Got two teams where I own Walker and Charbs together and the nightmare scenario is unfolding.
So two different teams starting lineup calls involving these two. All leagues are FFPC scoring, so PPR, TEP 1.5 PPR, QRRWWTFFKD.
League one:
Walker and Charbs both in the lineup and sit Tyrone Tracy, or commit to one to start with Tracy.
League two:
Walker and Charbs both in the lineup
Or
Sit both SEA's, go with Sampson and Bowers(I have no MNF protection fwiw)
Or
Sampson and choose a SEA, sit Bowers
Or
Choose a SEA and Bowers, sit Sampson
Oh man...
Yeah, it does look like it may be the nightmare scenario. But... Maybe it is what it looks like and Charbonet is the guy the Seahawks trust more? I know the touch distribution was 12 to 13 but, the snap share was 58% to 40% in favor of Charbonet. We can't know after one game but, ATM if I bench one it would be KWIII who, I think may be overrated. He's living off a rookie season that probably wasn't as great as we remember it to be.
But do you bench a 40% snap share, 10-14 opportunity guy on a mid team in favor of a 75% snap share guy, Tracy, who may only see 15 opportunities on, probably, a bad team?
I think I would. I think the Pittsburgh defense will come around, eventually. I don't think the Cowboys defense will.
Tracy>KWIii
Your second one is more difficult, IMO. Sampson could be a mirage IMO. 20 opportunities on a 43% snap share doesn't seem sustainable. Now Judkins is set to play so it's tough to see his snap share increase.
An 18% target share seems equally unsustainable to me.
I don't "break down" film and I don't pay for access to access advanced metrics but low snap % + high target % says they don't trust Sampson too much with protections and he plays pass downs where he's running a route. So, again it's tough to see his snap share increase if Flacco is going to be throwing 45x per game.
Personally, I think we may have seen Sampson's last 20 touch game.
Even so ... The Browns probably will have to throw 40+ passes today so it seems like Sampson could see as many opportunities as Charbonet & KWIII and seems to have a better shot at 5+ receptions. I have to give the potential TD edge to the Seattle backs particularly with Judkins back.
Charbonet>Sampson>KWIII
As far as Bowers goes; that's entirely dependent on your risk tolerance. Clearly he is better than all your other options, probably combined But, I have no insight as to his availability and true health status for Monday night.