evansilva: Wait, are people really excited about Stephens-Howling? The Vikings let him run on them.
Yup. LSH is fools gold. He'll never be a three down back and ARI knows and openly admitted it. I'm not dropping Powell just yet.evansilva: Wait, are people really excited about Stephens-Howling? The Vikings let him run on them.
I'd add RB Phillip Tanner DALJonathan DwyerRashad JenningsLaRod Stephens-HowlingDustin Keller
every starting RB should be ownedis rashad jennings really worth an add? doesn't the jags offense suck?
you realize he got hurt right?that worked out well for me when i wasted the number 1 waiver on ryan williams
I'm about as big a Steelers fan as any and almost always see the glass half-full. However, if you'd consider taking Dwyer over Jennings, with a straight face, you should probably have your head checked tomorrow morning.Jonathan DwyerRashad JenningsLaRod Stephens-HowlingDustin Keller
So......where would A. Brown, Giants fit in this "pecking order"?I'm about as big a Steelers fan as any and almost always see the glass half-full. However, if you'd consider taking Dwyer over Jennings, with a straight face, you should probably have your head checked tomorrow morning.Jonathan DwyerRashad JenningsLaRod Stephens-HowlingDustin Keller
I was not listing them in any particular order, and in no way would I suggest Dwyer should be considered ahead of Jennings with the news that MJD is likely to miss extended time. Jennings immediately steps in as a three-down back. Dwyer may have earned the right to a shot as the lead of a RBBC, but upon the return of Redman and Mendenhall, assuming they return to health, Dwyer is not likely to get consistent enough touches to make him anything more than a weekly flex play.These are some obvious "reactionary" waiver wire guys. Phillip Tanner is certainly worth consideration as well, if he is still out there. I am concerned that Murray could miss more time than the Cowboys are letting on, and as anyone who has ever owned Felix Jones knows, he cannot stay healthy long enough to be counted on. Already, Jones is nicked up.Joique Bell was in the game in some key situations, and despite his fumble, he was back out there as the game wound down. Shane Vereen got in the game (he even started), and he is undoubtedly talented enough to carve out a role. Vereen could be a Ridley fumble away from being very significant in any given week. Titus Young will be pushed by Broyles, but I actually like Young better of the two. If the Lions can get their offense going again (and Stafford stops eating the turf), either, or both, of these wideouts could be good adds.I think Hankerson is being overlooked somewhat by people. Santana Moss showed he still has some gas left in his tank, but with Garcon still out and now Fred Davis gone, I like Hankerson to benefit the most. He is a big guy who has a knack for making big plays going back to his days at Miami. Speaking of Fred Davis, for those of us who are scrambling at the TE position, Rob Housler should come at a discount compared to Keller, and Skelton looked toward him quite a bit Week 7.Shonn Greene took a shot to the head, but came back into the game. This is a good reminder to watch his backup. Although Bilal Powell may not be back until after the Jets' week 9 bye, I still like him, not McKnight or Grimes, to be the primary backup. Another Powell, William Powell, may still be a factor as well. LSH looked really good this week, but expecting him to hold up as an every-down back may not be realistic. If William Powell is dropped this week, he could be an inexpensive add for teams with an extra bench spot. DMac continues to struggle, and it wouldn't be surprising to see Goodson get some more carries. He has looked explosive when he has been in the game. It is surprising he is still available in leagues.Two deeper guys I like: Cedric Peerman got in the endzone on his lone carry, but the Lawfirm is not wowing anyone, so it is not unthinkable that Peerman could start getting some more looks. Also, Jamie Harper is now the handcuff for Chris Johnson. Harper cannot be counted on to score off the bench, like he did twice this week, but there would likely be a mad dash to add Harper if CJ were to get injured.I'm about as big a Steelers fan as any and almost always see the glass half-full. However, if you'd consider taking Dwyer over Jennings, with a straight face, you should probably have your head checked tomorrow morning.Jonathan DwyerRashad JenningsLaRod Stephens-HowlingDustin Keller
Ah, my bad. Great post.I was not listing them in any particular order, and in no way would I suggest Dwyer should be considered ahead of Jennings with the news that MJD is likely to miss extended time. Jennings immediately steps in as a three-down back. Dwyer may have earned the right to a shot as the lead of a RBBC, but upon the return of Redman and Mendenhall, assuming they return to health, Dwyer is not likely to get consistent enough touches to make him anything more than a weekly flex play.These are some obvious "reactionary" waiver wire guys. Phillip Tanner is certainly worth consideration as well, if he is still out there. I am concerned that Murray could miss more time than the Cowboys are letting on, and as anyone who has ever owned Felix Jones knows, he cannot stay healthy long enough to be counted on. Already, Jones is nicked up.Joique Bell was in the game in some key situations, and despite his fumble, he was back out there as the game wound down. Shane Vereen got in the game (he even started), and he is undoubtedly talented enough to carve out a role. Vereen could be a Ridley fumble away from being very significant in any given week. Titus Young will be pushed by Broyles, but I actually like Young better of the two. If the Lions can get their offense going again (and Stafford stops eating the turf), either, or both, of these wideouts could be good adds.I think Hankerson is being overlooked somewhat by people. Santana Moss showed he still has some gas left in his tank, but with Garcon still out and now Fred Davis gone, I like Hankerson to benefit the most. He is a big guy who has a knack for making big plays going back to his days at Miami. Speaking of Fred Davis, for those of us who are scrambling at the TE position, Rob Housler should come at a discount compared to Keller, and Skelton looked toward him quite a bit Week 7.Shonn Greene took a shot to the head, but came back into the game. This is a good reminder to watch his backup. Although Bilal Powell may not be back until after the Jets' week 9 bye, I still like him, not McKnight or Grimes, to be the primary backup. Another Powell, William Powell, may still be a factor as well. LSH looked really good this week, but expecting him to hold up as an every-down back may not be realistic. If William Powell is dropped this week, he could be an inexpensive add for teams with an extra bench spot. DMac continues to struggle, and it wouldn't be surprising to see Goodson get some more carries. He has looked explosive when he has been in the game. It is surprising he is still available in leagues.Two deeper guys I like: Cedric Peerman got in the endzone on his lone carry, but the Lawfirm is not wowing anyone, so it is not unthinkable that Peerman could start getting some more looks. Also, Jamie Harper is now the handcuff for Chris Johnson. Harper cannot be counted on to score off the bench, like he did twice this week, but there would likely be a mad dash to add Harper if CJ were to get injured.I'm about as big a Steelers fan as any and almost always see the glass half-full. However, if you'd consider taking Dwyer over Jennings, with a straight face, you should probably have your head checked tomorrow morning.Jonathan DwyerRashad JenningsLaRod Stephens-HowlingDustin Keller
yeah and he didn't do anything in the games that he played because the cards offense is crap which is why im wary of trying to get jenningsyou realize he got hurt right?that worked out well for me when i wasted the number 1 waiver on ryan williams
David Wilson - a function of bench size and recordHillman - not interestedbroyles - ok if wr are scarce and you have space -- sea game might be goodvereen - not too excited -- for desperate rb scroungersyoung - picked him up everywhere I could get himWhat about the likes of David Wilson & Hillman? I know Hillman was on a bye and Wilson...well, didn't do anything at all this week. But as mentioned previously, it's never a bad idea to have RB depth and both are an injury (or 2 in the case of Wilson) away from a starting role. How would we rank those 2 vs. say:VereenTitus YoungBroylesetc...
Screw Titus. He's a lazy wannabe star without the work ethic. Broyles though is intriguing. He looks like he's taking advantage of his chance. Could be a good pickup.Ditto on Titus. He might just have relevance now.Titus Young and Broyles now that Bureleson is out for the year.
Both were making really nice plays once Burleson went down, which makes it really tough to determine who is going to be more productive going forward. There is a lot of hype right about now with Broyles just like there WAS a lot of hype for Young - until he showed us how much of a bum he could be. I'd like to believe that Young's got a clean slate due to the fact that his opportunity has greatly increased. I was able to pick up Titus Young this week on waivers but Broyles is still floating out there. I am strongly considering rostering both and seeing who emerges. I have a feeling I will be pulling my hair out week to week trying to figure out the better start.Screw Titus. He's a lazy wannabe star without the work ethic. Broyles though is intriguing. He looks like he's taking advantage of his chance. Could be a good pickup.Ditto on Titus. He might just have relevance now.Titus Young and Broyles now that Bureleson is out for the year.
I drafted Young this year so maybe I'm a little jaded. But all the bonehead plays and penalties he's had this year make me just ignore him. Broyles looked like he ran hard and played good for the brief time he was in there. That can boost the confidence of a struggling QB like Stafford. I just see it as Stafford knows what Titus brings and might subconsciously lean towards Broyles when Calvin is covered.Both were making really nice plays once Burleson went down, which makes it really tough to determine who is going to be more productive going forward. There is a lot of hype right about now with Broyles just like there WAS a lot of hype for Young - until he showed us how much of a bum he could be. I'd like to believe that Young's got a clean slate due to the fact that his opportunity has greatly increased. I was able to pick up Titus Young this week on waivers but Broyles is still floating out there. I am strongly considering rostering both and seeing who emerges. I have a feeling I will be pulling my hair out week to week trying to figure out the better start.Screw Titus. He's a lazy wannabe star without the work ethic. Broyles though is intriguing. He looks like he's taking advantage of his chance. Could be a good pickup.Ditto on Titus. He might just have relevance now.Titus Young and Broyles now that Bureleson is out for the year.
I dunno about his work ethic, but putting "Young Sr." on the back of your jersey takes a pretty massive ego.As for Broyles, 3 career receptions. Hard to get too excited. He's got a long way to go to fantasy relevance (although he may get the opportunity).Screw Titus. He's a lazy wannabe star without the work ethic. Broyles though is intriguing. He looks like he's taking advantage of his chance. Could be a good pickup.
You are right davey. You should prolly just pickup Adrian Peterson.yeah and he didn't do anything in the games that he played because the cards offense is crap which is why im wary of trying to get jenningsyou realize he got hurt right?that worked out well for me when i wasted the number 1 waiver on ryan williams