Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.
Yeah, I guess Bloom would use the phrase "assumption of rational coaching".This is Pagano we're talking about here, so don't count on it soon. The guy is a bad coach.....period !!!Philip Dorsett. Have to think he gets bumped above Andre Johnson soon.
Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
Missing a QB and an OLine too.Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
What they have is serviceable..Missing a QB and an OLine too.Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
Never really thought of that but that's a great idea. Don't have the roster space though or else I'd be after him.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
You're absolutely nuts if you think Vegas or any book would put Denver as SB favourites over New England if they got Forte.Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
Lol put down the pipe.Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
I'm watching the game recap right now, and to me, Rodgers didn't really look sharp in the first half. The throw to Montgomery should have been caught, but it was just a tad in front of him and lacked the kind of trajectory I'm used to seeing from Rodgers's deep ball. He missed a throw in a very similar way to R. Rodgers early in the 2nd quarter.He dropped 3 passes today, including an 80 yard TD on the 1st play of the game.After the draft one scout called him a bigger Cobb so think that was the plan. They like him on bubble screens and as a RB/WR getting YAC.Ty Montgomery continuing to emerge for Green Bay. Using him out of the back field ala Harvin.
can he block?Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
God you're such a dork.i said etcNo Lewis?Woodhead, dunbar, duke, gio, etc these are the rbs i wanna own as rb2s in fantasy now. They disappear less frequently than the 1st and 2nd down guys
not even close..Denver would need to acquire much more than nForte to be favored over the PatriotsGood article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
He plays RT now too?BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.mquinnjr said:Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.ImTheScientist said:Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.Fat Nick said:This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
I agree with theplayer11. Anyone thinking a RB is the only missing piece to make Denver a superbowl favorite is missing something. That offensive line hsn't been very good. Their TE spot isn't very good either. I think the could also improve their secondary as well. Denver is a good team but if anyone is saying the only thing they are missing is a RB upgrade they must be smoking something in the mile high city.theplayer11 said:not even close..Denver would need to acquire much more than nForte to be favored over the PatriotsBroncoFreak_2K3 said:Good article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.mquinnjr said:Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.ImTheScientist said:Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.Fat Nick said:This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
No need to say Lewis as he is the best if that lot.i said etcNo Lewis?Woodhead, dunbar, duke, gio, etc these are the rbs i wanna own as rb2s in fantasy now. They disappear less frequently than the 1st and 2nd down guys
Have him in a few dynasty leagues. He is an excellent pick up.How about one from left field????
Derek Carrier Washington TE...decent % of snaps through the year, ex-WR small college player with speed (4.5 40), Washington seems to feature TE in their scheme, and the biggest factor is Mr. Jordan Reed is a walking infirmary with Carrier as the #2 TE.
Ha, incredible.Doug Moore @DMooreNFL 22m22 minutes ago Framingham, MA
Source: #Colts sign RB Ahmad Bradshaw after visiting & trying out with team today. #NFL
havent seen any other mention
Actually, not credible.Ha, incredible.Doug Moore @DMooreNFL 22m22 minutes ago Framingham, MA
Source: #Colts sign RB Ahmad Bradshaw after visiting & trying out with team today. #NFL
havent seen any other mention
Have him in a few dynasty leagues. He is an excellent pick up.How about one from left field????
Derek Carrier Washington TE...decent % of snaps through the year, ex-WR small college player with speed (4.5 40), Washington seems to feature TE in their scheme, and the biggest factor is Mr. Jordan Reed is a walking infirmary with Carrier as the #2 TE.
Steady 5-8 points/game and Brees seems comfortable finding and targetting him. Looks like an ideal bye/injury filler to me.Snead worth the #2 spot on waivers? Hurting at WR especially if Stevie Johnson misses time.
Interesting - in a bind at TE with Reed out and not going to get Barnidge. Any insight on CarrierHave him in a few dynasty leagues. He is an excellent pick up.How about one from left field????
Derek Carrier Washington TE...decent % of snaps through the year, ex-WR small college player with speed (4.5 40), Washington seems to feature TE in their scheme, and the biggest factor is Mr. Jordan Reed is a walking infirmary with Carrier as the #2 TE.
Please keep us updated.Someone dropped Edelman in my non-PPR work league. I need to put in a claim for him. I'll drop John Brown or Cooks.
Thanks for trolling...Please keep us updated.Someone dropped Edelman in my non-PPR work league. I need to put in a claim for him. I'll drop John Brown or Cooks.
Come on. First off nobody cares about your team and secondly Edelman has no business being in this thread so stop wasting everyone's time.Thanks for trolling...Please keep us updated.Someone dropped Edelman in my non-PPR work league. I need to put in a claim for him. I'll drop John Brown or Cooks.
Hmm.. what the dilly here?Actually, not credible.Ha, incredible.Doug Moore @DMooreNFL 22m22 minutes ago Framingham, MA
Source: #Colts sign RB Ahmad Bradshaw after visiting & trying out with team today. #NFL
havent seen any other mention
The Colts are working out Bradshaw. Every team does that on Tuesdays; it's called keeping the emergency signing list fresh.Hmm.. what the dilly here?Actually, not credible.Ha, incredible.Doug Moore @DMooreNFL 22m22 minutes ago Framingham, MA
Source: #Colts sign RB Ahmad Bradshaw after visiting & trying out with team today. #NFL
havent seen any other mention
Pretty sure you're misremembering.Haven't they worked him out already this year? Maybe his foot isn't healed and they're checking up on it? Seems kinda weird, I feel like he has been there 3 or 4 times?
Any word on these trade rumors? Langford would be a huge moveI agree with theplayer11. Anyone thinking a RB is the only missing piece to make Denver a superbowl favorite is missing something. That offensive line hsn't been very good. Their TE spot isn't very good either. I think the could also improve their secondary as well. Denver is a good team but if anyone is saying the only thing they are missing is a RB upgrade they must be smoking something in the mile high city.not even close..Denver would need to acquire much more than nForte to be favored over the PatriotsGood article. Acquiring Forte would put Denver over the top as the Super Bowl favorite. its the only piece they are missing right now.Joe B. made a really good point in the daily email today regarding the possibility of the Bears entertaining trade offers for Forte to pick up Jeremy Langford as a prospective pick up. Could be a steal if a trade is made, or droppable otherwise. A lot less cloudy of a picture than the CMike backfield in terms of where I would rank the two from a WW priority perspective.Cmike is a valid target. Donebar is out, and the other two backs are struggling.This thread is indicative of this whole forum lately. About 1/2 of you make honest advice, and about 1/2 of you are just here to make C-mike jokes and sarcastic, crap comments.
It's getting really hard to actually get useful information out of a lot of it, especially if you aren't one of those people who can afford to watch every game on Sunday and see how everyone did.![]()
I have the choice of Spiller or Duke, leaning towards Spiller.There are two problems for Duke. One is that he plays for Cleveland and the second is that Robert Turbin will be joining the cast of Cleveland RB's in a couple of weeks further muddling the situation there.
Some of that was probably Watkins' absence though. I'd probably try to roster both, if you could.Charles Clay is available in my league. Should I drop Eifert for him as a potential upgrade? Dude seemed like their WR1 last weekend whereas Eifert is in a crowd
You should not drop Eifert.Charles Clay is available in my league. Should I drop Eifert for him as a potential upgrade? Dude seemed like their WR1 last weekend whereas Eifert is in a crowd
but you should definitely pick up clay. right now he's about an average WR3 or a good WR4 in the flex spot.You should not drop Eifert.Charles Clay is available in my league. Should I drop Eifert for him as a potential upgrade? Dude seemed like their WR1 last weekend whereas Eifert is in a crowd