive struggle or a game where Atlanta just does nothing offensively isn't something I think will happen given how Green Bay's games have typically unfolded this season.

Hmmmm, well I might have to bank on your analysis over my own because I'm in a bad spot too when it comes to starting Ryan or one of the dudes mentioned here that are on the wire (to pull this thread back on topic). I have gone by what you've said in the past and it's panned out well so at least there's that.

Watch the game turn out to be 35-0 Packers now.

My apologies for turning this into a Matt Ryan thread. I know he's not on Waiver Wires.

 

[just_want_2_win]

Our 14 team 0.5 PPR league has early playoffs (started last week).

The A. Ellington injury is causing me to have some trouble with my flex this upcoming week. I currently have D. Baldwin (vs. @Phi) and D. Adams (vs. Atl)

Just and FYI, I am also starting R. Wilson and J. Nelson.

C. Johnson (Minn vs. Jets) and K. Wright (vs. NYG) are available on waivers.

Thoughts?

Not to turn this into a AC post, but

• Baldwin has the matchup but hasn't been much of a play the last few weeks.
• Davante exploded last week but NE efforted to take Nelson and Cobb out of play so AR had to fall back on DA and his TE.
• CJ has a nice matchup vs. NYJ and some good rapport there. To tie this back to the WW thread, this is what RW's Adam Levitan has to say about him:

Despite a very disappointing 2-41-0 line on four targets Sunday, I’m not giving up on Charles Johnson. Over the last two weeks he’s played on 97.4 percent of the snaps and over the last three weeks he leads the team with 22 targets. Cordarrelle Patterson is the No. 4 receiver, Greg Jennings is done and Jarius Wright is a sub-average player. Johnson was hurt on Sunday by game flow (the Vikings used two special teams touchdowns to take an early 21-3 lead), something won’t often be an issue for this mediocre team. He also has a very plus matchup in Week 14 against a Jets defense that stuffs the run but can’t defend the pass. I like Johnson as a WR3 again.

Recommendation: Should be owned in 12-team leagues

• I've heard Wright and Washington put both up as having good potential this week with TEN throwing down field a lot and Hunter out. I'd trust Wright over Wash.

 

[just_want_2_win]

Thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated.

Definitely agree a full-out implosion by the Falcons' line is possible. So my predictions could be on the optimistic side. But I'm looking at two things here which I think can outweigh Atlanta's o line issues - 1. Passing volume and 2. Julio. I think the former will definitely be there if the game goes the way I anticipate and I just don't think the Packers can slow down Julio. He's just far too talented.

Now considering we just saw a week where Ryan Fitzpatrick threw six freakin touchdowns I'm not ruling out anything. But just looking at how similar comps have produced in similar situations I think 275+ with at least 2 TDs is reasonable with 300+ and 3 TDs not out of the question. I could see the Packers winning this by something like 41-21. I don't think the Falcons will make a game of this but that could lend itself to Ryan having to throw it all night long.

ETA - I'm definitely banking on GTP here and I agree that's risky. But I really think this game will either be a Packers' blowout which likely will force Ryan to throw a lot or a competitive game which features both teams scoring (which also likely will mean Ryan is throwing a lot). A defensive struggle or a game where Atlanta just does nothing offensively isn't something I think will happen given how Green Bay's games have typically unfolded this season.

Hmmmm, well I might have to bank on your analysis over my own because I'm in a bad spot too when it comes to starting Ryan or one of the dudes mentioned here that are on the wire (to pull this thread back on topic). I have gone by what you've said in the past and it's panned out well so at least there's that.

Watch the game turn out to be 35-0 Packers now.

My apologies for turning this into a Matt Ryan thread. I know he's not on Waiver Wires.

It's ok because this helped some people who had to possibly turn to the WW this week due to his match up, so while it was a tangent, it was relevant.

 

[theothervcruz]

As someone who owns Ryan in two leagues, I welcome the tangential discussion on him.

 

[montana_grizzly_bears]

I haven't seen it mentioned but what about Marion Grice?

 

[Van Dyman]

Our 14 team 0.5 PPR league has early playoffs (started last week).

The A. Ellington injury is causing me to have some trouble with my flex this upcoming week. I currently have D. Baldwin (vs. @Phi) and D. Adams (vs. Atl)

Just and FYI, I am also starting R. Wilson and J. Nelson.

C. Johnson (Minn vs. Jets) and K. Wright (vs. NYG) are available on waivers.

Thoughts?

Not to turn this into a AC post, but

• Baldwin has the matchup but hasn't been much of a play the last few weeks.
• Davante exploded last week but NE efforted to take Nelson and Cobb out of play so AR had to fall back on DA and his TE.
• CJ has a nice matchup vs. NYJ and some good rapport there. To tie this back to the WW thread, this is what RW's Adam Levitan has to say about him:

Despite a very disappointing 2-41-0 line on four targets Sunday, I’m not giving up on Charles Johnson. Over the last two weeks he’s played on 97.4 percent of the snaps and over the last three weeks he leads the team with 22 targets. Cordarrelle Patterson is the No. 4 receiver, Greg Jennings is done and Jarius Wright is a sub-average player. Johnson was hurt on Sunday by game flow (the Vikings used two special teams touchdowns to take an early 21-3 lead), something won’t often be an issue for this mediocre team. He also has a very plus matchup in Week 14 against a Jets defense that stuffs the run but can’t defend the pass. I like Johnson as a WR3 again.

Recommendation: Should be owned in 12-team leagues

• I've heard Wright and Washington put both up as having good potential this week with TEN throwing down field a lot and Hunter out. I'd trust Wright over Wash.

Hunter was always out, even when he was in.

Wright>Washington but I wouldn't start either right now. The Titans have a big, very new OL problem (4 of 5 starters injured/IR in the last few weeks) and JJ Watt crunched Mett's throwing shoulder just two days ago. Look elsewhere.

 

[Milkman]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up".

No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

 

[JIslander]

How's about R. Woods vs S. Bailey? Who's a better play ROS? Orton looks for Woods a lot recently

 

[habsfan]

I'm trying to get Hillman. I have Anderson and feel like I have to "buy" on that backfield to try and protect myself.

 

[SpruceGoose]

My QBs are Ryan and Flacco, both of whom have terrible matchups this week. Holding onto Ryan because he has great matchups in weeks 15/16 but obviously need to win this week to get there. Definitely going to drop Flacco for one of the aforementioned WW guys (Manziel. Bridgewater, Hill. McCoy. Fitzmagic). Who though is the big question and just how much of a gamble do I want to take in the 1st round of the playoffs.

Would I be crazy to go with Hill against the porous Redskins offense?

im in the same situation.

The Falcons looked good on Sunday, and they are going to have to score a lot of points against GB.

Worst case scenario, they are going to get some garbage time scores.

The only scary thing is the weather...but still, they dont have a run game. They are going to have to throw no matter what.

 

[shadyridr]

I dnt know why people keep fooling themselves about Ryan. Start him at home, bench him on the road.

 

[steelerfan1]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

No way JC should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

 

[zftcg]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

No way JC should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

I thought he was working as an analyst for the SEC Channel these days.

 

[Area51Inhabitant]

Somebody who's going overlooked in this thread is Marqise Lee. His schedule down the stretch is looking very tasty and he's been getting much more target love lately and has been doing much more with his than either Hurns or Shorts have been. His ceiling might not be as high as the likes of Adams or Moncrief but his floor looks like it could be on more solid ground than some of the other boom/bust options out there.

 

[zftcg]

Somebody who's going overlooked in this thread is Marqise Lee. His schedule down the stretch is looking very tasty and he's been getting much more target love lately and has been doing much more with his than either Hurns or Shorts have been. His ceiling might not be as high as the likes of Adams or Moncrief but his floor looks like it could be on more solid ground than some of the other boom/bust options out there.

I want no part of any Jax WR. Robinson was decent until he got hurt, but the rest have been the epitome of flavor of the week. Maybe one will be useful ROS, but good luck predicting which.

 

[SpruceGoose]

I dnt know why people keep fooling themselves about Ryan. Start him at home, bench him on the road.

because what QB on the wire is trustworthy?

 

[Chief]

No way [Jesus Christ] should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

Best post of the thread.

 

[DropKick]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Dumbest reason I ever heard for not picking up a player.

+1What does that have to do with fantasy?

Freedom of speech, freedom of reasons to make FF choices. Let the man do what he wants for the reason he wants.

The "bone-head" factor is a legitimate fantasy consideration.

 

[zftcg]

Submitted my WW claims for tomorrow morning, in this order:

1. Add Dwayne Allen, drop Crabtree (a no-brainer; DA should have never been on the WW in the first place)

2. Add Woods, drop Hawkins (probably won't get it, but I view them as pretty interchangeable ROS, with Hawkins getting a slight downgrade because of the QB uncertainty in CLE)

3. Add NO, drop NYG (realized I'll never trust the Giants D enough to start them, so why waste a roster spot?)

4. Add Moncrief, drop Hawkins (see No. 2)

 

[DropKick]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

No way JC should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

I traded Jesus Christ for Lazarus of Bethany just prior to our week 10 trade dead-line. Trade barely passed league veto process. People think I got the short end of the stick but I was deep at the "saviors" position and fully expect Lazarus to come back to life for the fantasy play-off run. The 2nd round draft pick in 2015 was just gravy..

 

[Van Dyman]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

No way JC should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

I traded Jesus Christ for Lazarus of Bethany just prior to our week 10 trade dead-line. Trade barely passed league veto process. People think I got the short end of the stick but I was deep at the "saviors" position and fully expect Lazarus to come back to life for the fantasy play-off run. The 2nd round draft pick in 2015 was just gravy..

 

[achiappanza]

Any opinions on the best defense for NEXT week (week 15)? I don't want to play MiA against NE. My choices....

Minnesota Min - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYJ Tennessee Ten - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYG .
New York NYG - DEF Sun 10:00 am @ Ten .
Green Bay GB - DEF Mon 5:30 pm vs Atl I think we're using default Yahoo scoring.

 

[abishagenaden]

Any opinions on the best defense for NEXT week (week 15)? I don't want to play MiA against NE. My choices....

Minnesota Min - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYJ Tennessee Ten - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYG.
New York NYG - DEF Sun 10:00 am @ Ten.
Green Bay GB - DEF Mon 5:30 pm vs AtlI think we're using default Yahoo scoring.

MIN by a mile.

 

[Jerry Curl]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Dumbest reason I ever heard for not picking up a player.

+1What does that have to do with fantasy?

Freedom of speech, freedom of reasons to make FF choices. Let the man do what he wants for the reason he wants.

Funny, he isnt letting the Rams have that same freedom of speech without judging. Dont make it so easy to refute your statement next time.

 

[zftcg]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

No way JC should be on the ww. I want to play in your league...

I traded Jesus Christ for Lazarus of Bethany just prior to our week 10 trade dead-line. Trade barely passed league veto process. People think I got the short end of the stick but I was deep at the "saviors" position and fully expect Lazarus to come back to life for the fantasy play-off run. The 2nd round draft pick in 2015 was just gravy..

I dunno, if you're looking for someone who can a) come back strong after being left for dead and b) shine in the "post-season", seems like JC would be your man.

Still, I'm not one to judge. I traded Jesus straight up for a mess of pottage.

 

[Franknbeans]

I got our savior for some frankincense and myrrh

 

[Keith1]

Any opinions on the best defense for NEXT week (week 15)? I don't want to play MiA against NE. My choices....

Minnesota Min - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYJ Tennessee Ten - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYG.
New York NYG - DEF Sun 10:00 am @ Ten.
Green Bay GB - DEF Mon 5:30 pm vs AtlI think we're using default Yahoo scoring.

MIN by a mile.

as Lee Corso might say, not so fast my friend. The Vikings D is certainly a good play this week, but 2 punt returns for TDs was particularly fluky last week and is unlikely to occur again. The Jets did everything to keep Geno from screwing up and there is no reason why they would not again feature a run heavy offense. Geno is of course good for at least 1 INT, but unless it is a pick-6, I don't see monster points from the Vikings D this week. I personally think the Packers at home "on the frozen tundra of Lambeau Field" against a lousy Falcons team has a better chance of a defensive score. Presumably the Packers will put up points and the Falcons will have to throw to try to keep up, opening the door for a pick-6 along the way. Again--I think the Vikings D is a good play this week, but I don't think it is the best one of the teams listed, and certainly not "by a mile."

 

[zftcg]

I got our savior for some frankincense and myrrh

Clearly you took him in a rookie draft.

 

[Insein]

Jonathan Stewart looked real good against the Vikings and the matchup next week against the Saints is a very good one. We've been down this road a million times with this guy but if DeAngelo Williams is out with his hand injury JStew could be a nice RB2 for one week at least.

Please.just.stop.I think I would need a cattle prod in my ### in order to start him Week 15 in my playoffs.

I hear ya there. But he put up 13 points in PPR yesterday with Williams. If Williams doesn't go, that should put Stewart in position to get 15-20 touches against the league's 31st-ranked defense. On paper, it does make him an appealing reach.

Its one of those hold your nose and hope plays. Sometimes you need those in the playoffs.

 

[Insein]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

 

[rightbug]

Any opinions on the best defense for NEXT week (week 15)? I don't want to play MiA against NE. My choices....

Minnesota Min - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYJ Tennessee Ten - DEF Sun 10:00 am vs NYG.
New York NYG - DEF Sun 10:00 am @ Ten.
Green Bay GB - DEF Mon 5:30 pm vs AtlI think we're using default Yahoo scoring.

Note that those are the week 14 match-ups. The week 15 match-ups are as follows:

MIN @ DET

NYG v WAS

GB @ BUF

One I'm eyeing for week 15 is Tampa @ CAR. Tampa's been not bad of late and Carolina is a juicy match-up.

 

[Milkman]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

idk guys Jesus was a socialist so you should probably sit him.

 

[thriftyrocker]

Any thoughts on QB streamers for wk 14? Any matchups stand out? Seems like Fitz, Orton, and Hill are all options.

 

[Insein]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

idk guys Jesus was a socialist so you should probably sit him.

He was an idealist. Big difference. That's why he's a solid WR1 every week.

 

[PatriotJohn]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

The ultimate dynasty player.....he will play forever!

 

[zftcg]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

idk guys Jesus was a socialist so you should probably sit him.

I also imagine he'd have some strong opinions about a guy who was killed by agents of the state.

 

[thriftyrocker]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

The ultimate dynasty player.....he will play forever!

Hard to trust a receiver with nasty injuries to BOTH hands.

 

[Milkman]

How would you rank the following wr to pick up and play this week?

I got them like this

Moncrief @ clv

Bailey @ was

Adams vs at

Baldwin @ phi

Bailey. Then the rest.

Bailey was one of the idiots with his "hands up". No thanks.

Jesus Christ.

Already rostered. Otherwise, yea. Dude is a lock for 150-2 every week. Only Calvin has more skills.

The ultimate dynasty player.....he will play forever!

Hard to trust a receiver with nasty injuries to BOTH hands.

Got to have faith man.

 

[DocHolliday]

Strange turn in here.

 

[need2know]

yeah walked in here looking for WW adds and found the lord

 

[dickey moe]

Unreadable

 

[spider321]

Unreadable

It's week 14.

No decent players are on the waiver wire, anyway.